The human lung differs substantially from its mouse counterpart, resulting in a distinct distal airway architecture affected by disease pathology in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In humans, the distal branches of the airway interweave with the alveolar gas-exchange niche, forming an anatomical structure known as the respiratory bronchioles. Owing to the lack of a counterpart in mouse, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern respiratory bronchioles in the human lung remain uncharacterized. Here we show that human respiratory bronchioles contain a unique secretory cell population that is distinct from cells in larger proximal airways. Organoid modelling reveals that these respiratory airway secretory (RAS) cells act as unidirectional progenitors for alveolar type 2 cells, which are essential for maintaining and regenerating the alveolar niche. RAS cell lineage differentiation into alveolar type 2 cells is regulated by Notch and Wnt signalling. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, RAS cells are altered transcriptionally, corresponding to abnormal alveolar type 2 cell states, which are associated with smoking exposure in both humans and ferrets. These data identify a distinct progenitor in a region of the human lung that is not found in mouse that has a critical role in maintaining the gas-exchange compartment and is altered in chronic lung disease.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Respiratory Research Open Access 10 October 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All scRNA-seq data generated during this study have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession numbers GSE168191 and GSE130076). The scRNA-seq datasets can be viewed online (http://bit.ly/2O45FIb). All cell lines and other reagents will be distributed on request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Analysis associated with the current submission used published R packages and a custom R package, which are available at GitHub (https://github.com/Morriseylab/scExtras). The code for the custom graphical scRNA-seq interface is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Morriseylab/scViewer-Lite). For our analysis using published R packages, the following versions were used: R v.4.0.0, CellRanger v.3.1.0, Slingshot v.1.6.1, tradeSeq v.1.2.01, clusterProfiler v.3.16.1, ComplexHeatmap v.2.4.3, MAST v.1.14.0, Seurat v.3.0.1, Sctransform v.0.3.0 and clustree v.0.4.3.
Burney, P. G., Patel, J., Newson, R., Minelli, C. & Naghavi, M. Global and regional trends in COPD mortality, 1990-2010. Eur. Respir. J. 45, 1239–1247 (2015).
Basil, M. C. et al. The cellular and physiological basis for lung repair and regeneration: past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell 26, 482–502 (2020).
Zepp, J. A. & Morrisey, E. E. Cellular crosstalk in the development and regeneration of the respiratory system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 551–566 (2019).
Hogan, B. L. et al. Repair and regeneration of the respiratory system: complexity, plasticity, and mechanisms of lung stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell 15, 123–138 (2014).
Weibel, E. R., Sapoval, B. & Filoche, M. Design of peripheral airways for efficient gas exchange. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 148, 3–21 (2005).
Weibel, E. R. & Gomez, D. M. Architecture of the human lung. Use of quantitative methods establishes fundamental relations between size and number of lung structures. Science 137, 577–585 (1962).
Have‐Opbroek, A. A. W., Otto‐Verberne, C. J. M., Dubbeldam, J. A. & Dÿkman, J. H. The proximal border of the human respiratory unit, as shown by scanning and transmission electron microscopy and light microscopical cytochemistry. Anat. Rec. 229, 339–354 (1991).
Rock, J. R., Randell, S. H. & Hogan, B. L. Airway basal stem cells: a perspective on their roles in epithelial homeostasis and remodeling. Dis. Models Mech. 3, 545–556 (2010).
Mercer, R. R., Russell, M. L., Roggli, V. L. & Crapo, J. D. Cell number and distribution in human and rat airways. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 10, 613–624 (1994).
Ryu, J. H., Myers, J. L. & Swensen, S. J. Bronchiolar disorders. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 168, 1277–1292 (2003).
Hogg, J. C., Macklem, P. T. & Thurlbeck, W. M. Site and nature of airway obstruction in chronic obstructive lung disease. New Engl. J. Med. 278, 1355–1360 (1968).
Koo, H.-K. K. et al. Small airways disease in mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Respir. Med. 6, 591–602 (2018).
Visscher, D. W. & Myers, J. L. Bronchiolitis: the pathologist’s perspective. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 3, 41–47 (2006).
Fretzayas, A. & Moustaki, M. Etiology and clinical features of viral bronchiolitis in infancy. World J. Pediatr. 13, 293–299 (2017).
Gómez, R., Colás, C., Sebastián, A. & Arribas, J. Respiratory repercussions in adults with a history of infantile bronchiolitis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 93, 447–451 (2004).
Verleden, S. E. et al. Small airway loss in the physiologically ageing lung: a cross-sectional study in unused donor lungs. Lancet Respir. Med. 9, 167–174 (2020).
Montoro, D. T. et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature 560, 319–324 (2018).
Plasschaert, L. W. et al. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 560, 377–381 (2018).
Hyde, D. M., Samuelson, D. A., Blakeney, W. H. & Kosch, P. C. A correlative light microscopy, transmission and scanning electron microscopy study of the ferret lung. Scan. Electron Microsc. 3, 891–898 (1979).
Sterner-Kock, A., Kock, M., Braun, R. & Hyde, D. M. Ozone-induced epithelial injury in the ferret is similar to nonhuman primates. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162, 1152–1156 (2000).
Vinegar, A., Sinnett, E. E., Kosch, P. C. & Miller, M. L. Pulmonary physiology of the ferret and its potential as a model for inhalation toxicology. Lab. Anim. Sci. 35, 246––250 (1985).
Bal, H. S. & Ghoshal, N. G. Morphology of the terminal bronchiolar region of common laboratory mammals. Lab. Anim. 22, 76–82 (1988).
Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
Barkauskas, C. E. et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 3025–3036 (2013).
Nabhan, A. N., Brownfield, D. G., Harbury, P. B., Krasnow, M. A. & Desai, T. J. Single-cell Wnt signaling niches maintain stemness of alveolar type 2 cells. Science 359, 1118–1123 (2018).
Zacharias, W. J. et al. Regeneration of the lung alveolus by an evolutionarily conserved epithelial progenitor. Nature 555, 251–255 (2018).
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom. 19, 477 (2018).
Rock, J. R. et al. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12771–12775 (2009).
McCauley, K. B. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of pluripotent stem cell-derived SCGB3A2+ airway epithelium. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 1579–1595 (2018).
McCauley, K. B. et al. Efficient derivation of functional human airway epithelium from pluripotent stem cells via temporal regulation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell 20, 844–857 (2017).
Jacob, A. et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into functional lung alveolar epithelial cells. Cell Stem Cell 21, 472–488 (2017).
Miller, A. J. et al. In vitro and in vivo development of the human airway at single-cell resolution. Dev. Cell 53, 117–128 (2020).
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).
Jacob, A. et al. Derivation of self-renewing lung alveolar epithelial type II cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 14, 3303–3332 (2019).
Hawkins, F. et al. Prospective isolation of NKX2-1-expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2277–2294 (2017).
Guseh, J. S. et al. Notch signaling promotes airway mucous metaplasia and inhibits alveolar development. Development 136, 1751–1759 (2009).
Morimoto, M., Nishinakamura, R., Saga, Y. & Kopan, R. Different assemblies of Notch receptors coordinate the distribution of the major bronchial Clara, ciliated and neuroendocrine cells. Development 139, 4365–4373 (2012).
Rock, J. R. et al. Notch-dependent differentiation of adult airway basal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8, 639–648 (2011).
Stupnikov, M. R., Yang, Y., Mori, M., Lu, J. & Cardoso, W. V. Jagged and Delta-like ligands control distinct events during airway progenitor cell differentiation. eLife 8, e50487 (2019).
Tsao, P. N. et al. Notch signaling controls the balance of ciliated and secretory cell fates in developing airways. Development 136, 2297–2307 (2009).
Geling, A., Steiner, H., Willem, M., Bally‐Cuif, L. & Haass, C. A γ‐secretase inhibitor blocks Notch signaling in vivo and causes a severe neurogenic phenotype in zebrafish. EMBO Rep. 3, 688–694 (2002).
Frank, D. B. et al. Emergence of a wave of Wnt signaling that regulates lung alveologenesis by controlling epithelial self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Rep. 17, 2312–2325 (2016).
Zepp, J. A. et al. Distinct mesenchymal lineages and niches promote epithelial self-renewal and myofibrogenesis in the lung. Cell 170, 1134–1148 (2017).
Chapin, C. et al. Distribution and surfactant association of carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 6 in human lung. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 302, L216–L225 (2012).
Lin, S. E. et al. Expression of human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 and alveolar progenitor cells in normal and injured lungs of transgenic mice. Physiol. Rep. 3, e12657 (2015).
Shikotra, A. et al. A CEACAM6-high airway neutrophil phenotype and ceacam6-high epithelial cells are features of severe asthma. J. Immunol. 198, 3307–3317 (2017).
Lin, V. Y. et al. Excess mucus viscosity and airway dehydration impact COPD airway clearance. Eur. Respir. J. 55, 1900419 (2020).
Raju, S. V. et al. A ferret model of COPD-related chronic bronchitis. JCI Insight 1, e87536 (2016).
Stanford, D. et al. Airway remodeling in ferrets with cigarette smoke induced COPD using microCT Imaging. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 319, L11–L20 (2020).
Ganguly, K. et al. Secreted phosphoprotein 1 is a determinant of lung function development in mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. 51, 637–651 (2014).
Calabrese, D. R. et al. Dectin-1 genetic deficiency predicts chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death. JCI Insight 4, e133083 (2019).
Regeling, A. et al. HSPA6 is an ulcerative colitis susceptibility factor that is induced by cigarette smoke and protects intestinal epithelial cells by stabilizing anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 788–796 (2016).
Kim, C. F. et al. Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 121, 823–835 (2005).
Choi, J. et al. Release of Notch activity coordinated by IL-1β signalling confers differentiation plasticity of airway progenitors via Fosl2 during alveolar regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 953–966 (2021).
Todd, J. L. & Palmer, S. M. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the final frontier for lung transplantation. Chest 140, 502–508 (2011).
Verleden, S. E., Sacreas, A., Vos, R., Vanaudenaerde, B. M. & Verleden, G. M. Advances in understanding bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. Chest 150, 219–225 (2016).
Verleden, S. E. et al. The site and nature of airway obstruction after lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 189, 292–300 (2014).
Ghorani, V., Boskabady, M. H., Khazdair, M. R. & Kianmeher, M. Experimental animal models for COPD: a methodological review. Tob. Induc. Dis. 15, 25 (2017).
Diamond, J. M. et al. Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 187, 527–534 (2013).
Kiselev, V. Y. et al. SC3: consensus clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 14, 483–486 (2017).
Zappia, L. & Oshlack, A. Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions. Gigascience 7, giy083 (2018).
Van den Berge, K. et al. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 11, 1201 (2020).
Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).
Gotoh, S. et al. Generation of alveolar epithelial spheroids via isolated progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 394–403 (2014).
Kathiriya, J. J. et al. Human alveolar type 2 epithelium transdifferentiates into metaplastic KRT5+ basal cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 10–23 (2022).
We thank the patients who contributed to our study, without their willingness to participate in research, these studies would not be possible; the staff at the Cell and Developmental Microscopy Core at the University of Pennsylvania, the Flow Cytometry Core at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the Animal Model Core of the Cystic Fibrosis Research Center of the University of Alabama at Birmingham for assistance in these studies; and M. Beers, V. Krymskya, S. Millar, A. Vaughan and S. Albelda for their critiques and insights throughout the development of the project. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health including HL148857, HL087825, HL134745 and HL132999 (to E.E.M.); 5T32HL007586-35 (to M.C.B.); 5R03HL135227-02 (to E.C.); K23 HL121406 (to J.M.D.); K08 HL150226 (to J.K.); DK047967, HL152960 and Federal Contract 75N92019R0014 (to J.F.E.); R35HL135816, P30DK072482, and U01HL152978 (to S.M.R.), R35HL150767 and U01HL134766 (to H.A.C.); and F32HL143931-01A1 and K99HL155785-01 (to J.J.K.). E.E.M. was also supported by the BREATH Consortium/Longfunds of the Netherlands. J.K. was supported by the Parker B. Francis Foundation. F.L.C.-D. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from GSK (RA3000034436). The embryonic stem cell experiments in this manuscript were not funded as part of the research agreement between University of Pennsylvania and GSK.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks Irina Petrache and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 All sequenced patients contributed to all observed clusters in normal human epithelium and clusters are identified based on expression of known markers.
