Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Supported decision-making can advance clinical research participation for people with disabilities

Nature Medicine volume 28, pages 2250–2253 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Clinical research often excludes people with disabilities who have impaired decisional capacity, but they can be included through supported decision-making, where their decisions can be assisted by designated supporters of their choosing. This will promote equitable access to research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Feldman, M. A. et al. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 58, 800–809 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friesen, P. et al. Am. J. Bioeth. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434 1–14 (2022).

  3. Shogren, K. A. et al. Educ. Train. Autism Dev. Disabil. 52, 144–157 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): Article 12 – Equal Recognition Before the Law; https://go.nature.com/3fh6kUc (UN, accessed 1 September 2022).

  5. Stein, M. A. et al. Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  6. Vásquez Encalada, A. et al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 5204 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Implementing Supported Decision-Making: Developments Across Europe and the Role of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI, MHE, 2020).

  8. In Your State; https://go.nature.com/3BQPyTD (NRC-SDM, accessed 1 September 2022).

  9. Bard, J. S. JLPA 6, 489–560 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howell, B. M. et al. in Research Involving Participants with Cognitive Disability and Difference: Ethics, Autonomy, Inclusion, and Innovation (eds Cascio, M. A. & Racine, E.) Ch. 3. (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).

  11. Office for Human Research Protections. US Code of Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46); https://go.nature.com/3yl1Rq4 (US HHS, 2018).

  12. Subcommittee on Inclusion of Individuals with Impaired Decision-making in Research: Recommendation 6 https://go.nature.com/3r1Z7Kf (SACHRP, 2009).

  13. Informed Consent: Draft Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors (US FDA, 2014).

  14. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act 29 U.S.C. 794 (US Government, 2022).

  15. Americans with Disabilities Act U.S.C. 12101 (US Government, 2022).

  16. The Right to Make Choices: International Laws and Decision-Making by People with Disabilities (ASAN, 2016).

  17. U.S. Supported Decision-Making Laws; https://go.nature.com/3LGpQ8K (CPR, 1 September 2022).

  18. Supported Decision-Making Act: Delaware Code 16 9401A–9410A (Delaware, 2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Research Affairs, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA

    Benjamin C. Silverman

  2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Benjamin C. Silverman & Barbara E. Bierer

  3. Harvard Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Ari Ne’eman

  4. Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Ari Ne’eman & Michael Ashley Stein

  5. Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA

    Ari Ne’eman

  6. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA

    David H. Strauss

  7. Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    David H. Strauss, Willyanne DeCormier Plosky & Barbara E. Bierer

  8. Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Leslie P. Francis

  9. S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Leslie P. Francis

  10. Division of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Barbara E. Bierer

Authors
  1. Benjamin C. Silverman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ari Ne’eman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David H. Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Willyanne DeCormier Plosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Leslie P. Francis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Ashley Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Barbara E. Bierer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.C.S., W.D.P. and B.E.B. wrote the original draft. All authors were responsible for conceptualization, review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin C. Silverman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.N. received consulting fees from CareSource, Inclusa and the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights. The analysis presented here was not developed as part of his duties for any of these entities, including the Department of Health and Human Services, and the research, analysis, findings and conclusions were not reviewed by them and do not necessarily represent their views. D.H.S. received consulting fees as an external advisor to the Takeda Pharmaceuticals Ethics Advisory Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silverman, B.C., Ne’eman, A., Strauss, D.H. et al. Supported decision-making can advance clinical research participation for people with disabilities. Nat Med 28, 2250–2253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02035-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02035-3

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing