Abstract

Plasmodium parasites, the causative agents of malaria, possess a distinctive membranous structure of flattened alveolar vesicles supported by a proteinaceous network, and referred to as the inner membrane complex (IMC). The IMC has a role in actomyosin-mediated motility and host cell invasion. Here, we examine the location, protein interactome and function of PhIL1, an IMC-associated protein on the motile and invasive stages of both human and rodent parasites. We show that PhIL1 is located in the IMC in all three invasive (merozoite, ookinete-, and sporozoite) stages of development, as well as in the male gametocyte and locates both at the apical and basal ends of ookinete and sporozoite stages. Proteins interacting with PhIL1 were identified, showing that PhIL1 was bound to only some proteins present in the glideosome motor complex (GAP50, GAPM1–3) of both P. falciparum and P. berghei. Analysis of PhIL1 function using gene targeting approaches indicated that the protein is required for both asexual and sexual stages of development. In conclusion, we show that PhIL1 is required for development of all zoite stages of Plasmodium and it is part of a novel protein complex with an overall composition overlapping with but different to that of the glideosome.

Introduction

Intracellular protozoan parasites such as Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Eimeria and Cryptosporidium, belong to the eukaryotic phylum Apicomplexa, and their infections result in devastating human and livestock diseases that are of immense clinical importance. Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria, has a complex life-cycle in the mosquito and vertebrate host with three different forms and dimensions of invasive stages—merozoite, ookinete and sporozoite. All three extracellular forms are highly polarised and possess an apical complex at the anterior end of the cell, which is implicated in both motility and invasion of host cells and tissue. The motility of these invasive stages is powered by an actomyosin motor termed the glideosome1, which resides within the pellicle, tethered to the inner membrane complex (IMC) and located directly beneath the plasma membrane. The IMC is composed of flattened membrane cisternae or alveolar vesicles, whose cytoplasmic face is connected to subpellicular microtubules and a subpellicular protein network (SPN). The SPN is composed of several putative structural alveolin (or IMC) proteins as well as IMC sub-compartment proteins (ISPs), which both form broadly conserved protein families throughout Alveolate taxa2,3. In Plasmodium, the alveolins show differential expression in different invasive stages of the parasite lifecycle, namely in ookinete and sporozoite4,5. Several of these proteins have been implicated in cellular organisation of the non-motile stages; 17 P. falciparum (Pf) IMC proteins and two P. berghei (Pb) ISP proteins have been described as having a role in morphological differentiation during parasite development5,6,7,8. In addition to the structural components of the IMC, the actomyosin motor complex, or glideosome, is a central component of the invasion and motility machinery. Glideosome is comprised of various proteins including the glideosome-associated protein (GAP) 40, GAP45 and GAP50, and the class XIV myosin (Myo) A and its light chains, which are part of the outer IMC and anchored by GAP50 that is part of an integral membrane complex. Pf glideosome-associated proteins with multiple membrane spans (GAPMs) 1 to 3 also localise to the IMC and form part of the glideosome1. Despite these known IMC-associated protein families and complexes, it is clear that we have limited knowledge of how the shape, integrity and development of the IMC and cell pellicle are formed and controlled.

PhIL1 was identified in T. gondii (Tg) through photosensitized labelling of parasites with photoactivatable compound 5-[125I]iodonaphthalene-1-azide (INA) to target non GPI anchored membrane embedded protein in the pellicle9. PhIL1 was shown to be an integral membrane protein of the IMC, which is also associated with the cytoskeleton. Hence, it could function in mediating associations between the cytoskeleton and the IMC. PhIL1 in T. gondii is distributed over much of the IMC of the cell, but is excluded from the apical tip. It is, thus unlikely to be associated with the conoid, a conical structural element of the apical complex found throughout Apicomplexa, although not evident in some taxa including Plasmodium 10. Antibodies raised to TgPhIL1 recognised a ~25 kDa protein in P. falciparum lysates, suggesting that an orthologue might be present in this parasite9; however, no further information is available on the location or function of this protein in Plasmodium.

Here, we examine the cellular location and function of PhIL1 during the life-cycle of the human parasite P. falciparum and the rodent parasite P. berghei by generating PhIL1-GFP expressing transgenic lines. Live cell imaging and interactome analysis showed that PhIL1 has an IMC-like location during all three invasive stages, the merozoite, ookinete and sporozoite, but was most concentrated at both the apical and basal ends of the parasite in each stage. PhIL1 expression was also observed in the sexual stages, especially during male gametogenesis but was absent in female gametocytes. In genetic studies using a conditional knockdown strategy, we show that PhIL1 is likely essential for blood stage schizogony and a partial reduction in PhIL1 level during the sexual stages is tolerated, although with a delay to parasite development; this genetic modification has no effect on liver stages. In a parasite line in which PhIL1 was tagged with GFP, a novel interacting protein complex was identified; this complex contained GAP50 and GAPM1–3 but is distinct from the glideosome.

Results

PhIL1 has a peripheral localisation in both asexual and sexual stages of the Plasmodium life-cycle

Examination of the genomic databases for apicomplexan parasites indicated that the PhIL1 gene is conserved across species. Therefore, to investigate the temporal and spatial pattern of Plasmodium PhIL1 expression and localisation in Plasmodium, we generated parasite lines expressing C-terminal GFP-tagged PhIL1 in both P. falciparum (PF3D7_0109000) and P. berghei (PBANKA_0204600). The P. falciparum transgenic line allowed examination of mainly asexual blood stage biology, and PhIL1 expression during the different developmental stages in both mammalian and insect vector hosts was examined using the P. berghei transgenic line.

Additionally, we expressed PfPhIL1 in an E.coli expression system and purified the recombinant PhIL1 protein to near homogeneity (Fig. 1a). PfPhIL1 antibodies were raised both in rabbit and mouse using the recombinant PfPhIL1. These anti-PfPhIL1 antibodies were specific as they recognized the recombinant protein as well as a specific band in lysates of 3D7 parasites by western blot analysis (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Purified antisera from recombinant PhIL1 shows specific protein bands in P. falciparum 3D7 lysates. (a) Plasmodium falciparum PhIL1 was expressed in E. coli and purified using Ni2+-NTA chromatography. The purified protein was analysed by SDS PAGE, stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (lane 1) and probed using anti-His HRP conjugated antibody (lane 2). This protein was further used to generate PhIL1 antisera in laboratory mice and rabbit. (b) To check the specificity of the raised PfPhIL1 antisera, the serum was used to probe recombinant protein (lane 1: rabbit antiserum, lane 2: mouse antiserum) as well as detection of PhIL1 in 3D7 parasite lysate. (c) Indirect immunofluorescence assay showing localisation of PfPhIL1 in the parasite, using rabbit α-PhIL1 antiserum. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Rabbit antibody was used for IFA in 3D7 parasites, while PhIL1 antiserum was used for co-staining with GFP parasites as described below. In an indirect immunofluorescence assay of P. falciparum asexual blood stages, PhIL1 localised to the parasite periphery, consistent with an association with the IMC as seen for PhIL1 in T. gondii (Fig. 1c). We also expressed PfPhIL1 as a GFP fusion protein to allow pulldown of PfPhIL1 interacting proteins (see below). PfPhIL1-GFP was expressed from an episome maintained with blasticidin selection and using the hsp86 promoter (Supplementary Fig. S1A) and transfected in 3D7 parasites to generate a line expressing PfPhIL1-GFP (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Antibodies specific for PfPhIL1 recognised two bands in PhIL1-GFP parasite lysates, one corresponding to PhIL1-GFP and the other to the native PhIL1. The 50 kDa band was recognised by the GFP-specific antiserum (Supplementary Fig. S1C). Transgenic parasites expressing PhIL1-GFP showed the same pattern of location as the PhIL1 antibody in wild type cells, and a complete co-localisation of GFP and PhIL1 was observed when probed by immunofluorescence with the two antibodies (Supplementary Fig. S1D), indicating correct subcellular targeting of PhIL1-GFP.

In P. berghei, PhIL1 expression and localisation was studied using a C-terminal GFP-tagged fusion protein created by single crossover recombination at the 3’ end of the endogenous PhIL1 locus. Correct integration was confirmed by PCR analysis of genomic DNA using locus-specific diagnostic primers. Protein expression and size (~54 kDa) was confirmed by Western blot analysis of schizont lysates using the GFP-specific antibody (Supplementary Fig. S2). Using live cell imaging, PhIL1-GFP expression in early schizonts of P. berghei and cytomere liver stage parasites showed stronger expression of PhIL-GFP in a localisation typical of IMC formation (Fig. 2). The peripheral localisation was most evident during late schizogony in both liver (at 54 hr post infection) and blood stages as well as in the other extracellular motile invasive stages, the ookinete and sporozoite (Fig. 2b and c). In ookinetes and sporozoites a striking accumulation of PhIL1 at both apical and basal ends of the parasite was observed. Expression and peripheral localisation of PhIL1 were also observed in the activated male gametocyte, whereas no protein was observed in the female gametocyte (Fig. 2). These data suggest that PhIL1 is likely to be an IMC protein present at various stages and morphological forms of parasite development.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Peripheral localisation of PhIL1 during various stages of the Plasmodium life cycle as detected by live cell imaging. (a) PhIL1-GFP expression pattern in ring, trophozoite and schizont stages of P. falciparum (b) Localization of PhIL1-GFP in early and late stages of liver and blood stage schizogony in P. berghei. (c) PhIL1-GFP expression in gametocytes, zygote, ookinete, oocyst and sporozoite stages of P. berghei. 13.1, a cy3-conjugated antibody which recognises P28 on the surface of activated females, zygotes, and ookinetes was used with the sexual stages. Arrow shows apical end and arrow head the basal end of the parasite. Scale bar = 5 μm.

PhIL1 is localised at both the apical and basal end during ookinete development and forms a ring-like structure in both ookinetes and sporozoites

Since there was no PhIL1 expression in female gametocytes, but strong expression in differentiated ookinetes at both the apical and basal end, we further studied the temporal profile of PhIL1 expression during ookinete differentiation from the zygote to ascertain the potential participation of this protein in the establishment of polarity. We used live cell imaging of PhIL1-GFP localisation throughout stages I to VI of ookinete development11,12. Two hours post-fertilisation (stage I), a peripheral crescent-shaped protein localisation was observed in the zygote. With the initial protrusion of the membrane during stage I and II of zygote development, PhIL1–GFP was localised at the tip of this protrusion and this apical location persisted throughout early development and differentiation. The basal localisation was only observed at stage V, 15 to 18 hours post fertilisation, when ookinete development had progressed to the point when the nucleus had commenced migration to the centre of the ookinete body (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3
Figure 3

PhIL1 localisation during ookinete development, liver schizont and in sporozoites. (a) Expression of PhIL1-GFP during different stages (I-VI) of ookinete development. (b) Co-staining of ISP1 and MyoA protein with PhIL1 in early and late hepatocyte schizont stages and ookinetes. (c) PhIL1-GFP locates as a ring at the apical end of the ookinete and sporozoite stages, observed by super resolution microscopy, and ring or cap at the basal end. Arrow shows apical end and arrow head the basal end of the parasite. The refractive index of the immersion oil (Cargille) was adjusted to minimize spherical aberrations and sections were acquired at 0.125 μm z steps. Scale bar = 5 μm.

To investigate further the location of PhIL1 relative to other apical and uniform IMC markers, we crossed PhIL1-GFP parasites with lines expressing ISP1-Cherry (uniform IMC marker) and MyoA-Cherry (apical marker) lines. During liver stage development, PhIL1-GFP co-localized with MyoA-mCherry showing a similar overall distribution (Fig. 3b). In ookinetes, while a substantial portion of the peripheral weak PhIL1 staining colocalised with ISP1, the very apical end of the ISP1 staining was devoid of PhIL1 staining. MyoA-Cherry also displays a subapical ring-shaped location, but this also appeared as slightly apical to the strong sub-apical staining shown by PhIL1 (Fig. 3b). Therefore PhIL1 displays a distribution in ookinetes unlike that of either ISP1 or MyoA.

To achieve greater resolution of the PhIL1-GFP location, we used 3D-SIM super resolution fluorescence microscopy. This revealed that the distal concentration of PhIL1 forms a discrete ring in both ookinetes and sporozoites. In ookinetes the apical ring is in a sub-apical position forming a band or collar (Fig. 3c). This is different from the very tight band at the apical tip of the ookinete formed by Plasmodium SAS6L12. A similar broad band of PhIL1 at the apex is evident in sporozoites indicating a similar structure (Fig. 3c). At the posterior end of ookinetes the accumulation of PhIL1 sometimes also appears as a ring, although the shape of this structure is less consistent. In sporozoites it is unclear whether the strong posterior PhIL1 signal is a cap or ring of diameter below the resolution limit of 3D-SIM (Fig. 3c). These data indicate a previously undescribed pattern of protein locations in Plasmodium. The apical and basal patterns of PhIL1 location, including a weaker general pellicular presence, is very similar to that seen in Toxoplasma tachyzoites, although the presence of rings was beyond the limits of resolution of the microscopy used in that study9.

PhIL1 is part of a novel protein complex that includes GAP50 but is different from the glideosome

Having identified that PhIL1 is likely associated with the IMC, we examined the PhIL1-GFP interactome using a GFP-pulldown assay. PhIL1-GFP was isolated from cell lysates together with any interacting partners using GFP-Trap beads from both P. berghei and P. falciparum transgenic parasites. Bound proteins were then digested with trypsin and the released peptides were analysed by mass spectrometry to identify any interacting partners. Three sets of pulldown experiments recovered various IMC proteins that were co-precipitated with PhIL1 including the glideosomal proteins GAP50 and GAPM1, −2 and −3. A member of the alveolin/ IMC protein family was present in each precipitate, together with the previously uncharacterized orthologous proteins coded by PBANKA_1409200 and PF3D7_1310700. Other proteins of the glideosome complex, however, such as GAP40, GAP45, MyoA, or myosin tail interacting protein (MTIP) were not detected (Fig. 4a). As controls we used lysates of P. falciparum 3D7 and a line of P. berghei ubiquitously expressing GFP13 and the GFP-Trap beads did not precipitate any of these proteins from lysates. To validate the colocation of these interacting partners, we performed immunofluorescence analysis of P. falciparum cells stained with both PfPhIL1 and PfGAP50 antibodies. The PhIL1 and GAP50 signals significantly co-localised (Fig. 4b). Together, these results confirm the association of PhIL1 with known components of the IMC, and in particular interactions with select, but not all, components of the glideosome.

Figure 4
Figure 4

PhIL1 forms a novel protein complex, which includes GAP50 but is different from the glideosome. (a) List of proteins pulled down by GFP- Trap beads from lysates of PhIL1-GFP parasites from P. falciparum and P. berghei. IMC associated proteins are highlighted. *Denotes protein detected in both parasites by pulldown. The lists shown here are cumulative of three independent biological replicates and precipitated only in PhIL1-GFP lines. (b) Co-localization of PhIL1-GFP and GAP50 in P. falciparum blood-stage schizont. PfPhIL1 and PfGAP50 co-localise in IMC with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.78. Scale bar = 5 μm.

PhIL 1 is likely essential for asexual blood stage development and it also has a role in other life cycle stages

To study the function of PhIL1 throughout the P. berghei life cycle, we first attempted to delete the gene in the asexual blood stage using double homologous recombination, but were unable to generate a knockout despite several attempts (Supplementary Fig. S3A). This is consistent with the recent P. berghei functional screen (PlasmoGEM) that found the gene is essential14,15. To test the role of PhIL1 in other life cycle stages, we used a conditional knock down approach by placing the endogenous PhIL1 locus under the control of the ama1 promoter that is expressed in the asexual blood stage and down regulated in gametocyte and ookinete stages of parasite development. Transgenic parasites were generated using double homologous recombination to insert the promoter upstream of PhIL1 as described in Supplementary Fig. S3B. Integration of the ama1 promoter upstream of the PhIL1 locus was confirmed by diagnostic PCR (Supplementary Fig. S3C). Transcript analysis of these transgenic parasites (henceforth termed PhIL1-PTD, promoter trap double homologus) by qPCR revealed a substantial decrease in PhIL1 transcription in PhIL1-PTD gametocytes in comparison to wild type gametocytes (Fig. 5a). Phenotypic analysis was then carried out at various developmental stages in the PhIL1-PTD mutant in comparison to wild type control parasites. Male gametogenesis, as assessed by exflagellation, showed no significant change when compared to that in the wild-type parasite (data not shown). However, following fertilisation and zygote formation there was a 40–50% reduction in ookinete conversion in the PhIL1-PTD parasites, compared to wild-type (Fig. 5b). When A. stephensi mosquitoes were fed on mice infected with PhIL1-PTD parasites the number of oocysts was reduced to 40–50% in PhIL1 PTD parasites on day 14 and 21 post infection in comparison to WT parasites (Fig. 5c). However, the size of oocysts was similar in both WT and PhIL1-PTD parasites. The number of released sporozoites also decreased to 40–50% on days 14 and 21 post infection in the parasites (Fig. 5d), but no morphological differences were observed in the PhIL1-PTD sporozoites. When infected mosquitoes were used for bite back experiments to ascertain sporozoite infectivity, blood stage infection was observed at day 4 in naïve mice for both wild type and PhIL1-PTD parasites.

Figure 5
Figure 5

PhIL1 knockdown suggests its role at various stages of the parasite life cycle. (a) Conditional knock down, shows a significant reduction (60–70%) of PhIL1-PTD transcript in comparison to wild type in gametocytes of P. berghei. Three technical replicates and three biological replicates were performed for each assayed gene. The hsp70 (PBANKA_081890) and arginyl-t RNA synthetase (PBANKA_143420) genes were used as endogenous control reference genes. (b) Ookinete conversion shows a significant decrease in the percentage of ookinetes in triplicate experiments. (c) The number of oocysts in the mosquito gut was also reduced in PhIL1-PTD parasite samples 14 and 21-days post infection (dpi). The infection rate of >70% was observed for both PhIL1-PTD and WT parasites in triplicate experiments. (d) Sporozoite number per mosquito for 14 and 21 dpi in PhIL1-PTD parasites was comparatively low in midgut oocysts in comparison to WT. (e) Sporozoite numbers in salivary glands on 21 dpi were also decreased in PhIL1-PTD parasites comparing to WT but, (f) bite-back experiments showed successful transmission of both PhIL1-PTD and WT parasites from mosquito to mouse. The prepatent period was 4–5 days for both WT and PhIL1-PTD parasites. Bar chart shows mean ± SEM for three independent experiments. *P value was < 0.05.

Overall, the analysis of the knockdown of PhIL1 transcription showed that depletion of PhIL1 transcript resulted in a clear phenotype of a decrease in ookinete conversion followed by a corresponding reduction in the number of oocysts and sporozoites. Some parasites could still complete the life cycle, however, it is unknown what the effect of complete loss of PhIL1 would be in these stages, and a more severe phenotype is possible given the inability to generate a gene knockout in the asexual blood-stage.

Discussion

A unifying feature of apicomplexan parasites is that all invasive stages possess a surface pellicle and highly polarised cellular organisation with the apical complex at the anterior end of the cell implicated in motility and invasion of host cells/tissue10. Motility in these invasive stages is powered by an actomyosin motor termed the glideosome, which resides within the pellicle located directly beneath the surface membrane, and tethered to the IMC. Several recent studies have identified proteins associated with the IMC and provided insights into the organisation and role of this structure1,16,17,18.

PhIL1 was originally discovered as an IMC-associated protein in tachyzoites of Toxoplasma 9. Deletion of the gene showed only a very mild growth phenotype, including a reduced but not abolished parasite load in animal models, and a subtle morphological change of slightly shorter and wider parasites19. No loss of parasite motility was seen, although the trajectory of 3D gliding patterns did change with the cell morphology19,20. The presence, location, importance or function of a PhIL1 homolgoue in Plasmodium in invasive and/or sexual stages have not been previously investigated. We examined the localisation of PhIL1 using two species: P. falciparum and P. berghei, as the latter allows study of the sexual, sporogonic and liver stages and therefore the entire life cycle. By using parasites expressing PhIL1 tagged with GFP, we show that the protein exhibits an IMC-like localisation during liver and blood stage schizogony. This localisation was confirmed in P. falciparum schizonts using immunofluorescence with antibodies to PhIL1 and GAP50, a known component of the IMC. The protein was also detectable in the ring and trophozoite forms of the asexual blood-stage, which has not been observed for other IMC associated proteins studied to date5,6,7,8,21, and the function of PhIL1 in these stages is therefore not clear, which leaves an interesting stone unturned for further studies. Surprisingly whilst PhIL1 is expressed in activated male gametocytes it is not detected in female gametocytes, suggesting that the gene may be translationally repressed in females22,23. The early initial expression and localisation of PhIL1 in zygotes at 2 hours post-fertilisation supports this hypothesis. The PhIL1 gene has also been described as one of the target genes for the AP2-O transcription factor5.

The timing of the establishment of the PhIL1 apical signal during ookinete development differs from that of other apical IMC associated molecules like ISP1, which is detected before fertilization in early female gametocyte development8 or of other apical proteins such as SAS6L and Myosin B, which are detected after 4 hours post fertilisation or at a much later stage of ookinete development, respectively7,12,24. Therefore, PhIL1 has a spatial and temporal profile very different to that of many other IMC-associated proteins and proteins implicated in the apical complex. PhIL1 is unusual compared to known IMC-associated proteins in that it has both apical and basal polarity in the ookinete and sporozoite stages. The developmental pattern of PhIL1 during ookinete differentiation suggests that basal PhIL1 is organised after apical polarity during ookinete development. Very few basal localised proteins have been described in invasive stages in Plasmodium. Recently a transmembrane protein localising at the basal rim of nascent IMC was reported in blood stage parasites6. While many apically localised protein have been reported both in Toxoplasma and Plasmodium, very few have been characterised during ookinete or sporozoite stages5,6,7,8,12,24,25,26.

The super resolution microscopy studies described here indicate that PhIL1 is associated with a ring structure at the apical end, and might also form a ring at the basal end of the parasite. Its location is distinct from that of SAS6L, the other ring protein studied in Plasmodium 12. Many IMC, apical complex and ring proteins at the conoid (in Toxoplasma) are implicated in establishing apical polarity in Plasmodium and Toxoplasma 5,7,8,25,27,28. Since the sexual stages are difficult to obtain for many other apicomplexan parasites, the studies here provide important evidence for the role of PhIL1 during sexual and sporogony stages.

IMC proteins have been implicated as anchors for the actomyosin machinery used by the parasite for motility and invasion of host cells1,29. To obtain insight into the interactions of PhIL1 with other proteins, we identified binding partners following immuno-purification. Our analysis showed that PhIL1-GFP interacts with glideosome-associated proteins including GAP50, and GAPM1, −2 and −3 but it does not bind MyoA, MTIP or GAP45, proteins which are also crucial components of the glideosome1,29. These results suggest that PhIL1 forms a novel protein complex with alveolins and components that overlap with those in the known glideosome complex, including GAP50. It may be that GAPM1 to −3 are proteins which span both the outer and inner side of the IMC and hence may be components of complexes on either side of the IMC. Our IFA studies showed that PhIL1 colocalises with GAP50, while it has a different location to that of MyoA. Since GAP50 is both a lumenal and transmembrane protein it is possible that PhIL1 interacts with GAP50 on the inner membrane of the IMC and GAP50 interacts on the outer side with the myosin machinery like GAP45, GAP40, MyoA and MTIP. GAP50 has been shown to be part of the gametocyte membrane complex in P. falciparum 30. This suggests that PhIL1 and GAP50 may form another complex distinct from the glideosome, and which may be important in both sexual and asexual stages. The presence of MORN1 in the P. berghei interactome also suggests that PhIL1 may be part of the cell division machinery and also the part of the basal end of the parasite as seen in Toxoplasma 31,32,33. A recent study has shown that a pellicle protein, BTP1 is localised to the basal rim of the IMC during P. falciparum schizogony and co-localises with MORN16. The presence of MORN1 in our interactome data suggests that PhIL1 may also be part of the basal complex in P. berghei. To our knowledge this is the first description of a basal protein in ookinete and sporozoite stages of Plasmodium.

Our inability to knockout P. berghei PhIL1 by double homologous recombination indicates that the gene is likely essential for blood stage replication, a conclusion that is consistent with the recent functional profiling of the Plasmodium genome14. This suggests a greater susceptibility of Plasmodium to PhIL1 loss than seen in Toxoplasma. One possibility for this is that the in vitro system exposes the parasite to different stresses, or that there is greater redundancy of molecules maintaining IMC strength, integrity or functions such as motility and invasion in Toxoplasma. This has been recently suggested for the difference in gene essentiality between Plasmodium and Toxoplasma in genome-wide function screens in Toxoplasma and Plasmodium 14,34.

The conditional knockdown of PhIL1 expression using the ama1 promoter is an approach that has been utilised in previous studies of MyoA, MTIP and other motor complex genes35. The strategy produced viable parasites for MyoA and MTIP knockdowns suggesting that expression of these genes is not essential in ring and trophozoite stage parasites, since AMA1 is mostly expressed during late stages of schizogony. We could not completely knockdown PhIL1 transcription at gametocyte and ookinete stages of the life cycle suggesting that even partial expression of PhIL1 at these various stages is sufficient for the parasite to complete development. This could explain why we observed a significant decrease, but not complete ablation of exflagellation during male gametogenesis and of ookinete conversion in PhIL1-PTD parasites. This observation also correlates well with the fact that PhIL1-GFP expression was detected during male gametogenesis and ookinete development. The specific location of PhIL1-GFP in the male gametocyte and its role during male exflagellation and ookinete differentiation shows that IMC proteins are not only relevant for invasive stages but are involved in gametocyte/zygote differentiation. While there is no apical polar ring in gametocytes, PhIL1 might contribute to the IMC-like complex of the male gametocyte. IMC proteins have been shown to be present at the periphery of mature P. falciparum gametocytes36, however PhIL 1 was not shown to be part of this complex36. It will be interesting to identify the proteins interacting with PhIL1 during male gametogenesis and ookinete in future studies. Given that use of the AMA1 promoter only partially reduced PhIL1 expression, and that this allowed the parasite to complete its life cycle, albeit with reduced efficiency, it may be useful to use other gene promoters to control expression. clag1, which is active in ring, trophozoite and schizont stages and tightly regulated throughout the other life-cycle stages, offers one such option, and this promoter could be used to test whether a stronger transcription knockdown has more severe effects, as predicted by the attempts at gene knockout. This approach has been used to study the function of cdpk1 in ookinete development35.

Overall, we have demonstrated that PhIL1 is an IMC-associated protein that is not only present in motile and invasive stages but also in sexual stages, especially during male gametogenesis and ookinete differentiation. It defines both apical and basal polarity in the parasite and is essential in the life-cycle. We show that it forms a novel protein complex that shares some similar composition, but also differences from the glideosome. Other components of this complex will be studied in the future to investigate their function.

Material and Methods

Ethics statement

The animal work performed in this study was approved by the Institutional Animals Ethics Committee of ICGEB (IAEC-ICGEB) under the approval number ICGEB/AH/2015/01/MAL-74 and by the United Kingdom Home Office with the project licence number 30/3248. Rotary blood bank provided human red blood cells. Work was carried out according to the guidelines of IAEC-ICGEB and in accordance with the United Kingdom ‘Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986’ and in compliance with ‘European Directive 86/609/EEC’ for the protection of animals used for experimental purposes.

Tuck’s Original (TO) (Harlan) outbred mice were used for all experiments of Plasmodium berghei. New Zealand White rabbits and BALB/c mice were used for raising the PhIL1 antibodies.


For Plasmodium falciparum

Recombinant protein expression and generation of immune sera

The entire coding region of PfPhIL1 (PF3D7_0109000) was amplified using the primer sets: PHIL1_F and PhIL1_R (Supplementary Table 1), subcloned into pET28a expression vector (Invitrogen Life Technologies), expressed in BL21 (DE3) cells, and induced with 1 mM IPTG. The recombinant histidine tagged PhIL1 protein was purified by Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography. The purified recombinant protein was analysed on 12% SDS-PAGE and further confirmed with western blot using anti-His6 monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). Protein specific antibodies were raised in rabbit and mice following standard procedures.

Maintenance of P. falciparum cultures and transfection

The P. falciparum parasite line 3D7 was maintained as described previously37,38. To generate a transfection vector construct, the entire open reading frame of PfPhIL1 was amplified using PfPhIL1-F and PfPhIL1-R primer set (Supplementary Table 1), and cloned into the pSSPF2 vector39 to create a GFP- PfPhIL1 protein under the control of hsp86 promoter. P. falciparum 3D7 ring stage parasites were transfected with 100 μg of plasmid DNA by electroporation (310 V, 950 μF)40 and the transfected parasites were selected using 2.5 nM blasticidin. Expression of the PfPhIL1-GFP fusion protein in transgenic P. falciparum blood stage parasites was examined by western blotting. Protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Fluorescence microscopy: To visualize GFP expression, the transgenic parasite suspension was incubated with DAPI (2ng/ml) in PBS at RT for 10 min and observed on a Nikon A1 Confocal Microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan).

Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay

Parasites were fixed with solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 0.0075% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Parasites were then subjected to permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 followed by blocking with 5% FBS. After blocking, parasites were probed with primary antibody for 1 h, followed by secondary antibody for 1 h. The parasites were then incubated with DAPI and imaged using a Nikon A1-R confocal microscope. The images were analysed by NIS elements software (Nikon). The antibody combinations used are: 1. rabbit anti-PfPhIL (1:200) for PhIL1localisation in 3D7 parasites, 2. For confirming the GFP line, rabbit α-PfGFP (1:250) and mice anti-PfPhIL (1:100) were used, 3. For colocalisation studies, rabbit α-PfGAP50 (1:250), mice anti-PfPhIL (1:100) were used; followed by appropriate secondary antibodies: anti-mice Alexafluor 488 (1:500), anti-rabbit Alexafluor 488 (1:500) anti-rabbit Alexafluor 594 (1:500) (Invitrogen).

Immunoprecipitation of GFP-fusion protein and identification by mass spectrometry

The mature schizont/merozoite stage lysate was obtained and immunoprecipitation was done using GFP-Trap®_A Kit (Chromotek) following the manufacturer’s instructions. GFP-Trap®_A beads were allowed to bind to parasite lysate by tumbling the tube end-over-end. Proteins were eluted in 50 μl elution buffer, digested with trypsin and peptides were analysed by mass spectrometry41.


For Plasmodium berghei

Generation of transgenic parasites

The oligonucleotides used to generate the mutant parasite lines can be found in Supplementary Table 1. A schematic representation of the endogenous PhIL1 locus (PBANKA_0204600), the constructs and the recombined PhIL1 locus can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1. For GFP-tagging of PhIL1 by single crossover homologous recombination, a region of PhIL1 downstream of the ATG start codon was used to generate the construct as described previously42.The gene deletion targeting vector for ∆PhIL1 was constructed using the pBS-DHFR plasmid, which contains polylinker sites flanking a T. gondii dhfr/ts expression cassette confering resistance to pyrimethamine, as described previously43. The conditional knockdown construct (PhIL1-PTD) was derived from P ama1 (pSS368) where PhIL1 was placed under the control of ama1 promoter, as described previously35. P. berghei ANKA line 2.34 (for GFP-tagging) or ANKA line 507cl1 expressing GFP13 (for gene deletion and promoter trap) parasites were transfected by electroporation.

Genotypic analysis of parasites

For the genotypic analyses of C-terminal GFP tagged PhIL1 parasites, a diagnostic PCR reaction was performed as outlined in Fig. S2A. Primer 1 (intT221) and primer 2 (ol492) were used to determine correct integration of the gfp sequence at the targeted locus. A diagnostic PCR was performed for PhIL1 gene knockdown parasites as outlined in Fig. S3B. Primer 1 (intPTD295) and Primer 2 (5’-intPTD) were used to determine successful integration of the targeting construct at the 5’ gene locus. Primer 3 (3’-intPTD) and Primer 4 (intPTD293) were used to determine successful integration for the 3’ end of the gene locus. All the primer sequences can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

Phenotypic analyses

Blood containing approximately 50,000 parasites was injected intraperitoneally (i.p) into mice to initiate infections. Four to five days post infection, exflagellation and ookinete conversion were examined as described previously42 with a Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc) fitted with an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera. To analyse mosquito transmission, 30–50 Anopheles stephensi SD 500 mosquitoes were allowed to feed on anaesthetized, infected mice whose asexual parasitaemia had reached up to 15% and were carrying comparable numbers of gametocytes. To assess mid-gut infection, approximately 15 guts were dissected from mosquitoes on day 14 post feeding and oocysts were counted on Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope. On day 21 post-feeding, another 20 mosquitoes were dissected and their guts and salivary glands crushed separately in a loosely fitting homogenizer to release sporozoites, which were then quantified using a haemocytometer or used for imaging. Mosquito bite back experiments were performed 21 days post-feeding using naive mice and blood smears were examined after 3–4 days.

Culture and gradient purification of schizonts, gametocytes and ookinetes

Blood cells obtained from infected mice (day 5 post infection) were cultured for 24 h at 37 °C (with rotation at 100 rpm) and schizonts were purified the following day on a 60% v/v NycoDenz (in PBS) gradient, (NycoDenz stock solution: 27.6% w/v NycoDenz in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.20, 3 mM KCl, 0.3 mM EDTA). Purification of gametocytes was achieved using a protocol modified from ref.44. On day four post-infection mice were bled by cardiac puncture into heparin and gametocytes separated from uninfected erythrocytes on a 48% (v/v) NycoDenz in coelenterazine loading buffer (CLB; PBS, 20 mM HEPES, 20 mM Glucose, 4 mM sodium bicarbonate, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% w/v BSA, pH 7.25) gradient. Blood cells from day 5 post infection mice were placed in culture for 24 hrs at 20 °C for ookinete production and purified on a 62.5% v/v NycoDenz (in PBS) gradient.

Liver stage cultures

HeLa cells (European Cell Culture Collection) were grown in minimum essential medium with Earle’s salts, supplemented with 10% heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine (PAA Laboratories) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For infection, 1 × 105 HeLa cells were seeded into glass bottom dishes (MatTek). The day after seeding, salivary glands were removed from female Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes infected with PbPhIL1-GFP parasites and following mechanical disruption, sporozoites, in infection medium (MEM with 2.5 µg/ml Amphotericin B (PAA Laboratories), were used to infect the seeded HeLa cells. For live cell imaging, at 54 hpi Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) was added to infected cells at 1 μg/ml. Confocal live cell images of parasites were acquired using the Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope with the Leica Application Suite X software.

qRT-PCR analysis

The total RNA was isolated from purified gametocyte stage of parasite using the Absolutely RNA purification kit (Stratagene). The cDNA was synthesised using an RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression was quantified by qPCR using SYBR green fast master mix (Applied Biosystems). Analysis was conducted using an Applied Biosystems 7500 fast machine with the following cycling conditions: 95 °C for 20 sec followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 sec; 60 °C for 30 sec. The primers used for qPCR can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

Super resolution Imaging

Purified ookinetes or salivary gland sporozoites were fixed with 2% PFA and allowed to settle onto PEI-treated No. 1.5 H coverslips (0.170 mm ± 0.005 mm) for 20 minutes, stained with DAPI, rinsed in water and mounted in Vectashield as described earlier12.Super-resolution images were acquired using a Deltavision OMX 3D-SIM System V3 BLAZE from Applied Precision (GE Healthcare). Imaging of each channel was done sequentially using three angles and five phase shifts of the illumination pattern as described previously45. Raw OMX data was reconstructed and channel registered in SoftWoRx software version 6.1.3 (Applied Precision, GE Healthcare).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism 5 software. An unpaired t-test was conducted to examine significant differences between wild-type and mutant strains.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Boucher, L. E. & Bosch, J. The apicomplexan glideosome and adhesins - Structures and function. J Struct Biol 190, 93–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2015.02.008 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Gould, S. B., Tham, W. H., Cowman, A. F., McFadden, G. I. & Waller, R. F. Alveolins, a new family of cortical proteins that define the protist infrakingdom Alveolata. Mol Biol Evol 25, 1219–1230, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn070 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Woo, Y. H. et al. Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites. Elife 4, e06974, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06974 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Hall, N. et al. A comprehensive survey of the Plasmodium life cycle by genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses. Science 307, 82–86, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103717 (2005).

  5. 5.

    Kaneko, I., Iwanaga, S., Kato, T., Kobayashi, I. & Yuda, M. Genome-Wide Identification of the Target Genes of AP2-O, a Plasmodium AP2-Family Transcription Factor. PLoS Pathog 11, e1004905, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004905 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Kono, M. et al. Pellicle formation in the malaria parasite. J Cell Sci 129, 673–680, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.181230 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Kono, M. et al. Evolution and architecture of the inner membrane complex in asexual and sexual stages of the malaria parasite. Mol Biol Evol 29, 2113–2132, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss081 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Poulin, B. et al. Unique apicomplexan IMC sub-compartment proteins are early markers for apical polarity in the malaria parasite. Biol Open 2, 1160–1170, https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20136163 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Gilk, S. D. et al. Identification of PhIL1, a novel cytoskeletal protein of the Toxoplasma gondii pellicle, through photosensitized labeling with 5-[125I]iodonaphthalene-1-azide. Eukaryot Cell 5, 1622–1634, https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00114-06 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Morrissette, N. S. & Sibley, L. D. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66, 21–38; table of contents (2002).

  11. 11.

    Janse, C. J., Rouwenhorst, R. J., Van der Klooster, P. F., Van der Kaay, H. J. & Overdulve, J. P. Development of Plasmodium berghei ookinetes in the midgut of Anopheles atroparvus mosquitoes and in vitro. Parasitology 91(Pt 2), 219–225 (1985).

  12. 12.

    Wall, R. J. et al. SAS6-like protein in Plasmodium indicates that conoid-associated apical complex proteins persist in invasive stages within the mosquito vector. Sci Rep 6, 28604, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28604 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Janse, C. J. et al. High efficiency transfection of Plasmodium berghei facilitates novel selection procedures. Mol Biochem Parasitol 145, 60–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.09.007 (2006).

  14. 14.

    Bushell, E. et al. Functional Profiling of a Plasmodium Genome Reveals an Abundance of Essential Genes. Cell 170, 260–272 e268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.030 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Gomes, A. R. et al. A genome-scale vector resource enables high-throughput reverse genetic screening in a malaria parasite. Cell Host Microbe 17, 404–413, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.014 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Harding, C. R. et al. Gliding Associated Proteins Play Essential Roles during the Formation of the Inner Membrane Complex of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005403, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005403 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Harding, C. R. & Meissner, M. The inner membrane complex through development of Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium. Cell Microbiol 16, 632–641, https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12285 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Jacot, D. et al. An Apicomplexan Actin-Binding Protein Serves as a Connector and Lipid Sensor to Coordinate Motility and Invasion. Cell Host Microbe 20, 731–743, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.020 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Barkhuff, W. D. et al. Targeted disruption of TgPhIL1 in Toxoplasma gondii results in altered parasite morphology and fitness. PLoS One 6, e23977, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023977 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Leung, J. M., Rould, M. A., Konradt, C., Hunter, C. A. & Ward, G. E. Disruption of TgPHIL1 alters specific parameters of Toxoplasma gondii motility measured in a quantitative, three-dimensional live motility assay. PLoS One 9, e85763, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085763 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Tremp, A. Z., Al-Khattaf, F. S. & Dessens, J. T. Distinct temporal recruitment of Plasmodium alveolins to the subpellicular network. Parasitol Res 113, 4177–4188, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4093-4 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Guerreiro, A. et al. Genome-wide RIP-Chip analysis of translational repressor-bound mRNAs in the Plasmodium gametocyte. Genome Biol 15, 493, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0493-0 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Mair, G. R. et al. Regulation of sexual development of Plasmodium by translational repression. Science 313, 667–669, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125129 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Yusuf, N. A. et al. ThePlasmodium Class XIV Myosin, MyoB, Has a Distinct Subcellular Location in Invasive and Motile Stages of the Malaria Parasite and an Unusual Light Chain. J Biol Chem 290, 12147–12164, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.637694 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Beck, J. R. et al. A novel family of Toxoplasma IMC proteins displays a hierarchical organization and functions in coordinating parasite division. PLoS Pathog 6, e1001094, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001094 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Hu, K. et al. Cytoskeletal components of an invasion machine–the apical complex of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog 2, e13, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020013 (2006).

  27. 27.

    Katris, N. J. et al. The apical complex provides a regulated gateway for secretion of invasion factors in Toxoplasma. PLoS Pathog 10, e1004074, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004074 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Graindorge, A. et al. The Conoid Associated Motor MyoH Is Indispensable for Toxoplasma gondii Entry and Exit from Host Cells. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005388, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005388 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Frenal, K. et al. Functional dissection of the apicomplexan glideosome molecular architecture. Cell Host Microbe 8, 343–357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.002 (2010).

  30. 30.

    Yeoman, J. A. et al. Tracking Glideosome-associated protein 50 reveals the development and organization of the inner membrane complex of Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryot Cell 10, 556–564, https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00244-10 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Ferguson, D. J. et al. MORN1 has a conserved role in asexual and sexual development across the apicomplexa. Eukaryot Cell 7, 698–711, https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00021-08 (2008).

  32. 32.

    Heaslip, A. T., Dzierszinski, F., Stein, B. & Hu, K. TgMORN1 is a key organizer for the basal complex of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog 6, e1000754, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000754 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Hu, G. et al. Transcriptional profiling of growth perturbations of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Biotechnol 28, 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1597 (2010).

  34. 34.

    Sidik, S. M. et al. A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Toxoplasma Identifies Essential Apicomplexan Genes. Cell 166, 1423–1435 e1412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.019 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Sebastian, S. et al. A Plasmodium calcium-dependent protein kinase controls zygote development and transmission by translationally activating repressed mRNAs. Cell Host Microbe 12, 9–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.014 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Dearnley, M. K. et al. Origin, composition, organization and function of the inner membrane complex of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes. J Cell Sci 125, 2053–2063, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.099002 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Trager, W. & Jensen, J. B. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. 1976. J Parasitol 91, 484–486, https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2005)091[0484:HMPICC]2.0.CO;2 (2005).

  38. 38.

    Lambros, C. & Vanderberg, J. P. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol 65, 418–420 (1979).

  39. 39.

    Sato, S., Rangachari, K. & Wilson, R. J. Targeting GFP to the malarial mitochondrion. Mol Biochem Parasitol 130, 155–158 (2003).

  40. 40.

    Crabb, B. S. et al. Transfection of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Methods Mol Biol 270, 263–276, https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-793-9:263 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Zeeshan, M. et al. Proteomic Identification and Analysis of Arginine-Methylated Proteins of Plasmodium falciparum at Asexual Blood Stages. J Proteome Res 16, 368–383, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01052 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Guttery, D. S. et al. A unique protein phosphatase with kelch-like domains (PPKL) in Plasmodium modulates ookinete differentiation, motility and invasion. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002948, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002948 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Tewari, R. et al. The systematic functional analysis of Plasmodium protein kinases identifies essential regulators of mosquito transmission. Cell Host Microbe 8, 377–387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.006 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Beetsma, A. L., van de Wiel, T. J., Sauerwein, R. W. & Eling, W. M. Plasmodium berghei ANKA: purification of large numbers of infectious gametocytes. Exp Parasitol 88, 69–72, https://doi.org/10.1006/expr.1998.4203 (1998).

  45. 45.

    Gustafsson, M. G. et al. Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys J 94, 4957–4970, https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.120345 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by MRC Investigator Award and MRC project grants to RT [G0900109, G0900278, MR/K011782/1 and BB/N017609/1]. Financial support to MZ is from BB/N017609/1. PM and AM laboratories is funded by Programme Support Grant (BT/01/CEIB/11/V/01), Vaccine grant (BT/PR5267/MED/15/87/2012) and Centre Of Excellence grant (BT/COE/34/SP15138/2015) from Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Work in the Holder laboratory was supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001097), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001097), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001097). RFW was funded by an MRC grant (MR/M011690/1). VH is funded by). VH is funded by the Swiss National Foundation grant 310030_159519. We thank Rotary blood bank, for providing human red blood cells to ES and PM We are also grateful to Julie Rodgers for insectary maintenance and Kosali Redman for technical assistance to RT. We are also grateful to the MIC (Microscope Imaging Centre) in Bern for providing excellent microscopy facilities to VH. ES acknowledges the financial support from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India in the form of DBT-JRF Fellowship. PS and RP are awardees of fellowships from University Grants Commission, Govt. of India.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ekta Saini and Mohammad Zeeshan contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110067, India

    • Ekta Saini
    • , Rajan Pandey
    • , Pradeep Kumar
    • , Vandana Thakur
    • , Shreyansh Tatiya
    • , Inderjeet Kaur
    • , Asif Mohmmed
    •  & Pawan Malhotra
  2. School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG72UH, UK

    • Mohammad Zeeshan
    • , Declan Brady
    •  & Rita Tewari
  3. Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Bern, 3012, Switzerland

    • Gesine Kaiser
    • , Rebecca Stanway Limenitakis
    •  & Volker Heussler
  4. Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK

    • Ludek Koreny
    • , Nicholas J. Katris
    •  & Ross F. Waller
  5. Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK

    • Judith L. Green
    •  & Anthony A. Holder
  6. Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Laboratory, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK

    • Andrew R. Bottrill
  7. Department of Cancer studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK

    • David S. Guttery

Authors

  1. Search for Ekta Saini in:

  2. Search for Mohammad Zeeshan in:

  3. Search for Declan Brady in:

  4. Search for Rajan Pandey in:

  5. Search for Gesine Kaiser in:

  6. Search for Ludek Koreny in:

  7. Search for Pradeep Kumar in:

  8. Search for Vandana Thakur in:

  9. Search for Shreyansh Tatiya in:

  10. Search for Nicholas J. Katris in:

  11. Search for Rebecca Stanway Limenitakis in:

  12. Search for Inderjeet Kaur in:

  13. Search for Judith L. Green in:

  14. Search for Andrew R. Bottrill in:

  15. Search for David S. Guttery in:

  16. Search for Ross F. Waller in:

  17. Search for Volker Heussler in:

  18. Search for Anthony A. Holder in:

  19. Search for Asif Mohmmed in:

  20. Search for Pawan Malhotra in:

  21. Search for Rita Tewari in:

Contributions

Conception and design: P.M. for P. falciparum and R.T. for P. berghei. Performed most work on P. falciparum functional analysis: E.S. Performed most work on P. berghei analysis: R.T. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools for P. falciparum: R.P., P.K., V.T., I.K., S.T., J.L.G. and A.M. Performed the P. berghei Liver stage analysis: G.K., R.S.L. and V.H. Performed work on P. berghei Gene Knock in analysis: M.Z., D.B., R.T. Performed super resolution studies: L.K., N.J.K. and R.J.W. Performed the mass spectroscopy: A.R.B. Intellectual input, illustrations and scientific discussions: D.S.G., A.A.H., R.F.W. Wrote the paper: E.S., M.Z., P.M. and R.T. and all others contributed to it.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pawan Malhotra or Rita Tewari.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15781-z

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.