Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Lactate regulates cell cycle by remodelling the anaphase promoting complex

Nature volume 616, pages 790–797 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Lactate is abundant in rapidly dividing cells owing to the requirement for elevated glucose catabolism to support proliferation1,2,3,4,5,6. However, it is not known whether accumulated lactate affects the proliferative state. Here we use a systematic approach to determine lactate-dependent regulation of proteins across the human proteome. From these data, we identify a mechanism of cell cycle regulation whereby accumulated lactate remodels the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C). Remodelling of APC/C in this way is caused by direct inhibition of the SUMO protease SENP1 by lactate. We find that accumulated lactate binds and inhibits SENP1 by forming a complex with zinc in the SENP1 active site. SENP1 inhibition by lactate stabilizes SUMOylation of two residues on APC4, which drives UBE2C binding to APC/C. This direct regulation of APC/C by lactate stimulates timed degradation of cell cycle proteins, and efficient mitotic exit in proliferative human cells. This mechanism is initiated upon mitotic entry when lactate abundance reaches its apex. In this way, accumulation of lactate communicates the consequences of a nutrient-replete growth phase to stimulate timed opening of APC/C, cell division and proliferation. Conversely, persistent accumulation of lactate drives aberrant APC/C remodelling and can overcome anti-mitotic pharmacology via mitotic slippage. In sum, we define a biochemical mechanism through which lactate directly regulates protein function to control the cell cycle and proliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Lactate regulates protein interactions of APC/C.
Fig. 2: Lactate regulates APC/C composition via SUMOylation of APC4.
Fig. 3: Lactate forms a complex with zinc in the SENP1 active site to inhibit APC4 deSUMOylation.
Fig. 4: Lactate-mediated increase in APC4–SUMO stimulates mitotic exit and proliferation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD036641. NMR backbone resonance assignments of SENP1 have been deposited to the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank and can be accessed with the accession code 51766. All data associated with this work are otherwise provided in the manuscript, and will be provided upon request to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314 (1956).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koppenol, W. H., Bounds, P. L. & Dang, C. V. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 325–337 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, T., Marquardt, C. & Foker, J. Aerobic glycolysis during lymphocyte proliferation. Nature 261, 702–705 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brand, K., Leibold, W., Luppa, P., Schoerner, C. & Schulz, A. Metabolic alterations associated with proliferation of mitogen-activated lymphocytes and of lymphoblastoid cell lines: evaluation of glucose and glutamine metabolism. Immunobiology 173, 23–34 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Munyon, W. H. & Merchant, D. J. The relation between glucose utilization, lactic acid production and utilization and the growth cycle of L strain fibroblasts. Exp. Cell. Res. 17, 490–498 (1959).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemoigne, M., Aubert, J. P. & Millet, J. Ethyl alcohol production and growth of baker’s yeast cultured under aerobic conditions. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 87, 427–439 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luengo, A. et al. Increased demand for NAD+ relative to ATP drives aerobic glycolysis. Mol. Cell 81, 691–707.e696 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, Z., Shestov, A. A., Lai, L. & Locasale, J. W. A flux balance of glucose metabolism clarifies the requirements of the Warburg effect. Biophys. J. 111, 1088–1100 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Halestrap, A. P. The monocarboxylate transporter family-Structure and functional characterization. IUBMB Life 64, 1–9 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hui, S. et al. Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature 551, 115–118 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Faubert, B. et al. Lactate metabolism in human lung tumors. Cell 171, 358–371.e359 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Walenta, S. et al. High lactate levels predict likelihood of metastases, tumor recurrence, and restricted patient survival in human cervical cancers. Cancer Res. 60, 916–921 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walenta, S. et al. Tissue gradients of energy metabolites mirror oxygen tension gradients in a rat mammary carcinoma model. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 51, 840–848 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinn, W. J. 3rd et al. Lactate limits T cell proliferation via the NAD(H) redox state. Cell Rep. 33, 108500 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mateus, A. et al. Thermal proteome profiling for interrogating protein interactions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9232 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, L., Williamson, A., Banerjee, S., Philipp, I. & Rape, M. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 133, 653–665 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921–925 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sivakumar, S. & Gorbsky, G. J. Spatiotemporal regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 82–94 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi, M. et al. Cryo-EM of mitotic checkpoint complex-bound APC/C reveals reciprocal and conformational regulation of ubiquitin ligation. Mol. Cell 63, 593–607 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang, L., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., McLaughlin, S. H. & Barford, D. Atomic structure of the APC/C and its mechanism of protein ubiquitination. Nature 522, 450–454 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, N. G. et al. RING E3 mechanism for ubiquitin ligation to a disordered substrate visualized for human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5272–5279 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Savitski, M. M. et al. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science 346, 1255784 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, E. R., Brown, N. G., Peters, J. M., Stark, H. & Schulman, B. A. Posing the APC/C E3 ubiquitin ligase to orchestrate cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 117–134 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alfieri, C. et al. Molecular basis of APC/C regulation by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature 536, 431–436 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, N. R. et al. CDK1 structures reveal conserved and unique features of the essential cell cycle CDK. Nat. Commun. 6, 6769 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown, N. R. et al. Cyclin B and cyclin A confer different substrate recognition properties on CDK2. Cell Cycle 6, 1350–1359 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Flotho, A. & Melchior, F. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 357–385 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, C. C., Li, B., Yu, H. & Matunis, M. J. Sumoylation promotes optimal APC/C activation and timely anaphase. eLife 7, e29539 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Eifler, K. et al. SUMO targets the APC/C to regulate transition from metaphase to anaphase. Nat. Commun. 9, 1119 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yatskevich, S. et al. Molecular mechanisms of APC/C release from spindle assembly checkpoint inhibition by APC/C SUMOylation. Cell Rep. 34, 108929 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mukhopadhyay, D. & Dasso, M. Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 286–295 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cubenas-Potts, C., Goeres, J. D. & Matunis, M. J. SENP1 and SENP2 affect spatial and temporal control of sumoylation in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3483–3495 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ireland, S. M. & Martin, A. C. R. ZincBind-the database of zinc binding sites. Database 2019, baz006 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Skiles, J. W., Gonnella, N. C. & Jeng, A. Y. The design, structure, and therapeutic application of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 8, 425–474 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobsen, J. A., Major Jourden, J. L., Miller, M. T. & Cohen, S. M. To bind zinc or not to bind zinc: an examination of innovative approaches to improved metalloproteinase inhibition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1803, 72–94 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cannan, R. K. & Kibrick, A. Complex formation between carboxylic acids and divalent metal cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 2314–2320 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thun, H., Guns, W. & Verbeek, F. The stability constants of some bivalent metal complexes of α-hydroxyisobutyrate and lactate. Anal. Chim. Acta 37, 332–338 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pace, N. J. & Weerapana, E. A competitive chemical-proteomic platform to identify zinc-binding cysteines. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 258–265 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hann, M. M. & Simpson, G. L. Intracellular drug concentration and disposition—the missing link. Methods 68, 283–285 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwaid, A. G. & Cornella-Taracido, I. Causes and significance of increased compound potency in cellular or physiological contexts. J. Med. Chem. 61, 1767–1773 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Swinney, D. C. Biochemical mechanisms of drug action: what does it take for success. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 801–808 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fasano, M. et al. The extraordinary ligand binding properties of human serum albumin. IUBMB Life 57, 787–796 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Colombo, S. L. et al. Molecular basis for the differential use of glucose and glutamine in cell proliferation as revealed by synchronized HeLa cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 21069 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Maeda-Yorita, K., Aki, K., Sagai, H., Misaki, H. & Massey, V. l-lactate oxidase and l-lactate monooxygenase: mechanistic variations on a common structural theme. Biochimie 77, 631–642 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stacpoole, P. W., Nagaraja, N. V. & Hutson, A. D. Efficacy of dichloroacetate as a lactate-lowering drug. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 43, 683–691 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, H. et al. The landscape of cancer cell line metabolism. Nat. Med. 25, 850–860 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Parks, S. K., Mueller-Klieser, W. & Pouysségur, J. Lactate and acidity in the cancer microenvironment. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 4, 141–158 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sukonina, V. et al. FOXK1 and FOXK2 regulate aerobic glycolysis. Nature 566, 279–283 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Parks, S. K., Chiche, J. & Pouysségur, J. Disrupting proton dynamics and energy metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 611–623 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lens, S. M. A. & Medema, R. H. Cytokinesis defects and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 32–45 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Era, S. et al. The SUMO protease SENP1 is required for cohesion maintenance and mitotic arrest following spindle poison treatment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 426, 310–316 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schweppe, D. K. et al. Characterization and optimization of multiplexed quantitative analyses using high-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91, 4010–4016 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. McAlister, G. C. et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150–7158 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Eng, J. K., Jahan, T. A. & Hoopmann, M. R. Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics 13, 22–24 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Huttlin, E. L. et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Peng, J., Elias, J. E., Thoreen, C. C., Licklider, L. J. & Gygi, S. P. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC–MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2, 43–50 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S. P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285–1292 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Franken, H. et al. Thermal proteome profiling for unbiased identification of direct and indirect drug targets using multiplexed quantitative mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1567–1593 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mateus, A., Maatta, T. A. & Savitski, M. M. Thermal proteome profiling: unbiased assessment of protein state through heat-induced stability changes. Proteome Sci. 15, 13 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Whitfield, M. L. et al. Stem-loop binding protein, the protein that binds the 3’ end of histone mRNA, is cell cycle regulated by both translational and posttranslational mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4188–4198 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, G. & Deng, X. Cell synchronization by double thymidine block. Bio Protoc. 8, e2994 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang, T. et al. Succinate induces skeletal muscle fiber remodeling via SUNCR1 signaling. EMBO Rep. 20, e47892 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen, W. W., Freinkman, E., Wang, T., Birsoy, K. & Sabatini, D. M. Absolute quantification of matrix metabolites reveals the dynamics of mitochondrial metabolism. Cell 166, 1324–1337.e1311 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Cantor, J. R. et al. Physiologic medium rewires cellular metabolism and reveals uric acid as an endogenous inhibitor of UMP synthase. Cell 169, 258–272.e217 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bastians, H., Topper, L. M., Gorbsky, G. L. & Ruderman, J. V. Cell cycle-regulated proteolysis of mitotic target proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3927–3941 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Mikolajczyk, J. et al. Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-specific proteases: profiling the specificities and activities of human SENPs. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 26217–26224 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Coote, P. W. et al. Optimal control theory enables homonuclear decoupling without Bloch-Siegert shifts in NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 9, 3014 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hyberts, S. G., Takeuchi, K. & Wagner, G. Poisson-gap sampling and forward maximum entropy reconstruction for enhancing the resolution and sensitivity of protein NMR data. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 2145–2147 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Hyberts, S. G., Milbradt, A. G., Wagner, A. B., Arthanari, H. & Wagner, G. Application of iterative soft thresholding for fast reconstruction of NMR data non-uniformly sampled with multidimensional Poisson gap scheduling. J. Biomol. NMR 52, 315–327 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Claudia Adams Barr Program (E.T.C.), the Lavine Family Fund (E.T.C.), the Pew Charitable Trust (E.T.C.), NIH DK123095 (E.T.C.), NIH AG071966 (E.T.C.), The Smith Family Foundation (E.T.C.), the American Federation for Aging Research (E.T.C.), the American Heart Association (L.H.M.B.), NIH DK123321 (E.L.M.), the National Cancer Center (H.X.), NIH K99AG073461 (H.X.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German research foundation) Projektnummer 501493132 (N.B.), the Linde Family Foundation (S.D.-P.), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (S.D.-P.), Deerfield 3DC (S.D.-P.), Taiho Pharmaceuticals (S.D.-P.), the Hope Funds for Cancer Research HFCR-20-03-01-02 (H.-G.S.), NIH GM136859 (H.A.), and The Smith Family Foundation (H.A.). The authors thank M. Kirschner, R. King, B. Spiegelman, M. Murphy and W. Harper for helpful discussion; N. Brown for providing structural models of APC/C; and B. V. Caroloso for providing the LMO construct. Cartoon illustrations in Fig. 4h and Extended Data Figs. 1b,c,e, 5a,b,h and 6a were created with BioRender.com.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Weihai Liu, Yun Wang, Luiz H.M. Bozi, Patrick Fischer

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cancer Biology, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA

    Weihai Liu, Yun Wang, Luiz H. M. Bozi, Patrick D. Fischer, Mark P. Jedrychowski, Haopeng Xiao, Narek Darabedian, Xiadi He, Evanna L. Mills, Nils Burger, Sanghee Shin, Anita Reddy, Hans-Georg Sprenger, Nhien Tran, Sally Winther, Hyuk-Soo Seo, Kijun Song, Andrew Z. Xu, Luke Sebastian, Jean J. Zhao, Sirano Dhe-Paganon, Jianwei Che, Haribabu Arthanari & Edward T. Chouchani

  2. Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Weihai Liu, Yun Wang, Luiz H. M. Bozi, Mark P. Jedrychowski, Haopeng Xiao, Narek Darabedian, Xiadi He, Evanna L. Mills, Nils Burger, Sanghee Shin, Anita Reddy, Hans-Georg Sprenger, Nhien Tran, Sally Winther, Steven P. Gygi & Edward T. Chouchani

  3. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Weihai Liu & Jingnan Shen

  4. Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Yun Wang

  5. Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Patrick D. Fischer, Xiadi He, Hyuk-Soo Seo, Jean J. Zhao, Sirano Dhe-Paganon & Haribabu Arthanari

  6. Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Patrick D. Fischer

  7. Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Tao Wu

  8. Stanford Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Stephen M. Hinshaw

  9. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jean J. Zhao

Authors
  1. Weihai Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luiz H. M. Bozi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick D. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark P. Jedrychowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haopeng Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Narek Darabedian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiadi He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Evanna L. Mills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nils Burger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sanghee Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Anita Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hans-Georg Sprenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Nhien Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Sally Winther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Stephen M. Hinshaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jingnan Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Hyuk-Soo Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Kijun Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Andrew Z. Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Luke Sebastian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Jean J. Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Sirano Dhe-Paganon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Jianwei Che
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Steven P. Gygi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Haribabu Arthanari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Edward T. Chouchani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.L. and E.T.C. conceived of and designed the study. W.L., Y.W. and L.H.M.B. performed cellular experiments and analysed data. M.P.J., H.X. and N.D. carried out and analysed data from mass spectrometry experiments. P.F. performed and analysed data from NMR experiments. S.W. and E.L.M. carried out thermal proteome profiling experiments. T.W. assisted with design of APC/C experiments. N.D. assisted with protein expression and purification. X.H. assisted with time-lapse microscopy. E.L.M. performed T cells experiments and metabolomics experiments. N.B. assisted with LMO overexpression and metabolomics experiments. S.S. performed SUMO proteomics experiments. A.R. carried out and analysed data from metabolomics experiments and assisted with experiments under hypoxia. H.-G.S. performed cellular volume experiments. S.M.H. assisted with the expression and purification of SENP proteins. N.T. assisted with the construction of plasmids. J.S. assisted with design of mitosis and proliferation experiments. H.-S.S. carried out SENP1 expression and purification. K.S., A.Z.X. and L.S. assisted with SENP1 expression and purification. J.J.Z. oversaw time-lapse microscopy. S.D.-P. oversaw SENP1 expression and purification. J.C. performed molecular modelling. H.A. oversaw NMR experiments. S.P.G. oversaw mass spectrometry experiments. E.T.C. directed the research, oversaw the experiments, and wrote the manuscript with assistance from the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward T. Chouchani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.Z. is co-founder and board director of Crimson Biopharm Inc. and Geode Therapeutics Inc. E.T.C. is co-founder of Matchpoint Therapeutics and Aevum Therapeutics. J.C. is a co-founder for Matchpoint Therapeutics. J.C. is a scientific co-founder M3 Bioinformatics & Technology Inc., and consultant and equity holder for Soltego and Allorion. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Jordan Meier and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Molecular consequences of elevated lactate on UBE2C and APC/C.

(a) Hypothesis that high lactate concentration can directly regulate cellular processes. (b) Outline of the principle that TPP can reveal lactate mediated changes in protein thermostability through acquired protein-protein interactions. (c) Acute treatment of native HEK proteomes with lactate following cell lysis and dilution. (d) Stable abundance of lactate in HEK293 cellular lysates over 15 min incubation period used for TPP experiment. n = 6 cell replicates. (e) TPP workflow to assess proteome-wide changes in protein thermostability following lactate treatment. (f) Thermostability changes to UBE2C in HEK293 and HCT116 cell lysates following treatment with lactate, as determined by western blotting. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (g) Lack of observable thermostability changes to UBE2C in HCT116 cell lysates following treatment with D-lactate or pyruvate. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (h) Effect of acute (15 min) elevation of lactate on UBE2C protein abundance in cellular lysates. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (i) Effect of acute (15 min) elevation of lactate on post-translational modifications of UBE2C. (j) IP of pro-metaphase APC(CDC27) following lactate treatment without addition of exogenous UBE2C demonstrates lactate-mediated binding of UBE2C, cyclin B1, and securin to pro-metaphase APC/C. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (k) IP of UBE2C following lactate treatment demonstrates lactate-mediated binding of UBE2C to APC/C as determined by blotting for APC4. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (l) IP of pro-metaphase APC(CDC27) following 5 mM and 10 mM lactate treatment to determine effect on binding of UBE2C, cyclin B1, and securin to pro-metaphase APC/C. (m) IP of pro-metaphase APC(CDC27) following D-lactate (left) or pyruvate (right) treatment demonstrates no effect on binding of UBE2C, cyclin B1, and securin to pro-metaphase APC/C. (n) IP-MS of APC(CDC27) following D-lactate or pyruvate treatment demonstrates lack of effect on binding of Cyclin B1, CDK1, and CDK2. n = 4 cell replicates. (o) Quantification of phosphorylation on APC/C, and APC/C interacting proteins, following cell lysate incubation with 15 mM lactate. n = 8 cell replicates. (p) Effect of acute (15 min) elevation of lactate on post-translational modifications of APC/C, and APC/C interacting proteins. n = 8 cell replicates. (q) SUMO1 (top) and APC4 (bottom) immunoblot of immunopurified APC4 following lactate treatment in intact cells for 4 h. Representative blot from two experiments shown. Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Characterization of lactate-dependent APC4 SUMOylation.

(a) Effect of 15 min lactate treatment on total SUMO2/3 content in cellular lysates. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (b) Experimental design for identification of protein SUMOylation that is elevated in response to lactate. See Methods for details. (c) Quantification of differential SUMOylation of 860 proteins following treatment of HCT116 cell lysates with 15 mM lactate for 15 min. 16 proteins exhibiting significant lactate-dependent elevation in SUMOylation are highlighted. n = 3 cell replicates. (d) Sequencing of APC4 gene locus in APC4 KO HeLa S3 and HCT116 cells. In both cases, the relevant region of exon 29 is shown highlighting nucleotide differences (#) to WT sequence (black) and frameshift mutations that elicited KO (blue squares). In HeLa S3 cells the highlighted region indicates two distinct frame shift mutations. (e) APC4 KO cells exhibit abnormal mitosis. Method for defining abnormal mitosis described in the Methods section. (f) Sequencing of APC4 in HeLa S3 expressing lentiviral WT and mutant constructs containing WT sequence APC4 K772 & K798, and mutant R772 & R798. (g) Sequencing of APC4 in HCT116 expressing lentiviral WT and mutant constructs containing WT sequence APC4 K772 & K798, and mutant R772 & R798. (h) APC4 immunoblot of HeLa S3 and HCT116 WT, APC4 KO, and APC4 KO cells re-expressing WT APC4 or APC4 K772/798R. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (i) IP of APC(CDC27) following lactate treatment in cell lysates demonstrates lactate-mediated binding of cyclin B1 and securin to pro-metaphase APC/C requires APC4 SUMO2/3 targets K772 and K798. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (j) CRISPR depletion of SENP1 in three proliferative human cell lines. sgC: guide control. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (k) SUMO2/3 (top) and APC4 (bottom) immunoblot of immunopurified APC4 following lactate treatment in cells for 4 h in WT and SENP1KO cells indicates lack of additive effect, suggesting the modalities operate in series. Representative blot from four experiments shown. (l) Densitometry quantification immunoblot replicates from panel k immunopurified APC4 following lactate treatment in WT and SENP1KO cells indicates lack of additive effect, suggesting the modalities operate in series. n = 4 cell replicates. (m) SENP1 residues predicted as favorable for zinc binding according to ZincBind algorithm using SENP1 structure PDB 2XPH. (two-tailed Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons in l). ANOVA analyses were subjected to Bonferroni’s post hoc test. Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Characterization of lactate and zinc binding to SENP1.

(a) 1H-15N TROSY HSQC spectrum of SENP1419–644 +/− zinc binding, highlighting all active site regions. (b) Intensity reduction in SENP1 resonances as a function of residue number after addition of 100 µM zinc to SENP1. (c) Structure of SENP1 (PDB ID 2IYC) color-coded as a heatmap according to peak intensity reduction caused by the addition of 100 µM zinc (cyan = no intensity reduction, red = maximum intensity reduction). (d) 1H-15N TROSY HSQC spectra of SENP1419–644 + 100 µM zinc and +/− 1 mM L-lactate, highlighting active site residues. (e) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of human SENP1 catalytic domain comparing WT protein to C535S mutant. Spectral shifts differentiating WT and C535S SENP1 that match assignment to C535 in annotated spectra are highlighted. (f) MS determination and quantification of SENP1 cysteines that coordinate zinc. Method reports on stoichiometry of zinc binding with individual cysteines based on differential labelling with iodoacetamide (IAM)38. See Methods for details. (g) Quantification of zinc binding to human SENP1 cysteines by MS ± 1 mM lactate. Stoichiometry of zinc labelling of cysteines determined as described in Extended Data Fig. 3f, n = 5 independent samples. (h) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of human WT SENP1 ± ZnSO4 in the presence or absence of 0.5 mM L-lactate, D-lactate, or pyruvate. Active site residues where L-lactate+zinc induced CSPs are observed are highlighted. (i) 1H-15N NMR spectra regions of WT SENP1 comparing L-lactate+zinc induced active site CSPs to D-lactate and pyruvate. (j) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of human WT SENP1 ± 0.5 mM lactate. Regions of the spectrum where L-lactate+zinc induced CSPs in the active site are highlighted showing none of these CSPs occur in the absence of zinc. (one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons in g. ANOVA analyses were subjected to Bonferroni’s post hoc test). Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Characterization of functional effects of lactate and zinc on SENP family.

(a) Effect of ZnSO4 on recombinant human SENP1 deSUMOylation activity. n = 6; 7.5 nM n = 5 independent samples. (b) Effect of lactate on zinc-mediated inhibition of recombinant SENP1 deSUMOylation activity. n = 6; 120 nM zinc n = 4 independent samples. (c) Effect of MgCl2 and CaCl2 on recombinant human SENP1 deSUMOylation activity. n = 6; 500 nM CaCl2 n = 5 independent samples. (d) Effect of lactate on recombinant human SENP1 deSUMOylation activity. n = 6 independent samples. (e) Effect of ZnSO4 and lactate on recombinant human SENP2, SENP3, SENP5, SENP6, and SENP7 deSUMOylation activity. n shown in panel and indicate independent samples. (f) Sequence alignment of human SENP family active site regions highlighting residues invoked in SENP1 co-ordination of lactate-zinc complex (C535 and N556). (g) SUMO2/3 (top) and APC4 (bottom) immunoblot of immunopurified APC4 following lactate treatment in cellular lysates in the presence of EDTA to chelate zinc, including supplementation with Mg2+ to control for effects of EDTA on Mg2+ chelation. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (h) SUMO2/3 (top) and APC4 (bottom) immunoblot of immunopurified APC4 following ZnSO4 treatment in cellular lysates demonstrate that elevation of zinc stabilizes APC4 SUMOylation. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (i) SUMO2/3 (top) and APC4 (bottom) immunoblot of immunopurified APC4 following treatment with sub-optimal zinc and lactate in cellular lysates. Representative blot from four experiments shown. (j) Densitometry quantification immunoblot replicates from panel i of immunopurified APC4 following suboptimal zinc treatment in the presence or absence of lactate. n = 4 cell replicates. (k) Sequencing of SENP1 in HCT116 expressing lentiviral WT and mutant constructs containing WT sequence N556, and mutant A556. Blue region highlights silent PAM mutation, red region highlights N556A mutation. (l) Densitometry of immunopurified APC4 following lactate treatment in cellular lysates from SENP1 WT and N556A HCT116 cells, related to Fig. 3k. (m) Effect of lactate on zinc-mediated inhibition of recombinant human SENP1 deSUMOylation activity in the presence of 20 mg/ml albumin. n = 3 independent samples. (two-tailed Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons in l, one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons in a,b,j,m). ANOVA analyses were subjected to Bonferroni’s post hoc test. Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Timing and effects of lactate accumulation on cell cycle and proliferation.

(a) Schematic of metabolic flux to anabolic precursors tied to lactate production, pathways predicted to increase flux in response to growth demand in G1/S/G2 phase. (b) Outline of experiment to monitor relationship between lactate abundance and cell cycle phases in proliferative cells. Double thymidine block and release synchronized cells at the G1/S interface as described in Methods. (c) Parallel tracking of securin and cyclin B1 abundance (top), cell cycle phase (middle), and intracellular lactate abundance (bottom) in WT and APC4 K772/798R HCT116 cells. n = 6 cell replicates; 12 h APC4 K772/798R n = 5; lactate abundance n = 6; 6 h WT n = 5. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (d) MS quantification of proteins involved in lactate production and lactate abundance in asynchronous HCT116 cells and 0h, 6h, and 12h post-DTB release. n = 4 cell replicates. (e) MS quantification of lysine lactylation in asynchronous HCT116 cells and 0h, 6h, and 12h post-DTB release. n = 4 cell replicates. (f) Abundance of PDHe1α and PDHe1α phosphorylation on residue Ser293 tracked during cell cycle following DTB release. as = asynchronous. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (g) CD8+ T cells stimulated with IL-2 and anti-CD28 for 24 h with cell cycle and intracellular lactate abundance monitored. Lactate abundance n = 4; cell cycle n = 6 cell replicates. (h) Model for lactate accumulation mediating timed remodeling of APC/C to facilitate mitotic progression. (i) ΔCt quantification of bacterial LMO mRNA expression in HCT116 cells relative to β-actin. n = 3 cell replicates. (j) Cells expressing LMO, or treatment of cells with 25 mM DCA, lowers peak intracellular lactate abundance achieved upon mitotic entry. n = 6 cell replicates. (k) Negative correlation between intracellular lactate abundance and doubling time in 707 human proliferative cancers. See Methods for details. (l) Proliferation rate of WT and APC4 K772/798R HeLa S3 and HCT116 cells. Cells lacking APC4 SUMOylation sites exhibit a significantly lower proliferation rate. n = 4 cell replicates. (m) Exposure of asynchronous HCT116 cells to 1% O2 for 24 h lowers levels of securin and cyclin B1. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (n) Proliferation rate of WT, APC4 K772/798R, and LMO-expressing HCT116 cells cultured at 1% O2. n = 5 cell replicates. (two-tailed Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons in c,j, one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons in g, two-sided Pearson R in k, two-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons involving two independent variables in l,n). ANOVA analyses were subjected to Bonferroni’s post hoc test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Effect of lactate accumulation on cyclin B1, securin, and mitotic exit.

