Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Penetrance of pathogenic genetic variants associated with premature ovarian insufficiency

Abstract

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects 1% of women and is a leading cause of infertility. It is often considered to be a monogenic disorder, with pathogenic variants in ~100 genes described in the literature. We sought to systematically evaluate the penetrance of variants in these genes using exome sequence data in 104,733 women from the UK Biobank, 2,231 (1.14%) of whom reported at natural menopause under the age of 40 years. We found limited evidence to support any previously reported autosomal dominant effect. For nearly all heterozygous effects on previously reported POI genes, we ruled out even modest penetrance, with 99.9% (13,699 out of 13,708) of all protein-truncating variants found in reproductively healthy women. We found evidence of haploinsufficiency effects in several genes, including TWNK (1.54 years earlier menopause, P = 1.59 × 10−6) and SOHLH2 (3.48 years earlier menopause, P = 1.03 × 10−4). Collectively, our results suggest that, for the vast majority of women, POI is not caused by autosomal dominant variants either in genes previously reported or currently evaluated in clinical diagnostic panels. Our findings, plus previous studies, suggest that most POI cases are likely oligogenic or polygenic in nature, which has important implications for future clinical genetic studies, and genetic counseling for families affected by POI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: ANM in women with HC-PTVs in POI genes reported to have an AD pattern of inheritance.
Fig. 2: Range of ANM in carriers of missense variants with CADD score greater than 25 in genes reported to have an AD pattern of inheritance.
Fig. 3: Range of ANM in carriers of missense variants with REVEL score greater than 0.7 in genes reported to have an AD pattern of inheritance.
Fig. 4: ANM in carriers of HC-PTVs in POI genes reported to have an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance.
Fig. 5: Gene burden associations with ANM.
Fig. 6: ANM in carriers of HC-PTVs in POI genes by decile of polygenic risk score.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We used publicly available individual-level genotype and phenotype data from the UK Biobank (https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/). Access to these data needs to be requested from the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access). This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application 9905 (University of Cambridge) and 9072 and 871 (University of Exeter). POI genes were identified from the GEL Panel App (https://panelapp.genomicsengland.co.uk/panels/155/). Genes were annotated with pathogenicity constraint metrics from gnomAD v.2.1.1.

References

  1. Wesevich, V., Kellen, A. N. & Pal, L. Recent advances in understanding primary ovarian insufficiency. F1000Res 9, F1000 Faculty Rev-1101 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudnicka, E. et al. Premature ovarian insufficiency—aetiopathology, epidemiology, and diagnostic evaluation. Prz. Menopauzalny 17, 105–108 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Coulam, C. B., Adamson, S. C. & Annegers, J. F. Incidence of premature ovarian failure. Obstet. Gynecol. 67, 604–606 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Golezar, S., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Khazaei, S., Ebadi, A. & Keshavarz, Z. The global prevalence of primary ovarian insufficiency and early menopause: a meta-analysis. Climacteric 22, 403–411 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harlow, B. L. & Signorello, L. B. Factors associated with early menopause. Maturitas 35, 3–9 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goswami, D. & Conway, G. S. Premature ovarian failure. Hum. Reprod. Update 11, 391–410 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szeliga, A. et al. Autoimmune diseases in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency—our current state of knowledge. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2594 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortuño, C. & Labarta, E. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency: a review. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 31, 1573–1585 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Venturella, R. et al. The genetics of non-syndromic primary ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 13, 161–168 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Perry, J. R. et al. A genome-wide association study of early menopause and the combined impact of identified variants. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 1465–1472 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruth, K. S. et al. Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing. Nature 596, 393–397 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin, Y. et al. ESR1, HK3 and BRSK1 gene variants are associated with both age at natural menopause and premature ovarian failure. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 7, 5 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van Kasteren, Y. M. et al. Familial idiopathic premature ovarian failure: an overrated and underestimated genetic disease? Hum. Reprod. 14, 2455–2459 (1999).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pu, D., Xing, Y., Gao, Y., Gu, L. & Wu, J. Gene variation and premature ovarian failure: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 182, 226–237 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Persani, L., Rossetti, R., Cacciatore, C. & Bonomi, M. Primary ovarian insufficiency: X chromosome defects and autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 33, 35–41 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Day, F. R. et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat. Genet. 47, 1294–1303 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, H. et al. Whole-exome sequencing in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency: early detection and early intervention. J. OVarian Res. 13, 114 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. França, M. M. & Mendonca, B. B. Genetics of primary ovarian insufficiency in the next-generation sequencing era. J. Endocr. Soc. 4, bvz037 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, H. et al. Identification of potential causal variants for premature ovarian failure by whole exome sequencing. BMC Med. Genomics 13, 159 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Patiño, L. C. et al. New mutations in non-syndromic primary ovarian insufficiency patients identified via whole-exome sequencing. Hum. Reprod. 32, 1512–1520 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chapman, C., Cree, L. & Shelling, A. N. The genetics of premature ovarian failure: current perspectives. Int J. Women’s Health 7, 799–810 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Szustakowski, J. D. et al. Advancing human genetics research and drug discovery through exome sequencing of the UK Biobank. Nat. Genet. 53, 942–948 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner, E. J. et al. Reduced reproductive success is associated with selective constraint on human genes. Nature 603, 858–863 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, X. et al. Dynamic incorporation of multiple in silico functional annotations empowers rare variant association analysis of large whole-genome sequencing studies at scale. Nat. Genet. 52, 969–983 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Minikel, E. V. et al. Evaluating drug targets through human loss-of-function genetic variation. Nature 581, 459–464 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stankovic, S. et al. Genetic susceptibility to earlier ovarian ageing increases de novo mutation rate in offspring. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.23.22276698 (2022).

  28. Korhonen, J. A., Gaspari, M. & Falkenberg, M. TWINKLE Has 5′ -> 3′ DNA helicase activity and is specifically stimulated by mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48627–48632 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan, I. et al. Biochemical characterization of the human mitochondrial replicative twinkle helicase: substrate specificity, DNA branch migration and ability to overcome blockades to DNA unwinding. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 14324–14339 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bashamboo, A. & McElreavey, K. NR5A1/SF-1 and development and function of the ovary. Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris) 71, 177–182 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi, Y., Yuan, D. & Rajkovic, A. Germ cell-specific transcriptional regulator sohlh2 is essential for early mouse folliculogenesis and oocyte-specific gene expression. Biol. Reprod. 79, 1176–1182 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cerván-Martín, M. et al. Intronic variation of the SOHLH2 gene confers risk to male reproductive impairment. Fertil. Steril. 114, 398–406 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barros, F., Carvalho, F., Barros, A. & Dória, S. Premature ovarian insufficiency: clinical orientations for genetic testing and genetic counseling. Porto Biomed. J. 5, e62 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Stark, Z. et al. Scaling national and international improvement in virtual gene panel curation via a collaborative approach to discordance resolution. Am. J. Hum. Genet 108, 1551–1557 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lerat, J. et al. An application of NGS for molecular investigations in Perrault syndrome: study of 14 families and review of the literature. Hum. Mutat. 37, 1354–1362 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rouen, A. et al. Whole exome sequencing in a cohort of familial premature ovarian insufficiency cases reveals a broad array of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 50% of families. Fertil. Steril. 117, 843–853 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, X. et al. Gene variants identified by whole-exome sequencing in 33 French women with premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 36, 39–45 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ke, H. et al. Landscape of pathogenic mutations in premature ovarian insufficiency. Nat. Med. 29, 483–492 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li, Z. et al. Validation of UK Biobank data for mental health outcomes: a pilot study using secondary care electronic health records. Int J. Med Inf. 160, 104704 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pirastu, N. et al. Genetic analyses identify widespread sex-differential participation bias. Nat. Genet. 53, 663–671 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Murray, A. et al. Population-based estimates of the prevalence of FMR1 expansion mutations in women with early menopause and primary ovarian insufficiency. Genet. Med. 16, 19–24 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Backman, J. D. et al. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. Nature 599, 628–634 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Wenger, A. M., Zehir, A. & Mesirov, J. P. Variant review with the integrative genomics viewer. Cancer Res. 77, e31–e34 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Mbatchou, J. et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat. Genet. 53, 1097–1103 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tyrrell, J. et al. Using genetics to understand the causal influence of higher BMI on depression. Int J. Epidemiol. 48, 834–848 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Loh, P. R. et al. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat. Genet. 47, 284–290 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Gardner, E. J. et al. Damaging missense variants in IGF1R implicate a role for IGF-1 resistance in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes.Cell Genom. 2, 100208 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In Proc. 9th Python in Science Conference (eds van der Walt, S. & Millman, J.) (SCiPy, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) (Unit programs: MC_UU_12015/2, MC_UU_00006/2, MC_UU_12015/1, and MC_UU_00006/1). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors acknowledge the use of the University of Exeter High-Performance Computing facility in carrying out this work, funded by a MRC Clinical Research Infrastructure award (MRC Grant: MR/M008924/1). This study was supported by the NIHR Exeter Biomedical Research Centre. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising. S. Shekari was supported by the QUEX Institute (University of Exeter, UK and the University of Queensland, Australia). S. Stankovic is supported by the Clare Hall Ivan D. Jankovic PhD scholarship from the University of Cambridge. A.M., C.F.W. and M.N.W. are supported by the MRC (MR/T00200X/1). K.S.R. is supported by Cancer Research UK (grant number C18281/A29019). G.H. has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 875534. G.D.M. is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator grant (APP2009577). E.R.H. was supported by the European Research Council (724718-ReCAP), Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF15COC0016662; NNF0066487), the Independent Research Foundation Denmark (0134-00299B) and a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation Centre (6110-00344B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were involved in reviewing and editing the manuscript. The study was conceived by A. Murray and J.R.B.P. Lead analysts were S. Shekari and S. Stankovic, with additional analyses by E.J.G. and K.A.K. Exome sequencing pipelines were developed by E.J.G., G.H., R.N.B., A. Mörseburg, A.R.W., F.R.D., C.F.W., M.N.W., K.S.R., J.R.B.P. and A. Murray. Clinical interpretation was provided by G.D.M., E.R.H., J.B. J.K.P. and K.K.O.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to John R. B. Perry or Anna Murray.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.R.B.P. and E.J.G. hold shares in and are employees of Adrestia Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Triin Laisk, Yukinori Okada and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Saheli Sadanand, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1

Bars to the right of the dotted red line represent those with menopause ≥40 years.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Excel table with multiple sheets of additional data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shekari, S., Stankovic, S., Gardner, E.J. et al. Penetrance of pathogenic genetic variants associated with premature ovarian insufficiency. Nat Med 29, 1692–1699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02405-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02405-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing