Mapping spatial transcriptome with light-activated proximity-dependent RNA labeling


RNA molecules are highly compartmentalized in eukaryotic cells, with their localizations intimately linked to their functions. Despite the importance of RNA targeting, our current knowledge of the spatial organization of the transcriptome has been limited by a lack of analytical tools. In this study, we develop a chemical biology approach to label RNAs in live cells with high spatial specificity. Our method, called CAP-seq, capitalizes on light-activated, proximity-dependent photo-oxidation of RNA nucleobases, which could be subsequently enriched via affinity purification and identified by high-throughput sequencing. Using this technique, we investigate the local transcriptomes that are proximal to various subcellular compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. We discover that messenger RNAs encoding for ribosomal proteins and oxidative phosphorylation pathway proteins are highly enriched at the outer mitochondrial membrane. Due to its specificity and ease of use, CAP-seq is a generally applicable technique to investigate the spatial transcriptome in many biological systems.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Development and characterization of CAP-seq method.
Fig. 2: CAP-seq reveals subcellular transcriptome in the mitochondrial matrix.
Fig. 3: Mapping of the ER-proximal transcriptome.
Fig. 4: Mapping local transcriptome at the OMM.
Fig. 5: Validation of RNAs identified in OMM CAP-seq.
Fig. 6: OMM CAP-seq with drug perturbation.

Data availability

All data presented in this study are available in the main text and Supplementary Information. Sequencing data are included in Source Data Figs. 24 and 6a,d.


  1. 1.

    Buxbaum, A. R., Haimovich, G. & Singer, R. H. In the right place at the right time: visualizing and understanding mRNA localization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 95–109 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jung, H., Gkogkas, C. G., Sonenberg, N. & Holt, C. E. Remote control of gene function by local translation. Cell 157, 26–40 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sepulveda, G. et al. Co-translational protein targeting facilitates centrosomal recruitment of PCNT during centrosome maturation in vertebrates. eLife 7, e34959 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Martin, K. C. & Ephrussi, A. mRNA localization: gene expression in the spatial dimension. Cell 136, 719–730 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cioni, J. M., Koppers, M. & Holt, C. E. Molecular control of local translation in axon development and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 51, 86–94 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Glock, C., Heumuller, M. & Schuman, E. M. mRNA transport & local translation in neurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 45, 169–177 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Engreitz, J. M., Ollikainen, N. & Guttman, M. Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 756–770 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Diehn, M., Bhattacharya, R., Botstein, D. & Brown, P. O. Genome-scale identification of membrane-associated human mRNAs. PLoS Genet. 2, e11 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen, Q., Jagannathan, S., Reid, D. W., Zheng, T. & Nicchitta, C. V. Hierarchical regulation of mRNA partitioning between the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2646–2658 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Marc, P. et al. Genome-wide analysis of mRNAs targeted to yeast mitochondria. EMBO Rep. 3, 159–164 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mercer, T. R. et al. The human mitochondrial transcriptome. Cell 146, 645–658 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cajigas, I. J. et al. The local transcriptome in the synaptic neuropil revealed by deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging. Neuron 74, 453–466 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Minis, A. et al. Subcellular transcriptomics-dissection of the mRNA composition in the axonal compartment of sensory neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 74, 365–381 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hocine, S., Raymond, P., Zenklusen, D., Chao, J. A. & Singer, R. H. Single-molecule analysis of gene expression using two-color RNA labeling in live yeast. Nat. Methods 10, 119–121 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Femino, A. M., Fay, F. S., Fogarty, K. & Singer, R. H. Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280, 585–590 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lee, J. H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science 361, eaat5691 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rhee, H. W. et al. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 339, 1328–1331 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kaewsapsak, P., Shechner, D. M., Mallard, W., Rinn, J. L. & Ting, A. Y. Live-cell mapping of organelle-associated RNAs via proximity biotinylation combined with protein-RNA crosslinking. eLife 6, e29224 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Benhalevy, D., Anastasakis, D. G. & Hafner, M. Proximity-CLIP provides a snapshot of protein-occupied RNA elements in subcellular compartments. Nat. Methods 15, 1074–1082 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fleming, A. M. & Burrows, C. J. Formation and processing of DNA damage substrates for the hNEIL enzymes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 107, 35–52 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bulina, M. E. et al. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 95–99 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shu, X. et al. A genetically encoded tag for correlated light and electron microscopy of intact cells, tissues, and organisms. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001041 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Westberg, M., Holmegaard, L., Pimenta, F. M., Etzerodt, M. & Ogilby, P. R. Rational design of an efficient, genetically encodable, protein-encased singlet oxygen photosensitizer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1632–1642 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vegh, R. B. et al. Reactive oxygen species in photochemistry of the red fluorescent protein ‘Killer Red’. Chem. Commun. 47, 4887–4889 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Makhijani, K. et al. Precision optogenetic tool for selective single- and multiple-cell ablation in a live animal model system. Cell. Chem. Biol. 24, 110–119 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Moan, J. On the diffusion length of singlet oxygen in cells and tissues. J. Photoch. Photobio. B. 6, 343–347 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Morikawa, M. et al. Analysis of guanine oxidation products in double-stranded DNA and proposed guanine oxidation pathways in single-stranded, double-stranded or quadruplex DNA. Biomolecules 4, 140–159 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xu, X., Muller, J. G., Ye, Y. & Burrows, C. J. DNA-protein cross-links between guanine and lysine depend on the mechanism of oxidation for formation of C5 vs C8 guanosine adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 703–709 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ding, Y., Fleming, A. M. & Burrows, C. J. Sequencing the mouse genome for the oxidatively modified base 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by OG-Seq. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2569–2572 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bisby, R. H., Morgan, C. G., Hamblett, I. & Gorman, A. A. Quenching of singlet oxygen by Trolox C, ascorbate, and amino acids: effects of pH and temperature. J. Phys. Chem. A. 103, 7454–7459 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jan, C. H., Williams, C. C. & Weissman, J. S. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346, 1257521 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Linden, A. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 12, 132–139 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Williams, C. C., Jan, C. H. & Weissman, J. S. Targeting and plasticity of mitochondrial proteins revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346, 748–751 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lesnik, C., Golani-Armon, A. & Arava, Y. Localized translation near the mitochondrial outer membrane: an update. RNA Biol. 12, 801–809 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Calvo, S. E., Clauser, K. R. & Mootha, V. K. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1251–D1257 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Anger, A. M. et al. Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome. Nature 497, 80–85 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Khatter, H., Myasnikov, A. G., Natchiar, S. K. & Klaholz, B. P. Structure of the human 80S ribosome. Nature 520, 640–645 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Li, Y., Aggarwal, M. B., Nguyen, K., Ke, K. & Spitale, R. C. Assaying RNA localization in situ with spatially restricted nucleobase oxidation. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 2709–2714 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, Y., Aggarwal, M. B., Ke, K., Nguyen, K. & Spitale, R. C. Improved analysis of RNA localization by spatially restricted oxidation of RNA-protein complexes. Biochemistry 57, 1577–1581 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fazal, F. M. et al. Atlas of subcellular RNA localization revealed by APEX-Seq. Cell 178, 1–18 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chen, C. Y., Ezzeddine, N., & Shyu, A. B. & Messenger, R. N. A. MehMessenger RNA half-life measurements in mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 448, 335–357 (2008).

  44. 44.

    Bustamante, J., Boisson-Dupuis, S., Abel, L. & Casanova, J. L. Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease: genetic, immunological, and clinical features of inborn errors of IFN-gamma immunity. Semin. Immunol. 26, 454–470 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kumar, K. G. et al. Identification of adropin as a secreted factor linking dietary macronutrient intake with energy homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Cell Metab. 8, 468–481 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Brigelius-Flohe, R. & Maiorino, M. Glutathione peroxidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830, 3289–3303 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kaur, S. J., McKeown, S. R. & Rashid, S. Mutant SOD1 mediated pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gene 577, 109–118 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Maiorino, M., Conrad, M. & Ursini, F. GPx4, lipid peroxidation, and cell death: discoveries, rediscoveries, and open issues. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 29, 61–74 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Liang, H. et al. Short form glutathione peroxidase 4 is the essential isoform required for survival and somatic mitochondrial functions. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30836–30844 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kawamata, H. & Manfredi, G. Import, maturation, and function of SOD1 and its copper chaperone CCS in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Antioxid. Redox Signal 13, 1375–1384 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kall, L., Krogh, A. & Sonnhammer, E. L. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 1027–1036 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tsanov, N. et al. smiFISH and FISH—a flexible single RNA detection approach with super-resolution capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e165 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge funding from the National Key R&D Program of China (Ministry of Science and Technology, grant nos. 2017YFA0503600 and 2018YFA0507600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 91753131 and 21675098), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 5182011), the Interdisciplinary Medicine Seed Fund of Peking University (grant no. BMU2017MC006), Li Ge-Zhao Ning Life Science Junior Research Fellowship and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology. P.Z. and J.W. are sponsored by the National Thousand Young Talents Award. We thank X. Chen (Peking University, Beijing, China), K. Sarkisyan (Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia) and A.Y. Ting (Stanford University, USA) for providing plasmids, and J. Yang (Peking University, Beijing, China) for providing HEK293T cells. T. Ding assisted with photo-oxidation product characterization. C. Xiao assisted with streptavidin dot blot analysis. We thank Y. Wang, M. Conrad and Y. Sun for advice, and the National Center for Protein Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, China, for assistance with Fragment Analyzer 12.

Author information




P.W., W.T. and P.Z. conceived the project. P.W., W.T., Z.L., J.W. and P.Z. designed the experiments. P.W. and W.T. performed all experiments, unless otherwise noted. Z.L. and J.W. designed sequencing data analysis. Z.Z. and R.L. carried out mass-spec experiments. Y.Z. carried out probe synthesis. P.W. and T.X. carried out FISH experiments. P.W., W.T., Z.L., J.W. and P.Z. analyzed data. P.W., W.T. and P.Z. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianbin Wang or Peng Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–5 and Supplementary Figures 1–33

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Note

Synthetic Procedures

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Tang, W., Li, Z. et al. Mapping spatial transcriptome with light-activated proximity-dependent RNA labeling. Nat Chem Biol 15, 1110–1119 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing