Most of the light from blazars, active galactic nuclei with jets of magnetized plasma that point nearly along the line of sight, is produced by high-energy particles, up to around 1 TeV. Although the jets are known to be ultimately powered by a supermassive black hole, how the particles are accelerated to such high energies has been an unanswered question. The process must be related to the magnetic field, which can be probed by observations of the polarization of light from the jets. Measurements of the radio to optical polarization—the only range available until now—probe extended regions of the jet containing particles that left the acceleration site days to years earlier1,2,3, and hence do not directly explore the acceleration mechanism, as could X-ray measurements. Here we report the detection of X-ray polarization from the blazar Markarian 501 (Mrk 501). We measure an X-ray linear polarization degree ΠX of around 10%, which is a factor of around 2 higher than the value at optical wavelengths, with a polarization angle parallel to the radio jet. This points to a shock front as the source of particle acceleration and also implies that the plasma becomes increasingly turbulent with distance from the shock.
In blazars whose lower-energy emission component peaks in the X-ray band, such as Mrk 501, synchrotron radiation is the dominant emission process from radio to X-rays. Radiation at longer wavelengths probably arises from larger regions in the jet, and hence multiwavelength studies probe spatial variations in the magnetic field structure and other physical properties in different locations4,5. A particularly important diagnostic is the degree of order of the magnetic field and its mean direction relative to the jet axis, which can be determined by measurements of the linear polarization. For example, particle acceleration at a shock front should result in relatively high levels (tens of per cent) of X-ray linear polarization along a position angle that is parallel to the jet6. By contrast, more stochastic acceleration processes involving turbulence or plasma instabilities are expected to lead to weak polarization with random position angles. The optical, infrared and radio polarization probe the level of order and mean direction of the magnetic field in regions progressively farther from the site of particle acceleration. Simultaneous multiwavelength polarization from X-ray to radio, which is now achievable with the advent of the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE7), can therefore provide a more complete picture of the emission region of a blazar jet than has previously been possible.
Variations in the flux of blazars at all wavebands, and in the linear polarization at radio to optical wavelengths, is largely stochastic in nature, which can be interpreted as the result of turbulence5,6,8,9. Multizone emission models, often involving a turbulent magnetic field, can reproduce a number of the observed characteristics of the variable linear polarization. In a turbulent region, roughly modelled as N cells, each with a uniform but randomly oriented field, we expect a mean degree of polarization of <Π> ≈ 75/√N, with the value of Π exhibiting variability on short timescales with a standard deviation of around 0.5<Π> (ref. 5), as often observed10. For a turbulent field in the plasma crossing a shock front, particle acceleration should be most efficient in cells for which the magnetic field is nearly parallel to the shock normal; this bias leads to a higher value of Π and more pronounced variability at X-rays compared to lower frequencies5. The passage of turbulent cells through the emission region would also cause irregular variations, including some apparent rotations, in the polarization angle (ψ)8,11.
On the other hand, some of the observed radio and optical patterns of polarization variability (for example, the above-mentioned ψ rotations) have been found to be inconsistent with purely stochastic processes12,13. This indicates that there is some coherent ordering of the magnetic field, for example, by compression or amplification by plasma processes in shocks14 or by the presence of a global, perhaps helical, magnetic field component15,16,17. In the commonly used single-zone model, the radiating particles are accelerated by an unspecified process to highly relativistic energies while being confined within a plasmoid with a partially ordered or helical magnetic field. The global magnetic field structure is expected to produce similar polarization patterns across frequencies, with little variability over time18. If the field is helical, ψ should align with the jet direction for most viewing angles15. In an alternative scenario, which includes shock acceleration, particles become energized over a limited volume, for example at a shock front, and then advect or diffuse away from that region4,6,19. In this process, the electrons lose energy to radiation, and so emit at progressively decreasing frequencies as they travel away from the acceleration site. We refer to this model as being ‘energy-stratified’. If the magnetic field is well ordered over the small volume of the acceleration region and becomes increasingly turbulent farther downstream, Π will decrease towards longer wavelengths, whereas ψ can vary with frequency if the mean direction of the magnetic field changes as the volume increases. In Mrk 501, we expect a progressively higher Π from radio to X-rays. A shock partially orders the magnetic field of the plasma crossing the shock, with the ordered field perpendicular to the shock normal. This causes the net polarization electric vector to be aligned with the jet. In a kink-instability-induced magnetic reconnection scenario, in which contiguous regions of oppositely directed magnetic field come into contact, the jet flow is sheared because of transverse velocity gradients20. Shearing would stretch the magnetic field along the jet boundary, so that ψ is expected to be transverse to the jet direction. The simultaneous contribution of multiple current sheets will lead to an overall lower polarization than in a shock scenario, with similar levels of polarization across frequencies21. Our expectations from the different emission models are summarized in Table 1.
The first IXPE observation of Mrk 501 took place during the period 8–10 March 2022 (100 ks, MJD 59646–59648) and was accompanied by observations across the electromagnetic spectrum from multiple observatories (Methods). IXPE measured a polarization degree of ΠX = 10 ± 2% and an electric vector position angle ψX = 134 ± 5ο (measured east of north) over the X-ray energy range of 2–8 keV. Contemporaneous millimetre-radio and optical observations (Extended Data Table 2) measured the degree of polarization ΠR = 1.5 ± 0.5% along a radio polarization angle ψR = 152 ± 10ο and ΠO = 4 ± 1% along an optical polarization angle ψO = 119 ± 9ο, respectively. A second IXPE observation took place during the period 26–28 March 2022 (86 ks, MJD 59664–59667) yielding ΠX = 11 ± 2% along ψX = 115 ± 4ο. Simultaneously to the second observation, the optical polarization was measured as ΠO = 5 ± 1% along ψO = 117 ± 3ο(Extended Data Table 3). The two observed ψX are consistent within 3σ. The radio and optical ψ also lie within 3σ from each other and ψX. Moreover, the position angle of the jet of Mrk 501 has been determined through Very Long Baseline Array imaging at 43 GHz to be 120 ± 12ο(ref. 22). This would suggest that, in both cases, radio-to-X-ray ψ is aligned with the jet axis within uncertainties (Fig. 1). We do not find evidence of polarization variability during either IXPE observation. Compared with the archival multiwavelength observations, we find the flux and polarization of Mrk 501 for both observations to be within one standard deviation of the median of the long-term light curves (Fig. 2). Blazars such as Mrk 501 are known to reach X-ray fluxes during outbursts as much as an order of magnitude higher. For the first IXPE observation the measured X-ray flux indicates an average activity state, whereas during the second observation we find evidence of a slightly elevated X-ray flux state. Compared with the historical maximum X-ray flux, during our observations Mrk 501 was a factor of three and a factor of two fainter, respectively.
The polarization measurements reported here reveal an increase in Π towards higher frequencies, with a degree of X-ray polarization that is more than twice the optical value (Fig. 3). This is in tension with the single-zone, turbulent multizone and magnetic reconnection models discussed above. There is no significant variability within the duration of the individual IXPE observations, in contrast to the predicted behaviour if turbulent cells moved in and out of the emission region on timescales of less than 2 days. On the other hand, the low (<10%) optical and X-ray polarization suggests significant disordering of the local magnetic field, possibly due to the presence of stationary turbulence. The wavelength dependence and lack of variability of Π, plus the constancy of ψ and its alignment with the jet direction, supports the shock-accelerated energy-stratified electron population scenario4,19,21. Previous intensely sampled measurements of the polarization of Mrk 501 have found variations in ΠO by ±5% and in ψO by 50ο from one night to the next10. These apparently discrepant results can be reconciled if the turbulence of the plasma flowing through shocks in the jet is only intermittent, as has been found previously in other blazars23. One would also expect deviations of the observed ψ from the jet axis as one moves further away from the shock front into more turbulent regions of the jet. At present, the large ψ uncertainties prevent us from confirming such behaviour. Future observations of Mrk 501 or similar blazars will allow us to explore the jet’s multiwavelength polarization variability. A prediction of the energy-stratified model is that the X-ray polarization angle of blazars that have synchrotron spectral energy distribution peaks at X-ray frequencies, like Mrk 501, will exhibit rotations24.
Probing the magnetic environment of the site of energization of radiating particles has supplied a new method for discriminating among particle acceleration mechanisms in astrophysical jets. The new X-ray polarization observations, in combination with the previously available radio and optical polarization diagnostics, have provided a discriminating set of evidence. Our results demonstrate how multiwavelength polarization uniquely probes the physical conditions in supermassive black-hole systems. Future monitoring of the time variability of multiwavelength polarization with IXPE and other instruments will improve the definition of the range of physical conditions that occur in astrophysical jets.
X-ray polarization observations
IXPE is a joint mission of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Italian Space Agency (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana). A description of the spacecraft and of the payload is given in ref. 7 and the detector units are described in ref. 25. Mrk 501 was observed with IXPE over an effective exposure time of 100 ks from 8 to 10 March 2022 (MJD 59646–59648) and again from 26–28 March 2022 (MJD 59664–59666) for 86 ks. The exposure times were selected on the basis of the results of ref. 26, which determined that a 100 ks exposure would be sufficient to measure polarization in Mrk 501 in a blind survey. At the approximately 30” angular resolution of IXPE, Mrk 501 is essentially a point source.
The IXPE raw (level-1) data were first reduced and corrected for instrumental polarization artifacts as well as boom and spacecraft motion to create level-2 event files (L2). The L2 data were then corrected for the energy scaling of the detector and bad aspect time intervals following standard procedures within the latest version of the ixpeobssim pipeline27,28. The IXPE L2 files contain the polarization information in the form of photon-by-photon Stokes parameters. All the quoted results refer to the average of the three identical IXPE detector units. We selected source photons using xpselect and a circular region with a radius of 60” centred on the source. The polarization degree and angle were determined in the 2–8 keV energy range using three different analysis techniques performed by five independent groups to ensure an unbiased estimation. Those techniques were a model-independent analysis, a spectropolarimetric fit in the X-ray spectral fitting package (XSPEC) and a maximum likelihood spectropolarimetric fit implemented within the MULTINEST algorithm. Although the effect of the photoelectric absorption is negligible over the 2–8 keV energy range of IXPE, the spectropolarimetric fits included photoelectric absorption based on the measured Galactic neutral hydrogen column density toward Mrk 501 of NH = 1.69 × 1020 cm−2 (ref. 29). The model-independent analysis applies the formalism of ref. 30to a user-defined subset of photons and determines the total Stokes parameters. We have performed both a weighted and unweighted analysis. In the model-independent analysis we do not perform background subtraction. We found that the sky background counts for a 60” region are only 3% of the total counts. We have verified that for a bright blazar such as Mrk 501 the background has a negligible effect on the polarization analysis. For the spectropolarimetric fits, we simultaneously fit 3× I, Q and U spectra (one set from each IXPE detector unit). In XSPEC, following the approach of ref. 31, we used an absorbed single power-law component with constant Π and ψ (CONSTPOL model). For the maximum likelihood spectropolarimetric fit, we used a single power-law spectral component with constant intrinsic Q and U values. Given the exposure time and flux of Mrk 501 at the time of the IXPE observations, the minimum degree of detectable polarization at a 99% confidence level (MDP99) that we were able to achieve was 6.6% for the 8–10 March and 5.2% for the 26–28 March observations. The source was brighter in X-rays during the 26–28 March observation (see below), hence the lower MDP99. The derived Π and ψ values for the different methods are summarized in Extended Data Table 1 for both observations. In both cases, all the measurements through the different analyses are consistent within the uncertainties with the median linear X-ray Π and ψ of ΠX = 10 ± 2%, ψX = 134 ± 5ο and ΠX = 11 ± 2% and ψX = 115 ± 4ο, respectively. Extended Data Figure 1 shows the Stokes Q/I and Stokes U/I values of our observations along with the MDP99. Depending on the emission model, variability timescales are expected to range from subday to a few days18. A 16-day interval between observations allows us to look for variability on a timescale of a few days, which, however, we do not find. We have also searched for variability within the individual IXPE observations. This was done by splitting the IXPE exposures into two and three equal-sized time bins. We again do not find evidence for variability within the uncertainties.
Here we report on a subset of our contemporaneous multiwavelength campaign from radio to TeV γ-rays, which is summarized in Extended Data Tables 2 and 3 and Fig. 3. The complete multiwavelength dataset will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
Polarimetric millimetre-radio measurements at 3.5 mm (86.24 GHz) and 1.3 mm (230 GHz) were obtained with the 30 m Telescope of the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimetrique (IRAM), located at the Pico Veleta Observatory (Sierra Nevada, Granada, Spain), on 9–10 March 2022 (MJD 59647–59649), within the Polarimetric Monitoring of AGN at Millimeter Wavelengths (POLAMI) programme, http://polami.iaa.es/ (refs. 32,33,34). Weather-related reasons prevented us from obtaining radio observations during the second IXPE exposure. Under the POLAMI observing setup, the four Stokes parameters (I, Q, U and V) are recorded simultaneously using the XPOL procedure35. The data reduction, calibration and managing and flagging procedures used in POLAMI are thoroughly described in ref. 32. The source was relatively stable in flux during the observations at both 1.3 and 3.5 mm with total flux densities of 0.71 ± 0.04 Jy and 0.73 ± 0.04 Jy at 3.5 mm and 0.41 ± 0.02 Jy and 0.39 ± 0.02 Jy at 1.3 mm, on 9 and 10 of March, respectively. Also, the polarized flux at 3.5 mm remained stable both in the linear polarization degree and the angle between the two dates. No polarization above 3.46% (95% confidence upper limit) was detected at 1.3 mm.
Optical and infrared observations
Optical polarization observations were performed using several telescopes across the world: the Nordic Optical Telescope on the night of 8–9 March (MJD 59647); the Tohoku 60 cm (T60) telescope at the Haleakala Observatory on 10 March (MJD 59649) and on 28 March (MJD 59667); the 2.2 m Calar Alto Observatory and 1.5 m Sierra Nevada Observatory telescopes on 8–10 March; the AZT-8 telescope of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory and the St Petersburg State University LX-200 telescope during the periods 8–10 March and 25–28 March 2022.
The Nordic Optical Telescope observations used the Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (ALFOSC) in four bands (BVRI) in the standard polarimetric mode. The data were then analysed with the semi-automatic pipeline developed at the Tuorla Observatory using standard photometric procedures36,37. Both highly polarized and unpolarized standard stars were observed during the same night for calibration purposes. The T60 polarimetric measurements were performed using the Dipol-2 polarimeter38. Dipol-2 is a remotely operated double-image charged coupled device polarimeter, which is capable of recording polarized images in three (BVR) filters simultaneously39,40,41,42. We obtained 24 individual measurements of the Stokes Q/I and U/I parameters simultaneously in three filters (BVR). Twenty unpolarized and two highly polarized (HD204827 and HD25443) nearby standard stars were observed for calibration and determination of the polarization angle zero point. The individual measurements were used to compute nightly average values using the ‘2× sigma-weighting algorithm’. The algorithm iteratively filters out outliers, assigning smaller weights to these measurements. The errors on the Stokes Q/I and U/I parameters were computed as standard errors of the weighted means. These errors were then used to estimate uncertainties on the polarization degree and angle42,43. The Calar Alto Observatory observations were performed in the Johnson Cousins Rc optical band by the Calar Alto Faint Object Spectrograph in imaging polarimetric mode on the 2.2 m telescope. The data were reduced following standard analysis procedures using both unpolarized and polarized standard stars for calibration purposes. Similarly, Mrk 501 was observed by the 1.5 m telescope at Sierra Nevada Observatory using polarized Rc filters during the three nights. The 70 cm AZT-8 telescope and the 40 cm LX-200 telescope observations were carried out in the Cousins R-band. Both telescopes are equipped with nearly identical imaging photometers–polarimeters based on a ST-7 camera. Two Savart plates rotated by 45o relative to each other are swapped to measure the relative Stokes q and u parameters from the two split images of each source in the field. The polarization parameters for each observation are produced by the sum of 15 × 30 s consecutive exposures. The data are then corrected for bias, flat field and background level, and calibrated for instrumental and interstellar polarization using the (assumed) unpolarized comparison stars 1, 4 and 6 from ref. 44. The same stars were used to perform differential photometry. During both IXPE observations, all the optical polarization observations are within uncertainties, which suggests no significant variability.
Observations were also obtained with the WIRC+Pol instrument45 on the 200-inch Palomar Hale telescope in the J-band. WIRC+Pol uses a polarizing grating to disperse the light into four beams that sense the four different components of linear polarization (0ο, 45ο, 90ο, 135ο), and a half-wave plate for beam swapping to improve polarimetric sensitivity46,47. Data reduction made use of the WIRC+Pol Data Reduction Pipeline software (https://github.com/WIRC-Pol/wirc_drp(ref. 45)). The pipeline software averages the measurements over the course of the half-wave plate rotation cycles to account for subtle differences in light paths through the instrument, and reports the degree and angle of polarization in each band. The results were verified with the use of both polarized and unpolarized standard stars. For additional details on the data reduction, see ref. 48.
The starlight from the host galaxy (assumed to be unpolarized) of Mrk 501 contributes a significant fraction of the optical flux. For this reason, the observed ΠO needs to be corrected for the depolarization effect of the host galaxy. To achieve this, we need to estimate the contribution of the host galaxy (Ihost, in mJy) within the aperture used for the analysis of individual observations. The light profile of Mrk 501's host galaxy has been fully characterized in the R-band in ref. 49. This allows us to estimate Ihostfor each observation separately. We then subtract Ihostfrom the total intensity I and estimate the intrinsic polarization degree following ref. 36 as Πintr = ΠO × I/(I − Ihost). Owing to the Dipol-2 instrument layout as well as the lack of a light profile model for the host galaxy in the J-band we are not able to accurately estimate the host-galaxy contribution to the polarization measurements for the T60 and Palomar Hale telescopes. For this reason, the measurements from T60 and Hale should be treated as lower limits to the intrinsic polarization degree. For the remaining telescopes, we calculate Πintrin the R-band for each observation and then estimate a median. We find the median intrinsic polarization degree and its uncertainty to be Πintr = 4 ± 1% for the 8–10 March observation and Πintr = 5 ± 1% for the 26–28 March observation. Figure 3 shows the multiwavelength polarization degree from radio to X-rays.
During the IXPE observations we independently measured the X-ray total flux and spectrum with the X-Ray Telescope50 on the orbiting Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift) in Window Timing mode (WT, 4 × 1 ks exposures, with 2 × 1 ks for each IXPE observation) and with the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR, 20 ks exposure51) during the 8–10 March observation. We extracted the X-ray spectrum from each telescope following standard analysis procedures and the latest calibration data files. For the source regions we used a circular radius of 47” and 49” for Swift and NuSTAR, respectively. To estimate the background for the NuSTAR spectra we used a 147’’ circular region outside of the region containing significant photon counts from Mrk 501. The background for Swift was extracted using the same size circular region from an available blank sky WT observation from the Swift archive. For the 8–10 March observation, we fit the combined Swift and NuSTAR data in XSPEC with an absorbed log-parabola model N(E) = (E/Ep)(−α − βlog(E/Ep)), in the 0.3–79 keV energy range; N(E) is the number of photons as a function of energy E. NH was set to the Galactic value and the pivot energy was set to Ep = 5 keV. This model provides a reasonably good fit to the data (χ2/dof = 862/850) with best-fit parameters α = 2.27 ± 0.01 and β = 0.28 ± 0.01. We also tested a single power-law model; however, there is clear curvature in the spectrum and the fit is statistically worse (χ2/dof = 2,005/851). We measure the flux of the source in the 2–8 keV range to be (10.0 ± 0.5) × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2. We do not find evidence for variability during the IXPE observations. For the 26–28 March observation we follow the same procedure using only the available Swift data. The source was in a higher flux state with α = 2.05 ± 0.02 and β = 0.26 ±0.04 and flux in the 2–8 keV range of (21.0 ± 0.6) × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2. The Swift observations show a change from 12 to 14 counts s−1 (17% increase) from the beginning until the end of the IXPE observation. The results from our multiwavelength campaign are summarized in Extended Data Tables 2 and 3.
Activity state of Mrk 501
Mrk 501 is a BL Lac object at a redshift of z = 0.033, corresponding to a luminosity distance of 141.3 Mpc, assuming a flat Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model with a matter density Ωm = 0.27 and a Hubble constant H0 = 71 km s−1 Mpc−1 (ref. 52), and a synchrotron peak frequency νsyn ~ 2.8 × 1015 Hz (ref. 53). It is among the brightest sources in the sky at very high γ-ray energies (>0.1 Tev), and is well-studied across the electromagnetic spectrum54,55,56,57,58. We use archival data from Swift (https://www.swift.psu.edu/monitoring/), the Steward observatory (http://james.as.arizona.edu/~psmith/Fermi/(ref. 59)), the RoboPol programme (http://robopol.physics.uoc.gr/(ref. 3)) and the Boston University blazar monitoring programme (https://www.bu.edu/blazars/index.html) to build the long-term light curves of Mrk 501 in optical brightness (R-band magnitude), optical polarization degree, polarization angle and X-ray flux (Fig. 2). The optical observations cover a range from October 2008 to June 2021. For the R-band, the source varied between 13.53 min and 13.24 min, with a median of 13.4 min. The median observed ΠO (not corrected for the host-galaxy contribution) was 2.1% with a minimum of 0.07% and a maximum of 5.9%. The ψΟ typically fluctuates about the jet axis (120 ± 12ο) with a median of 136ο, and a minimum and maximum of 65ο and 171ο, respectively. The X-ray observations cover a range from April 2005 to June 2020. The median X-ray flux in the 0.3–10 keV was 15 × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2, with a minimum and maximum at around 3.7 × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2 and 76 × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2, respectively. At the time of the IXPE observations our multiwavelength campaign finds the flux and polarization of the source within one standard deviation of the median of the respective archival light curve. For the first IXPE observation the X-ray flux of the source seems to correspond to an average state, whereas in the second observation we find the source in a slightly elevated flux state.
The data that support the findings of this study are either publicly available at the HEASARC database or available from the corresponding author upon request.
Jorstad, S. G. et al. Polarimetric observations of 15 active galactic nuclei at high frequencies: jet kinematics from bimonthly monitoring with the Very Long Baseline Array. Astron. J. 130, 1418–1465 (2005).
Marin, F. A complete disclosure of the hidden type-1 AGN in NGC 1068 thanks to 52 yr of broad-band polarimetric observation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 3142–3154 (2018).
Blinov, D. et al. RoboPol: AGN polarimetric monitoring data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 3715–3726 (2021).
Marscher, A. P. & Gear, W. K. Models for high-frequency radio outbursts in extragalactic sources, with application to the early 1983 millimeter-to- infrared flare of 3C 273. Astrophys. J. 298, 114–127 (1985).
Marscher, A. P. Turbulent, extreme multi-zone model for simulating flux and polarization variability in blazars. Astrophys. J. 780, 87 (2014).
Tavecchio, F., Landoni, M., Sironi, L. & Coppi, P. Probing dissipation mechanisms in BL Lac jets through X-ray polarimetry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 2872–2880 (2018).
Weisskopf, M. C. et al. Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer: prelaunch. J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 8, 026002 (2022).
Peirson, A. L. & Romani, R. W. The polarization behavior of relativistic synchrotron jets. Astrophys. J. 864, 140 (2018).
Peirson, A. L. & Romani, R. W. The polarization behavior of relativistic synchrotron self-compton jets. Astrophys. J. 885, 76 (2019).
Marscher, A. P. & Jorstad, S. G. Frequency and time dependence of linear polarization in turbulent jets of blazars. Galaxies 9, 27 (2021).
Marscher, A. P. et al. The inner jet of an active galactic nucleus as revealed by a radio-to-γ-ray outburst. Nature 452, 966–969 (2008).
Kiehlmann, S., Blinov, D., Pearson, T. J. & Liodakis, I. Optical EVPA rotations in blazars: testing a stochastic variability model with RoboPol data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, 3589–3604 (2017).
Blinov, D. et al. RoboPol: connection between optical polarization plane rotations and gamma-ray flares in blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 1296–1306 (2018).
Tavecchio, F., Landoni, M., Sironi, L. & Coppi, P. Probing shock acceleration in BL Lac jets through X-ray polarimetry: the time-dependent view. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 599–608 (2020).
Lyutikov, M., Pariev, V. I. & Gabuzda, D. C. Polarization and structure of relativistic parsec-scale AGN jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360, 869–891 (2005).
Hovatta, T. et al. MOJAVE: monitoring of jets in active galactic nuclei with VLBA experiments. VIII. Faraday rotation in parsec-scale AGN jets. Astron. J. 144, 105 (2012).
Gabuzda, D. C. Inherent and local magnetic field structures in jets from active galactic nuclei. Galaxies 9, 58 (2021).
Di Gesu, L. et al. Testing particle acceleration models for BL LAC jets with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer. Astron. Astrophys. 662, A83 (2022).
Angelakis, E. et al. RoboPol: the optical polarization of gamma-ray-loud and gamma-ray-quiet blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 3365–3380 (2016).
Sironi, L., Rowan, M. E. & Narayan, R. Reconnection-driven particle acceleration in relativistic shear flows. Astrophys. J. Lett. 907, L44 (2021).
Tavecchio, F. Probing magnetic fields and acceleration mechanisms in blazar jets with X-ray polarimetry. Galaxies 9, 37 (2021).
Weaver, Z. R. et al. Kinematics of parsec-scale jets of gamma-ray bright blazars at 43 GHz during ten years of the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR program. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 260, 12 (2022).
Webb, J. R. et al. The nature of micro-variability in blazars. Galaxies 9, 114 (2021).
Blinov, D. et al. RoboPol: do optical polarization rotations occur in all blazars? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 462, 1775–1785 (2016).
Soffitta, P. et al. The instrument of the imaging x-ray polarimetry explorer. Astron. J 162, 208 (2021).
Liodakis, I., Peirson, A. L. & Romani, R. W. Prospects for detecting X-ray polarization in blazar jets. Astrophys. J. 880, 7 (2019).
Pesce-Rollins, M., Lalla, N. D., Omodei, N. & Baldini, L. An observation-simulation and analysis framework for the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 936, 224–226 (2019).
Baldini, L. et al. ixpeobssim: a simulation and analysis framework for the imaging X-ray polarimetry explorer. SoftwareX 19, 101194 (2022).
Kalberla, P. M. W. et al. The Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) Survey of Galactic HI. Final data release of the combined LDS and IAR surveys with improved stray-radiation corrections. Astron. Astrophys. 440, 775–782 (2005).
Kislat, F., Clark, B., Beilicke, M. & Krawczynski, H. Analyzing the data from X-ray polarimeters with Stokes parameters. Astropart. Phys. 68, 45–51 (2015).
Strohmayer, T. E. X-ray spectro-polarimetry with photoelectric polarimeters. Astrophys. J. 838(1), 72 (2017).
Agudo, I. et al. POLAMI: polarimetric monitoring of AGN at millimetre wavelengths - I. The programme, calibration and calibrator data products. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 1427–1435 (2018).
Agudo, I. et al. POLAMI: polarimetric monitoring of active galactic nuclei at millimetre wavelengths - III. Characterization of total flux density and polarization variability of relativistic jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 1850–1867 (2018).
Thum, C. et al. POLAMI: polarimetric monitoring of active galactic nuclei at millimetre wavelengths - II. Widespread circular polarization. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 2506–2520 (2018).
Thum, C., Wiesemeyer, H., Paubert, G., Navarro, S. & Morris, D. XPOL—the correlation polarimeter at the IRAM 30-m telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 120, 777 (2008).
Hovatta, T. et al. Optical polarization of high-energy BL Lacertae objects. Astron. Astrophys. 596, A78 (2016).
Nilsson, K. et al. Long-term optical monitoring of TeV emitting blazars. I. Data analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A185 (2018).
Piirola, V., Berdyugin, A. & Berdyugina, S. DIPOL-2: a double image high precision polarimeter. Proc. SPIE Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V 9147, 91478I (2014).
Piirola, V. A double image chopping polarimeter. Astron. Astrophys. 27, 383–388 (1973).
Berdyugin, A. V., Berdyugina, S. V. & Piirola, V. High-precision and high-accuracy polarimetry of exoplanets. Proc. SPIE Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII 10702, 107024Z (2018).
Berdyugin, A., Piirola, V. & Poutanen, J. in Astronomical Polarisation from the Infrared to Gamma Rays Vol. 460, Astrophysics and Space Science Library (eds Mignani, R. et al.) 33–65 (Springer, 2019).
Piirola, V., Kosenkov, I. A., Berdyugin, A. V., Berdyugina, S. V. & Poutanen, J. Double image polarimeter—ultra fast: simultaneous three-color (BVR) polarimeter with electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices. Astron. J. 161, 20 (2021).
Kosenkov, I. A. et al. High-precision optical polarimetry of the accreting black hole V404 Cyg during the 2015 June outburst. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 4362–4373 (2017).
Villata, M., Raiteri, C. M., Lanteri, L., Sobrito, G. & Cavallone, M. BVR photometry of comparison stars in selected blazar fields. I. Photometric sequences for 10 BL Lacertae objects. Astrophys. Space Sci. 130, 305–310 (1998).
Tinyanont, S. et al. WIRC+Pol: a low-resolution near-infrared spectropolarimeter. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 025001 (2019).
Tinyanont, S. et al. Achieving a spectropolarimetric precision better than 0.1% in the near-infrared with WIRC+Pol. Proc. SPIE 11132, 1113209 (2019).
Millar-Blanchaer, M. A. et al. WIRC-POL: 0.1 polarimetric precision on-sky with the installation of a HWP modulator. Proc SPIE Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII 11447, 114475Y (2021).
Masiero, J. R., Tinyanont, S. & Millar-Blanchaer, M. A. Asteroid polarimetric-phase behavior in the near-infrared: S- and C-complex objects. Planet. Sci. J. 3, 90 (2022).
Nilsson, K. et al. Host galaxy subtraction of TeV candidate BL Lacertae objects. Astron. Astrophys. 475, 199–207 (2007).
Burrows, D. N. et al. The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 165–195 (2005).
Harrison, F. A. et al. The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. Astrophys. J. 770, 103 (2013).
Komatsu, E. et al. Five-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe observations: cosmological interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 330–376 (2009).
Ajello, M. et al. The fourth catalog of active galactic nuclei detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Astrophys. J. 892, 105 (2020).
Quinn, J. et al. Detection of gamma rays with E > 300 GeV from Markarian 501. Astrophys. J. Lett. 456, L83 (1996).
Abdo, A. A. et al. Insights into the high-energy γ-ray emission of Markarian 501 from extensive multifrequency observations in the Fermi era. Astrophys. J. 727, 129 (2011).
Aleksić, J. et al. Multiwavelength observations of Mrk 501 in 2008. Astron. Astrophys. 573, A50 (2015).
Ahnen, M. L. et al. Multiband variability studies and novel broadband SED modeling of Mrk 501 in 2009. Astron. Astrophys. 603, A31 (2017).
Arbet-Engels, A. et al. Long-term multi-band photometric monitoring of Mrk 501. Astron. Astrophys. 655, A93 (2021).
Smith, P. S. et al. Coordinated Fermi/optical monitoring of blazars and the great 2009 September gamma-ray flare of 3C 454.3. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3621 (2009).
Bradley, L. et al. astropy/photutils: v0.7.2. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3568287 (2019).
I.L. thanks the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe for their hospitality while this paper was written. We thank A. Veledina for discussions that helped improve this work. I.L. was supported by the JSPS postdoctoral short-term fellowship programme. The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) is a joint US and Italian mission. The US contribution is supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and led and managed by its Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), with industry partner Ball Aerospace (contract NNM15AA18C). The Italian contribution is supported by the Italian Space Agency (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, ASI) through contract ASI-OHBI-2017-12-I.0, agreements ASI-INAF-2017-12-H0 and ASI-INFN-2017.13-H0, and its Space Science Data Center (SSDC) with agreements ASI-INAF-2022-14-HH.0 and ASI-INFN 2021-43-HH.0, and by the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) and the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) in Italy. This research used data products provided by the IXPE Team (MSFC, SSDC, INAF and INFN) and distributed with additional software tools by the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Data from the Steward Observatory spectropolarimetric monitoring project were used. This programme is supported by Fermi Guest Investigator grants NNX08AW56G, NNX09AU10G, NNX12AO93G and NNX15AU81G. This research has made use of data from the RoboPol programme, a collaboration between Caltech, the University of Crete, the Institute of Astrophysics-Foundation for Research and Technology (IA-FORTH), the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA), the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy (MPIfR) and the Nicolaus Copernicus University, which was conducted at Skinakas Observatory in Crete, Greece. The Instituto Astrofísica Andalucía (IAA)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) co-authors acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MCINN) through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa‘ award for the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia-CSIC (SEV-2017-0709). Acquisition and reduction of the POLAMI and Monitoring AGN with Polarimetry at the Calar Alto Telescopes (MAPCAT) data were supported in part by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) through grants AYA2016-80889-P and PID2019-107847RB-C44. The POLAMI observations were carried out at the IRAM 30 m Telescope. IRAM is supported by the National Institute of Sciences of the Universe (INSU)/Scientific Research National Center (CNRS) (France), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) (Germany) and Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN) (Spain). The research at Boston University was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant AST-2108622, NASA Fermi Guest Investigator grant 80NSSC21K1917 and NASA Swift Guest Investigator grant 80NSSC22K0537. This study uses observations conducted with the 1.8 m Perkins Telescope Observatory in Arizona (USA), which is owned and operated by Boston University. Based on observations obtained at the Hale Telescope, Palomar Observatory as part of a continuing collaboration between the California Institute of Technology, NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Yale University and the National Astronomical Observatories of China. This research made use of Photutils, an Astropy package for detection and photometry of astronomical sources60. G.V.P. acknowledges support by NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship grant no. HST-HF2-51444.001-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, owned in collaboration by the University of Turku and Aarhus University, and operated jointly by Aarhus University, the University of Turku and the University of Oslo, representing Denmark, Finland and Norway, the University of Iceland and Stockholm University at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, La Palma, Spain, of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. The data presented here were obtained (in part) with ALFOSC, which is provided by the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA) under a joint agreement with the University of Copenhagen and the Nordic Optical Telescope. V.K. thanks the Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation. J.J. was supported by Academy of Finland project 320085. E.L. was supported by Academy of Finland projects 317636 and 320045. Part of the French contribution was supported by the CNRS and the French spatial agency (CNES). Based on observations collected at the Observatorio de Sierra Nevada, owned and operated by the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA-CSIC). Based on observations collected at the Centro Astronomico Hispano-Aleman (CAHA), proposal 22A-2.2-015, operated jointly by Junta de Andalucia and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (IAA-CSIC).
Open access funding provided by University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05338-0.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Stokes Q/I and Stokes U/I parameters of our IXPE observations during 8–10 March 2022 (left) and 26–28 March 2022 (right).
The measurements are shown for the three detectors (DU1 [red x], DU2 [blue star], DU3 [magenta circle]) separately and combined (black triangle). In both panels error bars denote the 68% CI.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liodakis, I., Marscher, A.P., Agudo, I. et al. Polarized blazar X-rays imply particle acceleration in shocks. Nature 611, 677–681 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05338-0
This article is cited by
Shock waves spark blazing light from black holes
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.