Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Career Feature
  • Published:

Career feature

Sharing best practices for educational programs on venture creation and commercialization

Subjects

Longitudinal evaluation of the Biomedical Entrepreneurship Educational Program suggests the program successfully educates and inspires the next generation of life science and biotechnology innovators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Post-FBS course respondents, student impact.
Fig. 2: Post-FBS course respondents, impressions of course content: usefulness of FBS course sessions, post-participation.
Fig. 3: Post-FBS course respondents, indications for rollout (level, modality, lecturers): suitability and target audience.
Fig. 4: Post-FBS course respondents, indications for rollout (level, modality, lecturers): ideas regarding design and delivery.
Fig. 5: Key knowledge gained from TPCVD: Purdue University 2022.

References

  1. Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H. & Zhou, S. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 3049–3062 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schweickart, T. et al. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 7, e77 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vizgan, G. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 429–431 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vizgan, G. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1528–1529 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenan, C. J. H. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 5593 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology. CIMIT Clinical Impact Study 2014 Update https://www.cimit.net/documents/173804/228699/Clinical%20Impact%20Study%20Update.pdf/2336161f-4165-ff6f-dcc8-66fbfc4f6ab9 (2014).

  7. Brinton, T. J. et al. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 1803–1810 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. King, C. E. et al. Technol. Innov. 20, 179–195 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosset, N. & Lasch, J. G. IEEE Pulse 3, 46–48 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. USC Alfred Mann Institute. Company launches. https://web.archive.org/web/20231007213550/https://ami.usc.edu/companies/ (2023).

  11. Grailer, J. G. III et al. Acad. Med. 97, 1335–1340 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilon-Yanai, M. et al. Scientia (Bristol) https://doi.org/10.33548/scientia605 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Long, L., Dubois, C. & Faley, R. Int. J. E-Learn. 8, 347–359 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tomasik, M. J., Helbling, L. A. & Moser, U. Int. J. Psychol. 56, 566–576 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Altindag, D. T., Filiz, E. S. & Tekin, E. NBER working paper w29113 (2021); https://www.nber.org/papers/w29113

Download references

Acknowledgements

This program was supported by NIDDK R25 (DK119114), the Biomedical Entrepreneurship Skills Development Program for the Advancement of Research Translation (PI: G.G.-v.S.); NCATS 5UL1TR001445 Clinical and Translational Science Award (principal investigators B. Cronstein, J. Hochman); and NIDDK T35 (DK007421), the Short-Term Research Training Grant for Medical Students (principal investigator R. Ramasamy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan Eidlisz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data 1

2021–2022 FBS longitudinal survey

Supplementary Data 2

2019–2020 FBS longitudinal survey

Supplementary Data 3

2021–2022 TPCVD longitudinal survey

Supplementary Data 4

2022 Purdue TPCVD survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eidlisz, J., Hill-Whilton, Z., Vizgan, G. et al. Sharing best practices for educational programs on venture creation and commercialization. Nat Biotechnol 42, 675–681 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02199-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02199-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing