Article | Open

An oxytocin-dependent social interaction between larvae and adult C. elegans

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 10122 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09350-7
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Oxytocin has a conserved role in regulating animal social behaviour including parental-offspring interactions. Recently an oxytocin-like neuropeptide, nematocin, and its cognate receptors have been identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. We provide evidence for a pheromone signal produced by C. elegans larvae that modifies the behaviour of adult animals in an oxytocin-dependent manner increasing their probability of leaving a food patch which the larvae are populating. This increase is positively correlated to the size of the larval population but cannot be explained by food depletion nor is it modulated by biogenic amines, which suggest it is not an aversive behaviour. Moreover, the food-leaving behaviour is conspecific and pheromone dependent: C. elegans adults respond more strongly to C. elegans larvae compared to other nematode species and this effect is absent in C. elegans daf-22 larvae which are pheromone deficient. Neurotransmitter receptors previously implicated in C. elegans foraging decisions NPR-1 and TYRA-3, for NPY-like neuropeptides and tyramine respectively, do not appear to be involved in oxytocin-dependent adult food-leaving. We conclude oxytocin signals within a novel neural circuit that regulates parental-offspring social behaviour in C. elegans and that this provides evidence for evolutionary conservation of molecular components of a parental decision making behaviour.

Introduction

Animals have evolved intricate mechanisms that enable them to optimally locate and utilise food in their environment to satisfy their nutritional requirements, a behaviour called foraging. This is controlled by neural circuits which integrate conflicting sensory cues to drive behaviour appropriate to the specific current conditions. These cues relate not just to the abundance and quality of the food source but also the size and demographic of the population. This complexity is compounded by the need to evaluate to what extent the environment is benign or threatening. In this study, we show that the simple bacteriovorus nematode worm Caenorhabdiditis elegans, an exceptionally well-studied genetic model organism, makes foraging decisions which incorporate information about the presence of their well-fed offspring in the immediate environment.

Food-dependent behaviours have been extensively investigated in C. elegans. A paradigm that has been widely deployed involves placing a small number of adult hermaphrodite worms on a bacterial lawn of defined density and scoring the number of times individual worms leave the food patch and/or the proportion of worms that are off the food patch over a range of time-courses1,2,3,4,5. These studies have shown that adult food-leaving rate is strongly influenced by bacterial quality and density4, 5. Worms tend to dwell on a thick lawn of nutritional bacteria3, 5 but over time will increasingly leave the food patch more often and stay off the food for longer as the bacteria are consumed and the food source is depleted3, 5, 6. Various factors modulate the interaction of C. elegans with a food lawn: Pathogenic bacteria4, 7, 8, RNAi targeted to essential cellular processes1 and exposure to a range of chemical toxins1 all promote food-leaving. Worms fed on hard to digest bacteria4 or with an impaired ability to feed and digest bacteria9 also show enhanced food-leaving which has been interpreted as an indication of nutritional cues that regulate the behaviour9. The levels of metabolically important gases affects food-leaving with high carbon dioxide10 and oxygen levels11 causing worms to leave a food patch, the suggestion being that the animals integrate their response based on the benefits of feeding versus the danger of potentially toxic ambient air conditions6.

The assays that have been developed to investigate foraging in C. elegans have been coupled with genetic analyses to provide insight into the molecular substrates that underpin the worm’s decision of whether or not to leave a food patch. Some studies have taken advantage of the observation that different strains of C. elegans have distinct foraging behaviours. Specifically the N2 Bristol strain, the laboratory adapted wild isolate and standard reference strain, has a lower tendency to leave a bacterial lawn than the Hawaiian strain (Hw)5. There are striking differences in the level of food-leaving between these strains linking a plethora of genes to these behaviours12. Indeed, an enhanced food-leaving represents one of several sub-behaviours associated with the Hw strain13 in which the neuropeptide Y receptor NPR-12, 5, 14 and a catecholamine receptor TYRA-33 are significant determinants. Further studies have used a combination of forward and reverse genetics to unpick specific aspects of distinct cue dependent food-leaving as provoked by environment modulating cues. There is a selective role for serotonin signalling in learned avoidance of a pathogenic food source8 whilst neuroendocrine signalling involving TGFβ/DAF-7 and neuronal insulin signalling underpin food-leaving in response to resource depletion2.

In addition to being regulated by food density, quality and indicators of pathogenicity, foraging is also modified by factors relating to reproduction and fitness. Thus male C. elegans will leave a food patch in order to locate a mate15 highlighting the neural drive to reproduce can over-ride an otherwise potent nutritional cue to remain on the lawn. It has also been found that both arrested L1 or dauer larvae, which are C. elegans life stages generated under starvation conditions, produce signals that trigger adult food-leaving16 or dispersal. This is reinforced by evidence that population density can trigger dispersal for wild-type14 and it is also enhanced in a chitin synthase mutant, chs-2, which is nutritionally compromised9.

In this study, we provide evidence for an additional important modulator of adult C. elegans food-leaving behaviour, namely the specific impact of the presence of their larval progeny on their foraging response.

Results

Previous studies have identified the tendency of C. elegans to transiently leave a defined ‘worm naïve’ bacterial lawn is initially very low but shows a steady increase over time such that at the later time-points the number of worms off the food patch increases2. We noted a similar time-dependent increase in worm leaving events and the proportion of worms off the food patch for one-day old hermaphrodites. At 2 hours there were very few leaving events over the 30 minute observation period, equivalent to less than one per worm which increased roughly 10 fold after 24 hours (Fig. 1A). This increase in the frequency of leaving events was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of worms that were distributed off the bacterial lawn at each time point (Fig. 1B). During this period the adults sustain an active feeding rate whilst they are on the bacterial lawn as observed by their high frequency of pharyngeal pumping i.e. 245 ± 3 pumps per min at 2 hours, 239 ± 4 pumps per min at 6 hours and 244 ± 2 pumps per min at 24 hours, n = 6,6, and 9 respectively. This high rate of feeding may result in the bacterial lawn becoming depleted and provide a sensory cue for food-leaving. To test whether or not there was a significant change in the density of the bacterial lawn we measured bacterial growth curves for OP50 lawns that had been cultivated for 24 hours with 7 gravid worms; that is, the conditions under which there was a progressive increase in food-leaving (Fig. 1A). These were compared to lawns incubated for 24 hours without addition of 7 worms. The growth curves for both samples were identical (Fig. 1C) suggesting that the bacterial lawn is not significantly depleted by feeding. We also tested whether or not artificially reducing the density of the bacterial lawn would impact on food-leaving and found there was no difference in the food-leaving events despite greater than 10 fold differences in optical density of the bacteria used to make the food patch (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these data indicate that depletion in the food lawn does not provide an explanation for the enhanced food-leaving observed in adult C. elegans over the 24 hour period.

Figure 1
Figure 1

A food-leaving behaviour of adult wild-type N2 C. elegans that is not explained by depletion of the bacterial lawn. (A,B) Seven one day old adult wild-type (N2) C. elegans were placed on a defined bacterial lawn of E. coli OP50 and the number of leaving events scored for a period of 30 min beginning at the time points indicated. For each lawn the number of leaving events per worm was determined over the time-course and at each time point the ratio of worms off the lawn to worms on the lawn was counted. Data are mean ± s.e.mean for n = 6 lawns. One way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. (C) At the end of the food-leaving assay the bacterial lawns were cut out of the agar plates and grown in LB broth at 37 °C. The growth rate of the bacterial lawns that had been exposed to worms (food patch plus worms) was compared to bacterial lawns recovered from plates cultured in an identical manner except in the absence of worms (food patch minus worms). Data are mean ± s.e.mean; n = 4. (D) One day old adult C. elegans were exposed to bacterial lawns of different optical densities and food-leaving scored as for (A). Data are mean ± s.e.mean for n = 4 lawns.

During the time course of the food-leaving assay the adult C. elegans, which are gravid one day old animals, lay eggs which subsequently hatch. Typically C. elegans larvae take 6 to 8 hours to hatch after being laid so L1 larvae will begin to appear on the bacterial lawn between the 6 hr and 24 hour time-point. By 24 hours they will just be starting to transition to L2. Thus at the 24 hour time-point there is a mixed population containing both the original seven adults, eggs (around 200) and larvae of stages L1 and L2 (around 100). As we had no evidence to support depletion of the food source as a stimulus for enhanced food-leaving we suspected that the progressive increase in progeny of the bacterial lawn might provide a drive to enhance food-leaving.

To test our hypothesis we placed one day old hermaphrodite C. elegans on food patches that had been pre-loaded with increasing numbers of eggs (between 0 and 140) the previous day and which had developed into larvae. Remarkably, adult C. elegans placed on bacterial lawns that had been populated with 140 progeny (L1 larvae) showed an immediate high rate of food-leaving, similar to the food-leaving rate of worms placed on bacterial lawns without progeny after 24 hours (Figs 1A and 2A). Furthermore, this had the appearance of dose-dependency with a threshold of between 20 and 70 progeny (Fig. 2A). Additionally, the food-leaving of the adult worms placed on the lawns pre-loaded with the progeny increased slightly after 24 hours compared to adult worms placed on lawns that had not been pre-loaded with progeny, presumably because their own progeny populate the plate and further serve to increase the number of larvae on the lawn (Fig. 2A). However, the relative small increase between the experimental groups, control and pre-loaded with 140 progeny at the 24 hour time point suggests that there may be a plateauing effect with it reaching a near maximal level in the presence of 140 plus progeny. For plates preloaded with progeny the increase in food-leaving was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of worms off food (Fig. 2B). To further test whether or not the cue for adult food-leaving is offspring derived, instead of an enduring signal permeating the lawn left by the adults that were used to preload the lawns with eggs prior to their removal, we used another method to load the plates with progeny. For this, we isolated C. elegans eggs from gravid adults and pipetted them onto the bacterial lawn. We found that adult food-leaving on lawns preloaded with progeny in this manner was the same as that for lawns preloaded by allowing gravid adults to lay eggs before their removal (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2
Figure 2

C. elegans L1 larvae enhance adult food-leaving. Bacterial lawns were loaded with C. elegans eggs at increasing density, ranging from 5 to 140, as indicated by allowing gravid adults to lays eggs on the lawn for a period of time following which the adults were removed. The eggs were left overnight to hatch into larvae and the food-leaving assay instigated by placing seven adults on each lawn. (A) Food-leaving and (B) proportion of worms off food were scored as described for Fig. 1A,B. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. ‘n’ number for treatment group ‘0’, n = 4, all other treatments n = 3. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. (C) C. elegans larvae enhance adult food-leaving from lawns that have never been exposed to adults. In this experiments isolated eggs were pipetted onto the lawn and the effect of the resulting larvae on adult food-leaving compared to that on plates prepared by eggs laid from gravid adults as described in A. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. ‘n’ number for ‘0’ progeny treatment group and for ‘140’ progeny loaded by the method described in A = 3, ‘n’ for progeny preloaded by pipetting = 4. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; ****P < 0.0001. (D) L4 larvae did not enhance adult food-leaving. Bacterial lawns were conditioned with 120 L4s for 2 hours after which adult food-leaving was scored. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. ‘n’ = 3 for each experimental group. p > 0.05 unpaired Student’s t-test. This experiment was repeated to allow for longer pre-conditioning of the lawn by picking L3s onto the lawn and leaving them for 10 hours by which time the larvae had all developed into L4s. The leaving rate of adults (picked onto the lawn 2 hours before) was scored. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. ‘n’ = 5 for each experimental group. p > 0.05 unpaired Student’s t-test.

This suggests that a cue from the L1 larvae, rather than from the adults that supplied the eggs for preloading the plates, drives the enhanced food-leaving response in adults. The selective effect of early stage larvae on adult food-leaving is further reinforced by an experiment in which bacterial lawns were preloaded with 120 L4 larvae and then the impact on the food-leaving of adults was observed. There was no significant enhancement of food-leaving after L4 larvae had populated the lawn for 2 hours (Fig. 2D). In order to check whether an extended time of exposure of the lawn to later stage larvae might drive adult food-leaving the lawns were populated with 140 L3s which were allowed to inhabit the lawn for 10 hours before the food-leaving rate of adults, placed on the lawn 2 hours previously, was scored. By this time, all the L3s had developed into L4s and, as with the shorter time of exposure, an increase in adult food-leaving was not observed (Fig. 2D). This suggests that pre-conditioning the lawn with L1 larvae is required to drive the adult food-leaving rate. Furthermore, whilst adult worms exhibited enhanced food-leaving this behaviour was not observed in the larvae themselves suggesting that the response is specific for the adults (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3
Figure 3

The food-leaving response is not seen in larvae nor in sterile worms. (A) The proportion of worms off food were scored as described for Fig. 1B except that in these assays both adult worms and larvae were scored in parallel. n = 4 bacterial lawns. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. One way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. (B,C) C. elegans were pre-treated with 0.1 mg/ml FUdR to induce sterilisation. These worms lay eggs that do not hatch. They were subjected to the food-leaving assay as described in Fig. 1. Control worms were treated in an identical manner except for the omission of FUdR. Food-leaving and the proportion of worms off food was scored as described in Fig. 1. Data are mean ± s.e.mean; n = 5 lawns for both treatment groups. Two way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

To investigate the possibility that early stage larvae, not the eggs produced by adult C. elegans, enhanced adult food-leaving we sterilised young adult worms by pre-treating them with the DNA synthesis inhibitor 0.1 mg/ml 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FUdR)17, 18. The FUdR treated worms laid eggs that did not hatch and they failed to show enhanced food-leaving over time (Fig. 3B,C). This indicates that it is the L1 larvae that are largely responsible for the enhanced food-leaving effect. Altogether, these results show that C. elegans L1 larvae provide a significant drive to enhance the food-leaving behaviour of adults.

As our data indicated that adult C. elegans will increasingly leave a food source that is populated by predominantly L1 larvae in the absence of any obvious depletion in the quantity of food we next considered whether or not deterioration of the quality of the food might provide an explanation for the behaviour. We hypothesised that if excretory products from the larvae populating the food promote food-leaving then the same response should be observed in adult C. elegans regardless of the species of larvae used to pre-load the bacterial lawn. Therefore, we tested Caenorhabditis briggsae strains AF16 and HK104 which are wild isolates of a hermaphroditic relation of C. elegans that shares habitats with C. elegans19, 20 and Caenorhabditis remanei, JU724. This latter wild isolate, like C. elegans, is found in fermenting environments20. We also tested J2 juveniles of Globodera pallida. G. pallida is a plant parasitic nematode that infects and proliferates inside potato roots, and unlike the three Caenorhabditis species is not a bacteriovore21. As before, the presence of N2 larvae increased the food-leaving of N2 adults (Fig. 4A–D) as indicated by the immediate increase in leaving rate when the adults were placed on the lawns with the progeny. In contrast only a weak enhancement of food-leaving was observed for C. briggsae larvae (Fig. 4A,B) whilst for C. remanei (Fig. 4C) and G. pallida (Fig. 4D) there was no significant effect. Thus, the ability of larvae to drive the adult food-leaving response in C. elegans would appear to be conspecific and not due to a reduction in either the quantity, nor in the quality, of the food.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Progeny enhanced food-leaving response in adult C. elegans is conspecific. Different numbers of larvae, as indicated, from C. elegans, C. briggsae, C. remanei and G. pallida were pre-loaded onto bacterial lawns before adult C. elegans were added and assayed for food-leaving as described in Fig. 1A. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. n = 3 lawns for each experimental group. Significant difference is shown with respect to the no treatment group for each time-point. Two way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, **P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Whilst the adult food-leaving behaviour did not appear to be explained by deterioration of the food source, we were nonetheless interested to investigate whether or not it has any of the characteristics of an aversive response. Biogenic amines, and in particular serotonin, are key regulators of the interaction of C. elegans with its food and have been implicated in avoidance of pathogenic food8, 22 and dwelling states on food23. Therefore, we tested mutants for biogenic amines, tdc-1 and tbh-1 which are deficient in tyramine and octopamine24, 25 and tph-1 which is lacking serotonin26. Mutants for tdc-1 and tbh-1 showed the same food-leaving as wild-type adults (Fig. 5A) therefore tyramine and octopamine are not involved. There was a slight reduction in food-leaving in tph-1 therefore we re-tested this mutant in the format of the progeny enhanced food-leaving assay and showed that it behaved in the same way as N2 adults (Fig. 5B). This reinforces the suggestion that the progeny enhanced food-leaving in adults is not an aversive response to poor quality food as serotonin is an important regulator of aversive behaviour8, 22.

Figure 5
Figure 5

The progeny induced food-leaving response in adult C. elegans is not dependent on serotonin nor octopamine, but does require daf-22 pheromone signalling. (A) Food-leaving for seven wild-type N2, tbh-1 (n3247), tdc-1 (n3419) or tph-1(n4622) adults placed on bacterial lawns. (B) Food-leaving for seven wild-type N2 or tph-1(n4622) adults placed on bacterial lawns preloaded with 140 wild-type larvae. (C) Food-leaving was scored, as described in Fig. 1A, for wild-type and the pheromone deficient daf-22 (m130) mutant. n = 4 bacterial lawns. (D) Food-leaving for wild-type N2 worms in the presence of either wild-type larvae or daf-22 larvae. N2 adults were placed on bacterial lawns without pre-loaded larvae (n = 7) or with 130 N2 larvae (n = 5) or 130 daf-22 (n = 4) larvae. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. Two way ANOVA with Bonferonni multiple comparisons. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

By extrapolation, the data showing that food depletion and deterioration do not trigger adult food-leaving in the presence of larvae, invites an alternative explanation in which a pheromone signal from the larvae increases the frequency of food-leaving in the adults. In support of this we found that daf-22 mutants27, which are deficient in pheromone production, did not exhibit food-leaving (Fig. 5C). To test whether or not the deficit in the behaviour can be ascribed to a loss of signal from daf-22 larvae to the adults we tested the food-leaving rate of N2 adults on bacterial lawns that had been preloaded with either N2 or daf-22 progeny. Food-leaving was elicited to a significantly lesser extent by daf-22 larvae, supporting the idea that a daf-22 dependent signal from the larvae elicits food-leaving behaviour in adults.

To define further molecular determinants of progeny enhanced food-leaving we made use of the Hawaiian strain13. Its increased tendency to leave a bacterial lawn5, 14 has provided a route to Quantitative Trait Loci analysis (QTL) to identify genetic determinants of this polygenic behaviour3, 12. Interestingly, the base-line for the Hw food-leaving response was elevated compared to N2 across all the time-points: Previous analyses of the increased food-leaving of Hw has suggested that this may at least in part be explained by increased motility of the Hw strain compared to N23. Notably however the progeny enhancement was superimposed on this raised overall food-leaving behaviour at each of the time-points (Fig. 6A). Therefore, the genetic determinants of the increased food-leaving of Hw, major players in which are NPR-1 and TYRA-33, 5, does not occlude the progeny enhancement. This suggests that the progeny enhanced food-leaving has revealed a new and distinct neural circuit involved in complex decision making in C. elegans adults.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Progeny enhanced food-leaving is observed in the Hawaiian (Hw) strain of C. elegans but not in the neuropeptide deficient mutant egl-3 or in nematocin signalling mutants. (A) Food-leaving was scored for wild-type N2 adults and Hawaiian strain as described in Fig. 1A. In the absence and presence of 140 wild-type N2 larvae. n = 4 for N2 and n = 3 for Hw. (B) Food-leaving was compared between wild-type N2, egl-3 and transgenic egl-3 mutants expressing the cosmid C26B6 which harbours genomic sequence for egl-3. For this assay each strain tested was assayed in the absence or presence of 140 C. elegans larvae as indicated. n = 3 lawns for each experimental group. (C) Food-leaving was scored for wild-type N2 adults and nematocin mutants as described in Fig. 1A. N2 n = 3; ntc-1(tm2385)(LSC42) n = 5; ntr-1(tm2765)(LSC48) n = 5; Pntc-1::ntc-1(LSC455) n = 4; Pntr-1::ntr-1 (LSC402) n = 3. (D) The comparison between wild-type N2, nematocin mutants and rescue lines was repeated on bacterial lawns pre-loaded with 140 N2 progeny. N2 n = 4; ntc-1(tm2385)(LSC42) n = 6; ntr-1(tm2765)(LSC48) n = 5; Pntc-1::ntc-1(LSC455) n = 4; Pntr-1::ntr-1 (LSC402) n = 4. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.mean. Two way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Given that neuropeptides are well recognised modulators of behavioural plasticity28 we made use of a well-established approach for testing for neuropeptide involvement in the food-leaving behaviour using the mutant egl-3(ok979). This provides a global reduction in neuropeptide content as it is deficient in a proprotein convertase needed for processing of numerous neuropeptides in C. elegans29, 30. We found that egl-3 worms were deficient in the enhanced food-leaving response and this was rescued by expression of a wild-type copy of egl-3 following cosmid injection (Fig. 6B). This is consistent with a role for neuropeptide signalling in C. elegans as a major determinant of the food-leaving response although this could be an indirect consequence of an effect on locomotory behaviour: Whilst measurements of egl-3 speed and posture are not significantly different from wild-type31 this mutant is noted for its tendency to coil32 and we cannot rule out that this may impair its ability to leave the food lawn.

Nonetheless, given this indication for an involvement of neuropeptide signalling, we speculated that nematocin, the C. elegans homologue of the mammalian peptide hormone oxytocin33, may underpin the progeny enhanced food-leaving response. In mammals oxytocin is an important regulator of social behaviours, including parental bonding34. Nematocin has been shown to control mate searching and mating behaviours in male C. elegans, as well as gustatory learning in the form of salt chemotaxis35, 36. Moreover, unlike egl-3 mutants, no movement deficits have been reported for nematocin signalling mutants36. We tested C. elegans deficient in both the nematocin peptide (ntc-1(tm2385)) and its two receptors, ntr-1(tm2765) and ntr-2 (tm2243), in the food-leaving assay. We first investigated the reproductive capacity of these strains by counting the number of progeny produced in 24 hours by seven one day old adults. This revealed a significant reduction for ntc-1, ntr-1 and ntr-2 (Table 1). As they show this reproductive defect which might confound interpretation of a progeny enhanced food-leaving response we tested the effect of progeny induced food-leaving in the nematocin mutants by pre-loading the bacterial lawns with N2 larvae, as before, and then compared the food-leaving of adult wild-type and the nematocin signalling mutants. This revealed that nematocin mutant adults are deficient in progeny enhanced food-leaving (N2 0.04158 ± 0.002250; ntc-1 0.0190 ± 0.001905; ntr-1 0.02056 ± 0.006390; ntr-2 0.02056 ± 0.001556; food-leaving events per worm per minute; n = 4,4,3 and 3 respectively; p < 0.01 compared to N2 for ntc-1, ntr-1 and ntr-2; one way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons). To confirm this we repeated the assay in outcrossed and rescue strains for ntc-1 and ntr-1. Mutants for ntc-1 and ntr-1 both showed reduced food-leaving compared to N2 and this was rescued by expression of ntc-1 or ntr-1, respectively from their native promoters (Fig. 6C,D).

Table 1: The reproductive capacity of nematocin signalling mutants. The larvae produced by seven one day old adults in a 24 hour period was scored. LSC42 and LSC48 were outcrossed 3x and 4x, respectively. FX02243 was not outcrossed. Data are mean ± s.e.mean. One way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 with respect to N2.

Therefore nematocin signalling in adult worms mediates a daf-22 dependent signal emanating from their larvae and drives the adults to leave the food patch with increasing frequency.

Discussion

Measuring food-leaving behaviour in C. elegans is a binary assay that provides phenotypic quantification of a simple behavioural choice, whether to stay on a bacterial food source or to leave it3. To execute a food-leaving event the worm is driven by sensory modalities in the locality of its food; integration of these leads to a shift in their motor program such that they leave the food patch. Studies on the genetics of C. elegans have identified cellular control within defined microcircuits that integrate environmental cues and drive the outcome which is a food-leaving response2. Overall, this highlights that the simple measurement of the worms’ tendency to remain on, or leave, a food patch represents a powerful route to investigate molecular, cellular and microcircuit control of complex behaviour.

In this study we characterised the time-dependence of food-leaving by N2 adults over 24 hours and noted the previously observed enhanced dispersal from a food patch in the relatively benign environment of an E. coli OP50 lawn2, 5, 14. Our experiments used N2 worms and dense OP50 bacterial lawns to provide conditions that converge to ensure a relatively low rate of initial food-leaving. Indeed the initial rate of leaving from a lawn of 50 µl of OP50(OD600 0.8) was in the region of 0.02 leaving events/worm/minute which is comparable to the leaving rate previously reported for the same number of N2s on a lawn of 10 µl of HB101 (Ab600nm 2.0) in the region of 0.01 leaving events/worm/minute3. By pre-loading the bacterial lawns with progeny (L1 larvae), and testing sterile adults, we have shown that the increase in population of larvae drives food-leaving specifically in adults.

The adult food-leaving that is driven by the worm’s progeny is distinct from a previously described food-leaving behaviour driven by nutritional deprivation9: In our assays the adults and the larvae were well fed and the assays were conducted in the presence of abundant food. It is also distinct in terms of the magnitude of effect, which is greater in nutritionally deprived worms. This argues for discrete modulation of adult foraging decisions by the immediate proximity of their progeny on the food patch.

We have investigated a number of possible explanations for progeny enhanced adult food-leaving. In particular, we considered whether or not the negative impact of the increase in population density on either food quantity or quality has a role. Our measurements of the growth curves of bacterial lawns conditioned for 24 hours with or without worms did not reveal any indication of a significant depletion of the food during the assay. Whilst this on its own does not negate the possibility that there is an undetectable change in food quantity or quality, we argue that such a change is unlikely to provide an explanation for progeny enhanced food-leaving in adult C. elegans: If this were the case one might expect to see the same food-leaving response regardless of the species of nematode progeny that were used to pre-condition the bacterial lawn. The conspecific nature of the food-leaving behaviour in adult C. elegans in response to progeny of their own species, but not in response to other nematode species, argues that this is not an indirect consequence of depletion or deterioration of the food lawn. Furthermore, our observation that this behaviour is not modified by serotonin signalling, a known regulator of aversive behaviour1, 8, provides further argument that the response does not arise because the presence of the larvae modifies the bacteria making the lawn aversive to the adults.

Progeny enhanced food-leaving could be interpreted as a parental response in the adults to the increasing population density. Arguably, this would be beneficial to the larvae allowing them to take full advantage of the food source on which they hatched. Our data suggest a signal is transmitted from the larvae to the adults on the bacterial lawn to induce them to leave the food patch. An important class of molecules are the ascarosides, which act to control numerous behaviours37. One of these behaviours is entry to and exit from the dauer stage in the C. elegans lifecycle in response to varying food and population levels, as part of the ‘dauer pheromone’38. Other behaviours in C. elegans controlled by ascarosides include regulating mating behaviour39, 40, modifying olfactory preferences38,39,40 and dispersal16. The behaviours that ascarosides control have been shown to vary widely depending on the chemical compositions of the ascaroside mixture as well as the stage of the C. elegans lifecycle when the ascarosides are produced16, 41, 42 and varies for different natural isolates of C. elegans43. There is also evidence for an ascaroside independent signal that promotes survival of L1 larvae subjected to starvation44. Similar ascaroside and non-ascaroside cues may be expected and differentially expressed during the hatching and development of progeny. We found that the pheromone deficient mutant daf-22 does not show enhanced food-leaving consistent with the idea that an ascaroside signal from C. elegans larvae enhances food-leaving in adults as part of a parental behavioural response. This further distinguishes progeny enhanced food-leaving from that observed in nutritionally deprived worms as the latter is not daf-22 dependent9. The experimental paradigm we have established for progeny enhanced food-leaving will provide a tractable platform for resolving further chemical cues underpinning conspecific interactions.

Intriguingly, the progeny enhanced food-leaving we have described is independent of the neural circuit that has been previously described to regulate foraging decisions in the Hw strain3. Rather it engages a nematocin signal and its cognate receptors NTR-1 and possibly, in addition, NTR-235, 36. This oxytocin/vasopressin like peptide signalling pathway33, 45 is important for parental care and pair bonding in mammals46 and has an evolutionary conserved role in reproductive related behaviours47. We found that nematocin signalling is required in the adults for them to engage the progeny induced food-leaving behaviour. Given that the null nematocin hermaphrodites have normal locomotion speed36 and chemotaxis35 it is unlikely that this deficit is due to an indirect effect on a sub-behaviour required for the response. Rather it suggests that nematocin is required in circuits that integrate a chemical cue from the larvae in the context of the food source to drive dispersal in the adults. Oxytocin signalling is also recognised for its intimate role in social interactions in general and therefore it is possible that nematocin signalling between adults could be involved in population density effects previously reported for food-leaving behaviours9. Nematocin and its receptors are quite broadly expressed in C. elegans, in sensory neurones, interneurones and motorneurones35, 36. This places the signals in neural circuits that are involved in detecting and responding to environmental cues. It will be interesting to understand how the signalling is organised and to what extent it deploys neurohormonal versus local transmission compared to mammalian oxytocin signalling48, 49.

