b-AP15 and its derivatives block proteasome deubiquitinase (DUB) activity and have been developed and tested in the clinic as potential cancer therapeutic agents. b-AP15 induces apoptosis in cancer cells, but the underlying mechanisms are largely undefined. The current study focuses on studying the modulatory effects of b-AP15 on death receptor 5 (DR5) levels and DR5 activation-induced apoptosis as well as on understanding the underlying mechanisms. Treatment with b-AP15 potently increased DR5 levels including cell surface DR5 in different cancer cell lines with limited or no effects on the levels of other related proteins including DR4, c-FLIP, FADD, and caspase-8. b-AP15 substantially slowed the degradation of DR5, suggesting that it stabilizes DR5. Moreover, b-AP15 effectively augmented apoptosis when combined with TRAIL or the DR5 agonistic antibody AMG655; these effects are DR5-dependent because DR5 deficiency abolished the ability of b-AP15 to enhance TRAIL- or AMG655-induced apoptosis. Therefore, it is clear that b-AP15, and possibly its derivatives, can stabilize DR5 and increase functional cell surface DR5 levels, resulting in enhancement of DR5 activation-induced apoptosis. Our findings suggest that b-AP15 and its derivatives may have potential in sensitizing cancer cells to DR5 activation-based cancer therapy.
Targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), a conserved pathway in the regulation of some critical biological processes such as protein turnover, has emerged as a promising strategy for the development of novel anti-cancer therapies since cancer cells are assumed to be dependent on a functional UPS1. Ubiquitinated proteins are degraded by the 26S proteasome, which comprises a proteolytic 20S core particle capped by 19S regulatory particles. Beyond the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib (BTZ; also called PS-341) and carfilzomib (CFZ), which are FDA-approved anticancer drugs that target the 20S core, another group of small molecules including b-AP15 and its derivatives that block the deubiquitinase (DUB) activity of the 19S regulatory particle without inhibiting the proteolytic activity of the 20S core particle have been developed and tested in the clinic as potential cancer therapeutic agents1,2,3. b-AP15 inhibits two 19S regulatory particle-associated DUBs, USP14 and UCHL5, resulting in the rapid accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates and functional proteasome shutdown, as is caused by proteasome inhibitors1. Several studies have shown that b-AP15 induces apoptosis of cancer cells, which serves as its major anticancer mechanism2, 4,5,6,7. Induction of oxidative stress and ER stress has been suggested to account for b-AP15-induced apoptosis4. Otherwise, the mechanisms by which b-AP15 induces apoptosis of cancer cells are largely unclear.
Death receptor 5 (DR5; also known as TRAIL-R2) is located at the cell surface and becomes activated upon binding to its ligand tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) or being aggregated induced by an agonistic antibody. Activated DR5 initiates apoptosis through Fas-associated death domain (FADD)-dependent recruitment and activation of caspase-8 and eventual caspase 8-mediated activation of caspase cascades. This process is inhibited by cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) through competing with caspase-8 to bind to FADD at the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), blocking caspase-8 activation and final apoptosis8, 9. Given that TRAIL is endogenously produced by several types of immune cells such as cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells10, the induction of apoptosis by ligation of endogenous TRAIL with DR5 is a critical mechanism underlying the immune surveillance of cancer cells10, 11. Moreover, soluble recombinant human TRAIL and DR5 agonistic antibodies that activate DR5-dependent apoptosis are also potential anticancer therapeutics8, 12,13,14.
DR5, its sibling death receptor 4 (DR4), and other DISC proteins including FADD, caspase-8, and c-FLIP are known to be regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The E-3 ligase c-Cbl binds to both DR5 and DR4 and induces their monoubiquitination, resulting in internalization and degradation15. Accordingly, knockdown of c-Cbl increases the levels of DR5 and DR4, leading to sensitization of TRAIL-induced apoptosis16. A recent study has shown that the membrane-associated RING-CH-8 (MARCH-8) ligase interacts with and ubiquitinates DR4, facilitating its internalization and degradation17. Makorin ring finger protein 1 (MKRN1) E3 ligase has been shown to mediate ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of FADD. MKRN1 knockdown results in FADD protein stabilization and rapid formation of the DISC and sensitization to extrinsic apoptosis18. The polyubiquitination of caspase-8 is positively regulated by a cullin3 (CUL3)-based E3 ligase through the RING box protein RBX1, and can be reversed by the deubiquitinase A2019. c-FLIP has long been recognized as an unstable protein undergoing ubiquitination and proteasome degradation20,21,22.
A previous study showed that b-AP15 elevated cell surface DR5 accompanied with reduction of c-FLIP in some cancer cell lines and enhanced killing of cancer cells by natural killer cells and T cells through TRAIL-induced apoptosis23. However the underlying mechanism by which b-AP15 elevates DR5 levels has not been elucidated. The different UAB inhibitor PR-619 was shown to increase caspase-8 ubiquitination and caspase-8 enzymatic activity in normal human fibroblasts and eventually sensitize these cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis24. Our recent study has shown that the proteasome inhibitor, CFZ, elevates DR5 levels through protein stabilization, induces DR5-dependent apoptosis and enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis25. The current study thus focuses on demonstrating the modulatory effects of b-AP15 on DR5 and other DISC components, and the impact on DR5 activation-induced apoptosis and underlying mechanisms.
b-AP15 enhances the levels of DR5, but not other DISC components, in human cancer cells
The DISC components, DR5, DR4, c-FLIP, caspase-8, and FADD, are known to be regulated by protein ubiquitination15, 17,18,19,20, 22. We thus determined whether b-AP15 modulates the levels of these proteins. As presented in Fig. 1, b-AP15 at concentration ranges from 0.1 to 1 μM increased DR5 levels in every tested cancer cell line including A549, HCT116, Calu1, and H460 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). However, under the same conditions, b-AP15 did not change the levels of FADD, FLIP, or caspase-8. At a certain range of concentrations, b-AP15 minimally increased DR4 levels in some cell lines (A549 and HCT116) (Fig. 1B). Moreover, b-AP15 effectively increased the levels of cell surface DR5 in the 3 tested cell lines (Fig. 1C). These results demonstrate that b-AP15 primarily elevates DR5 levels including the levels of functional cell surface DR5.
b-AP15 stabilizes DR5 protein
To determine the mechanism by which b-AP15 increases DR5 levels, we examined the effect of b-AP15 on modulation of DR5 degradation or stability. By conducting a cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay, we found that the rate of DR5 degradation in b-AP15-treated cells was much slower than in DMSO control cells in both HCT116 and A549 cells (Fig. 2A and B), indicating that b-AP15 suppresses DR5 degradation or stabilizes DR5 protein. Given that b-AP15 is a proteasome DUB inhibitor, we further examined the effects of the proteasome inhibitors, MG132 and BTZ, on DR5 degradation. In a similar fashion as b-AP15 did, both MG132 and BTZ, apparently slowed down the degradation of DR5 in both HCT116 and A539 cells, indicating stabilization of DR5 (Fig. 2C and D).
b-AP15 enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis
Since b-AP15 increases the levels of DR5 including cell surface DR5, we then determined whether b-AP15 sensitizes cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We first examined the impact of b-AP15 on the survival of cancer cells in a 24 h assay and found that the presence of b-AP15 effectively enhanced the killing effects of TRAIL in every tested cell line (Fig. 3A). In a long-term (60 h) survival assay, the combination of b-AP15 and TRAIL was significantly more active than either agent alone in decreasing the survival of the tested cell lines (Fig. 3B). In agreement, the combination of b-AP15 and TRAIL was also significantly more potent than each single agent in increasing DNA fragmentation (Fig. 3C) and inducing cleavage of caspase-8, caspase-3 and PARP (Fig. 3D). These results together clearly show that b-AP15 significantly sensitizes cancer cells to TRAIL-mediated killing, likely though effectively enhancing TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
b-AP15 augments apoptosis induced by the DR5 agonistic antibody AMG655
With the same rationale as for TRAIL, we speculated that b-AP15 might sensitize cancer cells to apoptosis induced by AMG655, a DR5 agonistic antibody that triggers apoptosis through inducing cell surface DR5 aggregation26. Similar to our observations with TRAIL, b-AP15 augmented the effects of AMG655 in decreasing cell survival (Fig. 4A and B), increasing DNA fragmentation (Fig. 4C), and enhancing cleavage of caspase-8, caspase-3 and PARP (Fig. 4D) in both A549 and HCT116 cells. Hence b-AP15 also augments AMG655-induced apoptosis.
b-AP15 enhancement of apoptosis by TRAIL or AMG655 requires DR5 elevation
To demonstrate the critical role of DR5 elevation in mediating the enhancement of TRAIL- or AMG655-induced apoptosis by b-AP15, we compared the enhancement of TRAIL- and AMG655-induced apoptosis by b-AP15 in HCT116 and HCT116/DR5-KO cells. The combination of b-AP15 and TRAIL (Fig. 5A and B) or AMG655 (Fig. 5C and D) enhanced DNA fragmentation (Fig. 5B and D) and cleavage of caspase-8, caspase-3, and PARP (Fig. 5A and C) in HCT116 cells as demonstrated above, but failed to do so in HCT116/DR5-KO cells. Therefore it is clear that loss of DR5 fully protects cancer cells from undergoing apoptosis enhanced by b-AP15 combined with TRAIL or AMG655, indicating an essential role of DR5 elevation in the enhancement of TRAIL- or AMG655-induced apoptosis by b-AP15.
b-AP15 functions similarly to proteasome inhibitors in elevating DR5 levels and enhancing TRAIL-induced apoptosis
We compared the effects of b-AP15 with those of the proteasome inhibitors, CFZ and BTZ, on DR5 levels and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Treatment with b-AP15, CFZ and BTZ all increased DR5 levels including levels of cell surface DR5 with limited or no elevation of DR4 and FADD levels (Fig. 6A and B). However, CFZ and BTZ, but not b-AP15, elevated FLIPS levels as we previously reported25, 27. Under the tested conditions, treatment with b-AP15 increased the amounts of conjugated ubiquitin or protein polyubiquitination, as did CFZ and BTZ (Fig. 6C). Moreover, b-AP15, CFZ and BTZ also augmented TRAIL-induced apoptosis, as evidenced by the detection of greater numbers of annexin V-positive cells and higher levels of cleaved caspase-8, caspase-3, and PARP in cells exposed to TRAIL combined with any of the inhibitors than in cells exposed to TRAIL alone or a given inhibitor alone (Fig. 6D and E).
b-AP15 function differently from lysosome inhibitors in modulating total and cell surface DR5 levels and TRAIL-induced apoptosis
Some lysosomal inhibitors such as chloroquine (CQ) were reported to elevate DR5 levels28. We noticed that the two lysosomal inhibitors, CQ and bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1), strongly elevated the levels of total cellular DR5 with induction of an additional band lower than 40 kD, which was not induced by b-AP15 (Fig. 7A). However, they did not increase cell surface amounts of DR5 while b-AP15 potently increased cell surface levels of DR5 (Fig. 7B). Moreover, b-AP15, but not CQ and Baf A, enhanced the ability of TRAIL to induce cleavage of caspases (Fig. 7A) and to increase DNA fragmentation (Fig. 7C) even though both CQ and Baf A1 were much more potent than c-AP15 in elevating total cellular levels of DR5 (Fig. 7A). These findings clearly indicate that b-AP15 and lysosomal inhibitors exert different effects on modulating total and surface levels of DR5 and on TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We further examine the effects of Baf A1 on DR5 degradation in the CHX chase assay and observed that Baf A1 suppressed DR5 degradation in both HCT116 and A549 cells (Fig. 7D). Again we noted that Baf A1 induced appearance of an additional band of DR5 smaller than 40 kD in these two cell lines (Fig. 7D). Finally we compared b-AP15 with Baf A1 on protein polyubiquitination and found that b-AP15, but not Baf A1, increased the levels of conjugated ubiquitin or protein polyubiquitination (Fig. 7E).
Ubiquitinated proteins are degraded by the 26S proteasome, which comprises a proteolytic 20S core particle capped by 19S regulatory particles. Inhibition of the proteasome with either the conventional proteasome inhibitors such as BTZ and CFZ that target the 20S core particle or DUB inhibitors such as b-AP15 that abrogate DUB activity of the 19S regulatory particle eventually results in the accumulation of conjugated ubiquitin or ubiqutinylated proteins1, 2. Indeed, treatment with b-AP15 elevated the levels of conjugated ubiquitin or polyubiquitinated proteins in our tested cell lines, as did BTZ and CFZ (Fig. 6C), thus validating its targeting of the ubiquitin-proteasome process leading to accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins in our cell systems.
DR5, DR4, and other DISC components including FADD, caspase-8, and c-FLIP are known to be regulated by proteasome/ubiquitination mechanisms15,16,17,18,19,20. However, the current study has demonstrated that b-AP15 primarily elevates the levels of DR5 but not DR4, FADD, caspase-8, or c-FLIP. Moreover, b-AP15 slowed the degradation of DR5 as demonstrated in both HCT116 and A549 cells. Hence it is clear that b-AP15 increases DR5 levels through stabilization of DR5 protein. This effect is similar to our observations with CFZ, which also stabilizes DR5 protein in the same cell systems25 and as demonstrated in the current study (Fig. 2C and D). In contrast to proteasome inhibitors such as CFZ and BTZ that potently elevate the levels of FLIPS while increasing DR5 levels as we reported previously25, 27 and confirmed in this study (Fig. 6A), b-AP15 did not increase FLIPS levels. Similar to BTZ and CFZ25, 27, b-AP15 effectively increased cell surface DR5 levels and enhanced apoptosis induced by both TRAIL and AMG655, a DR5 agonistic antibody, in different cancer cell lines in a DR5-dependent manner, as evidenced by DR5 deficiency fully protecting cancer cells from undergoing apoptosis when treated with b-AP15 in combination with either TRAIL or AMG655 (Fig. 5). Therefore, it is clear that b-AP15 shares some similar functions (e.g., DR5 elevation and enhancement of DR5 activation-induced apoptosis) with proteasome inhibitors, but lacks some unneeded functions (e.g., FLIPS elevation) that proteasome inhibitors possess. c-FLIP is a key inhibitor of DR5 activation-induced apoptosis29. Sustained elevation of FLIPS may in turn attenuate TRAIL- or DR5 activation-induced apoptosis. Our previous finding showed that c-FLIP knockdown further enhanced BTZ-induced apoptosis27. From this perspective, b-AP15 has an advantage over proteasome inhibitors regarding modulation of c-FLIP.
In addition to the elevation of cell surface DR5, a previous study reported that b-AP15 reduced c-FLIP levels in some cancer cell lines23. However we did not find that b-AP15 altered the levels of either FLIPL or FLIPS in cancer lines we tested (Figs 1B and 6A). The discrepancy between these two studies may be due to the different cancer cell lines used. Based on our extensive research experience on c-FLIP, it is also very likely that the different results were generated from the use of different antibodies in the previous study and our current report. The antibody against c-FLIP used in our study has been validated in many of our previous studies21, 27, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37.
CQ was recently reported to elevate DR5 levels and enhance TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human renal cancer Caki cells28. However we failed to demonstrate the ability of both CQ and Baf A1 in increasing cell surface of DR5 and enhancing TRAIL-induced apoptosis in our lung cancer A549 cells although they elevated total cellular levels of DR5 and stabilized DR5 (Fig. 7). In agreement with our findings, another recent study also reported that CQ induced cytoplasmic localization of DR5 and did not modulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human colon cancer HCT116 cells38. Moreover lysosome inhibition induced an additional isoform of DR5 protein smaller than 40 kD (Fig. 7), which was not induced by either b-AP15 or proteasome inhibitors tested in this study. Moreover, b-AP15 also shows difference from Baf A1 in affecting protein polyubiquitination because b-AP51, but not Bal A1, elevated ubiquitinated protiens (Fig. 7). Therefore it is apparent that b-AP15 functions differently from lysosome inhibitors in modulating DR5 levels and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Further study on the mechanism underlying induction of this additional isoform of DR5 by lysosome inhibition is needed and will be our planning direction.
DR5 de novo synthesis and post translational modification such as ubiquitination and degradation, like other proteins, occurs in cytoplasm and functions at cell surface as a membrane protein. As other membrane proteins do, DR5 also undergoes internalization and endocytosis39. It is recognized that, after endocytosis, some membrane proteins return or recycle to the cell surface, while some are delivered to late endosome and eventually progressed to lysosome, where they are degraded and cannot go back to cell membrane40. Given the fact that lysosome inhibition with both CQ and Baf A1 failed to increase cell surface DR5 levels although stabilizing and increasing total cellular DR5 amounts, we favor that b-AP15, like other proteasome inhibitors do, elevates DR5 levels including cell surface DR5 through stabilizing de novo DR5 by suppressing its proteasomal degradation. This is in agreement with its function feature as a proteasome DUB inhibitor. It has been shown that lysosomal inhibition (e.g., with Baf A1) fails to elevate the levels of ubiquitinated proteins unless proteasome is inhibited41. The fact that b-AP15, but not Baf A1, is able to elevate ubuiquitinated protein levels (Fig. 7) further supports the function of b-AP15 on affecting proteasome. A recent study has also shown that the cell surface protein, PD-L1, undergoes GSK3-dependent and β-TrCP-mediated proteasomal degradation42.
Targeting the TRAIL/DR5 apoptotic pathway with either recombinant TRAIL or an agonistic DR5 antibody has emerged as an attractive cancer therapeutic strategy12, 14, 43. Our current findings of the enhancement of DR5 activation-induced apoptosis by b-AP15 warrant further investigation of b-AP15 in combination with TRAIL or DR5 agonistic antibody as an effective cancer therapeutic regimen in vivo and in the clinic, and underscore the clinical translational significance of this approach. The main effector immune cell types that exert cytotoxicity against malignant cells are cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, which can generate and secrete TRAIL and kill cancer cells through TRAIL/DR5 activation-mediated apoptosis in addition to through perforin and granzyme-containing lytic granules44. Hence, b-AP15 may have the potential to enhance immunotherapy against cancer cells by potently sensitizing cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. This notion is also supported by a previous study showing that b-AP15 sensitized cancer cells to killing by T and NK cells in vitro, which occurs in part through TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, and b-AP15 pre-treatment followed by infusion of either NK or T cells significantly delayed tumor progression in tumor-bearing mice23.
Materials and Methods
b-AP15 was purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI). CFZ was purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX). BTZ was originally provided by Millennium Pharmaceuticals (Cambridge, MA). CQ was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Baf A was purchased from LC laboratories (Woburn, MA). Human recombinant TRAIL was purchased from PeproTech, Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ). AMG655 was supplied by Amgen, Inc (Thousand Oaks, CA). Other antibodies were the same as described previously45.
A549, H460 and Calu-1 cells were described previously. HCT116 and its isogenic and DR5-KO cell lines were provided by Dr. Lin Zhang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) and used in our previous studies25, 46. A549 cells were authenticated by Genetica DNA Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH) through analyzing short tandem repeat DNA profile. Other cell lines were not authenticated. These cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere consisting of 5% CO2.
Cell survival assay
Cells seeded in 96-well cell culture plates were treated on the second day with the tested agents. Cell numbers were determined using sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as described previously47. The cells were seeded in 12-well plates and the next day exposed to different treatments for 60 h. The surviving cell colonies were stained with 0.2% crystal violet to determine the effect of long-term treatments on cell survival. Moreover, the stained cells were solubilized with 1% SDS for measurement of absorbance with a microplate reader at 570 nm.
Detection of apoptosis
Apoptosis was evaluated with a Cell Death Detection ELISAPlus kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) or with an annexin V/7-AAD apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Caspase and PARP cleavage were detected by Western blot analysis as additional indications of apoptosis.
Western blot analysis
Whole-cell protein lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting as described previously45.
Detection of cell surface DR5
Cell surface DR5 expression was detected with flow cytometry as described previously48. The mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) that represents antigenic density on a per cell basis was used to assess cell surface DR5 levels. Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse anti-human DR5 (DJR2-4) monoclonal antibody and PE mouse IgG1 isotype control (MOPC-21/P3) were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA).
D’Arcy, P. & Linder, S. Proteasome deubiquitinases as novel targets for cancer therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44, 1729–1738 (2012).
D’Arcy, P. et al. Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat Med 17, 1636–1640 (2011).
Wang, X. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of derivatives of the proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15. Chemical biology & drug design 86, 1036–1048 (2015).
Brnjic, S. et al. Induction of tumor cell apoptosis by a proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor is associated with oxidative stress. Antioxidants & redox signaling 21, 2271–2285 (2014).
Feng, X., Holmlund, T., Zheng, C. & Fadeel, B. Proapoptotic effects of the novel proteasome inhibitor b-AP15 on multiple myeloma cells and natural killer cells. Experimental hematology 42, 172–182 (2014).
Tian, Z. et al. A novel small molecule inhibitor of deubiquitylating enzyme USP14 and UCHL5 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Blood 123, 706–716 (2014).
Chitta, K. et al. Targeted inhibition of the deubiquitinating enzymes, USP14 and UCHL5, induces proteotoxic stress and apoptosis in Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia tumour cells. Br J Haematol 169, 377–390 (2015).
Yang, A., Wilson, N. S. & Ashkenazi, A. Proapoptotic DR4 and DR5 signaling in cancer cells: toward clinical translation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22, 837–844 (2010).
Holland, P. M. Death receptor agonist therapies for cancer, which is the right TRAIL? Cytokine & growth factor reviews 25, 185–193 (2014).
Falschlehner, C., Schaefer, U. & Walczak, H. Following TRAIL’s path in the immune system. Immunology 127, 145–154 (2009).
Smyth, M. J. et al. Nature’s TRAIL–on a path to cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 18, 1–6 (2003).
Bellail, A. C., Qi, L., Mulligan, P., Chhabra, V. & Hao, C. TRAIL agonists on clinical trials for cancer therapy: the promises and the challenges. Rev Recent Clin Trials 4, 34–41 (2009).
Falschlehner, C., Ganten, T. M., Koschny, R., Schaefer, U. & Walczak, H. TRAIL and other TRAIL receptor agonists as novel cancer therapeutics. Adv Exp Med Biol 647, 195–206 (2009).
Lim, B. et al. Targeting TRAIL in the treatment of cancer: new developments. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets 19, 1171–1185 (2015).
Song, J. J. et al. c-Cbl-mediated degradation of TRAIL receptors is responsible for the development of the early phase of TRAIL resistance. Cell Signal 22, 553–563 (2010).
Kim, S. Y., Kim, J. H. & Song, J. J. c-Cbl shRNA-expressing adenovirus sensitizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer DU-145 through increases of DR4/5. Cancer gene therapy 20, 82–87 (2013).
van de Kooij, B. et al. Ubiquitination by the membrane-associated RING-CH-8 (MARCH-8) ligase controls steady-state cell surface expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor 1. J Biol Chem 288, 6617–6628 (2013).
Lee, E. W. et al. Ubiquitination and degradation of the FADD adaptor protein regulate death receptor-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis. Nature communications 3, 978 (2012).
Jin, Z. et al. Cullin3-based polyubiquitination and p62-dependent aggregation of caspase-8 mediate extrinsic apoptosis signaling. Cell 137, 721–735 (2009).
Kim, Y., Suh, N., Sporn, M. & Reed, J. C. An inducible pathway for degradation of FLIP protein sensitizes tumor cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 277, 22320–22329 (2002).
Chen, S. et al. Celecoxib promotes c-FLIP degradation through Akt-independent inhibition of GSK3. Cancer Res 71, 6270–6281 (2011).
Chang, L. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase itch couples JNK activation to TNFalpha-induced cell death by inducing c-FLIP(L) turnover. Cell 124, 601–613 (2006).
Sarhan, D. et al. A novel inhibitor of proteasome deubiquitinating activity renders tumor cells sensitive to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by natural killer cells and T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62, 1359–1368 (2013).
Crowder, R. N., Dicker, D. T. & El-Deiry, W. S. The Deubiquitinase Inhibitor PR-619 Sensitizes Normal Human Fibroblasts to Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand (TRAIL)-mediated Cell Death. J Biol Chem 291, 5960–5970 (2016).
Han, B. et al. The novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib activates and enhances extrinsic apoptosis involving stabilization of death receptor 5. Oncotarget 6, 17532–17542 (2015).
Kaplan-Lefko, P. J. et al. Conatumumab, a fully human agonist antibody to death receptor 5, induces apoptosis via caspase activation in multiple tumor types. Cancer Biol Ther 9, 618–631 (2010).
Liu, X. et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 (bortezomib) up-regulates DR5 expression leading to induction of apoptosis and enhancement of TRAIL-induced apoptosis despite up-regulation of c-FLIP and survivin expression in human NSCLC cells. Cancer Res 67, 4981–4988 (2007).
Park, E. J. et al. Chloroquine enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis through up-regulation of DR5 by stabilization of mRNA and protein in cancer cells. Scientific reports 6, 22921 (2016).
Shirley, S. & Micheau, O. Targeting c-FLIP in cancer. Cancer Lett 332, 141–150 (2013).
Kauh, J. et al. c-FLIP degradation mediates sensitization of pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589. PLoS One 5, e10376 (2010).
Li, B. et al. The novel Akt inhibitor API-1 induces c-FLIP degradation and synergizes with TRAIL to augment apoptosis independent of Akt inhibition. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5, 612–620 (2012).
Lin, Y. et al. Involvement of c-FLIP and survivin down-regulation in flexible heteroarotinoid-induced apoptosis and enhancement of TRAIL-initiated apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 7, 3556–3565 (2008).
Yao, W., Yue, P., Khuri, F. R. & Sun, S. Y. The BET bromodomain inhibitor, JQ1, facilitates c-FLIP degradation and enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis independent of BRD4 and c-Myc inhibition. Oncotarget (2015).
Zhao, L., Yue, P., Khuri, F. R. & Sun, S. Y. mTOR complex 2 is involved in regulation of Cbl-dependent c-FLIP degradation and sensitivity of TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 73, 1946–1957 (2013).
Zou, W. et al. c-FLIP downregulation contributes to apoptosis induction by the novel synthetic triterpenoid methyl-2-cyano-3, 12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oate (CDDO-Me) in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther 6, 1614–1620 (2007).
Zou, W., Liu, X., Yue, P., Khuri, F. R. & Sun, S. Y. PPARgamma Ligands Enhance TRAIL-induced Apoptosis through DR5 Upregulation and c-FLIP Downregulation in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Cancer Biol Ther 6, 99–106 (2007).
Liu, X., Yue, P., Schonthal, A. H., Khuri, F. R. & Sun, S. Y. Cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein down-regulation contributes to celecoxib-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 66, 11115–11119 (2006).
Akpinar, B. et al. Aberrant DR5 transport through disruption of lysosomal function suggests a novel mechanism for receptor activation. Oncotarget 7, 58286–58301 (2016).
Twomey, J. D., Kim, S. R., Zhao, L., Bozza, W. P. & Zhang, B. Spatial dynamics of TRAIL death receptors in cancer cells. Drug resistance updates: reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy 19, 13–21 (2015).
Mellman, I. & Yarden, Y. Endocytosis and cancer. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 5, a016949 (2013).
Myeku, N. & Figueiredo-Pereira, M. E. Dynamics of the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by proteasomes and autophagy: association with sequestosome 1/p62. J Biol Chem 286, 22426–22440 (2011).
Li, C. W. et al. Glycosylation and stabilization of programmed death ligand-1 suppresses T-cell activity. Nature communications 7, 12632 (2016).
Lemke, J., von Karstedt, S., Zinngrebe, J. & Walczak, H. Getting TRAIL back on track for cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ 21, 1350–1364 (2014).
E, O. R., Tirincsi, A., Logue, S. E. & Szegezdi, E. The Janus Face of Death Receptor Signaling during Tumor Immunoediting. Frontiers in immunology 7, 446 (2016).
Oh, Y. T. et al. ERK/ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) signaling positively regulates death receptor 5 expression through co-activation of CHOP and Elk1. J Biol Chem 285, 41310–41319 (2010).
Oh, Y. T. et al. Suppression of death receptor 5 enhances cancer cell invasion and metastasis through activation of caspase-8/TRAF2-mediated signaling. Oncotarget 6, 41324–41338 (2015).
Sun, S. Y. et al. Differential effects of synthetic nuclear retinoid receptor-selective retinoids on the growth of human non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 57, 4931–4939 (1997).
Sun, S. Y. et al. The Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Lonafarnib Induces CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein Homologous Protein-dependent Expression of Death Receptor 5, Leading to Induction of Apoptosis in Human Cancer Cells. J Biol Chem 282, 18800–18809 (2007).
We thank Dr. L. Zhang for providing DR5-KO cell lines and Dr. A. Hammond for editing the manuscript. This study was supported by Emory Winship Cancer Institute Halpern Research Scholar award. S.-Y. Sun is an Emory Winship Cancer Institute Halpern Research Scholar and a Georgia Research Alliance Distinguished Cancer Scientist.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, YT., Deng, L., Deng, J. et al. The proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 enhances DR5 activation-induced apoptosis through stabilizing DR5. Sci Rep 7, 8027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08424-w
Inhibition of deubiquitination by PR‐619 induces apoptosis and autophagy via ubi‐protein aggregation‐activated ER stress in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Cell Proliferation (2021)
Dexamethasone Inhibits TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis through c-FLIP(L) Upregulation and DR5 Downregulation by GSK3β Activation in Cancer Cells
Deubiquitinase Inhibitor b-AP15 Attenuated LPS-Induced Inflammation via Inhibiting ERK1/2, JNK, and NF-Kappa B
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2020)
Differential antitumor activity of compounds targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) cells
Scientific Reports (2020)
Deubiquitylatinase inhibitor b-AP15 induces c-Myc-Noxa-mediated apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma