Abstract
Aerial seeding can quickly cover large and physically inaccessible areas1 to improve soil quality and scavenge residual nitrogen in agriculture2, and for postfire reforestation3,4,5 and wildland restoration6,7. However, it suffers from low germination rates, due to the direct exposure of unburied seeds to harsh sunlight, wind and granivorous birds, as well as undesirable air humidity and temperature1,8,9. Here, inspired by Erodium seeds10,11,12,13,14, we design and fabricate self-drilling seed carriers, turning wood veneer into highly stiff (about 4.9 GPa when dry, and about 1.3 GPa when wet) and hygromorphic bending or coiling actuators with an extremely large bending curvature (1,854 m−1), 45 times larger than the values in the literature15,16,17,18. Our three-tailed carrier has an 80% drilling success rate on flat land after two triggering cycles, due to the beneficial resting angle (25°–30°) of its tail anchoring, whereas the natural Erodium seed’s success rate is 0%. Our carriers can carry payloads of various sizes and contents including biofertilizers and plant seeds as large as those of whitebark pine, which are about 11 mm in length and about 72 mg. We compare data from experiments and numerical simulation to elucidate the curvature transformation and actuation mechanisms to guide the design and optimization of the seed carriers. Our system will improve the effectiveness of aerial seeding to relieve agricultural and environmental stresses, and has potential applications in energy harvesting, soft robotics and sustainable buildings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data generated and analysed during the study is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7057562. Digital models, processing protocols and datasets are available on request from L.Y.
Code availability
Code used for the finite-element analysis to simulate coil extension and drilling is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7263943. Further information on code and models used is available on request from T.Z.
References
Fisher, K. A., Momen, B. & Kratochvil, R. J. Is broadcasting seed an effective winter cover crop planting method? Agron. J. 103, 472–478 (2011).
Ball, B. C. Cereal production with broadcast seed and reduced tillage: a review of recent experimental and farming experience. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 35, 71–95 (1986).
Kelly, L. T. et al. Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Science 370, eabb0355 (2020).
Keane, R. E. Managing wildfire for whitebark pine ecosystem restoration in western North America. Forests 9, 648 (2018).
Xiao, X. et al. Aerial seeding: an effective forest restoration method in highly degraded forest landscapes of sub-tropic regions. Forests 6, 1748–1762 (2015).
Monsen, S. B., Stevens, R. & Shaw, N. L. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands, vol. 1. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2004).
Ranwell, D. S. in Geology and Engineering (Ed. Cronin, L. E.) 471–483 (Elsevier, 1975).
Collins, B. A. & Fowler, D. B. A comparison of aerial and conventional methods for seeding winter wheat. Soils and Crops Workshop (University of Saskatchewan, 1989).
Keisling, T. C., Dillon, C. R., Oxner, M. D. & Counce, P. A. An economic and agronomic evaluation of selected wheat planting methods in Arkansas. In Proc. Southern Conservation Tillage Conference 156–158 (1997).
Stamp, N. E. Self-burial behaviour of Erodium cicutarium seeds. J. Ecol. 72, 611–620 (1984).
Ha, J. et al. Hygroresponsive coiling of seed awns and soft actuators. Extreme Mech. Lett. 38, 100746 (2020).
Almeida, A. P. C. et al. Reversible water driven chirality inversion in cellulose-based helices isolated from Erodium awns. Soft Matter 15, 2838–2847 (2019).
Abraham, Y. et al. Tilted cellulose arrangement as a novel mechanism for hygroscopic coiling in the stork’s bill awn. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 640–647 (2012).
Evangelista, D., Hotton, S. & Dumais, J. The mechanics of explosive dispersal and self-burial in the seeds of the filaree, Erodium cicutarium (Geraniaceae). J. Exp. Biol. 214, 521–529 (2011).
Rüggeberg, M. & Burgert, I. Bio-inspired wooden actuators for large scale applications. PLoS ONE 10, e0120718 (2015).
Grönquist, P. et al. Analysis of hygroscopic self-shaping wood at large scale for curved mass timber structures. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1311 (2019).
Holstov, A., Bridgens, B. & Farmer, G. Hygromorphic materials for sustainable responsive architecture. Constr. Build. Mater. 98, 570–582 (2015).
Krieg, O. D. in Advancing Wood Architecture: a Computational Approach (eds. Achim, M. et al.) 16 (Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2016).
Cavanagh, A. M., Morgan, J. W. & Godfree, R. C. Awn morphology influences dispersal, microsite selection and burial of Australian native grass diaspores. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 581967 (2020).
Tothill, J. C. Soil temperatures and seed burial in relation to the performance of Heteropogon contortus and Themeda australis in burnt native woodland pastures in eastern Queensland. Aust. J. Bot. 17, 269–275 (1969).
Rice, K. J. Responses of Erodium to varying microsites: the role of germination cueing. Ecology 66, 1651–1657 (1985).
Garnier, L. K. M. & Dajoz, I. Evolutionary significance of awn length variation in a clonal grass of fire-prone savannas. Ecology 82, 1720–1733 (2001).
Keane, R. E. & Parsons, R. A. Management Guide to Ecosystem Restoration Treatments: Whitebark Pine Forests of the Northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. 133 (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2010).
Luo, D., Gu, J., Qin, F., Wang, G. & Yao, L. E-seed: shape-changing interfaces that self drill. In Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 45–57 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).
Igiehon, N. O. & Babalola, O. O. Biofertilizers and sustainable agriculture: exploring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101, 4871–4881 (2017).
Jung, W., Kim, W. & Kim, H.-Y. Self-burial mechanics of hygroscopically responsive awns. Integr. Comp. Biol. 54, 1034–1042 (2014).
Jung, W., Choi, S. M., Kim, W. & Kim, H.-Y. Reduction of granular drag inspired by self-burrowing rotary seeds. Phys. Fluids 29, 041702 (2017).
Agnarsson, I., Dhinojwala, A., Sahni, V. & Blackledge, T. A. Spider silk as a novel high performance biomimetic muscle driven by humidity. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 1990–1994 (2009).
Chen, X., Mahadevan, L., Driks, A. & Sahin, O. Bacillus spores as building blocks for stimuli-responsive materials and nanogenerators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 137–141 (2014).
Park, Y. et al. β‐Sheet nanocrystals dictate water responsiveness of Bombyx mori silk. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 41, 1900612 (2020).
Zhao, Z. et al. Digital printing of shape-morphing natural materials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2113715118 (2021).
Shintake, J., Sonar, H., Piskarev, E., Paik, J. & Floreano, D. Soft pneumatic gelatin actuator for edible robotics. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 6221–6226 (IEEE, 2017).
He, Q., Huang, Y. & Wang, S. Hofmeister effect-assisted one step fabrication of ductile and strong gelatin hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705069 (2018).
Baumgartner, M. et al. Resilient yet entirely degradable gelatin-based biogels for soft robots and electronics. Nat. Mater. 19, 1102–1109 (2020).
Zhao, D. et al. High-strength and high-toughness double-cross-linked cellulose hydrogels: a new strategy using sequential chemical and physical cross-linking. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 6279–6287 (2016).
Song, J. et al. Processing bulk natural wood into a high-performance structural material. Nature 554, 224–228 (2018).
Frey, M. et al. Delignified and densified cellulose bulk materials with excellent tensile properties for sustainable engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 5030–5037 (2018).
Frey, M. et al. Tunable wood by reversible interlocking and bioinspired mechanical gradients. Adv. Sci. 6, 1802190 (2019).
Xiao, S. et al. Lightweight, strong, moldable wood via cell wall engineering as a sustainable structural material. Science 374, 465–471 (2021).
Holmberg, S., Persson, K. & Petersson, H. Nonlinear mechanical behaviour and analysis of wood and fibre materials. Comput. Struct. 72, 459–480 (1999).
Báder, M., Németh, R. & Konnerth, J. Micromechanical properties of longitudinally compressed wood. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 77, 341–351 (2019).
Donaldson, L. Microfibril angle: measurement, variation and relationships – a review. IAWA J. 29, 345–386 (2008).
Goodrich-Blair, H. They’ve got a ticket to ride: Xenorhabdus nematophila–Steinernema carpocapsae symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 225–230 (2007).
Gaugler, R. & Boush, G. M. Effects of ultraviolet radiation and sunlight on the entomogenous nematode, Neoaplectana carpocapsae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 32, 291–296 (1978).
Chen, X. et al. Scaling up nanoscale water-driven energy conversion into evaporation-driven engines and generators. Nat. Commun. 6, 7346 (2015).
Park, Y. & Chen, X. Water-responsive materials for sustainable energy applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 15227–15244 (2020).
Shin, B. et al. Hygrobot: a self-locomotive ratcheted actuator powered by environmental humidity. Sci. Robot. 3, eaar2629 (2018).
Wen, M.-Y., Kang, C.-W. & Park, H.-J. Impregnation and mechanical properties of three softwoods treated with a new fire retardant chemical. J. Wood Sci. 60, 367–375 (2014).
Stamp, N. E. Seed dispersal of four sympatric grassland annual species of Erodium. J. Ecol. 77, 1005 (1989).
Freckman, D. W. & Virginia, R. A. Low-diversity Antarctic soil nematode communities: distribution and response to disturbance. Ecology 78, 363–369 (1997).
Yang, N., Li, T. & Zhang, L. A two-dimensional lattice model for simulating the failure and fracture behavior of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 54, 63–87 (2020).
Reiterer, A. & Stanzl-Tschegg, S. E. Compressive behaviour of softwood under uniaxial loading at different orientations to the grain. Mech. Mater. 33, 705–715 (2001).
Hanhijärvi, A. Advances in the knowledge of the influence of moisture changes on the long-term mechanical performance of timber structures. Mater. Struct. 33, 43 (2000).
Fortino, S., Mirianon, F. & Toratti, T. A 3D moisture-stress FEM analysis for time dependent problems in timber structures. Mech. Time Depend. Mater. 13, 333 (2009).
Lunni, D., Cianchetti, M., Filippeschi, C., Sinibaldi, E. & Mazzolai, B. Plant‐inspired soft bistable structures based on hygroscopic electrospun nanofibers. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1901310 (2020).
Krüger, F. et al. Development of a material design space for 4D-printed bio-inspired hygroscopically actuated bilayer structures with unequal effective layer widths. Biomimetics 6, 58 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Y. Wei for processing suggestions, E. Sharon for mechanism discussions, and L. B. Hu, J. Z. Gu and J. Forman for helpful insights. We also thank J. Y. Zhu and N. Z. Plaza from the US Department of Agriculture Forest Products Laboratory for discussions and characterization through X-ray diffraction. We acknowledge funding support from the US National Science Foundation, including IIS-CAREER-1847149 (L.Y.), CMMI-2020476 (T.Z.) and the Future Eco Manufacturing Research Grant, no. CMMI 2037097 (S.Y.). Simulations were carried out at the Triton Shared Computing Cluster at the San Diego Supercomputer Center and the Expanse cluster (TG-MSS170004, T.Z.) in the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment. We also acknowledge the use of the Materials Characterization Facility at Carnegie Mellon University (MCF-677785, L.Y.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62002321, G.W.) and a gift to Carnegie Mellon University (L.Y.) from Accenture Labs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Y. and D.L. conceived the initial concept. A.M. and A.D. conceived two application contexts. L.Y., T.Z., S.Y. and G.W. supervised the project. L.Y., D.L., T.Z. and S.Y. wrote the manuscript. D.L., L.Y. and G.W. carried out fabrication and peak force measurements. D.L., L.Y., G.W., J.L., Y.Y., Y.T. and L.S. carried out drilling and germination tests. D.L., L.Y. and Y.Y. carried out bending angle and coil pitch measurements. D.L., L.Y. and D.K.P. carried out scanning electron microscopy and micrograph analysis. D.K.P. and L.Y. conducted tensile tests. T.Z. and L.Y. carried out curvature analysis. T.Z. carried out mechanical modelling and simulation. S.Y., T.Z. and L.Y. provided scientific and experimental advice. L.Y. and D.L. created the videos.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A US patent application (application no. 17/718,232) on the methods and devices for the biomimetic composite has been filed by Carnegie Mellon University (assignors: L.Y., G.W., J. Gu, D.L. and F. Qin.). The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Barbara Mazzolai, Naomi Nakayama and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 SEM images of partially delignified wood veneer.
a, Chemically washed and moulded wood veneer (0.5 mm thick, 0.8 mm mandrel diameter). Wrinkled cell walls are caused by mechanical moulding on the longitudinal cells on the inner side. The outer side cells show no obvious signs of deformation. b, The chemically washed but not moulded wood veneer, showing uniform cell structure throughout the sample.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Performance of the engineered moisture-driven actuators.
a, Reversible curvature changes of a bending actuator during three actuation cycles. b, Reversible actuation of a moulded coiling actuator with seven coils in three consecutive hydration-dehydration cycles, showing the angular changes relative to the initial position of the top end of the helix (θ-θdry). Both actuators are 3 mm in width and 0.5 mm in thickness, moulded with a mandrel, with a 0.8 mm diameter. The length is 3 mm in (a) and 40 mm in (b).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Design of a remote-controlled device that can be attached to a drone to carry and deploy seeds.
a, Photograph of the customized seed deployment mechanism attached to a drone. b–d, Top view of the device with a sliding cover to prevent turbulence caused by the wings of the drone from affecting the deployment. e–f, Bottom view of the device, with a magnetic double-side door that can be opened with a remote-controlled pulling mechanism, shown in (g). h–j, A field test of the aerial delivery with examination of the landing pose of the seed carriers. k–l, a portion of the seed carriers for the aerial delivery test. The tails are dyed with bright colors for easy identification. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Photos of the fabrication and assembly of the seed carrier prototypes.
a–f, The process of turning a white oak log into a wood veneer with a specified thickness and fiber orientation. g–h, The process of laser cutting, chemical washing and manual moulding of the wood strips. i, The chemical washing process. j–n, The mechanical moulding process. o-q, Adding two additional tails for three-tailed seed carriers. r–w, The tip manufacturing process adapted from the literature24 with additional seeds embedding. x, The process of moulding a double-coiled body. Scale bar is 10 mm unless otherwise specified.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Comparison of the self-drilling depth between a double-coiled and a single-coiled seed carrier.
a–b, Photographs of four cycles of a double-coiled seed carrier (a) and a single-coiled seed carrier (b) at each hydration and dehydration state.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Tracking of the living nematodes extracted from the soil.
a, Representative images of nematodes extracted from the soil (Methods). b, The total number of living nematodes identified in the soil samples. Data are means ± s.d. n = 3 soil samples each day.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Selective field drilling and germination test results (more details in Supplementary Table 5).
a, Drilling test 1 from Table S5, with 22 three-tailed seed carriers under natural conditions for two consecutive days. b, A rain-anchored seed continues to drill after the sun emerges, as shown in drilling test 3 of Table S5. c, Established seed carriers tend to germinate more easily than non-established seed carriers after five days with four periods of rain. The established and exposed seeds had a 100% and 19% germination rate, respectively, in drilling test 1 of Supplementary Table 5.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Optimizing the material choice and processing method.
a, Comparison of the mouldability and actuation range of bending actuators made of different types of wood. The wood strip is ~0.5 mm thick and the moulding diameter is 0.8 mm. Data are means ± s.d. n = 3 samples for each type of wood. b, Comparison of the mouldability of the seed body made of various types of wood. The wood strip is ~0.5 mm thick. c, Effect of the chemical washing durations on the curvature changes. For both (a) and (c), data are means ± s.d. n = 3 with a thickness of ~0.5 mm, length of ~3 mm and width of ~3 mm, moulded with a mandrel with a 0.8 mm diameter. d, Moulding quality comparison on wood veneer of different thickness, moulded on mandrels of different diameters, with a washing duration of 10 min.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Experiments and simulations for seed carrier drilling on a surface that is hard and smooth.
a, Simulation (top) and experimental (bottom) snapshots of the drilling process of the single-tailed design seed carrier. b, Simulation (top) and experimental (bottom) snapshots of the drilling process of the three-tailed design seed carrier.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Tables 1–5, Notes 1–12 including Figs. 1–26, and References.
Supplementary Video 1
The natural Erodium seed has an inevitable crevice-searching phase that can negatively impact the drilling efficiency especially in the case of relatively flat land.
Supplementary Video 2
Dropping test of both natural and engineered seed carriers. Compared to Erodium seeds thath have an 80% chance of landing flat, this three-tailed carrier has a 90% chance of landing with a guaranteed angle between its body and the ground to increase the drilling success.
Supplementary Video 3
Comparing the self-drilling success of the engineered three-tailed seed carrier and the natural single-tailed Erodium seed.
Supplementary Video 4
Experiment and finite-element simulation of the self-drilling processes of both three-tailed and single-tailed designs. The three-tailed design generates a larger force, as multiple tail tips and bodies can generate effective torques simultaneously.
Supplementary Video 5
Self-drilling processes of three seed carrier design variations, including three-tailed, double-coiled and large-sized systems, tailored to different use cases. The tests were conducted in an indoor controlled environment.
Supplementary Video 6
Fabrication process of the seed carriers.
Supplementary Video 7
Germination experiment using the three-tailed seed carrier, with embedded symbiotic cherry belle radish seeds and beneficial fungi, captured for a duration of 190 h.
Supplementary Video 8
Living nematodes captured in the soil after 9 days of seed burial.
Supplementary Video 9
Successful self-drilling and germination under natural conditions outdoors for 7 continuous days, with 2 periods of intermittent light rain on the first day and 1 thunderstorm and heavy rain, which lasted for more than 6 h on the second day.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, D., Maheshwari, A., Danielescu, A. et al. Autonomous self-burying seed carriers for aerial seeding. Nature 614, 463–470 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05656-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05656-3
This article is cited by
-
Honeybee comb-inspired stiffness gradient-amplified catapult for solid particle repellency
Nature Nanotechnology (2024)
-
Self-sustainable autonomous soft actuators
Communications Chemistry (2024)
-
Nature-inspired interfacial engineering for energy harvesting
Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering (2024)
-
Self-burying robot morphs wood to sow seeds
Nature (2023)
-
A Review of Recent Manufacturing Technologies for Sustainable Soft Actuators
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.