In conclusion, our data show that well fed early stage larvae generate potent inter-organismal signalling. This is in addition to the previously reported signalling that emanates from starved larvae44. This signal, which may reflect differential ascaroside activity exhibits a dose-dependent modulation of food-leaving activity. Previous determinants implicated in food-leaving were not attributed to this context2. Our observation, that the behaviour is dependent on intact nematocin signalling, points to a novel neural circuit mediating an offspring-dependent social interaction in C. elegans.

Materials and Methods

All Caenorhabditis strains were maintained on 5 cm Nematode Growth Media (NGM) plates, according to standard methods50. Strains used were C. elegans Bristol N2; Hawaiian strain CB4856; MT14984 tph-1 (n4622); MT13113 tdc-1 (n3419); MT9455 tbh-1 (n3247); XA3441 egl-3 (ok979); FX02385 ntc-1(tm2385); DR476 daf-22 (m130); FX02765 ntr-1(tm2765) and FX02243 ntr-2 (tm2243) C. briggsae HK104 and AF16, C. remanei JU724. The egl-3 rescue line was generated from XA3441 by microinjection of 10ng/µl of cosmid C26B6 together with the transformation marker 50ng/µl pmyo-2::gfp as previously described31. Gfp expressing worms were selected for analysis. Animals were synchronised prior to assay by being picked at the L4 larval stage and developed for 16 hours (or overnight) prior to examination. The outcrossed strains for ntc-1 and ntr-1 mutants were LSC42 and LSC48, respectively. Rescue constructs for the nematocin receptor (ntr-1) and nematocin precursor (ntc-1) were made using the pSM SL2 GFP vector (kindly provided by C. Bargmann, Rockefeller University, New York, USA). ntc-1 genomic DNA or ntr-1 cDNA was cloned between the SalI and KpnI sites of the pSM vector, while the corresponding promoters (3.6 kb or 4 kb of sequence upstream of the ntc-1 or ntr-1 start codon, respectively) were cloned between the FseI and AscI sites. Microinjection of these plasmids into LSC48 or LSC42 yielded the rescue strains LSC402: LSC48 lstEx326 [Pntr-1::ntr-1(tm2765):: SL2 gfp 100ng/ul; Pelt-2::gfp] and LSC455: LSC42 lstEx374 [Pntc-1(tm2385)::ntc-1:: SL2 gfp 50ng/ul; Pelt-2::gfp], respectively.

For experiments using Globodera pallida free living J2 stage nematodes were collected from hatchings of infected roots. This was done by incubating potato root cysts in individual wells in a 3:1 mix of double distilled H2O and potato root diffusate. J2 stage animals that emerged within a 48 hour window were collected from these hatchings, washed with distilled water and known numbers pipetted onto OP50 lawns. These J2s were left to dry before the adult C. elegans to be assayed were introduced onto the plate.

Cultures of E. coli OP50 were maintained on 9 cm LB plates. For seeding C. elegans NGM plates, individual bacterial colonies where grown in LB at 37 °C overnight in a rotary incubator before being diluted 1 in 100 and grown at 37 °C in LB until an OD600 of 0.8 was reached. NGM plates were prepared according to standard protocols50, stored at room temperature (20 °C) and used within 5 days of pouring. For each paired food-leaving assay plates for the control and experimental groups were taken from the same batch. NGM plates were prepared with a bacterial lawn as follows: Upon reaching an OD600 of 0.8, 50 µl of OP50 (which is equivalent to 4 × 107 colony forming units) was pipetted onto 5 cm NGM plates then left to grow overnight (18 hours) at 20 °C to form a bacterial lawn, after which these were used as food-leaving assay plates. The plates used for the serial dilution of OP50 experiments were set up in the same way with the exception that a range of dilutions of OP50, as indicated, was pipetted onto the agar surface.

To test OP50 growth curves from bacterial lawns with or without C. elegans, we removed the adult C. elegans from the worm cultivated lawns which were subject to the conditions under which there was a progressive increase in food-leaving (Fig. 1A). Under sterile conditions, we cut out the OP50 patches from these lawns. These were directly compared to OP50 lawns generated from the same OD600 0.8 OP50 but incubated for 24 hours without addition of seven worms.

These samples were grown in 3 ml LB at 37 °C under sterile conditions with aeration for three hours. The optical density of each culture was measured every 30 mins for the 3 hours to estimate the relative growth curves.

C. elegans were age synchronised by picking L4 onto culture plates the day before the experiments. On the day of the food-leaving assay, seven one day old C. elegans hermaphrodites of each strain under investigation were picked from these plates onto the middle of the OP50 lawn. Once the worms had been placed on the plate, they were allowed 10 minutes to recover from picking before commencing the food-leaving measurements. Food-leaving was scored by visual observation using a Nikon SMZ800 binocular zoom microscope at ×10 magnification. A leaving event was defined as the whole body of one C. elegans completely leaving the food patch. The number of food-leaving events was recorded over 30 minutes at time 0 (10 min after the transfer of the worms to the lawn) and at time points 2, 6 and 24 hours as indicated. In addition to this dynamic measurement the proportion of the seven adult animals off the food patch was recorded at each of these same time points. For some experiments, as indicated, the number of eggs and larvae on the plate after 24 hours was counted. In addition, in some assays pharyngeal pumping was measured by visual observation of movements of the terminal bulb grinder as previously described51.

To examine how progeny produced during the 24 hour time course influences food-leaving bacterial lawns were laced with eggs before adding the adult worms. Assay plates were prepared as above with the modification that both control plates and plates to be preloaded with eggs before the food-leaving assay were seeded with OP50 two days before the experiment. This protocol was adopted to normalise the bacterial growth of the control and the progeny laced lawn to an extra 24 hours pre-assay growth. Gravid adults were placed on bacterial lawns and left to lay a defined numbers of eggs on the food patch before being removed. The eggs were then left overnight to hatch into larvae. The number of eggs placed on each plate ranged from 5 up to 150. The highest density value was chosen as this is equivalent to the number of larvae that would be present on each lawn after it had been populated by seven adult worms for 24 hours. The next day, approximately, 18 hours after removing the adults, a food-leaving assay was performed as above, measuring the food-leaving behaviour of adult C. elegans subsequently added to the plates. The experiment was repeated by varying indicated numbers of C. briggsae and C. remanei larvae. For G. pallida juveniles, defined numbers of hatched J2s were added directly to the plates prior to addition of adult C. elegans. As an alternative approach to pre-loading lawns with progeny avoiding the need to expose the lawns to gravid adults which might leave a pheromone trace we pipetted isolated eggs directly onto the bacterial lawns. Isolated eggs were prepared from gravid adults by washing them off plates in 1 ml M9 into an Eppendorf containing 500 µl bleaching solution (20% bleach, 25% 1 M NaOH 55% water). The tube was left for 5 minutes and was then pelleted by centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 2 minutes. The supernatant was removed and replaced with 100 µl M9. 25 µl of this solution was pipetted onto the food lawn and eggs were left to hatch resulting in 130–140 L1 larvae the following day.

To test the effect of L4 larvae on adult food-leaving 120 L3s or L4s were picked directly onto a bacterial lawn and left to settle for nine hours or one hour, respectively. At this time-point seven adults were picked onto the lawn to initiate the food-leaving assay. Food-leaving was scored after one hour.

To test the effect of sterility, NGM plates were prepared as above and were seeded with OP50. The day before the assay, 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FUdR) (Sigma) diluted in distilled water was pipetted onto the NGM plates to a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. This method was performed in order to not affect the bacterial lawn, as adding FUdR to molten agar affects bacteria’s ability to grow on NGM plates18, 52. The following day, adults were added to the plates and the food-leaving assay was performed as indicated above.

Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.mean for ‘n’ experiments. For food-leaving assays each ‘n’ represents one bacterial lawn with seven adults. Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were analysed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6, San Diego). One way or two-way ANOVA was used as appropriate and post-hoc tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Melo, J. A. & Ruvkun, G. Inactivation of conserved C. elegans genes engages pathogen- and xenobiotic-associated defenses. Cell 149, 452–466 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Milward, K., Busch, K. E., Murphy, R. J., de Bono, M. & Olofsson, B. Neuronal and molecular substrates for optimal foraging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 20672–20677 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Bendesky, A., Tsunozaki, M., Rockman, M. V., Kruglyak, L. & Bargmann, C. I. Catecholamine receptor polymorphisms affect decision-making in C. elegans. Nature 472, 313–318 (2011).

  4. 4.

    Shtonda, B. & Avery, L. Dietary choice behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 209, 89–102 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Harvey, S. C. Non-dauer larval dispersal in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Zool Part B-Mol Develop Evol 312B, 224–230 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Busch, K. E. & Olofsson, B. Should I stay or should I go? Worm 1, 182–186 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Gaglia, M. M. et al. Genes that act downstream of sensory neurons to influence longevity, dauer formation, and pathogen responses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Plos Genetics 8 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Zhang, Y., Lu, H. & Bargmann, C. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 438, 179–184 (2005).

  9. 9.

    Olofsson, B. The olfactory neuron AWC promotes avoidance of normally palatable food following chronic dietary restriction. J Exp Biol 217, 1790–1798 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Bretscher, A. J., Busch, K. E. & de Bono, M. A carbon dioxide avoidance behavior is integrated with responses to ambient oxygen and food in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 8044–8049 (2008).

  11. 11.

    Busch, K. E. et al. Tonic signaling from O2 sensors sets neural circuit activity and behavioral state. Nat Neurosci 15, 581–591 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Zhu, Z., Lu, Q., Wang, J. & Huang, S. Collective effects of common SNPs in foraging decisions in Caenorhabditis elegans and an integrative method of identification of candidate genes. Sci Rep 5, 16904 (2015).

  13. 13.

    de Bono, M. & Bargmann, C. I. Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 94, 679–689 (1998).

  14. 14.

    Gloria-Soria, A. & Azevedo, R. B. R. npr-1 Regulates foraging and dispersal strategies in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 18, 1694–1699 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Lipton, J., Kleemann, G., Ghosh, R., Lints, R. & Emmons, S. W. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: A genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J Neurosci 24, 7427–7434 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Kaplan, F. et al. Interspecific nematode signals regulate dispersal behavior. PLoS ONE 7, e38735 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Aitlhadj, L. & Sturzenbaum, S. R. The use of FUdR can cause prolonged longevity in mutant nematodes. Mech. Ageing Dev. 131, 364–365 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Mitchell, D. H., Stiles, J. W., Santelli, J. & Rao, S. D. Synchronous growth and aging of Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of fluorodeoxyuridine. J Gerontol 34, 28–36 (1979).

  19. 19.

    Felix, M. A. & Duveau, F. Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. BMC Biol 10, 18 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Kiontke, K. & Sudhaus, W. Ecology of Caenorhabditis species. WormBook, 1–14 (2006).

  21. 21.

    Perry, R.N. & Moens, M. Plant Nematology. (Cabi, 2013).

  22. 22.

    Ballestriero, F. et al. Caenorhabditis elegans employs innate and learned aversion in response to bacterial toxic metabolites tambjamine and violacein. Sci Rep 6, 29284 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Flavell, S. W. et al. Serotonin and the neuropeptide PDF initiate and extend opposing behavioral states in C. elegans. Cell 154, 1023–1035 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Alkema, M., Hunter-Ensor, M., Ringstad, N. & Horvitz, H. Tyramine functions independently of octopamine in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Neuron 46, 247–260 (2005).

  25. 25.

    Wragg, R. T. et al. Tyramine and octopamine independently inhibit serotonin-stimulated aversive behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans through two novel amine receptors. J Neurosci 27, 13402–13412 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Sze, J. Y., Victor, M., Loer, C., Shi, Y. & Ruvkun, G. Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature 403, 560–564 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Butcher, R. A. et al. Biosynthesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106, 1875–1879 (2009).

  28. 28.

    Holden-Dye, L. & Walker, R. J. The role of neuropeptides in Caenorhabditis elegans including their importance in the regulation of feeding and metabolism. Protein Pept Lett 20, 636–646 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Kass, J., Jacob, T., Kim, P. & Kaplan, J. The EGL-3 proprotein convertase regulates mechanosensory responses of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 21, 9265–9272 (2001).

  30. 30.

    Husson, S. J., Clynen, E., Baggerman, G., Janssen, T. & Schoofs, L. Defective processing of neuropeptide precursors in Caenorhabditis elegans lacking proprotein convertase 2 (KPC-2/EGL-3): mutant analysis by mass spectrometry. J Neurochem 98, 1999–2012 (2006).

  31. 31.

    Mitchell, P. et al. A differential role for neuropeptides in acute and chronic adaptive responses to alcohol: Behavioural and genetic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 5, e10422 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Trent, C., Tsung, N. & Horvitz, H. R. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 104, 619–647 (1983).

  33. 33.

    Elphick, M. R. & Rowe, M. L. NGFFFamide and echinotocin: structurally unrelated myoactive neuropeptides derived from neurophysin-containing precursors in sea urchins. J Exp Biol 212, 1067–1077 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Marlin, B.J., Mitre, M., D/‘amour, J.A., Chao, M.V. & Froemke, R.C. Oxytocin enables maternal behaviour by balancing cortical inhibition. Nature 520, 499–504 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Beets, I. et al. Vasopressin/Oxytocin-related signaling regulates gustatory associative learning in C. elegans. Science 338, 543–545 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Garrison, J. L. et al. Oxytocin/vasopressin-related peptides have an ancient role in reproductive behavior. Science 338, 1029–1029 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Artyukhin, A. B. et al. Succinylated octopamine ascarosides and a new pathway of biogenic amine metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem 288, 18778–18783 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Jeong, P. Y. et al. Chemical structure and biological activity of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer-inducing pheromone. Nature 433, 541–545 (2005).

  39. 39.

    Ludewig, A. H. & Schroeder, F. C. Ascaroside signaling in C. elegans. WormBook: the online review of C. elegans biology, 1–22 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Yamada, K. et al. Olfactory plasticity is regulated by pheromonal signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 329, 1647–1650 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Srinivasan, J. et al. A blend of small molecules regulates both mating and development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 454, 1115–U1146 (2008).

  42. 42.

    Srinivasan, J. et al. A modular library of small molecule signals regulates social behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol 10 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Greene, J. S. et al. Balancing selection shapes density-dependent foraging behaviour. Nature 539, 254–258 (2016).

  44. 44.

    Artyukhin, A. B., Schroeder, F. C. & Avery, L. Density dependence in Caenorhabditis larval starvation. Sci Rep 3, 2777 (2013).

  45. 45.

    Beets, I., Temmerman, L., Janssen, T. & Schoofs, L. Ancient neuromodulation by vasopressin/oxytocin-related peptides. Worm 2, e24246 (2013).

  46. 46.

    Young, L. J. & Wang, Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat Neurosci 7, 1048–1054 (2004).

  47. 47.

    Lockard, M. A., Ebert, M. S. & Bargmann, C. I. Oxytocin mediated behavior in invertebrates: An evolutionary perspective. Develop Neurobiol 77, 128–142 (2016).

  48. 48.

    Grinevich, V., Knobloch-Bollmann, H. S., Eliava, M., Busnelli, M. & Chini, B. Assembling the puzzle: Pathways of oxytocin signaling in the brain. Biol Psych 79, 155–164.

  49. 49.

    Leng, G. & Ludwig, M. Neurotransmitters and peptides: whispered secrets and public announcements. J Physiol 586, 5625–5632 (2008).

  50. 50.

    Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).

  51. 51.

    Dallière, N. et al. Multiple excitatory and inhibitory neural signals converge to fine-tune Caenorhabditis elegans feeding to food availability. FASEB J 30, 836–848 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Davies, S. K., Leroi, A. M. & Bundy, J. G. Fluorodeoxyuridine affects the identification of metabolic responses to daf-2 status in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech. Ageing Dev. 133, 46–49 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). The nematocin mutants, ntc-1, ntr-1 and ntr-2 were provided by the National BioResource Project (NBRP) Japan. Euan Scott was funded by a Doctoral Training Programme Grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK and Public Health England. Raissa de Freitas was funded by the Brazilian Government ‘Science without Borders’. We are grateful to Professor Peter Urwin’s laboratory (University of Leeds, UK) for provision of Globodera pallida. Work done in the Liliane Schoofs’ laboratory was funded by the European Research Council Grant ERC- 2013-ADG-340318. We are grateful to Isabel Beets (Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Department of Biology, KU Leuven) for sending the nematocin strains LSC42, LSC48, LSC402 and LSC455 and for helpful discussion. We gratefully acknowledge Birgitta Olofsson (University of Cambridge) for critical reading of the manuscript before submission.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Biological Sciences, Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    • Euan Scott
    • , Adam Hudson
    • , Emily Feist
    • , Fernando Calahorro
    • , James Dillon
    • , Raissa de Freitas
    • , Vincent O’Connor
    •  & Lindy Holden-Dye
  2. National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK

    • Matthew Wand
  3. Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    • Liliane Schoofs

Authors

  1. Search for Euan Scott in:

  2. Search for Adam Hudson in:

  3. Search for Emily Feist in:

  4. Search for Fernando Calahorro in:

  5. Search for James Dillon in:

  6. Search for Raissa de Freitas in:

  7. Search for Matthew Wand in:

  8. Search for Liliane Schoofs in:

  9. Search for Vincent O’Connor in:

  10. Search for Lindy Holden-Dye in:

Contributions

L.H.D., V.O.C. and E.S. wrote the main manuscript text. E.S. and L.H.D. prepared the figures. E.S., A.H., E.F., R.F. conducted experiments. E.S., A.H., E.F., F.C., J.D., M.W., L.S., V.O.C., L.H.D. designed experiments and analysed data. L.H.D., V.O.C., E.S., F.C., J.D., M.W., L.S. reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vincent O’Connor or Lindy Holden-Dye.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.