Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Post-zygotic rescue of meiotic errors causes brain mosaicism and focal epilepsy

Abstract

Somatic mosaicism is a known cause of neurological disorders, including developmental brain malformations and epilepsy. Brain mosaicism is traditionally attributed to post-zygotic genetic alterations arising in fetal development. Here we describe post-zygotic rescue of meiotic errors as an alternate origin of brain mosaicism in patients with focal epilepsy who have mosaic chromosome 1q copy number gains. Genomic analysis showed evidence of an extra parentally derived chromosome 1q allele in the resected brain tissue from five of six patients. This copy number gain is observed only in patient brain tissue, but not in blood or buccal cells, and is strongly enriched in astrocytes. Astrocytes carrying chromosome 1q gains exhibit distinct gene expression signatures and hyaline inclusions, supporting a novel genetic association for astrocytic inclusions in epilepsy. Further, these data demonstrate an alternate mechanism of brain chromosomal mosaicism, with parentally derived copy number gain isolated to brain, reflecting rescue in other tissues during development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Brain mosaic copy number gain of chr1q.
Fig. 2: Chr1q gain originates in maternal meiosis.
Fig. 3: Chr1q copy number gain enriched in astrocytes.
Fig. 4: Chr1q copy number gain has cell type-specific effects.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The single-nuclei RNA-seq data presented in this publication has been deposited in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus and is accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE221849. Exome sequencing data are available either through dbGAP (phs002128.v1.p1) or BioProject (PRJNA1017875). Capture and targeted sequencing results are available as supplementary data. Exome sequence data from 342 controls were obtained from the North American Brain Expression Consortium (NABEC—dbGAP Study Accession: phs001300.v1.p1), and 15 whole genome-sequenced controls available from the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network (National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive). Human reference genome build GRCh38.p12 is available from Index of /genomes/all/GCF/000/001/405/GCF_000001405.26_GRCh38 (https://www.nih.gov/). The Allen Brain Map Human M1 Cortex Dataset is available from https://portal.brain-map.org/atlases-and-data/rnaseq/human-m1-10x.

Code availability

R scripts to analyze the data and generate the figures are available on GitHub (https://github.com/bedrosian-lab/1q_mosaicism).

References

  1. Bae, T. et al. Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 359, 550–555 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Gama, A. M. & Walsh, C. A. Somatic mosaicism and neurodevelopmental disease. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1504–1514 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobow, K. et al. Mosaic trisomy of chromosome 1q in human brain tissue associates with unilateral polymicrogyria, very early-onset focal epilepsy, and severe developmental delay. Acta Neuropathol. 140, 881–891 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Poduri, A. et al. Somatic activation of AKT3 causes hemispheric developmental brain malformations. Neuron 74, 41–48 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedrosian, T. A. et al. Detection of brain somatic variation in epilepsy-associated developmental lesions. Epilepsia 63, 1981–1997 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai, D. et al. Somatic variants in diverse genes leads to a spectrum of focal cortical malformations. Brain 145, 2704–2720 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, G. M. et al. Filamin A-negative hyaline astrocytic inclusions in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy: report of 2 cases. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 26, 38–44 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedley-Whyte, E. T. et al. Hyaline protoplasmic astrocytopathy of neocortex. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 68, 136–147 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, X. et al. Single-cell, genome-wide sequencing identifies clonal somatic copy-number variation in the human brain. Cell Rep. 10, 645 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez-Rivera, J. A. et al. The genomic landscape across 474 surgically accessible epileptogenic human brain lesions. Brain 146, 1342–1356 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conlin, L. K. et al. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 1263–1275 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Robberecht, C. et al. Meiotic errors followed by two parallel postzygotic trisomy rescue events are a frequent cause of constitutional segmental mosaicism. Mol. Cytogenet. 5, 19 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396–1401 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pai, B. et al. High-resolution transcriptomics informs glial pathology in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 149 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Satz, J. S. et al. Distinct functions of glial and neuronal dystroglycan in the developing and adult mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 30, 14560–14572 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhoog, Q. P., Holtman, L., Aronica, E. & van Vliet, E. A. Astrocytes as guardians of neuronal excitability: mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis. Front. Neurol. 11, 591690 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Saint-Martin, M. & Goda, Y. Astrocyte-synapse interactions and cell adhesion molecules. FEBS J. 290, 3512–3526 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, M. B. et al. Somatic genomic changes in single Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Nature 604, 714–722 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, C. P. et al. Mosaic tetrasomy 12p with discrepancy between fetal tissues and extraembryonic tissues: molecular analysis and possible mechanism of formation. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 49, 235–238 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coorens, T. H. H. et al. Inherent mosaicism and extensive mutation of human placentas. Nature 592, 80–85 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eggermann, T. et al. Mosaic trisomy 1q due to a de novo translocation in a foetus with early developmental abnormalities (karyotype 46,XY, der(14),t(1;14)(p11;p11.2)/46,XY) delineation of parent and cell stage of origin. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 8, 317–323 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheres, J. M. et al. Isochromosome 1q as the sole chromosomal abnormality in two fetal teratomas. Possible trisomic or tetrasomic zygote rescue in fetal teratoma with an additional isochromosome 1q. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 115, 1–10 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Warburton, D. et al. Trisomy recurrence: a reconsideration based on North American data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 376–385 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Struski, S., Doco-Fenzy, M. & Cornillet-Lefebvre, P. Compilation of published comparative genomic hybridization studies. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 135, 63–90 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vladoiu, M. C. et al. Childhood cerebellar tumours mirror conserved fetal transcriptional programs. Nature 572, 67–73 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ward, S. et al. Gain of 1q and loss of 22 are the most common changes detected by comparative genomic hybridisation in paediatric ependymoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 32, 59–66 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carter, M. et al. Genetic abnormalities detected in ependymomas by comparative genomic hybridisation. Br. J. Cancer 86, 929–939 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pajtler, K. W. et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell 27, 728–743 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Varela, C. et al. Recurrent genomic instability of chromosome 1q in neural derivatives of human embryonic stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 569–574 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mehrjardi, N. Z. et al. Acquisition of chromosome 1q duplication in parental and genome-edited human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells results in their higher proliferation rate in vitro and in vivo. Cell Prolif. 53, e12892 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Minagawa, M., Shioda, K., Shimizu, Y. & Isshiki, T. Inclusion bodies in cerebral cortical astrocytes: a new change of astrocytes. Acta Neuropathol. 84, 113–116 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van den Veyver, I. B. et al. Presence of filamin in the astrocytic inclusions of Aicardi syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 30, 7–15 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barba, C. et al. Clinical features, neuropathology, and surgical outcome in patients with refractory epilepsy and brain somatic variants in the SLC35A2 gene. Neurology 100, e528–e542 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kelly, B. J. et al. Churchill: an ultra-fast, deterministic, highly scalable and balanced parallelization strategy for the discovery of human genetic variation in clinical and population-scale genomics. Genome Biol. 16, 6 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Koboldt, D. C. et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568–576 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Koboldt, D. C. et al. PTEN somatic mutations contribute to spectrum of cerebral overgrowth. Brain 144, 2971–2978 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, K. E. et al. Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical findings in epilepsy brain tissue. Neurol. Genet. 6, e460 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–87.e29 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 8, 329–37.e4 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. InferCNV. GitHub https://github.com/broadinstitute/inferCNV (2020).

  43. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and families for contributing their specimens to advance our understanding of the genetic bases of epilepsy-associated brain malformations. We also thank R. K. Wilson and the Genomic Services Laboratory and Computational Genomics Group at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. The work was funded by the Nationwide Innovation Fund, L. B. Research and Education Foundation (N.S.), The Ohio State University Medical Scientist Training Program—T32 Training Grant—T32GM139784 (N.S.), NIH-NINDS (R01NS094596) to E.L.H., and NIH-NINDS (R01NS129784) to T.A.B. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Some figures were created in BioRender. Data and/or research tools used in the preparation of this manuscript were obtained from the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive. National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive is a collaborative informatics system created by the National Institutes of Health to provide a national resource to support and accelerate research in mental health. Dataset identifier(s): 2962. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or of the Submitters submitting original data to the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.E.M., E.L.H. and T.A.B. conceptualized the study. K.E.M., E.L.H., T.A.B., J.B.N., J.J.W., A.C.R., N.S., R.D.R., M.G., M.M., S.S., D.C.K. and A.R.M. performed the experiments and analyzed data. K.E.M., T.A.B., N.S. and A.C.R. visualized the results. T.A.B., E.L.H. and E.R.M. contributed funding and resources. K.E.M., E.L.H., T.A.B., D.C.K. and R.S. contributed project administration support. Y.A., D.R.B., D.L.T., C.R.P., J.P., A.S., J. Lu, J. Leonard, A.P.O., A.P., C.H., M.E.H., E.L.H., M.B.B., O.R., E.Y., H.G.W.L., M.N.S., G.K.V.A., J.E.G. and D.C.K. provided patient data and samples, provided phenotypic data and interpreted clinical findings. K.E.M., D.C.K., E.L.H. and T.A.B. supervised the research. K.E.M., E.L.H. and T.A.B. wrote the original draft. All authors participated in review and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Erin L. Heinzen or Tracy A. Bedrosian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Genetics thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Single-nuclei whole genome sequencing.

Whole genome sequencing of single-nuclei from Patient 1 brain tissue confirming the presence of chromosome 1q tetrasomy. Chromosome 1 copy number data is shown for representative nuclei with and without 1q tetrasomy (top) and the entire genome is shown (bottom) for the cell with the 1q gain.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Parental origin of chromosome 1q SNVs.

a, Variant allele fractions for SNVs found on chromosome 1q in Patient 1 brain, blood, buccal, and parental blood samples, demonstrating that these SNVs represent an extra chromosome 1q allele of maternal origin. b, OncoScan array results for Patient 1 trio demonstrating a chromosome 1q gain in proband brain tissue but no gain observed in blood samples from either parent, showing the parents are karyotypically normal. c, Variant allele fractions for a small number of representative chromosome 1q SNVs in available tissues from Patients 4, 5, and 6.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Mosaic chromosome 1q SNVs in patients with epilepsy or tumors.

a, Number of brain-restricted mosaic variants identified from exome sequencing of resected brain tissue versus blood samples from epilepsy Patients 1–6. b, Somatic variants identified from tumor-normal exome sequencing of various pediatric CNS tumors with chromosome 1q gains. No enrichment of variants on chromosome 1q is observed.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Inverted duplication of chromosome 1q in one patient.

a, A breakpoint-spanning read from PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing of Patient 2 brain DNA identifies the structure of the gain as an inverted duplication of chromosome 1q. b, Optical genome mapping coverage of the breakpoint.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Single-nuclei RNA-seq.

a, Single-nuclei RNA-seq quality control metrics: number of reads per nucleus, number of genes per nucleus, and percent mitochondrial reads. b, Feature plots showing expression of cell type markers.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Chromosome 1q gain in astrocytes.

a, InferCNV output for Patient 3 demonstrating the chromosome 1q gain enriched in astrocytes. b, Percent of cells with chromosome 1q gain depicted by patient and by cell type. c, Astrocytes with and without the chromosome 1q gain highly express astrocytic marker genes. d, InferCNV output comparing Patient 3 astrocytes from affected brain tissue to Patient 3 astrocytes from unaffected adjacent brain tissue. e, Fluorescence activated nuclei sorting based on PAX6-APC signal to enrich astrocytes followed by targeted sequencing of chromosome 1q marker SNVs in Patient 3. Astrocyte enriched cell population has increased representation of the chromosome 1q gain compared to bulk cells or PAX6-negative cells.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Gene expression differences between excitatory neurons with and without chromosome 1q gain.

a, Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in excitatory neurons with the chromosome 1q gain vs. those without. Black points represent genes located on chromosome 1q. b, Enriched GO terms for 1q gain excitatory neurons derived from an over-representation test performed with the enrichGO function of clusterprofiler R package with FDR p-value adjustment. c, Venn diagram showing overlap of differentially expressed genes with genes located on chromosome 1q.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Alternate models of isochromosome formation.

a, A potential model of mosaic isochromosome 1q formation in the early cleavage-stage embryo. b, An alternate model of mosaic isochromosome 1q formation originating in an oocyte.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Neuroimaging.

Brain MRIs from subjects with 1q duplications. a, b, Axial (a) and coronal (b) T2 images of Patient 1 at 13 months demonstrates hazy T2 prolongation involving the right frontal and parietal lobes (dashed circles). c, d, Axial (c) and coronal (d) T2 images of Patient 2 at 5 years of age demonstrate a dysplastic right frontal sulcus (dashed circles). e, f, Axial (e) and coronal (f) T2 images of Patient 3 at 9 months of age demonstrate polymicrogyria in the right frontal lobe and insula (dashed circle). g, h, Axial T1 (g) and axial T2 (h) images of Patient 6 at 14 months demonstrates hazy T1/T2 prolongation involving the inferior left frontal lobe (dashed circles). i, j, Axial T2 (i) and sagittal T1 (j) images of Patient 4 at 9 years of age demonstrate generalized decrease in size of the right hemisphere with a large frontoparietal area of dysplastic cortex (hazy T2 prolongation and increased gyral frequency indicated by dashed circles). k, l, Axial T2 (k) and coronal T2 (l) images of Patient 5 at 5 years of age demonstrate subtle T2 prolongation in the left supramarginal and superior temporal gyri (dashed circles).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Data 1

1q mosaic variants identified in exome sequencing.

Supplementary Data 2

1q capture panel results for patient 3.

Supplementary Data 3

1q capture panel results for patient 1.

Supplementary Data 4

Deep targeted amplicon sequencing results for patients 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Supplementary Data 5

Number of 1q gain versus no gain cells used for differential expression analysis per cell type and lists of differentially expressed genes identified per cell type.

Supplementary Data 6

Oligonucleotide sequences used for targeted sequencing assays.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, K.E., Rivaldi, A.C., Shinagawa, N. et al. Post-zygotic rescue of meiotic errors causes brain mosaicism and focal epilepsy. Nat Genet 55, 1920–1928 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01547-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01547-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing