Introduction

Secondary walls in the form of wood and fibers are most abundant biomass produced by vascular plants, and are the most important biomaterials that meet a variety of needs of humans for fibers, textiles, pulping and paper manufacture, and bioenergy1, 2. Thus, there has been a tremendous interest in elucidating the underlying molecular mechanisms governing secondary wall formation3,4,5,6,7,8. The secondary wall formation is a developmental process that involves highly coordinated expression of secondary wall biosynthesis genes, which are known to be regulated by a cascade of transcription factors (TFs). Therefore, it is a central task to understand how TFs regulate the secondary wall formation2, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13. It has been demonstrated that a few NAC domain TFs function as high hierarchical regulators controlling the secondary wall biosynthesis program through activating a nexus of intermediate-level TFs mostly are MYBs9, 10, 13,14,15. These intermediate TFs in turn activate some low-level MYBs that directly regulate secondary wall biosynthesis genes12, 16. At the same time, molecular and genomic studies in tree species have also revealed the existence of a hierarchical transcriptional regulation network that consists of a set of TFs, which regulate wood formation in the similar hierarchical fashion as their counterparts in Arabidopsis thaliana do2, 4, 5, 16,17,18,19. Among them, the best-characterized TFs are, for example, Populus trichocarpa wood-associated NAC domain TFs (PtrWNDs), Eucalyptus grandis WND1 (EgWND1) and Populus deltoids MYB21 (PdMYB21)5, 6, 16, 17. Such a multilayered regulatory network implicates the existence of some high hierarchical regulators that can be tuned to alter different secondary wall biosynthesis pathways in order to optimize secondary wall composition2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 12, 20. This is a big leap in understanding the molecular mechanisms of wood formation. For this reason, it is important to identify new high hierarchical TFs to authenticate this model7.

In plants, APETALA2/ethylene-responsive element-binding proteins (AP2/EREBP) are one of the largest TF families21. This super family is characterized by the conserved AP2/ERF DNA-binding domain of 60–70 amino acid residues22, and plays a key role in regulating developmental processes, hormonal signal transductions, and environmental responses23. Recently, the AP2/EREBP domain transcription factors are also found to participate the secondary wall formation in the developmental stem of Medicago truncatula 24. There are three A. thaliana SHINE genes, AtSHN1, AtSHNE2, and AtSHN3, which belong to ERF-B6 clade of AP2/ERF family and harbor more other two exclusive motifs: “mm” (middle domain, with approximate 61 amino acids) and “cm” (c-terminal domain, containing approximate 10 amino acids)25,26,27. AtSHN2 is highly precise and temporarily coordinated in anther and silique dehiscence zones28. Moreover, AtSHN2 was previously shown to be involved in wax/cutin lipid regulation and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis 25, 26. Following these findings, Ambavaram et al. demonstrated that AtSHN2 directly regulates NAC and MYB TFs, and modification of AtSHN2 coordinately alters cell wall components deposition, causing a 34% increase in cellulose and a 45% decrease in lignin content without any obvious detriment on plant development in the overexpression transgenic lines of rice (Oryza sativa)29. In E. grandis, two SHINE TFs (EgrSHN1 and EgrSHN2) contain all conserved motifs and characteristic features of SHINE family, but their functions in the wood formation have not been characterized30. In fact, it is still unknown whether SHINE family genes in trees have functions in the secondary wall formation.

In this study, we investigated the roles of SHN2 of Populus simonii × Populus nigra (PsnSHN2) in secondary wall formation, and its biological functions in regulating cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin biosynthesis. We showed that ectopic expression of PsnSHN2 in tobacco led to thickened secondary walls through a coordinated regulation of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin biosynthesis. We observed the altered expression of some key secondary wall-associated TFs and secondary wall biosynthesis genes in PsnSHN2 tobacco transgenic lines. Our results indicate that PsnSHN2 is a high hierarchical TF that governs the secondary wall formation, and is more importantly capable of coordinately regulating cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin biosynthesis pathways.

Results

Isolation and characterization of the PsnSHN2 from P. simonii × P. nigra

We isolated the full length cDNA sequence encoding a protein of 179 amino acid residues, which is 100%, 90.3%, and 95.2% identical to the P. trichocarpa putative SHINE protein (27009360), E. grandis SHN2 (32053465) and A. thaliana SHN2 (19673076), respectively. Its protein sequence contains all the SHINE protein domains that include an AP2 DNA binding domain, a “mm” domain and a “cm” domain (Fig. 1A). The AP2 domain of PsnSHN2 has all the characteristic elements, namely the YRG and RYAD, and the structure of three β-sheets and the α-helix (Fig. 1A). Thus, it was given the nomenclature of PsnSHN2, in resemblance to AtSHN2. In addition, PsnSHN2 contains a basic N-terminal region that might serve as a nuclear location signal (NLS), and an acidic C-terminal region that might act as an activation domain (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1
figure 1

Protein sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of PsnSHN2. (A) PsnSHN2 was aligned with SHINE proteins from Populus trichocarpa (Potri.018G028000 and Potri.018G131400), Eucalyptus globulus (Eucgr.C04221), Theobroma cacao (Thecc1EG038081 and Thecc1EG0370070), Oryza sativa (LOC_Os06g40150) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AT1G15360 and AT5G11190). The conserved YRG and RAYD elements in AP2 domain are indicated by brackets. α helix is indicated by an arrow; cm stands for c-terminal domain while mm represents middle domain; Asterisks mark the putative domains for nuclear localization signals; the boxed region indicates the putative activation domain. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of PsnSHN2 with other SHINE proteins. 93 SHINE genes of 44 species are available in Supplemental file. PsnSHN2 is shown in a red rectangle. The number after short dash is gene ID number from the phytozome database.

Phylogenetic analysis of PsnSHN2 together with 93 SHINE genes with full-length protein sequences from 44 species revealed there are three large phylogenetic classes of SHINE proteins (Fig. 1B). PsnSHN2 was located in the Clade I, the largest one with 50 SHINE proteins from 29 species that were distributed in 12 sub-clades of different levels and branches. The Clade II and III comprised 30 and 14 proteins from 21 and 10 species, respectively, which include a sub-clade where woody trees and shrub species are present. It was noteworthy that the proteins from the same species were not necessarily located in the same sub-clades, and the proteins from both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species could present in the same sub-clades. Such results indicated that the evolution of SHINE proteins is not aligned well with the evolution of cotyledons. In addition, phylogenic result showed that the PsnSHN2 was in the same clade with AtSHN2 (Fig. 1B), indicating it may play a role in secondary wall formation, as what AtSHN2 does29.

Expression pattern, subcellular localization and transcriptional activation activity of PsnSHN2

To investigate whether PsnSHN2 is associated with secondary wall biosynthesis, we analyzed its expression levels in different tissues of poplar by qRT-PCR. The result showed PsnSHN2 was differentially expressed at detectable levels in all tissues as examined (Fig. 2A). The relative levels of the PsnSHN2 transcripts in the secondary and transition xylem were the higher than any other studied tissues, whereas the expression in the transition leaves is the lowest. The preferential expression in developing secondary xylem tissues suggests that PsnSHN2 is involved in secondary wall biosynthesis.

Figure 2
figure 2

Expression patterns, subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of PsnSHN2. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of PsnSHN2 in different poplar tissues. Actin was used as a control. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. (B) Subcellular localization of PsnSHN2. Confocal images show the localization of PsnSHN2-GFP in the nuclei of onion epidermal cells. DAPI, a nuclear staining dye; Merged: The merged images of bright-field, GFP and DAPI staining. (C) Transcriptional activation analysis of PsnSHN2 fused with the GAL4 DNA binding domain (GAL4DB) in yeast shows its potential to activate the expression of the His-3 and X-α-Gal reporter genes.

The presence of a nuclear localization signal at the N-terminal region of the PsnSHN2 may indicate that the protein is likely to localize in the nuclei (Fig. 1A). To verify this, the PsnSHN2 coding region was fused to the N-terminus of the GFP gene under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter and transferred into onion epidermal cells using the particle gun bombardment. Localization of the fusion protein was then visualized with a fluorescence confocal microscope. As seen in Fig. 2B, the PsnSHN2-GFP fusion protein was exclusively colocalized to DAPI-stained nuclei, indicating the PsnSHN2 encodes a nuclear-localized protein.

To examine whether PsnSHN2 can activate transcription, we fused PsnSHN2 with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and test its potential to activate the reporter gene expression in yeast. It was found that PsnSHN2 could activate the expression His3 and X-α-Gal reporter genes (Fig. 2C), indicating it is indeed a transcriptional activator.

The potential of PsnSHN2 as a higher hierarchical TF

In order to test whether PsnSHN2 can function as a higher hierarchical TF in the secondary wall biosynthesis process as AtSHN2 does in rice, a yeast one-hybrid assay was performed to test the potential of PsnSHN2 binding to cis-acting elements including GCC box, SNBE, SMBE, ACI and ACII element that are often present in the upper streams of TFs (Table S9) present in the hierarchical transcriptional network governing secondary wall formation. The result manifested that PsnSHN2 had obvious binding affinities to these five cis-acting elements (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Yeast one-hybrid assay of PsnSHN2′s potential to bind to cis-acting elements. The pHIS2-p53/pGADT7-p53 and pHIS2-p53/pGADT7-PsnSHN2 were used as the positive and negative control, respectively. 1, 10−2 and 10−4 represent solution dilution ratio of transformed Y187 yeast cells.

Changes in the thickness and composition of the secondary walls caused by PsnSHN2 overexpression in tobacco

We obtained T2 PsnSHN2 tobacco transgenic lines through hybridization of T1 generations. All PsnSHN2 lines exhibited more vigorous growth than wild-type (Fig. 4A). We chose those PsnSHN2 transgenic lines, L6, L8, L10, L11 and L12, which had higher expression levels of PsnSHN2 (Fig. 4B). To investigate the contribution of PsnSHN2 overexpression to the secondary wall biosynthesis, we measured the thicknesses and three major components of secondary wall in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. The scanning electron microscope of stem cross-sections and thickness of secondary wall analysis revealed that the secondary wall thicknesses increased 55% in the PsnSHN2 transgenic lines than those in wild-type (Fig. 4C–G). To identify which components (e.g., cellulose, lignin, or hemicellulose) gave rise to the increased thicknesses of the secondary walls, the stem cross-sections were histochemically stained with phloroglucinol-HCl and calcofluor white solutions. Phloroglucinol stain reacts with coniferaldehyde groups in lignin, and the color intensity reflects the total lignin content, while calcofluor white reacts with cellulose and make it display fluorescence staining. The results clearly showed a decrease in lignin content and an increase in cellulose content in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines in comparison with wild-type (Fig. 5A–D). To further assess the alternation of secondary wall composition, the chemical analysis of the stem composition was performed using an automatic fiber analyzer and the results showed a 37% increase in cellulose, a 28% increase in hemicellulose, and a 34% reduction in lignin (Fig. 5E). Owing to these changes, the break force of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines measured was on average 22% higher than that of the wild-type (Fig. 5F). Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that PsnSHN2 coordinately regulates the biosynthesis pathways of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of PsnSHN2 overexpression on the secondary wall thickness in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. (A) Three-month-old wild-type (left) and PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (middle and right). (B) The expression levels of PsnSHN2 in transgenic lines. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. (C–F) The scanning electron microscope of cross stem sections of wild-type (C,E) and PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (D,F). (G) The secondary wall thickness of cross stem sections of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate levels of significance (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Figure 5
figure 5

Effects of PsnSHN2 overexpression on the secondary wall deposition and breaking force in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. (A,B) Phloroglucinol-HCl staining (red color) stem sections of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (A) and wild-type (B). (C,D) Calcofluor white staining (blue color) stem sections of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (C) and wild-type (D). (E,F) The contents of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin (E) and the breaking force in stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (F). Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate levels of significance (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Lignocellulosic pathway genes and TFs induced by PsnSHN2 overexpression in tobacco

The finding that overexpression of PsnSHN2 induced ectopic deposition of secondary wall and coordination alternation the secondary wall composition prompted us to determine the expression levels of secondary wall biosynthesis pathway genes in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. The results from qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the transcript levels of tobacco lignin biosynthesis pathway genes (including PAL1, PAL4, C3H, C4H, 4CL1, 4CL2, 4CL3, CCR, HCT, COMT, CCoAOMT, CAD6, and CAD9)31 were significantly repressed in the stem of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (Fig. 6). On the other hand, the expression of a number of cellulose and hemicellulose biosynthesis pathway genes, such as three CEAS genes (CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8)32 and three CESA-like genes (IRX8, IRX9, and IRX10)33, were significantly up-regulated in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines compared with wild-type (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Expression analysis the TF genes and secondary wall biosynthesis genes in PsnSHN2 transgenic lines. Secondary wall biosynthesis genes for cellulose (CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8), hemicellulose (IRX8, IRX9, and IRX10), and lignin (PAL1, PAL4, C3H, C4H, 4CL1, 4CL2, 4CL3, CCR, HCT, COMT, CCoAOMT, CAD6, and CAD9). MYB20, MYB43, MYB69, MYB58, MYB63, MYB85, MYB83, VND6, and SND1 are known TFs that control the secondary wall formation. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate levels of significance (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

To unravel the molecular mechanism underlying the altered expression of secondary wall biosynthesis genes in the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines, we further analyzed the expression levels of a number of TFs known to control these secondary wall biosynthesis genes using qRT-PCR. The results demonstrated that the transcript abundance of NAC TFs (SND1 and VND6), and MYB TFs (MYB58, MYB63, and MYB85), which specifically activate lignin biosynthesis pathway genes34 (Fig. 6), were significantly repressed in PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (Fig. 6). On the contrary, the expression levels of the one nexus intermediate switch MYB83 11, and several MYB genes (MYB20, MYB43, and MYB69) that specially activate the cellulose and hemicellulose biosynthesis genes11, increased significantly in PsnSHN2 transgenic lines (Fig. 6).

Activation of Poplar TFs involved in regulating wood formation by PsnSHN2 in tobacco

Based on the fact that PsnSHN2 induced the expression of a number of TFs that regulate pathway genes of secondary wall biosynthesis in transgenic tobacco, we investigated whether it can directly control poplar counterparts. We performed transcriptional activation assays to analyze whether the promoters of these poplar TFs could be activated or repressed by PsnSHN2 in tobacco leaves. The 2-kb proximal promoter regions amplified from P. simonii × P. nigra genomic DNA were linked to the GUS reporter gene to create the reporter constructs, and the full-length cDNA of PsnSHN2 was ligated to the CaMV 35S promoter to generate the effector construct (Fig. 7A,B). The reporter and effector constructs were co-transfected into tobacco leaves, together with 35S:LUC that was primarily used for normalizing the transformation efficiency values. The subsequent assay of the GUS activity in the transfected leaves demonstrated that PsnSHN2 significantly repressed the activities of PsnWND1A, PsnWND3A, PsnMYB28, PsnMYB85, and PsnMYB192 promoters (Fig. 7C), and significantly activated the activities of the PsnMYB3, PsnMYB20, and PsnMYB152 promoters (Fig. 7D).

Figure 7
figure 7

Activation or repression of the promoters of poplar TFs by PsnSHN2. (A,B) Diagrams of the effector and reporter constructs. (C,D) The expression of the GUS was repressed and activated by PsnSHN2, respectively. GUS activity in tobacco leaves transfected with the reporter construct alone was used as a control and was set to 1. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate levels of significance of differential expression (t test; *P < 0.01).

Discussion

The biosynthesis of secondary wall involves a coordinated expression of secondary wall biosynthesis genes regulated by a cascade of TFs2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 35. To look into the molecular mechanism of wood formation and develop molecular means for genetic improvement of wood productivity and quality, it is necessary to continuously identify new master regulators or switches whose changes can boost and suppress low hierarchical TFs and further downstream lignocellulosic pathway genes in a differential manner5, 6, 10, 13, 17. The AP2/EREBP gene family have been reported to regulate plant secondary growth24, development and environmental responses23, which indicate that AP2/EREBP family genes may have pleiotropic effects on multiple biological processes, and may potentially serve as high hierarchical TFs. For example, as a member of AP2/EREBP family genes, AtSHN2 has been reported to play a role not only in coordinated regulation of lignin and cellulose/cell wall biosynthesis in transgenic rice29, but also in cuticle (cuticular wax and cutin) formation in response to drought25, 26. As a high degree of conservation exists between transcription factors involved in the secondary wall formation between herbaceous and woody plants36, it is reasonable to propose that the SHN2 gene in poplar may function in the similar way in regard to the secondary wall formation. In order to identify a new TF involved in secondary wall formation in poplar like AtSHN2, we have cloned and characterized PsnSHN2 from P. simonii × P. nigra, an economically important tree species in the northeast region of P.R. China. The PsnSHN2 showed a high amino acid similarity with AtSHN2 in A. thaliana, and is clustered into the same clade of with AtSHN2. The previous studies about the necessity of valine (V) at the 14th position and glutamic acid (E) at 19th position in the AP2/ERF domain proteins for binding to GCC box are evidently controversial22, 37, 38. One example is that several ERF proteins containing alanine (A) and aspartic acid (D) at the 14th and 19th amino acids can bind to GCC box39, 40. In this study, PsnSHN2 containing Glutamine (Q) at the 14th position and V at the 19th position instead of V at the14th and E at the 19th or A at the 14th and D at the 19th can bind to GCC box (Fig. 3).

PsnSHN2 contains an acidic C-terminal region (cm), as shown in rice and durum wheat, which act as a transcriptional activation domain37, 41. Our results of yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that PsnSHN2 has transcriptional activity (Fig. 2C), and yeast one-hybrid analysis indicated that PsnSHN2 could bind to five important cis-acting elements that are often present in proximal regions of wood formation genes (Fig. 3). In addition, the presence of NLS indicates that PsnSHN2 might be targeted to the nuclei (Fig. 1), which was further corroborated by localization of recombinant PsnSHN2-GFP protein to the nuclei of onion epidermal cells (Fig. 2B). Moreover, PsnSHN2 is predominantly expressed in developing xylem tissues of poplar (Fig. 2A). Based on these results, we propose that PsnSHN2 appears to act as a high hierarchical TF that exerts strong regulation of secondary wall formation, having a resemblance to AtSHN2 that functions in rice secondary wall formation29.

Our finding that the ectopic expression of PsnSHN2 led to a coordinated regulation between repression of lignin and activation of cellulose and hemicellulose biosynthesis, which eventually resulted in the thickened secondary wall (Fig. 4D,F). The declination of lignin content caused by PsnSHN2 overexpression is somewhat similar to the down-regulation of PAL, 4CL, CAD and their upstream TFs in Arabidopsis and other plants42. Similarly, plants expressing both antisense 4CL and sense CALd5H have been reported to have 52% less lignin and 30% more cellulose43. On the contrary, the rice bc1 mutant and maize bk2 mutant, which all encode COBRA-like protein, have been shown to contain more lignin and less cellulose44, 45. We noticed that the changes in contents of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin did not adversely affect growth of the PsnSHN2 transgenic lines, as evidenced by the fact that PsnSHN2 transgenic lines displayed normal plant phenotype, maturity, and seed yield in greenhouse condition (Fig. 4A). Surprisingly, the PsnSHN2 transgenic lines even grew bigger and more vigorously than wild-type, for example, much larger leaves and bigger diameters of stems, and taller height, as well as more biomass (Fig. S1). Such phonotypes with increased cellulose and reduced lignin have been reported in the 4CL antisense transgenic aspen lines, which also exhibit better growth46. Based on these facts, we speculated that the increased growth in all dimensions in the PsnSHN2 transgenic lines arose from the reduction in lignin because lignification in plants often has strong inverse correlation with growth47. In addition, the breaking force of the stems of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines became stronger than that of wild-type (Fig. 5F). The previous study found the tensile or bending strength of maize was shown to correlate with the cellulose content48. Therefore, the PsnSHN2 transgenic lines with increased the contents of cellulose and hemicellulose probably offset some reduction in mechanical strength caused a decrease in lignin content. It is worth to mention that the thickened secondary wall in PsnSHN2 transgenic lines also contributed to the stem tensile strength.

In summary, the evidence from three experiments consistently supports PsnSHN2 as a higher hierarchical TF exerted coordinate regulation of the secondary wall component mainly through regulation low hierarchical TFs in transcriptional network governing secondary wall formation. Evidence includes (1) PsnSHN2 overexpression in tobacco caused the low-level TFs to be activated or repressed, such as NACs (SND1 and VND6) and MYBs (MYB58, MYB63, and MYB85, et al.). (2) Yeast one-hybrid assay showed PsnSHN2 could bind to cis-acting elements, which are often present in the proximal regions of TFs controlling secondary wall biosynthesis genes. (3) PsnSHN2 could directly transactivate or suppress the expression of low hierarchical TFs involved in wood formation. For example, PsnSHN2 could repress the poplar master switches TFs, PsnWND1A and PsnWND3A. At a relatively high hierarchical level, PsnSHN2 could regulate and/or coordinate multiple pathways through controlling the low-level TFs in a top-down fashion.

Although our finding that PsnSHN2 played a high hierarchical role in controlling the secondary wall formation may provide some basis for further our understanding on the regulation of wood formation in woody plants, it is noteworthy to mention that we cannot deduce the functions of PsnSHN2 in the wood formation in tree species through directly applying the knowledge of PsnSHN2 gained from the overexpression transgenic tobacco lines even though the conservative mechanisms exist in regulating vascular plant secondary growth between herbaceous and wood plant species16. Although the stem structures of tobacco plants resemble to those of tree species49, there are some distinct features between xylem tissues in woody and herbaceous tobacco49, implicating that some unique regulatory mechanisms are present in tree species in controlling secondary wood formation50. Further, it has been reported that some orthologous TFs have marginally or drastically diverged function51, 52, and even the same TF can have different effects on secondary growth in different transgenic plants29, 53. Therefore, it is still necessary to characterize the functions of the PsnSHN2 in wood formation of tree species. Nevertheless, the activity of PsnSHN2 in the herbaceous model tobacco shows that it has a potential role in engineering the cellulose-lignin composition and content in herbaceous plants or other suitable biomass producers. The PsnSHN2 master regulator can also be used as a tool for unveiling the regulatory pathway in secondary wall formation.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and RNA extraction

Two-year-old hybrid (P. simonii × P. nigra) trees were propagated and planted in a mixture of turfy peat and sand (2:1 v/v) in a greenhouse owned by Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, P.R. China. The primary shoot leaves, transition leaves, secondary leaves, primary xylem, transition xylem, secondary xylem, primary phloem, transition phloem, secondary phloem and roots were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. The RNA was isolated according to a previously published method54 and then treated with DNase I (Qiagen) to remove any residual of genomic DNA.

Cloning PsnSHN2 gene from P. simonii × P. nigra

Five micrograms of total RNA was used for the synthesis cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo (dT) 16 primers, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The full cDNA fragment encoding PsnSHN2 was amplified from P. simonii × P. nigra with gene-specific primers (Table S1). The PCR product was cloned into the pMD18-T cloning vector (TaKaRa), and then transformed into Escherichia coli cells (DH5α) for massive sequencing.

Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis

Multiple sequence alignments were carried on using ClustalW2 (available in http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) with default setting. SHINE homologous gene sequences from P. trichocarpa (Potri.018G028000 and Potri.018G131400), Eucalyptus globulus (Eucgr.C04221), Theobroma cacao (Thecc1EG038081 and Thecc1EG0370070), O. sativa (LOC_Os06g40150) and A. thaliana (AT1G15360 and AT5G11190) were retrieved in Phytozome Database (http://www.phytozome.net/) using TBLASTN with the PsnSHN2 sequence being query. A total of 93 putative plant SHN2 protein sequences from 44 species (Supplementary file) were aligned with PsnSHN2 using ClustalW2. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the MEGA 5.0 using the neighbor-joining method with complete deletion; 1,000 replicates were used for bootstrap analysis, and the cutoff value was set to 50%.

Subcellular localization

The full-length coding region of PsnSHN2 without the termination codon was amplified using specific primers (Table S2) and ligated in frame to the N–terminal of GFP driven by CaMV 35S promoter in pGWB5 vector to generate the 35S:SHN2-GFP plant expression vector. The plasmids were delivered into onion epidermal cells by Gene Gun (GJ-1000). The onion skin tissues were stained with DAPI 24 h after bombardment, and then photographed with confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP5).

Transcriptional activation assay

The transcriptional activation of PsnSHN2 on putative targets was corroborated using the yeast two–hybrid system. The complete CDS of PsnSHN2 was amplified using specifically designed primers (Table S3). The amplified fragments were fused in-frame to the GAL4 DNA binding domain in the pGBKT7 vector to generate the pGBKT7-PsnSHN2 construct. The pGBKT7-PsnSHN2 and the pGBKT7 blank vector (as negative control) were transformed into AH109 yeast cells independently. The transformed AH109 yeast cells were plated onto SD/-Trp (growth control), SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade and X-α-Gal media and incubated on at 30 °C for 3–5 days to identify the transcriptional activation.

Analysis of the downstream cis-elements of the PsnSHN2

Three tandem copies of the secondary NAC binding element (SNBE)8, 55, secondary MYB binding element(SMBE)8, ACI and ACIIcis–acting elements34, and GCC box motif29, 56 (Table S4) were inserted into pHIS2 (Clontech) upstream of the reporter HIS3, respectively. The full CDS of PsnSHN2 amplified used primers in Table S4 was inserted into pGADT7-Rec2 as the effector vector. Both constructs were cotransformed into Y187 yeast cells, which were plated onto SD medium minus Trp, Leu, and His plus 60 mM 3-amonotrizole to test the expression of the His3 gene at 30 °C for 3–5 days. The cotransformation of pHIS2-p53 and pGADT7-p53 were used as a positive control, and the pHIS2-p53 and pGADT7-PsnSHN2 were used as a negative control. The interactions of these sequences with the PsnSHN2 were studied using yeast one-hybrid analysis as aforementioned.

Transformation tobacco plant

The full length CDS of PsnSHN2 was amplified with the primers listed in Table S5 from pMD18-T cloning vector. Then, the amplified fragments and pROKII vector were double digesting with BamHI and KpnI at same time. The gel-purified PsnSHN2 and pROKII vector were ligated by T4 ligase. The obtained construct, pROKII-PsnSHN2, was transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 using the freeze-thaw method. Transgenic plants were selected on MS medium containing 250 ug/ml kanamycin and 500 ug/ml carbenicillin. The shoots of each transgenic line were cut and cultured until sufficient replicates were generated. All plants were transferred to greenhouse. The T1 seeds were collected from self-pollinated plants and were germinated on MS medium with kanamycin (25 mg/L) to produce T1 generation transgenic plants. These procedures were repeated to obtain the T2 generation seeds. The genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of one-month-old PsnSHN2 T2 seedlings using Depure Plant DNA kit (Deaou Biology Company). The genomic DNA was amplified by regular PCR using the pROKII sequencing primers listed in Table S5 to verify whether PsnSHN2 was integrated into tobacco genome. All tested PsnSHN2 transgenic lines and wild-type were grown in the greenhouse and used for analyses.

The plastichron index (PI) method was used to determine the stem growth. The first leaf with a length greater than 5 cm was defined as the first leaf and named PI0. Then the leaf immediately below PI0 was defined as PI1. Stem segments between PI5 and PI8 were used for analyzing the secondary wall thickness, histology and anatomy, cell wall chemical composition. Stem between PI3 and PI5 was retained for analyses of RNA transcript abundance.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Five micrograms of total RNA from different tissues of P. simonii × P. nigra, as well as stem segments between PI3 and PI5 of PsnSHN2 lines and wild-type were used for the synthesizing cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT) 16 primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were run in triplicate with the SYBR premix ExTaq kit (TaKaRa) and an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System to determine the critical threshold (Ct).

The PsnSHN2 expression level in P. simonii × P. nigra different tissues and in the stem of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines were detected by qRT-PCR using primers listed Table S6. The changes in the expression of postulated downstream target TFs (such as NACs and MYBs), and pathway genes involved the secondary wall biosynthesis, which are known in previous studies2, 9, 11, 13, 14, 20, 32, 34, 42, were also characterized using qRT-PCR using primers listed in Table S7. The downstream target TFs were also inferred from the previous study of AtSH2 in rice via homology mapping29. The relative expression of each gene relative to the reference gene was calculated using the delta-delta CT method57. The reference gene was PsnACTIN1 in poplar and the NtACTIN 2 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) (Table S6). Each measurement was carried out with three biological replicates, and three technical replicates. The error bars represent SE of the mean fold changes for the three biological replicates.

Determination of break force

The breaking force needed to break a stem segment into two segments between PI5 and PI8 was calculated using YYD-1 plant stalk analyzer (Zhejiang Top Instrument Co., Ltd.).

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Stem segments between PI5 and PI8 of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines and wild-type were used for scanning electron microscopy (S-4800, HITACHI). The secondary wall thicknesses of fibers in the scanning electron microscopy micrographs were quantified in an area of 45 cells using Image J software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).

Histological Analysis

The stem segments between PI5 and PI8 were cut into 0.5-mm-thick sections that were stained for lignin with phloroglucinol-HCl and examined by light microscopy. The cellulose was stained with calcofluor white and examined by fluorescence microscope.

Determination of the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents

The stem segments between PI5 and PI8 were ground to a powder after drying. The cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin contents were analyzed according to the Klason procedure58 using an ANKOM 2000i Automatic fiber analyzer (Ankom).

Transactivation Assay

To test if PsnSHN2 can activate the poplar downstream target TFs promoters such as PsnWND1A, PsnWND3A, PsnMYB28, PsnMYB85, PsnMYB192, PsnMYB3, PsnMYB20 and PsnMYB152 11, 16, 20, which were chosen based on the expression analysis results of PsnSHN2 transgenic lines and the previous study of AtSHN2 in rice29, the full coding region of PsnSHN2 was cloned into pROKII under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter as the effector construct. The reporter construct contained the GUS reporter gene driven by a 2-kb promoter of TFs, which was amplified using the primer listed in Table S8 from the P. simonii × P. nigra genomic DNA. Both effector and reporter constructs were cotransfected into tobacco leaves by A. tumefaciens-mediated transient transformation59. Another construct containing the firefly luciferase (LUC) gene driven by the CaMV 35S promoter was also cotransfected for monitoring the transfection efficiency.

After agroinfiltration, plants were covered with a transparent plastic cover and transferred into a growth chamber at 25 °C with 16/8 h light/dark cycle for 2–3 days. The transfection leaves were soaked with 100 mM MG-132 (Wako Pure Chemical) for 6 h. Then, the total protein of leaves was extracted in the extraction buffer60. For LUC activity analysis, the LUC substrate (Promega, Madison, WI) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 10 ml of sample extract was mixed with 50 ml of substrate, and the LUC activity was measured on a Zylux FB15 luminometer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). GUS activities were determined by fluorometry with 4-methylumbelliferyl glucuronide as substrate according to Desikan et al.61. The GUS activity was normalized against the luciferase activity in each transfection, and the data are averages of three biological replicates.

Statistical Analysis

The student’s t test (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm) was used for statistical analysis of the data generated in the experiment. In all analyses, it was found that the quantitative differences between two groups of data in comparison were statistically significant (*P-value < 0.05; **P-value < 0.01).