Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Sampling techniques and microbial concentration measurements influence the results of microbiome studies

Most microbiome studies measure relative abundance of the various microorganisms in a sample. This study demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale measurements of absolute microbial concentrations. Moreover, it demonstrates how sample handling and storage methods can alter microbial measurements, potentially introducing bias in conclusions drawn about microbiome–host relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Quantification of absolute microbial concentrations in microbiome samples.

References

  1. Jian, C., Luukkonen, P., Yki-Järvinen, H., Salonen, A. & Korpela, K. Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling. PLoS One 15, e0227285 (2020). This paper provides a workflow for 16S rRNA qPCR for quantification of microbial concentration.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandeputte, D. et al. Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load. Nature 551, 507–511 (2017). This paper provides a workflow for amplicon sequencing and flow-based quantification of absolute microbial concentration.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagan, T. et al. Antibiotics-driven gut microbiome perturbation alters immunity to vaccines in humans. Cell 178, 1313–1328 (2019). This paper reports microbial concentration variation in response to antibiotic treatment.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, C. et al. Multi-kingdom ecological drivers of microbiota assembly in preterm infants. Nature 591, 633–638 (2021). This paper provides a spike-in sequencing method for multi-kingdom count quantification.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oduaran, O. H. et al. Gut microbiome profiling of a rural and urban South African cohort reveals biomarkers of a population in lifestyle transition. BMC Microbiol. 20, 330 (2021). This paper profiles the gut microbiomes of people in South African communities.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Maghini, D. G. et al. Quantifying bias introduced by sample collection in relative and absolute microbiome measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01754-3 (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampling techniques and microbial concentration measurements influence the results of microbiome studies. Nat Biotechnol 42, 194–195 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01804-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01804-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research