Article | Open | Published:

Prevalence of mutations linked to antimalarial resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Chhattisgarh, Central India: A malaria elimination point of view

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 16690 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Antimalarial drug resistance is a major global challenge in malaria control and elimination. Mutations in six different genes of Plasmodium falciparum (crt, mdr1, dhfr, dhps, ATPase6 and K-13 propeller) that confer resistance to chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artemisinin-based combination therapy were analyzed in samples from Chhattisgarh. Seventy-eight percent of the samples were found to have a pfcrt mutation (53% double, 24% triple and 1% single mutant), and 59% of pfmdr1 genes were found to have an N86Y mutation. Double mutations were recorded in pfdhfr gene among 76% of the samples while only 6% of the samples harbored mutant genotypes in pfdhps. No mutation was found in the K-13 propeller gene, while only one sample showed a mutant genotype for the PfATPase6 gene. The Tajima test confirmed that there is no role of evolutionary natural selection in drug resistance, and gene pairwise linkage of disequilibrium showed significant intragenic association. The high level of pfcrt mutations suggests that parasite resistance to chloroquine is almost at a fixed level, whereas resistance to SP is evolving in the population and parasites remain sensitive to artemisinin derivatives. These findings provide potential information and understanding of the evolution and spread of different drug resistance alleles in Chhattisgarh.

Introduction

Malaria is a global public health problem, and India alone contributes to 89% of malaria cases in the southeast region1. Chhattisgarh State (Central India) is the second most highly malarious state, contributing 14% of the total country’s malaria cases with more than 80% of Plasmodium falciparum infections2. Over the past decade, the total number of malaria cases and deaths due to malaria has progressively decreased in most of the countries where malaria is endemic1. This significant gain has become possible with multisector efforts including the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACT). In India, the combination of artesunate and sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine (AS + SP) is used as a first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria except in the northeastern states where artemether + lumefantrine is used. Furthermore, a recent rise in ACT resistance against P. falciparum in Cambodia and neighboring countries poses a serious threat to malaria control and elimination globally and in India3,4. Considering the evolution and spread of malaria, parasites resistant to different antimalarials such as chloroquine (CQ), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), and an artemisinin derivative (ART) influence malaria’s epidemiological outcome and present a great challenge to malaria control programs5,6,7. Resistance to chloroquine has been found to be associated with mutations at several amino acid positions in the P. falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter (pfcrt) and P. falciparum multidrug resistance (pfmdr1) genes8. Point mutations at codons 72–76 of pfcrt and N86Y, Y184F in pfmdr1 are known for chloroquine resistance9,10. Antifolate resistance has been associated with point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) genes11,12,13. Point mutations at codons 16, 51, 59, 108 and 164 of pfdhfr inhibit its activity, and the parasite becomes resistant to pyrimethamine, while mutations at 436, 437, 540, 580 and 613 of pfdhps reduce the substrate binding capacity and confer resistance to sulphadoxine14.

Polymorphisms of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase ortholog in P. falciparum (PfATPase6) have been associated with ART resistance although the association of SNPs in pfatpase6 with resistance to ART is not yet fully confirmed15,16. However, recently, K-13 propeller (Pf3D7-1343700 kelch propeller) as a key molecular marker for ART resistance has been reported17. Tracking the pattern of mutations, estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level and assessing linkage among the SNPs in the population are the most efficient ways to understand the evolution of a particular gene18. Therefore, to achieve the goal of malaria elimination, molecular data on anti-malarial drug resistance with wide coverage in India, particularly in highly endemic states, is needed for proper implementation of antimalarial drug treatment policy. With this aim, we assessed the prevalence of point mutations involved in the antimalarial resistance genes pfcrt & pfmdr1 (for CQ), pfdhfr & pfdhps (for SP) and PfATPase6 & K-13 propeller (for ART) among P. falciparum samples from Chhattisgarh, Central India. The molecular data from this study could contribute to the comprehensive baseline information on antimalarial drug resistance prior to a malaria elimination phase in India.

Results

Demographic profile of the study population

A total of 6718 patients were screened; of these patients, 5.2% (n = 352) were found to be positive for malaria parasite {P. falciparum (n = 271), P. vivax (n = 79) or a mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infection (n = 2)}. Of 271 P. falciparum patients, 180 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria were included in the study (Table 1). The majority of the participants were from the tribal community (75%, n = 134).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study patients.

Molecular analysis of pfcrt & pfmdr1 genes

DNA was isolated from all the enrolled samples (n = 180), and analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller mutations was attempted using DNA sequencing methodology. A total of 143 samples were successfully analyzed for the pfcrt gene covering codons 44–177. Out of these, 78% of the samples were mutant genotypes, while only 22% were wild type (Table 2). In addition, codon K76T was found as a mutant position in all the mutant genotypes (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862117- KY862119). Fifty-three percent of isolates were found to be a double mutant at positions C72S and K76T followed by 24% triple mutants at codons M74I, N75E, K76T, and a single point mutation at K76T was observed in only 1% of samples (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Mutation analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, pfATPase6, and K13 genes in the study population.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Mutation rates in P. falciparum genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) that confer resistance to antimalarials.

The pfmdr1 gene was amplified and analyzed from 162 samples, and 59% were found mutant at N86Y (Table 2). Combining the pfcrt and pfmdr1 mutations, only 18% of samples were found to be wild-type, and the majority (82%) were mutant genotypes (Fig. 2). Additionally, 27% of the samples harbored a double mutant (SVMNT) pfcrt genotype with mutant pfmdr1, and 7% had a triple mutant (CVIET) genotype with mutant pfmdr1 (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862127- KY862128).

Figure 2
Figure 2

(A) Prevalence of grouped Pfcrt/Pfmdr1 alleles in P. falciparum linked to chloroquine resistance from central India. (B) Prevalence of grouped Pfdhps/Pfdhfr alleles in P. falciparum linked to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance from central India.

Analysis of pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations

A total of 163 P. falciparum samples were successfully amplified and analyzed for both the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes. Out of the five pfdhfr codon mutations (A16V, N51I, C59R, S108N/T and I164l) conferring pyrimethamine resistance, only two, C59R and S108N, were found in this study either as single mutants or in the form of a double mutant (Table 2). Only 22% of samples were found to be the wild-type genotype (A16N51C59S108I164). The majority (76%, n = 124) of samples were double mutants and only 2% (n = 3) of samples were single mutants (Fig. 1). A total 4 haplotypes were determined with haplotype diversity of 0.375 (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862120- KY862122). Out of the five pfdhps mutations (S436F/A, A437G, K540E, A581G AND A613 S/T) known to be involved in sulphadoxine resistance, three codons, S436A, A437G and K540E, were found to be mutant either as single or double mutants (Table 2). A low level (6%) of mutant genotypes (3% single and 3% double mutant) (Fig. 1) and a total of 3 haplotypes were found with 0.106 haplotype diversity (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862123- KY862126). Furthermore, the combined results for both pfdhfr and pfdhps showed that only 20% of samples were wild type. Quadruple mutations of pfdhfr (59,108) and pfdhps (436,540) were found in only 3% of isolates (Fig. 2).

Analysis of PfATPase6 and K-13 mutations

The PfATPase6 gene was successfully sequenced from the PCR products of 143 samples (79%, n = 143/180) and was analyzed by comparing with the reference strain 3D7 (Pf3D7_0106300) covering codons 653–797. The known SNPs, N683K and S769N substitutions, associated with ART resistance in the pfATPase6 gene were absent and genotyped as wild type (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862115-KY862116). However, only one sample with a non-synonymous mutation was found at nucleotide position A2167G, which covers codon I723V (Table 2). Additionally, the propeller region of the K-13 gene was successfully sequenced from 143P. falciparum samples. No polymorphism was found in any of the 17 locations in the K-13 propeller region covering codons 427–702 that confer resistance to ART (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862114).

Furthermore, we extended our analysis, and Tajima’s D test of neutrality confirmed that there was no role of evolutionary natural selection in the drug resistance genes. However, pairwise LD estimation to assess the selection of P. falciparum resistance markers revealed a total of 34 possible pairs of SNPs with fine statistically significant intragenic associations, but no intragenic associations were found between different genes (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of SNPs located in four different genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) implicated in drug resistance in P. falciparum populations of Central India. The strength of LD between the SNPs was determined from the association of statistical significance by calculating the r2 values and represented by the darkness of the boxes.

Discussion

Drug resistance in P. falciparum malaria has become an important hurdle for malaria control and elimination globally. In 2010, ACT was implemented as a first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in India. Although artemisinin (ART) resistance has not appeared in India, its presence in Myanmar, 25 km away from the Indian border4, generates concern about drug-resistant strains following the same historical corridor and spreading into India, as seen previously with other anti-malarials19. Hence, continuous monitoring or molecular surveillance of drug resistance is very important to provide early warning and to guide national drug policies. The emergence of drug-resistant parasites in India is quite alarming, as drug resistance against CQ and SP has already been circulating in the northeast and other parts of the country5,6,19,20,21. The availability of easy and rapid molecular methods is extremely useful for the detection of drug resistance and plays an important role in epidemiological surveys as well as in regular updating of antimalarial drug policy. We investigated mutations in the pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller genes of P. falciparum samples collected from Chhattisgarh, Central India, to determine the current extent of resistance to CQ, SP, and ART. A number of recent studies have shown reoccurrence of CQ sensitivity among P. falciparum populations after its withdrawal22,23,24. In the present study, we found four different haplotypes including 22% wild type (CQ sensitive), which is rarely observed throughout the country25,26,27. However, our findings corroborate recent reports (after 6 years of CQ withdrawal) where 20–40% of samples carried a wild-type haplotype28,29, suggesting that CQ-sensitive P. falciparum strains might have returned after the withdrawal of CQ. In this study only one case of single point mutation (C72V73M74N75 T 76 ) were found while majority of the cases (53%) were double mutant genotype (S 72 V73M74N75 T 76 ) which is already established to be the chloroquine resistant genotype5. We also found that 24% of samples carried triple mutations (C72V73 I 74 E 75 T 76 haplotype) known to confer higher resistance to CQ, suggesting a high level of CQ resistance still in the P. falciparum parasite population in this region. Moreover, in the pfmdr1 gene, a mutation at codon N86Y is known to contribute to CQ resistance30, but the pfmdr1 gene has been found to correlate poorly with CQ resistance31. The prevalence of the N86Y mutation varies from 0 to 100% across the country21,27,29,32,33. In this study, 35% of samples had a mutant genotype of the pfcrt gene along with an N86Y pfmdr1 mutant genotype, which agrees with Djimde et al. 2001 who also reported that the N86Y mutation modulates a higher level of CQ resistance when present with the mutant K76T pfcrt genotype34. Mutations in the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes are associated with SP resistance and have been reported in most parts of the country25,26,35,36,37,38. In this study, a high level (78%) of the pfdhfr mutation (A16N51 R 59S108I164, A16N51C59 N 108I164, A16N51 R 59 N 108I164) and a low level (6%) of pfdhps mutations (S436 G 437K540A581A613, A 436G437 E 540A581A613) was recorded. This suggests a moderate degree of reduced susceptibility to SP and a low risk of treatment failure at the time of the study, as the authors have assessed the efficacy of artesunate + sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine against uncomplicated P. falciparum and found 100% efficacy (unpublished data). Single point mutation among these genes is the only early sign of the improper action of the drugs, while double mutation (A16N51 R 59 N 108 I164) showed that the sensitivity of parasite against drug is decreasing and it might be responsible for drug resistance. However, the triple (A16N51 R 59 N 108 L 164 ) and quadruple (A16 A 51 R 59 N 108 I164) mutation in the Pfdhfr gene conferred the resistance against the drugs. In the presesent study, 3% of samples had a quadruple mutation (pfdhfr 59 + 108 and pfdhps 436 + 540), indicating that these parasite populations need one more SNP in pfdhfr to become resistant P. falciparum haplotypes39. It is worth mentioning that we did not find a single case of triple mutation in either the pfdhfr or pfdhps gene despite the high rate of malaria transmission in the region. ART resistance is considered a major risk to public health with the hazard of ART resistant parasites spreading from western Cambodia to the greater Mekong sub-region17. However, in India, artemisinin derivatives remain quite effective in treating malaria, but the presence of non-synonymous mutations in the propeller region and decreased drug efficacy are important deterrents in the fight against malaria6,40,41,42,43. Mutations in K-13 propeller have been identified as an important and putative molecular marker for ART resistance. Currently, 108 non-synonymous mutations from different geographic regions of the world44 and four point mutations, i.e., Y493H, R539T, I543T and C580Y, have exhibited associations with ART resistance17. In addition, 13 other point mutations have also been associated with late parasite clearance3,45,46. Recently, K-13 propeller mutations have been reported in southeast countries44 and Bangladesh47. However, in India, very limited polymorphism has been reported7,42; in the present study, all samples were found to be wild type, which agrees with a report from the West Bengal region48. Interestingly, in the PfATPase6 gene, one sample had a non-synonymous mutation at the I723V position, which is consistent with previous reports from India and Equatorial Guinea39,49.

Furthermore, in the present study, the π value of nucleotide diversity was higher in the pfcrt gene and lower than that in the PfATPase6 gene. This confirmed that mutant alleles are fixed in the population; Chauhan et al. 2014 and Antony et al. 2016 reported similar findings among Indian isolates29,33. These data confirm that resistance against SP is low while resistance against ART was not observed in this study. We observed significant intragenic association among the pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps genes, which is in agreement with previous reports from Odisha and Pondicherry states18,29. Additionally, no significant intergenic association was found in the SNPs of different genes; this finding, however, contrasts with Kar et al. 2016 who found strong intergenic associations with the pfcrt gene in combination with the pfmdr, pfdhfr and pfdhps genes28. Therefore, further large-scale genetic population studies are required to compare the LD association of different endemic malaria regions. The genotyping of drug resistance markers can reveal the efficacy of current treatment regime. Therefore, the data generated from this study can be used to improve the patient care and disease management and help researchers working on clinical efficacy of different antimalarials.

The principle limitations of this study are that (i) we did not carry out an in vivo therapeutic efficacy study from the same site and that (ii) we did not correlate the clinical outcome with mutation patterns. However, there is no obvious bias in the sample collection, and these comprehensive molecular data are a representation of both past and present antimalarial drugs. The strengths of this study is the comprehensive use of sensitive and standardized assays, rendering our findings amenable to a detailed analysis of genetic polymorphisms responsible for antimalarial P. falciparum resistance genes from an area where malaria is a major health problem. In the present study, we aimed for such analysis to be relevant for epidemiologic investigations, and design of control measures for malaria control and subsequent to elimination.

Methods

Study area, population and sample collection

This study was carried out at Janakpur Community Health Care (CHC), district Baikunthpur, Chhattisgarh, Central India (23.7191°N, 81.7883°E and 550 M height above sea level). This is a secondary health care facility situated in a remote area of the district surrounded by dense forest (60%), and the majority (65%) of the population work mainly in forest nurseries and use traditional folk medicine for their treatment. P. falciparum is the predominant species followed by P. vivax, and both Anopheles culicifacies and A. fluviatilis are responsible for transmitting the disease in this area. The present study was carried out from August 2013 to March 2015, and symptomatic patients were screened for malaria parasites by microscopy using thick and thin blood smears stained with JSB stain. Patients having asexual stage of P. falciparum monoinfection with no other symptoms of severe malaria were included in this study. Patients have chronic infection of any other disease were excluded from the study. Patients were given the treatment with Artemisinin combination therapy (Artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) as per national guideline (National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme) and this combination therapy is 100% efficacious for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in this region. Intravenous blood samples, in sterile conditions, were collected from the patients positive for P. falciparum malaria after taking their written informed consent.


Ethical approval

The study protocol for patient participation and collection of blood samples for laboratory testing was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee of NIRTH, Jabalpur. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to their participation according to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India guidelines. A copy of the consent form in the local language was also provided and explained to the patients or the parents/guardian of children. The participation of other institutes was also approved by the ICMR.


Genomic DNA extraction and parasite genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated by QIAamp DNA blood mini kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, CA, USA) and stored at −20 °C for further use.

The K76T and N86Y mutations in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes, respectively, which are the primary determinant markers of CQ resistance, were targeted using nested PCR and Sanger sequencing. The pfcrt region covering codons 44–177 (582 bp) was performed as described earlier5. The pfmdr1 region covering codons 1–177 (521 bp) was sequenced as per protocol described earlier by Djimde et al. 200134. Alleles of the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes, primary molecular markers for sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, were amplified and analyzed as described previously35,50. The PCR amplification of the pfdhfr gene spanning codons 51–164 and pfdhps gene spanning codons 425–640 was carried out and the details of nested PCR primers and cycling conditions are given in the supplementary table. In brief, primary PCR was performed in a volume of 25 μL with 0.2 U of Taq polymerase enzyme (Invitrogen, life technologies), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1 μM each primer and 1.5 mM MgCl2. The newly discovered molecular markers K-13 propeller 17 and PfATPase6 for tracking the emergence and spread of ART resistance in P. falciparum were determined. The PfATPase6 gene was amplified using single-step PCR covering codons 653–797 as described by Zhang G et al. 200851. In this study all the amplicon sizes were less than 1Kb and positive control samples always provided correct sequences.


Nucleotide sequencing

The PCR products were purified from the agarose gel using a HiyieldTM gel/PCR DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The gel-purified product was used with the ABI Big dye Terminator Ready Reaction Kit Version 3.1 for sequencing PCR. The sequencing PCR was performed in a volume of 20 μl with 1 μl of Terminator Ready Reaction Mix (TRR), 3.2 pmol of gene specific primer and 5X sequencing buffer. The cycling conditions for the sequencing PCR include 25 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 10 sec, annealing at 50 °C for 5 sec and extension at 60 °C for 4 min. The sequences were aligned and analyzed using Bio edit Sequence Alignment Editor v.7.0.5.2 software and online sequence alignment tool Clustal W.


Statistical analysis

Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and exported to Stata version 12.0 for analysis. Chi-square and Fischer exact tests were used where applicable to assess the relationship between single and multiple mutations. In addition, haplotype diversity52 and nucleotide diversity (Ɵ & π) were estimated for each gene. The nucleotide diversity parameter π is estimated based on the average number of pairwise nucleotide differences per site53 and Ɵ estimates are dependent on the number of segregating sites. All the parameters were estimated using DnaSP version 5.10.01. To determine the association between SNPs (present in pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr and pfdhps) in the population, both inter- and intragenic linkage disequilibrium (LD) tests were performed using the Haploview Software54.

Conclusion

This was the first comprehensive molecular study carried out in this geographical area focusing on mutations of the pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller genes that were strongly associated with CQ, SP and ART resistance. This study showed a high level of CQ resistance genotypes, a moderate level of SP resistance and evolving SP resistance genotypes. Fortunately, no mutations were found against ART resistance.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    World Malaria Report 2016. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2016/report/en/ (2016).

  2. 2.

    Malaria situation in India. NVDCP. http://www.nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/malaria-situation-Feb17.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Ashley, E. A. et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 371, 411–423 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Tun, K. M. et al. Spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Myanmar: a cross-sectional survey of the K13 molecular marker. Lancet Infect Dis. 15, 415–421 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Bharti, P. K. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine and sequence variation in pfcrt gene among patients with falciparum malaria in central India. Trop Med Int Health. 15, 33–40 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Saha, P. et al. Comparative Efficacies of Artemisinin Combination Therapies in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria and Polymorphism of pfATPase6, pfcrt, pfdhfr, and pfdhps Genes in Tea Gardens of Jalpaiguri District, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 56, 2511–2517 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Mishra, N. et al. Monitoring the efficacy of antimalarial medicines in India via sentinel sites: Outcomes and risk factors for treatment failure. J Vector Borne Dis. 53, 168–178 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Wellems, T. E. & Plowe, C. V. Chloroquine-resistant malaria. J Infect Dis. 184, 770–776 (2001).

  9. 9.

    Fidock, D. A. et al. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell. 6, 861–871 (2000).

  10. 10.

    Pickard, A. L. et al. Resistance to antimalarials in Southeast Asia and genetic polymorphisms in pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47, 2418–2423 (2003).

  11. 11.

    Cowman, A. F., Morry, M. J., Biggs, B. A., Cross, G. A. & Foote, S. J. Amino acid changes linked to pyrimethamine resistance in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85, 9109–9113 (1988).

  12. 12.

    Plowe, C. V., Kublin, J. G. & Doumbo, O. K. P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase mutations: epidemiology and role in clinical resistance to antifolates. Drug resistance updates. 1, 389–396 (1998).

  13. 13.

    Anderson, A. C. Targeting DHFR in parasitic protozoa. Drug Discov Today. 10, 121–128 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Sharma, Y. D. Molecular surveillance of drug-resistant malaria in India. Current Science. 102, 696–703 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Afonso, A. et al. Malaria parasites can develop stable resistance to artemisinin but lack mutations in candidate genes atp6 (encoding the sarcoplasmic and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase), tctp, mdr1, and cg10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 50, 480–489 (2006).

  16. 16.

    Cui, L. et al. Lack of association of the S769N mutation in Plasmodium falciparum SERCA (PfATP6) with resistance to artemisinins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 56, 2546–2552 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Ariey, F. et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 505, 50–55 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Das Sutar, S. K., Dhangadamajhi, G., Kar, S. K. & Ranjit, M. Molecular monitoring of antimalarial drug resistance among Plasmodium falciparum field isolates from Odisha, India. Acta Trop. 126, 84–87 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Sehgal, P. N., Sharma, M. I. D., Sharma, S. L. & Gogoi, S. Resistance to chloroquine in falciparum malaria in Assam State. Indain J Comm Dis. 5, 175–180 (1973).

  20. 20.

    Lumb, V. et al. Differential genetic hitchhiking around mutant pfcrt alleles in the Indian Plasmodium falciparum population. J Antimicrob Chemother. 67, 600–608 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Mallick, P. K. et al. Mutant pfcrt “SVMNT” haplotype and wild type pfmdr1 “N86” are endemic in Plasmodium vivax dominated areas of India under high chloroquine exposure. Malar J. 11, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-16 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Koukouikila-Koussounda, F. et al. Molecular surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in the Republic of Congo: four and nine years after the introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy. Malar J. 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1816-x (2017).

  23. 23.

    Huang, B. et al. Prevalence of crt and mdr-1 mutations in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Grande Comore island after withdrawal of chloroquine. Malar J. 15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1474-4 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Atroosh, W. M. et al. Different patterns of pfcrt and pfmdr1 polymorphism in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Tehama region, Yemen. PeerJ. 4, e2191, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2191 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Mixson-Hayden, T. et al. Evidence of selective sweeps in genes conferring resistance to chloroquine and pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum isolates in India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 54, 997–1006 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Pathak, A. et al. Characterization of drug resistance associated genetic polymorphisms among Plasmodium falciparum field isolates in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India. Malar J. 13, 182, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-182 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Chatterjee, M. et al. Polymorphisms in Pfcrt and Pfmdr-1 genes after five years withdrawal of chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in West Bengal, India. Infect Genet Evol. 44, 281–285 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Kar, N. P. et al. Comparative assessment on the prevalence of mutations in the Plasmodium falciparum drug-resistant genes in two different ecotypes of Odisha state, India. Infect Genet Evol. 41, 47–55 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Antony, H. A., Das, S., Parija, S. C. & Padhi, S. Sequence analysis of pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes and its association with chloroquine resistance in Southeast Indian Plasmodium falciparum isolates. Genom Data. 8, 85–90 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Volkman, S. & Wirth, D. Functional analysis of pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Methods Enzymol. 292, 174–181 (1998).

  31. 31.

    Duraisingh, M. T. & Cowman, A. F. Contribution of the pfmdr1 gene to antimalarial drug-resistance. Acta Trop. 94, 181–190 (2005).

  32. 32.

    Valecha, N. et al. Low efficacy of chloroquine: time to switchover to artemisinin-based combination therapy for falciparum malaria in India. Acta Trop. 111, 21–28 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Chauhan, K., Pande, V. & Das, A. DNA sequence polymorphisms of the pfmdr1 gene and association of mutations with the pfcrt gene in Indian Plasmodium falciparum isolates. Infect Genet Evol. 26, 213-222 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Djimde, A., Doumbo, O. K., Steketee, R. W. & Plowe, C. V. Application of a molecular marker for surveillance of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. Lancet. 358, 890–891 (2001).

  35. 35.

    Ahmed, A. et al. Plasmodium falciparum Isolates in India Exhibit a Progressive Increase in Mutations Associated with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 48, 879–889 (2004).

  36. 36.

    Alam, M. T. et al. Similar trends of pyrimethamine resistance-associated mutations in Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 51, 857–863 (2007).

  37. 37.

    Mohapatra, P. K. et al. Molecular evidence of increased resistance to anti-folate drugs in Plasmodium falciparum in North-East India: a signal for potential failure of artemisinin plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination therapy. PloS one. 9, e105562, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105562 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Sharma, D. et al. Polymorphism in drug resistance genes dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase in Plasmodium falciparum in some states of India. Parasit Vectors. 8, 471, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1080-2 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Saha, P. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of artemisinin combination therapies and prevalence of S769N mutation in PfATPase6 gene of Plasmodium falciparum in Kolkata, India. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 6, 443–448 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Mishra, N. et al. Declining efficacy of artesunate plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in northeastern India. Malar J. 13, 284, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-284 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Mishra, N. et al. Surveillance of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in India using the kelch13 molecular marker. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 59, 2548–2553, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.04632-14 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Bharti, P. K. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria from three highly malarious states in India. Malar J. 15, 498, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1555-4 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Mishra, S. et al. Clinical and molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drug (artesunate+ sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine) in two highly malarious district of Madhya Pradesh, Central India from 2012-2014. Pathog Glob Health. 09, https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2017.1331875 (2017).

  44. 44.

    Menard, D. et al. A Worldwide Map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-Propeller Polymorphisms. N Engl J Med. 374, 2453–2464 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Huang, F. et al. A Single Mutation in K13 Predominates in Southern China and Is Associated With Delayed Clearance of Plasmodium falciparum Following Artemisinin Treatment. J Infect Dis. 212, 1629–1635 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Amaratunga, C., Witkowski, B., Khim, N., Menard, D. & Fairhurst, R. M. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Lancet Infect Dis. 14, 449–450 (2014).

  47. 47.

    Mohon, A. N. et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum K13 propeller gene from Bangladesh (2009–2013). Malar J. 13, 431, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-431 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Chatterjee, M. et al. No Polymorphism in Plasmodium falciparum K13 Propeller Gene in Clinical Isolates from Kolkata, India. J Pathog. 2015, 374354, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/374354 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Li, J. et al. Limited artemisinin resistance-associated polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller and PfATPase6 gene isolated from Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 6, 54–59 (2016).

  50. 50.

    Ahmed, A. et al. Quadruple Mutations in Dihydrofolate Reductase of Plasmodium falciparum Isolates from Car Nicobar Island, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 50, 1546–1549, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.50.4.1546-1549.2006 (2006).

  51. 51.

    Zhang, G., Guan, Y., Zheng, B., Wu, S. & Tang, L. No PfATPase6 S769N mutation found in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from China. Malar J. 7, 122, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-122 (2008).

  52. 52.

    Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York (1987).

  53. 53.

    Tajima, F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123, 597–601 (1989).

  54. 54.

    Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M. J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 21, 263–265 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was made possible by a NPRP grant [NPRP 5 - 098 - 3 – 021] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author[s]. We thank all the study participants and their relatives for providing their informed consent.This study was funded by NPRP grant [NPRP 5 - 098 - 3 – 021] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation).

Author information

Author notes

    • Priyanka Patel

    Present address: Symbiosis School of Biomedical Sciences, Symbiosis International University, Lavale, Maharashtra, 412115, India

Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Research in Tribal Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Nagpur Road, Garha, Jabalpur, 482003, Madhya Pradesh, India

    • Priyanka Patel
    • , Praveen K. Bharti
    • , Nazia A. Ali
    •  & Neeru Singh
  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation - Education City, Doha, Qatar

    • Devendra Bansal
    •  & Ali A. Sultan
  3. Medical Officer, Community Health Centre Janakpur, District Baikunthpur, Chhattisgarh, India

    • Rajive K. Raman
  4. Regional Medical Research Centre, NE, Indian Council of Medical Research, Post Box no. 105, Dibrugarh, 786 001, Assam, India

    • Pradyumna K. Mohapatra
    •  & Jagadish Mahanta
  5. Department of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, Punjab, India

    • Rakesh Sehgal

Authors

  1. Search for Priyanka Patel in:

  2. Search for Praveen K. Bharti in:

  3. Search for Devendra Bansal in:

  4. Search for Nazia A. Ali in:

  5. Search for Rajive K. Raman in:

  6. Search for Pradyumna K. Mohapatra in:

  7. Search for Rakesh Sehgal in:

  8. Search for Jagadish Mahanta in:

  9. Search for Ali A. Sultan in:

  10. Search for Neeru Singh in:

Contributions

N.S., A.A.S., D.B., J.M. and R.S. conceived the study; N.S., D.B., P.K.B., P.K.M., J.M., R.S. and A.A.S. designed the study protocol; P.P., P.K.B., N.A.A. and R.K.R. carried out the sample and data collection; P.P., P.K.B., D.B., N.A.A., R.K.R. and N.S. analyzed the data; N.S., P.P., D.B., N.A.A. and P.K.B. carried out interpretation of data; N.S., P.K.B., P.P. and D.B. drafted the manuscript. N.S., A.A.S., J.M., P.K.M. and R.S. critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeru Singh.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16866-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.