(a) Model for putative role of chronic lactate elevation on APC/C dependent processes in proliferative cells. (b) Intracellular lactate concentration in asynchronous HeLa S3 (n = 6), DLD1 (n = 4), and HCT116 (n = 5) cells. n indicates cell replicate number. (c) Treatment of asynchronous human proliferative cells with elevated lactate at 15 and 25 mM for 4 h lowers levels of securin and cyclin B1. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (d) mRNA transcript abundance of human FOXK1 (n = 3) and FOXK2 (n = 4) in HCT116 cells following engineered overexpression (oe). n designates cell replicates. (e) Effect of forced overexpression on abundance of cyclin B1 and securin in asynchronous HCT116 cells. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (f) Treatment of asynchronous human proliferative cells with elevated glucose for 4 h has no effect on levels of securin and cyclin B1. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (g) Treatment of asynchronous human proliferative APC4 K772/798R cells with 25 mM lactate for 4 h has no effect on securin or cyclin B1 abundance. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (h) Lactate mediated depletion of securin and cyclin B1 is lost upon treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (i) Treatment of asynchronous HCT116 cells with 15 mM lactate for 4 h lowers levels of securin and cyclin B1 in the presence of the LDH inhibitor GSK2837808A. Representative blot from two experiments shown. (j) Effect of treatment of asynchronous human proliferative cells with 1 µM oligomycin A for 24 h on abundance of securin and cyclin B1 in WT and APC4 K772/798R cells. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (k) Effect of treatment of asynchronous human proliferative cells with 5 mM αCHCA for 24 h on abundance of securin and cyclin B1 in WT and APC4 K772/798R cells. Representative blot from three experiments shown. (two-tailed Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons in d). Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Persistent lactate elevation drives mitotic slippage through aberrant APC/C activation.

(a) Treatment of cells with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole (sync.) for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase leads to accumulation of cyclin B1. Exposure of arrested WT cells to lactate for the last 12 h of nocodazole exposure stimulates depletion of cyclin B1 in the presence of nocodazole. (b) Treatment of HCT116 or HeLa S3 cells with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole (sync.) for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase leads to accumulation of cyclin B1. Co-exposure of arrested WT cells to 1 µM oligomycin A stimulates depletion of cyclin B1 in the presence of nocodazole. Arrested APC4 K772/798R cells treated with oligomycin A exhibit no oligomycin A dependent effect. (c) Treatment of HCT116 or HeLa S3 cells with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole (sync.) for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase leads to accumulation of cyclin B1. Co-exposure of arrested WT cells to 5 mM αCHCA stimulates depletion of cyclin B1 in the presence of nocodazole. Arrested APC4 K772/798R cells treated with αCHCA exhibit no αCHCA dependent effect. (d,e) Treatment of (d) WT cells and (e) APC4 K772/798R with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase. Rate of mitotic progression was determined by timelapse microscopy following exposure of cells to lactate for the last 12 h of nocodazole incubation. Analysis represents time in mitotic arrest beginning with nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) to DNA decondensation. n = 30 individual cell replicates. (two-tailed Student’s t-test for pairwise comparisons in d). (f) Treatment of cells with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase. Quantification of WT cells exhibiting chromosome mis-segregation following treatment with lactate for the last 12 h of nocodazole exposure. n = 30 individual cell replicates. (g) Treatment of cells with an inhibitor of microtubule assembly nocodazole for 14 h to arrest in pro-metaphase. Quantification of APC4 K772/798R cells exhibiting chromosome mis-segregation following treatment with lactate for the last 12 h of nocodazole exposure. n = 30 individual cell replicates. Data are mean ± s.e.m.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

Uncropped western blots.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

TMT-MS thermal proteomic profile of HEK cell lysates following acute treatment with sodium lactate.

Supplementary Table 2

Quantitative IP-MS of APC interacting proteins upon treatment with 15 mM lactate.

Supplementary Table 3

Quantitative phosphopeptide analysis following IP-MS of APC/C and interacting proteins upon treatment with 15 mM lactate.

Supplementary Table 4

Quantitative IP-MS of protein SUMOylation upon treatment with 15 mM lactate.

Supplementary Table 5

SENP1 NMR peak assignments.

Supplementary Data 1

SENP1 NMR data supplement.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Wang, Y., Bozi, L.H.M. et al. Lactate regulates cell cycle by remodelling the anaphase promoting complex. Nature 616, 790–797 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05939-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05939-3

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing