Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Machine learning improves prediction of clinical outcomes for invasive breast cancers

A prognostic model for invasive breast cancer that is based on interpretable measurements of epithelial, stromal, and immune components outperforms histologic grading by expert pathologists. This model could improve clinical management of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and address the concerns of pathologists about artificial intelligence (AI) trustworthiness by providing transparent and explainable predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Morphologic features included in the HiPS.

References

  1. Van Dooijeweert, C., Van Diest, P. J. & Ellis, I. O. Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward. Virchows Arch. 480, 34–43 (2022). A review article that presents an overview of histologic grading of invasive breast cancers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L. & Beam, A. L. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e745–e750 (2021). This viewpoint article describes the shortcomings of prevalent approaches to explaining AI healthcare models.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa, A. et al. Fibroblast heterogeneity and immunosuppressive environment in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 463–479 (2018). This article identifies subtypes of cancer-associated fibroblasts found in breast cancers and their role in immunosuppression.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariotto, A. et al. Expected monetary impact of oncotype DX score-concordant systemic breast cancer therapy based on the TAILORx trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 112, 154–160 (2020). An article that analyzes the costs associated with molecular testing for breast cancers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, B. A. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in Oncotype DX Test receipt in a statewide population-based study. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 15, 346–354 (2017). An article that analyzes disparities in access to molecular testing for breast cancer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Amgad, M. et al. A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machine learning improves prediction of clinical outcomes for invasive breast cancers. Nat Med 30, 41–42 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02667-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02667-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer