Abstract
Hendra virus (HeV) is an emerging zoonotic pathogen harbored by Australian mainland flying foxes. HeV infection can cause lethal disease in humans and horses, and to date all cases of human HeV disease have resulted from contact with infected horses. Currently, diagnosis of acute HeV infections in horses relies on the productive phase of infection when virus shedding may occur. An assay that identifies infected horses during the preclinical phase of infection would reduce the risk of zoonotic viral transmission during management of HeV outbreaks. Having previously shown that the host microRNA (miR)-146a is upregulated in the blood of HeV-infected horses days prior to the detection of viremia, we have profiled miRNAs at the transcriptome-wide level to comprehensively assess differences between infected and uninfected horses. Next-generation sequencing and the miRDeep2 algorithm identified 742 mature miRNA transcripts corresponding to 593 miRNAs in whole blood of six horses (three HeV-infected, three uninfected). Thirty seven miRNAs were differentially expressed in infected horses, two of which were validated by qRT-PCR. This study describes a methodology for the transcriptome-wide profiling of miRNAs in whole blood and supports the notion that measuring host miRNA expression levels may aid infectious disease diagnosis in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
introduction
Hendra virus (HeV) is a negative strand RNA virus belonging to the genus Henipavirus family Paramyxoviridae. Its geographical range spans most of the north-eastern coast of Australia, ultimately determined by the range of its natural reservoir hosts, pteropid fruit bats (flying foxes)1. HeV was discovered in 1994 during an outbreak of severe respiratory disease at a horse stable in Hendra, Queensland2. HeV was confirmed as the etiological agent of this outbreak that resulted in the death of 14 horses and one person. Between 1994 and 2010 HeV outbreaks occurred sporadically in coastal Queensland and north-eastern New South Wales. Between 2011 and 2013, however, 34 HeV incidents were reported in horses, increasing public concern over HeV as an emerging infectious disease. A HeV vaccine was developed for use in horses in 20123, and since 2013 reported incidents have declined but continue at a reduced level and in unvaccinated horses. Seven human cases of HeV disease have also occurred, four of which resulted in fatal disease.
To date, all cases of HeV disease in humans have resulted from close contact with infected horses, with virus transmission resulting from contact with an infected horse’s nasal discharge, blood, saliva or urine. Infected horses do not display signs of disease (for example, elevated heart rate, temperature) until after viral genome is detectable in secretions, and interaction between owners or veterinarians and infected horses increases with the onset of florid diseases and viral peak shedding4. Accordingly, horses pose a transmission risk both late in the incubation period and also after they become clinically ill. An assay that could identify infected horses early in the infection course, prior to the onset of high levels of virus shedding, would reduce the risk of zoonotic HeV transmission by assisting decision-making around in-contact animals during management of an HeV outbreak. Since the clinical signs of HeV disease in horses are not specific and the associated pathological changes are not pathognomonic, laboratory diagnosis is essential. Current laboratory testing to confirm suspected cases of HeV disease in horses includes virus isolation, detection of viral RNA in clinical or post-mortem specimens or viral antigen detection in tissues taken at necropsy5. Serological tests, such as ELISA and virus neutralization test, are also available but are of limited use for the diagnosis of acutely infected horses prior to the development of antibodies.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of single-stranded non-coding RNAs that regulate biological processes in eukaryotes6,7,8,9,10. The production of miRNAs requires several processing steps, first where primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) are cleaved by the ribonuclease Drosha to produce precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) which in turn are cleaved by the ribonuclease Dicer to produce mature, single stranded miRNAs11, 12. The binding of miRNAs to target gene mRNA can lead to the degradation, suppression or even the up-regulation of target mRNA levels. The regulation of biological processes by miRNAs often involves changes in miRNA transcript levels. Thus miRNA expression profiles are emerging as valuable tools to assist disease diagnosis, including for viral infections13, 14. For diagnostic decision support, miRNAs are attractive for several reasons – they can be detected from easily-collected bodily fluids such as blood and urine, are stable once secreted into bodily fluids, and can be detected using common and highly sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques such as PCR15.
We have previously shown that infection of human cells with HeV changes the expression levels of several host-encoded miRNAs, including miR-146a, which was also shown to be up-regulated in the blood of three horses experimentally infected with HeV16. The up-regulation of miR-146a in horse blood precedes the detection of viral genome in the same samples by several days, supporting the notion that miRNA profiling could be used to aid early HeV disease diagnosis. However, as miR-146a is induced by several pathogens, including bacteria17 and multiple viruses18, 19, the development of miRNAs as disease-specific biomarkers likely requires a more comprehensive measurement of miRNAs. In this study, we describe a methodology for the transcriptome-wide identification, quantification and differential expression analysis of miRNAs in horse blood. Our study identifies a number of miRNAs differentially expressed in the blood of horses infected with HeV, and supports the further development of miRNA profiling to aid henipavirus disease diagnosis.
Results
MiRNA identification, quantification and normalization
Whole blood samples from three horses infected with HeV were submitted to the CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory for diagnostic testing (Table 1). HeV was isolated from whole blood of two of the three horses (horses 2 and 3), and viral genome was detected in all three. All three infected horses were seronegative and were therefore likely sampled during the early stages of infection. Three healthy seronegative control horses were sampled from a single property in Victoria, Australia, where HeV is not considered endemic. EDTA blood from the control horses were negative for viral genome by PCR. Small RNA deep sequencing resulted in 7–11 million raw reads obtained per sample, which have been submitted to the NCBI short read archive (SRA) BioProject PRJNA323953. Reads were trimmed of adaptors and filtered, resulting in a loss of 4.5–8% of raw reads, leaving 6–10 million reads per sample for further analysis (Fig. 1A). The majority (92–95%) of sequences were deemed high quality by FASTQC.
MiRDeep2 was used to identify all known and novel miRNA transcripts amongst the pooled data for the six samples (Supplementary Table 1). MiRNAs with sequences matching those deposited in miRBase were accepted and included for further analysis. Novel candidate miRNAs were also included if they had a miRDeep2 score ≥1, consistent with previous studies20, 21. A total of 742 different mature miRNA transcripts were detected, corresponding to 593 different precursors (5p and 3p miRNAs were counted separately) (Fig. 1B). A total of 332 miRNAs in horse blood matched known miRBase entries. Of those, 47 appear to be horse-specific (yellow region), while 110 are conserved between horses and other mammals but have not been previously identified in horse (pink region). The remaining 410 candidates (red region) are putative novel miRNAs. We did not observe a significant difference in the total number of miRNAs identified in infected versus uninfected horses (data not shown).
Read counts were determined for each mature miRNA transcript (Supplementary Table 2). Total counts included all reads that mapped to a locus (as opposed to reads matching the canonical/consensus sequence only), and care was taken to avoid counting reads more than once. By examining the combined counts for the six samples, horse blood was shown to be heavily skewed towards a small set of dominant miRNAs (Fig. 2A). MiR-486–5p was extremely abundant compared to any other miRNA, taking up approximately 73% of all sequencing reads in the combined samples. Approximately 13% of the total reads corresponded to the second most abundant miRNA, miR-451, while miR-16 and miR-92a each took up about 1.5% of reads. Other highly expressed miRNAs in horse blood included miR-25, miR-191a, miR-186, miR-22 and miR-142-5p.
To examine the relationship between abundance and inter-sample variance, miRNAs were sorted by increasing read depth and plotted on a log10 scale against their coefficient of variation (CoV) (Fig. 2B). The CoV graph revealed a relatively clear relationship between read depth and variance. The point at which CoV dropped below 1.0 corresponded to a read depth of approximately 101 (i.e. 10) reads, and therefore data for miRNAs with <10 reads should be considered qualitative only. A total of 41 miRNAs were observed exclusively in infected horses, of which five had reads in all three infected samples. A total of 24 of these were singletons (only one read detected), while four had ≥10 reads (maximum reads 21). A further 20 miRNAs were present only in uninfected horses, however only one displayed reads in all three uninfected horses. Nine of these 20 were singletons and none had ≥10 reads (maximum 9). Based on these small counts, it appeared that the presence/absence of specific miRNAs is unlikely to be a robust measure of HeV infection status. We therefore sought to identify quantitative differences in miRNA abundance between the infected and uninfected animals.
Technical artifacts caused by library preparation and sequencing were corrected by normalization in order to perform quantitative cross-sample analysis (Fig. 3). Between-sample differences were evident in the raw counts (Fig. 3A, Raw data), and removing miRNAs with low abundance made a clear improvement in inter-sample variance (L filter). Global normalization (counts per million, CPM) made very little discernable improvement over L filter alone, whilst removal of both low count miRNAs and the two over-abundant outliers (miR-486 and miR-451) followed by CPM normalization led to a greatly improved profile (LH filter + CPM). Discarding low-count miRNAs followed by EdgeR or DESeq2 normalization produced horizontally aligned medians and consistent interquartile ranges, without having to discard the highly abundant miRNAs. We therefore elected to normalize data using the DESeq. 2 normalization method in subsequent analyses.
To further evaluate inter-sample consistency following normalization, we performed pairwise analyses at the single-miRNA level. The blood miRNA profile of two uninfected horses showed a high degree of similarity, as did the profiles of two infected horses (Fig. 4A and B, respectively). By contrast, the profile of an uninfected horse showed a lower degree of similarity to an infected horse, as reflected by a lower correlation coefficient (Fig. 4C). Similar trends were observed for other horses (e.g. U1 vs. U3, HeV1 vs. HeV3, U2 vs HeV2, data not shown). These data suggest that HeV infection induces changes in the miRNA profile of horse blood that can be detected above the background level of biological and technical variation.
Differential expression analysis
We next sought to identify miRNAs with significantly altered expression levels between infected and uninfected horses. By using DESeq2 to perform count-based differential expression (DE) testing based on the negative binomial distribution22, 23, a subset of miRNAs were identified that were either upregulated or downregulated in infected vs. uninfected animals (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 3). EdgeR yielded a similar set of DE miRNAs (Supplementary Table 4). In total, 37 miRNAs were significantly DE according to both methods, of which 18 were up-regulated (elevated in infected horses) and 19 were down-regulated.
A second approach was to identify DE miRNAs based on miRNA ratios, analogous to the use of housekeeping genes as internal normalization controls in quantitative real-time PCR. In contrast to evaluating the quantity of an individual miRNA in isolation, this strategy considers the ratio of two different miRNAs to determine whether there is a significant difference between the average ratio for the infected group and that of the uninfected group. MiR-103 was selected as an initial housekeeping miRNA based on previous studies24 and our own observation that miR-103 expression levels were not significantly different between infected and uninfected horses (data not shown). Two miRNAs significantly upregulated in infected horses, as identified by DESeq2 (miR-16 and miR-32), were also upregulated when expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized against relative levels of miR-103 (Fig. 6). This data validates two results from the miRNA profiling pipeline.
We next assessed the miRNA-Seq data to identify ratios of particular miRNA pairs which together would enable the best possible distinction between infected and uninfected horses. To this end, every possible combination of miRNAs were tested in order to identify pairs whose ratios produce the most statically significant differences between the two groups (i.e. the highest signal to noise ratio). By taking the ratio of \(\frac{miRNA\_A}{miRNA\_B}\) for each horse individually, inter-replicate differences were minimized. The results were ranked by corrected p-value and the top-ranking miRNA pairs identified (Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 5). After correcting for multiple testing using the false discovery rate (FDR) method, we note that the corrected p-values were improved over the raw p-values obtained for individual miRNAs in isolation. This strategy therefore appeared to improve the signal to noise ratio, and we noted that many of the miRNAs identified in this way had also been individually identified as differentially expressed miRNAs.
IsomiR analysis
Downstream application of transcriptome-wide miRNA profiling may include PCR-based detection for select miRNAs. As PCR-based detection can be highly sensitive to sequence variation, we next examined sequence variation amongst individual reads mapping to each miRNA locus. Furthermore, we assessed whether the most-abundant isomiR might be DE while pooled isoforms were not, or vice versa. We therefore sought to identify the most highly-abundant isoform corresponding to each locus (Supplementary Table 6). Most-abundant isoforms with >10 reads were identified for 271 mature and 29 star miRNAs. Of these, 65 (22%) had a nucleotide mismatch relative to the consensus sequence as reported by miRDeep2. We observed that 62 (21%) of the most-abundant isoforms had a nucleotide mismatch relative to the reference genome, and 19 of these (6.3% of all mRNAs, 20% of all mismatches) had a non-templated 3′ uridine (U) addition (Fig. 8). Of the remaining most-abundant forms containing a mismatch relative to the reference genome, 12 exhibited a mismatch within the seed region, including eca-miR-147b plus 11 of the novel miRNAs. Finally, we performed DESeq2 differential expression analysis using count data for only the most-abundant isoform of each miRNA (Supplementary Table 7). Of the 37 miRNAs that were DE in the pooled isoform analysis, 22 (59%) were also shown to be DE in this analysis. Two of these candidates included miR-16 and miR-32.
Discussion
The measurement of circulating miRNAs has been explored in chronic disease states such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and some chronic viral infections such as HIV25, 26 and hepatitis C virus27. More recently, host miRNA profiles have been studied in response to acute viral infections associated with prolonged preclinical phases and/or high consequence of infection, such as rabies virus28 and Ebola virus29. The early identification of horses infected with HeV would provide an opportunity to decrease human exposure to infectious secretions and therefore reduce risk of zoonotic transmission. We have previously shown that HeV infection induces human host miRNA responses in vitro, and at least one of these responses, the transient up-regulation of miR-146a, is observed in vivo in horse blood. While miR-146a induction is not unique to HeV infection, it begged the question of whether altered expression patterns of blood miRNAs during the earliest stages of acute viral infection might reveal useful diagnostic biomarkers. As a first step in addressing this hypothesis, we have profiled horse miRNAs at the transcriptome-wide level in HeV-infected and uninfected horses. Following data filtering and normalization a panel of differentially expressed miRNAs that distinguished infected from uninfected animals was identified.
The collection of reference horse miRNAs in miRBase 21 were originally identified in silico 30, whilst horse miRNAs have since been detected in vivo 31. Our results confirm and extend the known horse miRNA transcriptome with the addition of a substantial number of putative novel miRNAs. The criteria and methods for identifying miRNAs vary widely, so it is anticipated that additional horse miRNAs will continue to be identified. The four highest-expressed miRNAs (miR-486-5p, miR-451, miR-16 and miR-92a) are known to be highly expressed in erythrocytes32, 33. Much effort has gone into identifying valid normalization strategies for miRNA quantification but consensus has not yet been achieved on the most suitable approach34. Many studies have used cell-free serum or plasma, or have used purified extracellular vesicles (exosomes). Other studies use whole blood, and there is not yet a consensus on which sample type is best. We observed in the horse blood that the two most abundant miRNAs (miR-486-5p, miR-451) were expressed at such high levels relative to the remaining miRNAs that they affected quantification of the raw data.
The development of miRNA profiling as a diagnostic tool requires further work to assess specificity. We cannot comment on whether changes to the host miRNA profile induced by HeV are similar or different to those induced by other pathogens. However, a comparison of our work to published studies reveal clear differences between the DE miRNAs induced by rabies virus, Ebola virus and HeV in vivo. On the other hand, miR-146a is up-regulated during acute stages of Ebola virus infection in humans and non-human primates and is consistent with several other viral infections, including HeV. Intriguingly, miR-146a was elevated in the blood of horses experimentally infected with HeV16 but showed no indication of upregulation in samples from infected horses analyzed in the present study. This potentially reflects the use of field samples taken during outbreaks, for which the time period between HeV exposure and blood collection is unknown. Another possibility is the dose difference, which may lead to different kinetics of miRNA regulation. In the original study, miR-146a was elevated in both horse and ferret blood within the first few days post-infection, but the effect is potentially transient, thus the collection of field samples may have missed the window for observing elevated miR-146a.
Host-encoded miRNAs responsive to viral infections can have large impacts on virus infection. We have recently shown that two immune-responsive miRNAs transiently up-regulated by HeV, miR-181 and miR-146a, promote HeV infection through different mechanisms. miR-181 strongly promotes HeV cellular entry by degrading ephrin receptors that bind and prevent viral attachment to the ephrin-B2 and –B3 HeV entry receptors35. miR-146a promotes HeV infection by degrading components of the A20 ubiquitination complex, which negatively regulates activity of NF-κB, a transcription factor that promotes HeV infection16. Multiple members of the let-7 family and miR-17~93 cluster are significantly elevated in HeV-infected horses (Fig. 5, Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). Cross-referencing results from a functional genomics screen highlights that let-7 family members inhibit HeV infection in vitro, while miR-17~93 members sharing the same seed sequence (AAGUG) promote HeV infection35. miR-16, validated in the present study as up-regulated by HeV, also shows a pro-viral phenotype35. Future work is required to define the mechanism of these miRNAs impacting the HeV infection cycle.
In conclusion our study demonstrates that HeV infection alters the expression profile of many host miRNAs. Whilst further work is required to optimize this technology, our study, and several others, suggest that host miRNA profiling during acute viral infections represents a novel approach to future diagnosis of infectious diseases.
Methods
Sample collection and processing
EDTA blood samples from horses were collected from horses that were naturally infected with HeV in New South Wales in 2011 and 2013, and in Queensland in 2011 (Table 1). Total RNA was harvested using Tri-reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) following manufacturer’s instructions. Small RNA was separated from total RNA using the miRNEasy mini kit (Qiagen). Samples were prepared for Illumina next generation sequencing as previously described20. Sample preparation followed the “TruSeq Small RNA Library prep Kit” protocol (#15004197, Kit #RS-200-0012 from Illumina). Briefly, 10–50 ng of purified small RNA was used per sample. The 3′ adapter was ligated, followed by ligation of the 5′ adapter. RT and PCR were performed according to the protocol using 12 cycles of PCR. The small RNA yield was verified by running the samples on the Bioanalyzer HS chip (Agilent). Samples were pooled according to the concentration listed on the BA chip of the ~142 and 150 nt bands, to get an accurate yield of the adapter-ligated small RNA for each sample. The samples were gel purified using Novex 6% TBE gels (Invitrogen), run for 1 h at 145 V. After ethidium bromide staining for 2.5 minutes, bands between 145 and 160 bp were excised to account for the ~125 bp adapter. The gel was centrifuged through gel breaker tubes. 200 µL of ultrapure water was added to each tube and placed on a shaker at room temperature overnight. The gel debris was then run through a Qiagen spin column to elute the RNA. The libraries were finally concentrated by speed vac for 40 min, before verifying that the concentration was above the 2 nM yield needed for the run. The concentration and size was verified by Qubit HS (Invitrogen) and a BA HS chip. The libraries were denatured and clustered on the cBot according to cBot user guide (#15006165 Illumina). The sequencing was performed on the HiSeq. 2000 using v3 SBS reagents. Studies were approved by the CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory’s Animal Ethics Committee and conducted following the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes guidelines for housing and care of laboratory animals.
miRNA identification
Raw data were assessed for overall quality using FASTQC. Reads were trimmed of adaptors using Cutadapt, and subsequently filtered by length (reads <18 nt or >26 nt discarded) and quality (reads with >10% of bases with quality score <16 discarded) using the FASTX toolkit. MiRNA identification and quantification were carried out using miRDeep221. Initially, trimmed and filtered reads from the six samples were combined and processed with the mapper.pl and mirdeep2.pl modules to identify the total pool of miRNAs present. Reference miRNA sequences were downloaded from the latest version of miRBase (version 21)36. For mirdeep2.pl, the following options were used: For the “mature_this_species” and “precursor_this_species” options, miRBase 21 horse mature and precursor sequences were used, while for the “mature_other_species” option, a file containing all miRBase 21 mature sequences from all mammals other than horse was supplied. Additional parameters provided to mirdeep2.pl were: –a 1, the minimum number of stacked reads for a precursor to be considered, and –b 1, the minimum miRDeep2 score for a novel miRNA to be retained. Consensus mature and star sequences and their corresponding precursors were extracted to FASTA format and compared against miRBase 21 mature reference sequences, allowing for minor differences in length.
miRNA quantification
Quantitative miRNA expression in the individual samples was determined using the quantifier.pl module of the miRDeep2 package. Firstly, novel miRNAs identified in the pooled data (described above) were combined with miRBase 21 known horse miRNAs to construct the reference FASTA files. Quantifier.pl was then used to individually count the number of reads mapping to each miRNA in each individual sample. By default, individual reads were allowed to map at up to five different locations. Because of this behavior, the –W option was used to allocate counts fractionally across multiple mapping sites so that the sum of reported counts remained equal to the number of mapped reads. This was necessary to avoid distortion of the final count profiles due to a few highly-expressed sequences mapping to multiple loci. Individual count tables for each of the six samples were combined into a single count table in csv format and any miRNA that reported zero counts for every sample was discarded. Variance analysis was done by taking the coefficient of variation (CoV) (standard deviation of the six samples divided by the mean of the six samples for each individual miRNA). Graph smoothing was performed on the CoV plot using the exponentially-weighted moving averages method with a sliding window size of 15.
miRNA normalization and differential expression (DE) testing
Normalization and DE testing were carried out using the R libraries EdgeR23 and DESeq222. It should be noted here that since counts for multi-mapping reads were distributed fractionally across the mapping sites during the quantification step, many read counts reported non-integer values. Both EdgeR and DESeq2 require discrete (integer) counts, so all values were first rounded to the nearest integer. The following filters were then applied: (1) CPM (counts per million mapped reads) ≥1 in ≥3 samples, (2) Mean fold change ≥2, (3) FDR <0.05. In EdgeR, TMM normalization was applied, while DESeq2 used a default normalization method. Lists of significant DE miRNAs and normalized count tables were exported in csv format.
The second method used for DE analysis was based on miRNA ratios. MiRNAs with ≥100 reads in each replicate group (infected and uninfected) were tested against all other such miRNAs and ratios of raw counts for \(\frac{miRNA\_A}{miRNA\_B}\) were determined for each of the six samples. Ratios with an average fold change ≥2 between infected and uninfected groups were subjected to unpaired t-tests. Multiple testing correction was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Corrected p-values were sorted from lowest to highest, and exported to csv format.
IsomiR analysis
For each unique read present in the trimmed and filtered data, per-sample counts were extracted using a custom python script that combined data from the *.reads and *.mrd files output by mapper.pl and mirdeep2.pl, respectively. For each mature and star miRNA locus reported by miRDeep2, the sequence with the highest read count was designated as the “most abundant isoform”. Conflicts (two or more sequences from the same locus with equally high read counts) were resolved according to the following rules: (1) Known sequences (100% identity to a mirbase miRNA) were given priority over novel sequences. (2) Sequences with zero mismatches relative to the horse genome were given priority over sequences containing mismatches. If conflicts were still present, the first remaining item was chosen. In a few instances where multiple loci had the same mature sequence they were collapsed into a single entry. This is because a mature miRNA can be encoded at more than one locus, and from the RNA-Seq data it is not possible to determine which of these loci the transcripts actually originated from, as they all report exactly the same read counts. For the isomiR analysis we ignored multiple copies and instead treated them as duplicates (i.e. keep one, discard the rest) by applying the rules described above. If conflicts remained, items were sorted alphabetically (by locus id) and the first remaining item was chosen. IsomiRs with ≤10 reads were discarded, then DE analysis was repeated as described above, but using most-abundant isoform counts instead of pooled isoform counts.
Uridylation analysis
The most-abundant isoforms were compared with the consensus sequences and also the reference genome. Reads that did not conform to the reference were classified according to whether the differences were at either the 5′ or 3′ terminus or internal, and according to the observed mismatching nucleotide. A maximum of 1 mismatch per miRNA was present due to settings supplied to bowtie via miRDeep2 during read mapping. Python was used to analyze the total collection of individual reads to determine the proportion of mismatches of each type.
Statistics
Differential expression analysis was carried out using DESeq2, which employs a generalized linear model based on the Negative Binomial (a.k.a. Gamma-Poisson) distribution, and Wald significance tests. False discovery rate was used for p-value correction. For PCR results, the difference between groups was analysed using a two-tailed Student’s t test, with a P value of <0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Error bars represent standard deviations, and all data points are the average of a minimum of 3 replicates.
References
Halpin, K., Young, P. L., Field, H. E. & Mackenzie, J. S. Isolation of Hendra virus from pteropid bats: a natural reservoir of Hendra virus. J Gen Virol 81, 1927–1932, doi:10.1099/0022-1317-81-8-1927 (2000).
Murray, K. et al. A morbillivirus that caused fatal disease in horses and humans. Science 268, 94–97 (1995).
Middleton, D. et al. Hendra virus vaccine, a one health approach to protecting horse, human, and environmental health. Emerg Infect Dis 20, 372–379, doi:10.3201/eid2003.131159 (2014).
Marsh, G. A. et al. Experimental infection of horses with Hendra virus/Australia/horse/2008/Redlands. Emerg Infect Dis 17, 2232–2238, doi:10.3201/eid1712.111162 (2011).
Daniels, P., Ksiazek, T. & Eaton, B. T. Laboratory diagnosis of Nipah and Hendra virus infections. Microbes Infect 3, 289–295 (2001).
Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L. & Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854 (1993).
Lee, R. C. & Ambros, V. An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 294, 862–864, doi:10.1126/science.1065329 (2001).
Lau, N. C., Lim, L. P., Weinstein, E. G. & Bartel, D. P. An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 294, 858–862, doi:10.1126/science.1065062 (2001).
Lagos-Quintana, M., Rauhut, R., Lendeckel, W. & Tuschl, T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 294, 853–858, doi:10.1126/science.1064921 (2001).
Gantier, M. P. New perspectives in MicroRNA regulation of innate immunity. J Interferon Cytokine Res 30, 283–289, doi:10.1089/jir.2010.0037 (2010).
Meister, G. & Tuschl, T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature 431, 343–349, doi:10.1038/nature02873 (2004).
Tomari, Y. & Zamore, P. D. Perspective: machines for RNAi. Genes Dev 19, 517–529, doi:10.1101/gad.1284105 (2005).
Chen, X. et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 18, 997–1006, doi:10.1038/cr.2008.282 (2008).
Li, L. M. et al. Serum microRNA profiles serve as novel biomarkers for HBV infection and diagnosis of HBV-positive hepatocarcinoma. Cancer Res 70, 9798–9807, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1001 (2010).
Gilad, S. et al. Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One 3, e3148, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003148 (2008).
Stewart, C. R. et al. Promotion of Hendra virus replication by microRNA 146a. J Virol 87, 3782–3791, doi:10.1128/JVI.01342-12.
Boldin, M. P. et al. miR-146a is a significant brake on autoimmunity, myeloproliferation, and cancer in mice. J Exp Med 208, 1189–1201, doi:10.1084/jem.20101823 (2011).
Hou, J. et al. MicroRNA-146a feedback inhibits RIG-I-dependent Type I IFN production in macrophages by targeting TRAF6, IRAK1, and IRAK2. J Immunol 183, 2150–2158, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900707 (2009).
Cameron, J. E. et al. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces cellular MicroRNA miR-146a, a modulator of lymphocyte signaling pathways. J Virol 82, 1946–1958, doi:10.1128/JVI.02136-07 (2008).
Cowled, C. et al. Characterisation of novel microRNAs in the Black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics 15, 682, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-682.
Friedlander, M. R., Mackowiak, S. D., Li, N., Chen, W. & Rajewsky, N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 37–52, doi:10.1093/nar/gkr688 (2012).
Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11, R106, doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 (2010).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 (2010).
Peltier, H. J. & Latham, G. J. Normalization of microRNA expression levels in quantitative RT-PCR assays: identification of suitable reference RNA targets in normal and cancerous human solid tissues. RNA 14, 844–852, doi:10.1261/rna.939908 (2008).
Munshi, S. U., Panda, H., Holla, P., Rewari, B. B. & Jameel, S. MicroRNA-150 is a potential biomarker of HIV/AIDS disease progression and therapy. PLoS One 9, e95920, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095920 (2014).
Asahchop, E. L. et al. Plasma microRNA profiling predicts HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. AIDS 30, 2021–2031, doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001160 (2016).
Akamatsu, S. et al. Differences in serum microRNA profiles in hepatitis B and C virus infection. J Infect 70, 273–287, doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.10.017 (2015).
Han, M. G. et al. Serum MicroRNA Expression Profiling in Mice Infected with Rabies Virus. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2, 186–191, doi:10.1016/j.phrp.2011.11.043 (2011).
Duy, J. et al. Circulating microRNA profiles of Ebola virus infection. Sci Rep 6, 24496, doi:10.1038/srep24496 (2016).
Zhou, M. et al. In silico detection and characteristics of novel microRNA genes in the Equus caballus genome using an integrated ab initio and comparative genomic approach. Genomics 94, 125–131, doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.04.006 (2009).
Lee, S. et al. Expression of microRNAs in Horse Plasma and Their Characteristic Nucleotide Composition. PLoS One 11, e0146374, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146374 (2016).
Pritchard, C. C. et al. Blood cell origin of circulating microRNAs: a cautionary note for cancer biomarker studies. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5, 492–497, doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0370 (2012).
Blondal, T. et al. Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluids. Methods 59, S1–6, doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.09.015 (2013).
Schwarzenbach, H., da Silva, A. M., Calin, G. & Pantel, K. Data Normalization Strategies for MicroRNA Quantification. Clin Chem 61, 1333–1342, doi:10.1373/clinchem.2015.239459 (2015).
Foo, C. H. et al. Dual microRNA Screens Reveal That the Immune-Responsive miR-181 Promotes Henipavirus Entry and Cell-Cell Fusion. PLoS Pathog 12, e1005974, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005974 PPATHOGENS-D-16-01396 [pii] (2016).
Griffiths-Jones, S. The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Res 32, D109–111, doi:10.1093/nar/gkh023 (2004).
Smith, I. L., Halpin, K., Warrilow, D. & Smith, G. A. Development of a fluorogenic RT-PCR assay (TaqMan) for the detection of Hendra virus. J Virol Methods 98, 33–40 (2001).
McNabb, L. et al. Henipavirus microsphere immuno-assays for detection of antibodies against Hendra virus. J Virol Methods 200, 22–28, doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.01.010 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CSIRO and the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (National Hendra Virus Research Program funding awarded to C.R.S.). The authors wish to acknowledge colleagues at the Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, New South Wales and the Biosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for submitting clinical specimens for HeV diagnostic testing. We also wish to thank the scientists in the Diagnosis, Surveillance and Response group at the CSIRO AAHL involved in the diagnostic testing of the samples used in this study. We thank Meagan Gillespie, Mary Tachedjian and Tamsyn Crowley for technical advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: C.C., C.H.F., D.M., L.F.W., A.G.B., C.R.S. Performed the experiments: C.C., C.H.F., C.D., C.L.R., C.R.S. Analysed the data: C.C., C.H.F., D.T.W., C.R.S. Wrote the paper: C.C., D.T.W., C.R.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cowled, C., Foo, CH., Deffrasnes, C. et al. Circulating microRNA profiles of Hendra virus infection in horses. Sci Rep 7, 7431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06939-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06939-w
This article is cited by
-
MicroRNA let-7 and viral infections: focus on mechanisms of action
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.