Correspondence | Published:

Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the ‘CRISPR babies’ experiment?

Nature Biotechnology (2019) | Download Citation

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Marchione, M. & Larson, C. Could anyone have stopped gene-edited babies experiment? AP News https://apnews.com/8d79b8da09624aabbec28d1227650a66 (2 December 2018).

  2. 2.

    Regalado, A. Rogue Chinese CRISPR scientist cited US report as his green light. MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612472/rogue-chinese-crispr-scientist-cited-us-report-as-his-green-light/ (27 November 2018).

  3. 3.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome editing and human reproduction. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-FINAL-website.pdf (2018)

  4. 4.

    Sample, I. Genetically modified babies given go ahead by UK ethics body. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jul/17/genetically-modified-babies-given-go-ahead-by-uk-ethics-body (17 July 2018).

  5. 5.

    Knapton, S. Designer babies on horizon as ethics council gives green light to genetically edited embryos. The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/07/16/designer-babies-horizon-ethics-council-gives-green-light-genetically/ (17 July 2018).

  6. 6.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome editing and human reproduction: social and ethical issues — short guide. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-short-guide-website.pdf (2018).

  7. 7.

    Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Dickenson, D. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 743 (2009).

  9. 9.

    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/human-genome-and-human-rights/ (1997).

  10. 10.

    Council of Europe. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. European Treaty Series – No. 164. https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98 (1997).

  11. 11.

    Council of Europe. Explanatory report to the convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. European Treaty Series – No. 164. https://rm.coe.int/16800ccde5IIn (1997).

  12. 12.

    Haeartel, I. International Perspectives' report. Nuffield Council on Bioethics conference on ‘Genome editing in human reproduction: ethical issues'. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/about/events (23 July 2018).

  13. 13.

    National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. On human gene editing: international summit statement. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a (3 December 2015).

  14. 14.

    Anonymous. Lancet 392, 253 (2018).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of London, London, UK

    • Donna Dickenson
  2. Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    • Donna Dickenson
  3. Center for Genetics and Society, Berkeley, CA, USA

    • Marcy Darnovsky

Authors

  1. Search for Donna Dickenson in:

  2. Search for Marcy Darnovsky in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Dickenson.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0077-3

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing