Abstract
The Wine Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) label is a European quality scheme that protects high quality wines by linking them to legally defined geographic areas and a set of specific production practices. Because of the tight relation between PDO wines and the specifications defined in the official regulatory documents, these products are highly susceptible to changes in climatic, environmental, or socioeconomic conditions. However, the content of these regulatory documents has never been systematically analysed and summarized in a single dataset. Here, we present the first geospatial inventory that organizes regulatory information about the 1177 wine PDO in Europe based on the documents from the official EU geographical indication register. It includes essential legal information that defines the wine PDO such as the geographic boundaries, authorized cultivars and maximum yields. This inventory opens new possibilities for researchers to accurately assess, compare and map the regulatory information in each wine region at an unprecedented level of detail, supporting decision makers in developing adaptation strategies for the preservation of PDO wine regions.
Measurement(s) | Wine • Agriculture |
Technology Type(s) | Database • GIS |
Factor Type(s) | Regulatory documents |
Sample Characteristic - Organism | Vitis vinifera |
Sample Characteristic - Environment | agriculture |
Sample Characteristic - Location | Europe |
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
The Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) label is a European Union (EU) quality scheme that protects products made within closely defined areas, under specific physical and biological conditions and using strictly defined production practices1,2. In the overall list of products that are registered and protected by the EU, wine plays a major role and includes the largest share of recognized PDO (65%)3. The 1177 European wine PDO comprise 21 countries and a broad range of wine products, including still, sparkling, and liquor wine. As such, PDO viticulture and winemaking represent a key socioeconomic activity4, for instance, in 2018 more than 81 million hl of PDO wine were produced, with an export business value of around 9 billion €5.
The quality scheme for PDO wines was set up to protect the unique characteristics of specific wine products and to promote their high quality6. It includes strict regulations regarding cultivation and production processes together with the definition of the area where the grapes must be cultivated. For example, a PDO regulation may require that wines are exclusively produced from traditional vine cultivars of a region, or that they are aged for a certain amount of time in wooden barrels. To be labelled as a PDO product, a wine needs to be formally recognized by the European commission, which requires applicants to establish a direct link between the quality attributes of the product and its geographical origin7. In this process, the producers need to elaborate a detailed documentation that specifies the production requirements of each wine product, i.e., the product specification, and summarize it in a stand-alone report, the so-called single document. Once a wine product is recognized and registered as a PDO, the product specification along with the single document can only be amended after presenting specific reasons why the changes are required8. The documents produced during the application and all eventual amendments are published online in the official EU indication register eAmbrosia, that represents the legal repository of all the geographical indications for agri-food production, wine and spirits registered and protected in the EU9,10.
Because of the strong relation between PDO wines and the specific conditions and production practices defined during the application process, these products are highly vulnerable to any changes in the climatic, environmental, or economic conditions in the production area1,11. For example, warmer climate conditions are already affecting the growing suitability of several cultivars, posing significant challenges to many labelled wine products from PDO regions12,13,14,15,16. Moreover, the introduction of alien pest species from other wine growing areas is endangering the health of vines, requiring vineyard managers to use new agricultural practices for pest control17,18,19. Economic and social preferences, on the other hand, are pushing for a more sustainable management of vineyards encouraging many European winegrowers to adopt new production practices, such as organic viticulture20,21,22. All these factors are impacting wine PDO throughout Europe and are often in conflict with the regulations defined in the application documents. For instance, to maintain their quality standards, PDO areas may need to use new production practices that are different from those specified in the regulatory documents. For this reason, there is a need to thoroughly plan and develop specific adaptation strategies that consider the local conditions and legal regulations of single PDO1,23. However, such strategies require knowledge about the legal specifications that characterize each PDO, which is currently only available in the regulatory documents of each wine PDO and not as a harmonized dataset.
Here, we present the first geospatial inventory of regulatory information for all 1177 PDO areas across Europe (as of 04.11.2021). We collected, standardized and spatialized a set of regulatory information from the EU indications register eAmbrosia and aggregated it in a harmonized dataset. This information is intended to be a fundamental support to inform research and decision making in the field of viticulture. For instance, crop modellers can use the information to model possible scenarios of climate impacts and adaptation in wine PDO areas. Agronomists can suggest new wine growing strategies by comparing information about different PDO, and decision makers can plan possible actions to improve high quality grapevine production.
Methods
Extraction and standardization of the information from the legal documents was carried out during the period March 2021 – November 2021 using the EU geographical indication register eAmbrosia as a source3. The last time we checked for any changes to the legal documents of the PDO regions was on 04.11.2021; PDO areas or amendments that were published after this date are therefore not included in the present dataset. We focused on all PDO recognized in the EU and the United Kingdom. The two main steps of the process were: (1) the spatialization of the wine PDO cultivation areas and (2) the selection and standardization of regulatory information for each PDO (Fig. 1). Team members were fluent in Italian, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, and English. The knowledge of these languages was helpful, because in most cases the regulatory documents are provided in the language of the country where the PDO is located and 80% of European wine PDO are located in Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Spain and Portugal. In case the team was not fluent in the language of a document, we had to use Regulation (EU) No 1308/201310 and the commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/3324 and 349. These documents specify the rules for PDO regulation in the EU and the guidelines to write the application as PDO for wine products, respectively, and are translated in all the EU languages. We used them to find relevant keywords in the different EU languages that we were not fluent with and then used these keywords to find the relevant information in the regulatory documents. This was necessary for part or all of the PDOs located in Bulgaria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. If any of the official documents were not available in the eAmbrosia register, we searched on dedicated websites for each country or contacted the related governmental institution to obtain the missing information.
STEP 1: spatialization of PDO cultivation areas
In the vast majority of legal documents, the PDO area was defined by including a list of municipalities where the cultivation of grapes for the PDO wines is allowed. For this reason, we georeferenced the wine PDO areas using the administrative boundaries at the municipal scale provided by the EuroRegionalMap dataset (© EuroGeographics 202225) as the minimum mapping unit. For each PDO, we copied the municipality names from the legal document one-by-one, manually extracted the corresponding boundaries in the geographic dataset, merged all the single municipalities and finally exported the PDO boundary as a single shapefile. For countries where the EuroRegionalMap did not include information on the municipality boundaries, we used administrative boundaries from other repositories26,27. This was necessary for Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania, Denmark, United Kingdom and Greece. In some cases, the documentation provided a detailed outline of the boundaries of the PDO area but did not include any reference to the municipality, typically only indicating specific landscape features such as roads and rivers. In these cases, we manually selected the relevant municipalities using satellite images from various sources (e.g., Esri28, Google Earth29) as a reference. Once we obtained the municipal polygons that together constitute the total PDO cultivation area, we dissolved them first to have a single polygon per PDO and then merged each single PDO together to build a unified spatial dataset (Fig. 2). The steps to spatialize the PDO areas were carried out using the QGIS30, ArcGIS31 and R32 software.
STEP 2: extraction of PDO regulatory information
In the second step, we extracted a set of regulatory information from the official documents in the eAmbrosia portal. The available information was heterogenous between the single EU countries, with some of them providing very detailed information while others provided only very little information. We collected only regulatory information that was available for all included countries and could be standardized among all PDO areas. Therefore, we had to exclude a set of information such as the training system, chemical composition of wines (e.g., sugars and acid contents), organoleptic profiles and alcoholic strength. For some PDO areas, mostly those located in Italy and France, we also found that more detailed regulations regarding planting densities or yields are available, that are specified depending on varieties, wine product or even topographic conditions (e.g., localization in steep slopes). We aggregated information from more detailed regulations to the same level of detail as in the other countries. The selected regulatory information that we extracted is presented in Table 1, including the methodology that was used for standardization. To extract the regulatory information from the legal documents and insert them into our dataset, we copied the relevant entries and pasted them in a dedicated spreadsheet table before proceeding with their standardization, using the Excel software33.
Once all the regulatory information for the European wine PDOs was gathered, we aggregated them either based on their PDO identifier (PDOid field) or based on the wine product information (Category_of_wine_product field). This was necessary because we wanted to provide both, a dataset that gives an overview of the wine PDOs in Europe and their main characteristics, and a dataset that is dedicated to wine products. Therefore, two distinct files were compiled:
-
I.
A dataset containing 1177 entries, one for each PDO. It gives an overview of the main regulatory information, including the maximum yield, the minimum planting density and a list field with all the authorized vine varieties in a PDO. All the data regarding the remaining regulatory information are included in full detail.
-
II.
A dataset containing 1983 entries, with a focus on the wine products of each PDO. It includes information about maximum yield and minimum planting density per category of wine product that is produced in each PDO. The authorized vine varieties for each category of wine product are specified in a list field. All the data regarding the remaining regulatory information are fully included.
Table 2 summarizes some of the information gathered in STEP 1 and STEP 2. Figure 3 represents a selection of key variables included in our inventory for different countries.
Data Records
We present an easily accessible and freely available inventory for the current wine PDO areas in the EU, comprising geospatial information as well as a set of regulatory information that can be used by researchers and decision makers. The data is freely available through the Figshare data publisher34.
It includes a geospatial file that contains the boundaries of the analysed PDO and two .csv files that contain the regulatory information aggregated either based on the PDO identifier or based on the category of wine product. The .csv files were saved using commas (“,”) to separate the columns, and a point (“.”) as decimal separator. Both .csv files are saved using utf-8 encoding. The files included in the inventory are:
-
1.
EU_PDO.gpkg: a geopackage file that includes the boundaries for each of the 1177 PDO areas defined in the regulatory documents from eAmbrosia. The join between the spatial features and the other files is guaranteed by the common field PDOid.
-
2.
PDO_EU_id.csv: a .csv file that includes the regulatory information outlined in Table 1 aggregated based on the PDO (PDOid field).
-
3.
PDO_EU_cat.csv: a .csv file that includes the regulatory information outlined in Table 1 aggregated based on the category of wine product (Category_of_wine_product field).
Technical Validation
We spatialized and gathered the regulatory information about wine PDO in Europe based on the official geographical indication register eAmbrosia, that constitutes the legal basis for PDO designation in the EU. In many cases, more than 90% of all the vineyards identified by the Corine Land Cover35 map are also included in the spatialized wine PDO areas (Table 2). For each PDO, we provide the reference to the official documents from which the data was created, allowing the user to cross check pieces of information with ease. Throughout the spatialization of the PDO and the collection of related regulatory information, spot checks were conducted at various stages of the progress to verify that mistakes had been kept to a minimum.
Usage Notes
Given the amount of information included in our inventory and its coverage, this dataset will be particularly useful for researchers and decision makers in the field of viticulture. For example, the knowledge of regulatory information, such as the planting density, yield, and vine variety, can be used by researchers to calibrate crop models and generate projections of phenology and water stress indicators in PDO areas12. The results of these models can be compared to the characteristics of the authorized vine cultivars planted in a PDO to develop adaptation solutions for climate change such as the inclusion of new vine cultivars or the authorization of irrigation in the regulatory documents19. Analysing the contents of PDO documents and the related amendments can also improve our understanding of the critical factors that determine the sustainability and reputation of PDO regions. For example, Marescotti et al.7, studied the amendments of protected geographical indications in the fruit and vegetable sector and found that there is a strong need to introduce more environmental criteria in the regulatory documents, and Scozzafava et al.36, analysed how a change in PDO regulations can promote the premium products from a wine PDO region.
Code availability
No custom code has been used during the generation and processing of this dataset.
References
Clark, L. F. & Kerr, W. A. Climate change and terroir: The challenge of adapting geographical indications. J. World Intellect. Prop. 20, 88–102 (2017).
European Commission - Food, Farming, Fisheries. Quality schemes explained https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/quality-schemes-explained_en (2022).
European Commission - Food, Farming, Fisheries. eAmbrosia, the EU geographical indication register https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/geographical-indications-register/ (2022).
European Commission – Directorate - General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Study on economic value of EU quality schemes, geographical indications (GIs) and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSGs): final report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021).
European commission - Food, Farming, Fisheries. Wine market observatory https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/farming/facts-and-figures/markets/overviews/market-observatories/wine_en#:~:text=The%20aim%20of%20the%20EU,analysis%20in%20a%20timely%20manner (2022).
Zappalaglio, A. The Debate Between the European Parliament and the Commission on the Definition of Protected Designation of Origin: Why the Parliament Is Right. IIc – Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. Law 50, 595–610 (2019).
Marescotti, A. et al. Are Protected Geographical Indications Evolving Due to Environmentally Related Justifications? An Analysis of Amendments in the Fruit and Vegetable Sector in the European Union. Sustainability 12, 3571 (2020).
Ruiz, X. F. Q. et al. How are food Geographical Indications evolving? – An analysis of EU GI amendments. Brit. Food J 120, 1876–1887 (2018).
European commission Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/34 - of 17 October 2018 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards applications for protection of designations of origin, geographical indications and traditional terms in the wine sector, the objection procedure, amendments to product specifications, the register of protected names, cancellation of protection and use of symbols, and of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards an appropriate system of checks (Official journal of the European Union, 2019).
European commission Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (Official journal of the European Union, 2013).
International Organization of Vine and Wine. Resolution OIV/VITI 333/2010 https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/379/viti-2010-1-en.pdf (2010).
Fraga, H., Atauri, I. G., de, C., Malheiro, A. C. & Santos, J. A. Modelling climate change impacts on viticultural yield, phenology and stress conditions in Europe. Global Change Biol. 22, 3774–3788 (2016).
Neethling, E., Barbeau, G., Coulon-Leroy, C. & Quénol, H. Spatial complexity and temporal dynamics in viticulture: A review of climate-driven scales. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 276–277, 107618 (2019).
Hannah, L. et al. Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 110, 6907–6912 (2013).
Tscholl, S., Tasser, E., Tappeiner, U. & Vigl, L. E. Coupling solar radiation and cloud cover data for enhanced temperature predictions over topographically complex mountain terrain. Int. J. Climatol (2021).
Fraga, H., Molitor, D., Leolini, L. & Santos, J. A. What Is the Impact of Heatwaves on European Viticulture? A Modelling Assessment. Appl. Sci. 10, 3030 (2020).
Daane, K., Vincent, C., Isaacs, R. & Ioratti, C. Entomological Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Viticulture in a Global Market. Annual Review of Entomology 63, 193–214 (2018).
Caffarra, A., Rinaldi, M., Eccel, E., Rossi, V. & Pertot, I. Modelling the impact of climate change on the interaction between grapevine and its pests and pathogens: European grapevine moth and powdery mildew. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 148, 89–101 (2012).
Santos, J. A. et al. A Review of the Potential Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Options for European Viticulture. Appl. Sci. 10, 3092 (2020).
International Organization of Vine and Wine. Focus OIV, the world organic vineyard https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/8514/en-focus-the-world-organic-vineyard.pdf (2021).
Strub, L., Kurth, A. & Loose, S. M. Effects of Viticultural Mechanization on Working Time Requirements and Production Costs. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 72, 46–55 (2020).
Marín, D. et al. Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: tackling the issue from the roots. Aust. J. Grape Wine R. 27, 8–25 (2021).
Neethling, E., Petitjean, T., Quénol, H. & Barbeau, G. Assessing local climate vulnerability and winegrowers’ adaptive processes in the context of climate change. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl. 22, 777–803 (2017).
European commission Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2019/ 33 of 17 October 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards applications for protection of designations of origin, geographical indications and traditional terms in the wine sector, the objection procedure, restrictions of use, amendments to product specifications, cancellation of protection, and labelling and presentation (Official journal of the European Union, 2019).
Eurogeographic. EuroRegionalMap. https://www.mapsforeurope.org/datasets/euro-regional-map (2022).
United Nation Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The Humanitarian Data Exchange. https://data.humdata.org/ (2022).
Geoadata.gov.gr. Boundaries of the local authorities. https://geodata.gov.gr/en/dataset/oria-ota-pro-kapodistria/resource/5434dd9f-2b8c-4a03-84f4-63e3803c3e41 (2022).
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). World street map. Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, Tomtom (2022).
Google. Google Earth Pro: release 7.3.4.8248 https://www.google.com/intl/en-GB/earth/ (2022).
QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System, version 3.22.4. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project https://qgis.org/en/site/ (2016).
ArcGIS desktop, version 10.8. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2022).
R core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.1.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. https://office.microsoft.com/excel (2018)
Candiago, S., Tscholl, S., Bassani, L., Fraga, H., Egarter Vigl, L. A geospatial inventory of regulatory information for wine protected designations of origin in Europe. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5877659.v1 (2022).
European Environment Agency (EEA). Corine land cover 2018 version 2020. Copernicus programme https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc2018 (2022).
Scozzafava, G., Gerini, F., Dominici, A., Contini, C. & Casini, C. Reach for the stars: The impact on consumer preferences of introducing a new top-tier typology into a PDO wine. Wine Econ. Policy 7, 140–152 (2018).
International Organization of Vine and Wine. International list of vine varieties and their synonyms https://www.oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/description-of-grape-varieties/international-list-of-vine-varieties-and-their-synonyms (2013).
Eurostat, GISCO: Geographical Information and Maps. LAU 2020. © EuroGeographics for the administrative boundaries https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-statistical-units/lau (2022).
Acknowledgements
Sebastian Candiago’s PhD grant was co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Alpine Space Programme (‘AlpES | Alpine Ecosystem Services – mapping, maintenance, management’, project number ASP 183), and the Interreg V-A ITA-AUT programme (REBECKA, project number ITAT1002). Simon Tscholl’s PhD grant was co-financed by the ‘Südtiroler Sparkasse Foundation’. We thank the Unit B.3. – geographical indications, of the Directorate General Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission, that helped us with information about the eAmbrosia database during the conceptualization phases of this study. The authors thank the Department of Innovation, Research and University of the Autonomous Province of Bozen/Bolzano for covering the Open Access publication costs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing - original draft, writing – review & editing. S.T.: methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing - original draft, writing – review & editing. L.B.: formal analysis, data curation. H.F.: methodology, writing – review & editing. L.E.V.: supervision, methodology, writing – review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Candiago, S., Tscholl, S., Bassani, L. et al. A geospatial inventory of regulatory information for wine protected designations of origin in Europe. Sci Data 9, 394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01513-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01513-0