Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Patents

Discovering value: women’s participation in university and commercial AI invention

More can be done to diversify the AI innovation ecosystem, especially in the emerging field of biotechnology AI, where women’s participation is associated with substantial value.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The WIR for AI and non-AI patents across all technologies and within biotechnology.
Fig. 2: The WIR and average proportion of women on patenting teams for AI and non-AI patents across all technologies.
Fig. 3: The association between patent value and the proportion of women on patenting teams.

References

  1. Schmidt, E. et al. Final Report: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI, 2021).

  2. Toole, A. A. et al. Inventing AI: Tracing the Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence with US Patents (United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2020).

  3. Bell, A. et al. Q. J. Econ. 134, 647–713 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, L. & Yang, Y. The Commercialization Gap in Pink and Black (Michigan State University, working paper) (2017).

  5. Cook, L. Policies to Broaden Participation in the Innovation Process (Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution (2020).

  6. Exec. Order No. 14801. Fed. Regist. 87, 56849–56860 (2022).

  7. Jumper, J. et al. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thornton, J. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Borkakoti, N. Nat. Med. 27, 1666–1669 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Callaway, E. Nature 604, 234–238 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giczy, A. V., Pairolero, N. A. & Toole, A. A. J. Technol. Transf. 47, 476–505 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmoch, U. Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons: Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) (World Intellectual Property Organization, 2008).

  12. Frietsch, R. et al. Res. Policy 38, 590–599 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt, J. et al. Res. Policy 42, 831–843 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toole, A. A. et al. Progress and Potential: A Profile of Women Inventors on U.S. Patents (United State Patent and Trademark Office, 2019).

  15. Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., West, J. D. & Larivière, V. PLoS One 10, e0128000 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Corley, E. & Gaughan, M. J. Technol. Transf. 30, 371–381 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giuri, P. et al. J. Technol. Transf. 45, 122–150 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whittington, K. B. & Smith-Doerr, L. Gend. Soc. 22, 194–218 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding, W. W., Murray, F. & Stuart, T. E. Science 313, 665–667 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perrault, R. et al. The AI Index 2019 Annual Report (AI Index Steering Committee, Human-Centered AI Institute, Stanford University, 2019).

  21. Gaule, P. & Piacentini, M. Res. Policy 47, 805–813 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennehy, T. C. & Dasgupta, N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5964–5969 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmadpoor, M. & Jones, B. F. Science 357, 583–587 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B. & Kristinsson, K. Res. Policy 40, 500–509 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H. & Van Praag, M. Manage. Sci. 59, 1514–1528 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kogan, L. et al. Q. J. Econ. 132, 665–712 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aneja, A., Reshef, O. & Subramani, G. Try, Try, Try Again? Differential Responses to Rejection and the Gender Innovation Gap (University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, working paper) (2021).

  28. Pairolero, N. et al. Closing the gender gap in patenting: evidence from a randomized control trial at the USPTO. In Proc. 82nd Ann. Meeting of the Acad. Management, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.197 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Office of the Chief Economist or the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas A. Pairolero.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–19, Supplementary Figs. 1–13 and Appendix A

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giczy, A.V., Pairolero, N.A. & Toole, A.A. Discovering value: women’s participation in university and commercial AI invention. Nat Biotechnol 42, 26–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02075-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02075-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research