Article | Open

# Prolonged duration of nonequilibrated Dirac fermions in neutral topological insulators

• Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 14080 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14308-w
Accepted:
Published online:

## Abstract

Topological insulators (TIs) possess spin-polarized Dirac fermions on their surface but their unique properties are often masked by residual carriers in the bulk. Recently, (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3 was introduced as a non-metallic TI whose carrier type can be tuned from n to p across the charge neutrality point. By using time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, we investigate the ultrafast carrier dynamics in the series of (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3. The Dirac electronic recovery of 10 ps at most in the bulk-metallic regime elongated to >400 ps when the charge neutrality point was approached. The prolonged nonequilibration is attributed to the closeness of the Fermi level to the Dirac point and to the high insulation of the bulk. We also discuss the feasibility of observing excitonic instability of (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3.

## Introduction

A three-dimensional (3D) topological insulator (TI) hosts spin-polarized massless Dirac states along its two-dimensional (2D) surface due to the topology of the bulk band structure1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The 2D metal on the surface exists as long as time reversal symmetry is preserved and exhibits novel phenomena not found in conventional 2D metals: These include the ballistic (high-mobility) transport due to the massless characteristic of the Dirac fermions and half-integer quantum Hall effects similar to those observed in graphene8,9.

While the surface of TIs is considered to be a promising platform for novel phenomena and applications, the surface-related properties are often masked by the residual carriers of bulk. Extensive efforts have been made to reduce the number of bulk carriers through the following guidelines10,11,12: (1) Design the band structures so that the Dirac bands are energetically isolated from the bulk bands; (2) Locate the Fermi level (EF) in the bulk band gap. Recently, it was shown that the carrier concentration can be controlled very precisely in the nonmetallic regime of the ternary TI (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te313,14,15. Upon increasing x, the type of conduction changes from p to n across the intrinsic point. The bulk insulation is hallmarked by the demonstration of surface quantum Hall effect in a film sample16. (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3 is thus regarded as a promising platform to unveil the exotic surface phenomena of TIs.

TIs irradiated by ultrashort light pulses have attracted much interest from both fundamental and application points of view. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) implemented by the pump-probe method is a powerful tool to investigate the ultrafast phenomena of TIs. Time-resolved ARPES (TARPES) studies have disclosed novel states (Floquet17 and population-inverted states18), dynamics19,20,21,22,23, and functions (surface photovoltage (SPV) effect24 and generation of transient photocurrents25) on the nonequilibrated surface of TIs. Furthermore, it was recently proposed that these systems could host an excitonic insulating state particularly when the Dirac cone is neutrally doped26. Concerning the electronic recovery, there has been a dispute over the mechanism after the studies on bulk metallic TIs27,28. It is also not clear how the short 10-ps recovery for the bulk-metallic TIs18,19,20,21,22,23 is connected to the elongated 100-ps electronic recovery reported for bulk-insulating TIs24,29. In addition, it is not known whether or not there is a relationship between the electronic recovery and SPV effect, the latter observed in some bulk-insulating TIs24,30. Thus, a systematic study from the bulk-metallic to bulk-insulating regime is required for founding a solid platform to realize the novel light-induced phenomena.

In the present study, we investigate the ultrafastly-induced dynamics in a series of (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3 (x = 0, 0.29 and 0.43) by using TARPES. When the intrinsic point was approached, the electronic recovery time for the surface Dirac fermions was prolonged to >400 ps even though the SPV was not sizable. We thus attribute the prolonged duration to the increase of the bulk insulation and to the closeness of EF to the Dirac point. We also discuss the feasibility of observing an excitonic instability for the near-neutral Dirac cone. The prolonged duration will facilitate the realization of novel optoelectronic functions such as optical gating of the high-mobility surface spin currents, efficient saturable absorption, and broad-band lasing31.

## Results

We start by showing the band dispersions of the samples x = 0, 0.29 and 0.43. In Fig. 1(a), we show typical TARPES images recorded at representative delay times t and pumping fluences p. All the images show the dispersions along the $Γ ¯ − K ¯$ line. The impact by the pump pulse redistributes the electrons across EF and transiently fills the bands in the unoccupied side. Thus, the band structures above EF can be accessed by TARPES. The Dirac cone dispersions and conduction bands above EF are nicely observed. Upon increasing x, the Dirac point is shifted to lower energies. The Dirac points for x = 0, 0.29 and 0.43 are located at 190, 60 and −30 meV, respectively, showing that the filling of the Dirac cone changed from p- to n-type between x = 0.29 and 0.43. For x = 0 and 0.29, EF crosses the valence band, while for x = 0.43, EF is located within the bulk band gap; the results of which are consistent with previous ARPES studies13. Figure 1(b) shows constant energy maps of the angular distribution of photoelectrons for x = 0.43. Here, in order to reduce the matrix-element effect, the mapping was done by both p- and s-polarized probe, and the two maps were added. In going from the Dirac point to energies above EF, the distribution pattern gradually evolves from circular to hexagonal, due to the hexagonal warping effect that becomes pronounced at energies away from the Dirac point32.

Figure 2(a)–(c) show TARPES images recorded at various pump-probe delay times for the three samples. We also display, in the left-most column, the images recorded in the absence of the pump pulse. In all cases, the unoccupied states are filled after the pumping at t = 0 ps. The main observation is that the time for the recovery from the nonequilibrated state elongates as x is increased: The filling is still observed at 396 ps in the case for x = 0.43, while for x = 0, the recovery is mostly accomplished already at 5 ps. Below, we look into the dynamics of the three samples one by one.

First, we focus on the sample x = 0 [Fig. 2(a)], whose Dirac point is located at the highest energy among the three. Before the arrival of the pump pulse (t = −1.4 ps), the photoemission signal is observed only below EF. The image is virtually unchanged from that recorded without the irradiation of the pump pulses [left-most panel of 2(a)], showing that the image recorded before t = 0 ps represents the spectrum of the equilibrium state. After the arrival of the pump pulse, for instance at t = 0.40 ps, the electrons are populated in the Dirac and bulk conduction bands located above EF. The excited state is gradually relaxed to the equilibrium state. We note that a novel population inversion across the Dirac point takes place during this period18. The relaxation is mostly accomplished by 5 ps. Next, we look into the dynamics of the sample x = 0.29 [Fig. 2(b)]. In this case, the Dirac point is located at an energy lower than that of x = 0. The image recorded at t < 0 ps represents that of the equilibrium state, as in the case for x = 0. At t = 0.67 ps, the bands in the unoccupied side are filled. During the recovery, some electrons remained at the bottom of the bulk conduction band; see the images recorded at t = 6.15 and 12.0 ps. The pump-induced variation is discerned for more than 20 ps. Finally, we describe the dynamics for the sample x = 0.43 [Fig. 2(c)], whose Dirac point is located closest to EF among the three. Even at 400 ps, the excited electrons still remain not only in the Dirac band above EF but also at the bottom of the bulk conduction band. We also notice that, unlike the x = 0 and x = 0.29 cases, the image recorded at t < 0 ps is shifted in energy from that recorded without pump, which we discuss later.

In order to resolve the energy-dependent carrier dynamics occurring in the bulk and surface bands, we set several frames along their dispersions as shown in Fig. 2(d)–(f), and plot, in Fig. 2(g)–(l), the intensity variations in each frame as a function of the pump-probe delay time. For the x = 0 sample [2(g) and 2(h)], the pump-induced variations are mostly diminished by 5 ps in all frames. For the x = 0.29 sample [2(i) and 2(j)], the recovery of the intensity takes longer than that of x = 0. It is also observed that delay in the filling (time until the maximum variation is reached) becomes prominent in the frames at lower energies. For the x = 0.43 sample [2(k) and 2(l)], whose Dirac point is located most closely to EF among the three, the recovery time drastically elongates in going from the higher to lower energy frames in both the bulk [2(k)] and surface bands [2(l)]. The electrons remain at the bottom of the bulk conduction band (frame B3) even at 400 ps, as shown in Fig. 2(k). To our knowledge, such a long duration of the transient electrons at the conduction-band bottom has not been reported to date. In the surface bands [2(l)], the pump-induced variation persists for more than 100 ps in the frames located within the bulk band gap (S4 to S6). In particular, the duration exceeds 400 ps in the vicinity of EF (S6). The delay in the filling also becomes pronounced in the x = 0.43 sample. In addition to the delayed filling, we also observe a time-resolution-limited rise in the intensity around t = 0 ps, which is notable in B3 and S3 to S6. This indicates that there are two types in the mechanism of the filling33; one that is similar to an impact ionization18,34, and the other that occurs through the transfer of electrons from high to low energies across the bands19.

In Fig. 3 we show the pump-fluence dependency recorded at p = 0.13, 0.26 and 0.52 mJ/cm2 for x = 0.43 sample. Figure 3(a) and (b) show the intensity variation and the recovery times at the bottom of the bulk conduction band (B3) and the bottom of the upper Dirac cone (S6), respectively. Upon increasing the pump fluence, both the bulk and surface recovery times are elongated. Even at p = 0.13 mJ/cm2, the fluence of which is comparable to those applied for x = 0 and 0.29 samples, the recovery time at S6 still exceeds 200 ps. The results strongly suggest that the prolonged recovery time of x = 0.43 sample is marginally affected by the fluence of the pump.

We summarize the electronic recovery time in Fig. 4, in which we plot the electronic recovery time for bulk (τ b ) and surface (τ s ) taken at various pump fluence values as functions of x. Here, τ b and τ s were estimated respectively from the intensity variations in the frame at the bottom of the bulk conduction band and that located just above the Dirac point along the surface band33. By increasing x from 0 to 0.43, both τ b and τ s are increased. τ s exceeds 300 ps for the bulk-insulating x = 0.43 sample. The recovery time hardly depended on p, while it elongated upon increasing temperature33, the implication of which will be discussed later. For x = 1, the recovery time is reported to be 50 ps22.

We turn our attention to the photovoltaic shift of the spectrum observed for the x = 0.43 sample. The left and middle panels of Fig. 5(a) respectively display the TARPES images recorded without and with the irradiation of the pump pulses. The time delay was set to −1.33 ps for the latter. The right panel of Fig. 5(a) shows the difference between the two TARPES images (with pump - without pump). We can clearly see that the image is shifted upward in energy when the pump beam is irradiated. To emphasize the difference, Fig. 5(b) shows angle-integrated energy distribution curves of the images presented in the left and middle panels of Fig. 5(a). The shift upon the irradiation is estimated to be 15 meV, which is attributed to the emergence of SPV on the x = 0.43 sample. The SPV occurs when the insulation of the bulk is sufficiently high; then, an optically active band bending develops in the surface region [Fig. 5(c)]. The photovoltaic shift for the x = 0.43 sample thus fingerprints the insulating nature of the bulk and concomitant development of a downward surface band bending. The shift is observed even at t < 0 ps, because the duration of SPV exceeds the 4-μ s interval of the pump-probe events: That is, the SPV is maintained in the periodic steady state under the repetitive irradiation of the pump pulses at 250 kHz, and hence the shift is observable also at t < 0 ps24,30.

Finally, we investigate whether the SPV effect has some correlation with the electronic recovery. To this end, we plot in Fig. 5(d) as functions of the delay time, the locus of the Dirac point in energy and $U(t)≡ ∫ ω > 0 ωI(ω,t)dω$ where ω is the energy from EF and I(ω, t) is the angle-integrated photoemission intensity35. The former represents the dynamics of SPV, and the latter represents the recovery of the electronic energy retained by the electrons above EF. The overall profile of U(t) shown in Fig. 5(d) nicely agrees with those shown in Fig. 2: The gradual recovery of the electronic excitation is seen to occur for 400 ps. On the other hand, the locus of the Dirac point is virtually unchanged in the time region [0, 400 ps] after the initial shift of −25 meV at t = 0 ps. The latter shows that the time for the SPV to recover is much longer than 400 ps: The SPV recovers for 25 meV with more than 4 μs. Because the recovery time for the electronic excitation and that for SPV are orders of magnitude different, we consider that there is no correlation between the two.

## Discussion

Recently, a giant SPV shift of 50 meV was reported in a TARPES study of a bulk-insulating TI, Bi2Te2Se24. Even though the SPV shift therein is much larger than the 15 meV of the present case, the electronic recovery time of the surface state was as short as 100 ps24. The Dirac point for Bi2Te2Se was located at 300 meV below EF, which is deeper than the case for the x = 0.43 sample that exhibits the exceedingly long τ s of 400 ps. Moreover, very recently, a large SPV (45 meV) was also observed in (Bi0.45Sb0.55)2Te3, whose the Dirac point is located at 150 meV below EF, at room temperature36. However, the electronic recovery time of surface state was as short as 25 ps. Based on these observations, we propose that: The prolonged electronic recovery of 400 ps observed for x = 0.43 is not only due to the bulk insulation but also due to the closeness of EF to the Dirac point, while the size of the SPV is not directly related to the initial electronic recovery. Our view is supported by the fact that the electronic recovery time increased already from x = 0 to 0.29 even though the SPV effect was absent. When EF approaches the Dirac point, the available phase space for the scattering within the Dirac cone (intra-band scattering) becomes small, so that the recovery of the Dirac electrons becomes less efficient. Besides, upon the increase in the bulk insulation, the photo-excited electrons in the Dirac cone will be less screened by the near EF excitations in the bulk, which also contributes to the extension of the electronic recovery time within the Dirac cone.

Let us also discuss the possibility whether the exciton condensation can be formed in the optically excited state26. The formation of the excitonic insulating state is closely related to the dimensionless coupling constant α = e2/εħv where e is the charge of the electron, ε is the system-specific dielectric constant, ħ is the Planck constant, and v is the Dirac velocity. When α is greater than the critical value ($α c ≈1$), it is expected that the electron-hole pairs formed by a mutual Coulomb attraction condense at low temperature37,38,39. Optically-excited Dirac materials are predicted to be a good candidate to realize the excitonic insulator. However, in 3D TIs for example Sb2Te3, ε is quite large (600), although v is small (2.3 × 105m/s) compared to graphene and other TIs18,40. This leads to a predicted excitonic gap less than 1 meV, which is much smaller than our energy resolution, and corresponds to a critical temperature that is quite low. The near-neutral Dirac cone nevertheless provides an interesting platform for the realization of the excitonic insulating state, if the material parameters are properly set.

## Methods

High quality (Sb1−x Bi x )2Te3 single crystals of x = 0, 0.29, and 0.43 were grown by the Bridgman method41. Atomic ratios of the constituents were determined by using electron probe micro analysis. TARPES spectrometer consisted of a hemispherical electron analyzer and a Ti:sapphire laser system that delivered 1.48-eV pump and 5.92-eV probe pulses at the repetition rate of 250 kHz42. The pump and probe pulses had spot diameters of 280 and 85 μm, respectively, on the sample. When recording the dynamics over 500 ps by varying the delay stage, it becomes crucial to keep the spatial overlap of the pump and probe beams throughout. We calibrated and checked that the spot of the pump beam on sample did not move for 5 μm when the delay stage was shifted for 600 ps. This was done by using a pin hole of 200 μ m attached next to the sample. We set the locus of the pin hole at the focal point of the electron lens of the analyzer, and monitored that the power of the pump beam passing through the hole during shifting the delay stage. The energy and time resolutions were 15 meV and 300 fs, respectively. Samples were cleaved in the spectrometer at the base pressure 1 × 10−8 Pa, and were held at 8 K during the TARPES measurements. Spectral broadenings due to space charge effects were set to 10 meV.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).

2. 2.

Hsieh, D. et al. A topological Dirac insulator in a quantum spin Hall phase. Nature 452, 970 (2008).

3. 3.

Hsieh, D. et al. Observation of Unconventional Quantum Spin Textures in Topological Insulators. Science 323, 919 (2009).

4. 4.

Roushan, P. et al. Topological surface states protected from backscattering by chiral spin texture. Nature 460, 1106 (2009).

5. 5.

Hsieh, D. et al. A tunable topological insulator in the spin helical Dirac transport regime. Nature 460, 1101 (2009).

6. 6.

Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).

7. 7.

Moore, J. E. The birth of topological insulators. Nature 464, 194 (2010).

8. 8.

Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201 (2005).

9. 9.

Novoselov, K. S. et al. Room-Temperature Quantum Hall Effect. Graphene. Science 315, 1379 (2007).

10. 10.

Ren, Z., Taskin, A. A., Sasaki, S., Segawa, K. & Ando, Y. Large bulk resistivity and surface quantum oscillations in the topological insulator Bi2Te2Se. Phys. Rev. B 82, 241306(R) (2010).

11. 11.

Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Salehi, M., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Emergence of Decoupled Surface Transport Channels in Bulk Insulating Bi2Se3 Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 026801 (2014).

12. 12.

Zhao, L. et al. Stable topological insulators achieved using high energy electron beams. Nat. Commun. 7, 10957 (2016).

13. 13.

Kong, D. et al. Ambipolar field effect in the ternary topological insulator (Bi x Sb1−x )2Te3 by composition tuning. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 705 (2011).

14. 14.

Zhang, J. et al. Band structure engineering in (Bi1−x Sb x )Te3 ernary topological insulators. . Nat.commun. 2, 574 (2011).

15. 15.

Niu, C. et al. Realization of tunable Dirac cone and insulating bulk states in topological insulators (Bi1−x Sb x )Te3. Sci Rep 2, 976 (2012).

16. 16.

Yoshimi, R. et al. Quantum Hall effect on top and bottom surface states of topological insulator (Bi1−x Sb x )Te3. Nat Commun 6, 6627 (2015).

17. 17.

Wang, Y. H., Steinberg, H., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch States on the Surface of a Topological Insulator. Science 342, 342 (2013).

18. 18.

Zhu, S. et al. Ultrafast electron dynamics at the Dirac node of the topological insulator Sb2Te3. Sci Rep 5, 13213 (2015).

19. 19.

Sobota, J. A. et al. Ultrafast Optical Excitation of a Persistent Surface-State Population in the Topological Insulator Bi2Se3. Phys Rev Lett 108, 117403 (2012).

20. 20.

Wang, Y. H. et al. Measurement of Intrinsic Dirac Fermion Cooling on the Surface of the Topological Insulator Bi2Se3 Using Time-Resolved and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 109, 127401 (2012).

21. 21.

Hajlaoui, M. et al. Ultrafast Surface Carrier Dynamics in the Topological Insulator Bi2Te3. Nano Lett 12, 3532 (2012).

22. 22.

Hajlaoui, M. et al. Tuning a Schottky barrier in a photoexcited topological insulator with transient Dirac cone electron-hole asymmetry. Nat Commun 5, 3003 (2014).

23. 23.

Sanchez-Barriga, J. et al. Ultrafast spin-polarization control of Dirac fermions in topological insulators. Phys Rev B 93, 155426 (2016).

24. 24.

Neupane, M. et al. Gigantic surface life-time of an intrinsic topological insulator. Phys Rev Lett 115, 116801 (2015).

25. 25.

Kuroda, K., Reimann, J., Gudde, J. & Hofer, U. Generation of Transient Photocurrents in the Topological Surface State of Sb2Te3 by Direct Optical Excitation with Midinfrared Pulses. Phys Rev Lett 116, 076801 (2016).

26. 26.

Triola, C., Pertsova, A., Markiewicz, R. S. & Balatsky, A. V. Excitonic gap formation in pumped Dirac materials. Phys Rev B 95, 205410 (2017).

27. 27.

Wang, M. C., Qiao, S., Jiang, Z., Luo, S. N. & Qi, J. Unraveling Photoinduced Spin Dynamics in the Topological Insulator Bi2Se3. Phys Rev Lett 116, 036601 (2016).

28. 28.

Glinka, Y. D. Comment on “Unraveling Photoinduced Spin Dynamics in the Topological Insulator Bi2Se3”. Phys Rev Lett 117, 169701 (2016).

29. 29.

Sterzi, A. et al. Bulk diffusive relaxation mechanisms in optically excited topological insulators. Phys Rev B 95, 115431 (2017).

30. 30.

Ishida, Y. et al. Emergent photovoltage on SmB6 surface upon bulk-gap evolution revealed by pump-and-probe photoemission spectroscopy. Sci Rep 5, 8160 (2015).

31. 31.

Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, V. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat Photonics 4, 611 (2010).

32. 32.

Fu, L. Hexagonal Warping Effects in the Surface States of the Topological Insulator Bi2Te3. Nat Photonics 4, 266801 (2009).

33. 33.

See Supplemental Material for additional experimental data and description of surface photovoltage effect and filling mechanism, which includes Refs. [19, 21].

34. 34.

Ishida, Y., Masuda, H., Sakai, H., Ishiwata, S. & Shin, S. Revealing the ultrafast light-to-matter energy conversion before heat diffusion in a layered Dirac semimetal. Phys Rev B 93, 100302(R) (2016).

35. 35.

Ishida, Y. et al. Non-thermal hot electrons ultrafastly generating hot optical phonons in graphite. Sci Rep 1, 64 (2011).

36. 36.

Sanchez-Barriga, J. et al. Laser-induced persistent photovoltage on the surface of a ternary topological insulator at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett 110, 141605 (2017).

37. 37.

Kotov, V. N., Uchoa, B., Pereira, V. M., Guinea, F. & Castro Neto, A. H. Electron-Electron Interactions in Graphene: Current Status and Perspectives. Rev Mod Phys 84, 1067 (2012).

38. 38.

Gamayun, O. V., Gorbar, E. V. & Gusynin, V. P. Supercritical Coulomb center and excitonic instability in graphene. Phys Rev B 80, 165429 (2009).

39. 39.

Gamayun, O. V., Gorbar, E. V. & Gusynin, V. P. Gap generation and semimetal-insulator phase transition in graphene. Phys Rev B 81, 075429 (2010).

40. 40.

Richter, W., Kohler, H. & Becker, C. R. A Raman and Far-Infrared Investigation of Phonons in the Rhombohedral V2−VI3 Compounds Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, Sb2Te3 and Bi2(Te1−xSex)3 (0 < x < 1), (Bi1−ySbx)2Te3 (0 < y < 1). Phys. Stat. Sol. (B) 84, 619 (1977).

41. 41.

Kokh, K. A., Makarenko, S. V., Golyashov, V. A., Shegai, O. A. & Tereshchenko, O. E. Melt growth of bulk Bi2Te3 crystals with a natural p-n junction. CrystEngComm. 16, 581 (2014).

42. 42.

Ishida, Y. et al. Time-resolved photoemission apparatus achieving sub-20-meV energy resolution and high stability. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 123904 (2014).

## Acknowledgements

We thank I. Belopolski, M. Z. Hasan, K. Kuroda, R. Akiyama and T. Okuda for useful information. TARPES experiment was carried out by the joint research in ISSP, University of Tokyo. K.S. was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (No. 16J03874). The work was supported by KAKENHI Nos. 26247064 and 26800165 and the bilateral collaboration program between RFBR (Russia; #15-52-50017) and JSPS (Japan). This study was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project #17-12-01047, in part of crystal growth, structural characterization and electrophysical properties). Work of A.P., C.T. and A.V.B. was supported by ERC-DM-32031, KAW and Villum Foundation. Work at LANL was supported by USDOE BES E3B7. We acknowledge support from Dr. Max Rössler, the Walter Haefner Foundation and the ETH Zurich Foundation.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan

• K. Sumida
• , S. Zhu
•  & A. Kimura

• Y. Ishida
•  & S. Shin

• M. Ye
4. #### Nordita, Roslagstullsbacken 23, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

• A. Pertsova
• , C. Triola
•  & A. V. Balatsky
5. #### Center for Quantum Materials (CQM), KTH and Nordita, Stockholm, Sweden

• A. Pertsova
• , C. Triola
•  & A. V. Balatsky

• K. A. Kokh
7. #### Novosibirsk State University, ul. Pirogova 2, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

• K. A. Kokh
•  & O. E. Tereshchenko
8. #### Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, 198504, Russia

• K. A. Kokh
•  & O. E. Tereshchenko
9. #### Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Akademika Lavrent’eva 13, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

• O. E. Tereshchenko
10. #### Institute for Materials Science, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA

• A. V. Balatsky
11. #### ETH Institute for Theoretical Studies, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

• A. V. Balatsky
12. #### Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA

• A. V. Balatsky

### Contributions

K.S., Y.I., S.Z., and M.Y. performed the TARPES experiments. K.A.K. and O.E.T. synthesized the crystals. A.P., C.T. and A.V.B. provided the theoretical framework. K.S., Y.I. and A.K. wrote the the manuscript with inputs from all authors. S.S. and A.K. supervised the work.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to K. Sumida or Y. Ishida or A. Kimura.