A) Distribution of individual patient data is shown overlaying concatenated UMAP of the full distal data set (top row) and the subset of epithelium (bottom row). B) The patient contribution to each of the epithelial clusters is shown, demonstrating that each patient contributed to each epithelial population. RAS cell cluster marked with red asterisk. C) The UMAPs of each patient that contributed to the proximal data sets is shown for the full data set (top row) and the subset of epithelium (bottom row). D) The patient contribution to each epithelial cluster is shown in stacked bar graph. E) Output of clustree analysis as used to determine optimal cluster resolution. Green box denotes chosen resolution for epithelial analysis shown, red box denotes RAS cell cluster, yellow box denotes Secretory cell cluster. Gene expression between canonical Secretory cells and RAS cells were compared and F) GO analysis and G) WikiPathway analysis was performed on differentially expressed genes between RAS cells and Secretory cells. Shown are categories either up or down regulated in RAS cells as compared to Secretory cells. Previously identified cell lineage markers were examined to identify various cell types within the epithelium in distal (H, I) and proximal (J, K) epithelial subsets. H, J) Feature plots show graded gene expression and distribution in UMAP. I,K) Violin plots show selected gene expression per cluster.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Epithelial clusters within the normal distal human lung each harbor unique gene expression patterns.
A) Heatmap of top cluster defining genes within the distal human lung epithelium demonstrates that SCGB3A2+ RAS cells have a distinct transcriptional signature. Of note, AT2_c is a very small cluster with a small subset of cluster defining genes that are expressed at low levels and are not identified in most other cells. B) IHC of SCGB3A2, LAMP3, and RAGE on human lung distal parenchyma, demonstrating the interdigitation between respiratory bronchioles and alveolar units. N = 3. Scale bar = 100 µm. C) In contrast to the distal human lung in B, distal mouse lung shows the termination of the mouse terminal bronchiole directly into the alveolar space. N = 2. Scale bar = 50 µm. D) Separate channels from IHC presented in Fig. 1h are presented to allow for enhanced evaluation of each protein.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Epithelial clusters in the normal human lung proximal airways lack the distinct secretory subtypes found in distal ariways.
A) Heatmap of cluster defining genes within the proximal human epithelium. B) Selected gene expression compared across all proximal epithelial clusters shown as dot plot. C) RNAscope analysis for SCGB1A1 and SCGB3A2 transcripts reveals a similar distribution to protein expression in distal airways; A distal airway transitioning from terminal to respiratory bronchiole is shown, highlighting the preserved gradient of SCGB1A1 expressing cells in larger airways to SCGB3A2 expressing cells in more distal airways. Scale bar = 500 µm. N = 3. D, E) Additional airway structure showing intermixing of SCGB1A1 and SCGB3A2 positive populations. Yellow arrows point to double positive cells along gradient. While with the scRNA analysis there is SCGB1A1 expression in SCGB3A2 positive cells, double positive cells were rarely observed in RNAscope or protein IHC, likely due to a threshold of the technique. Yellow arrows indicate rare double positive cells in a distal human respiratory airway. Red arrows indicate SCGB3A2 single positive cells. Scale bars = 50 µm. N = 3. F, G) IHC of SCGB1A1 and SCGB3A2 expression in large and distal airways from representative individual patients (n = 6). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Integration of proximal and distal single cell transcriptomes defines the unique gene signature and location of human RASCs.
A) Distal and proximal scRNA-sequencing results from the same patient were concatenated, epithelium was isolated and re-clustered, and cell types were identified based on known markers. B) Distal and Proximal epithelium contribution to the resultant UMAP. C) Expression of SCGB1A1 and SCGB3A2. Secretory cell cluster outlined in yellow, RAS cell clustered outlined in Red. D) Violin plots showing expression of selected genes, highlighting unique genes for each cluster, and shared gene expression between secretory and RAS cell clusters (orange box) and RAS cell and AT2 cell clusters (green box). E) Feature plots of both the proximal and distal epithelium highlighting key gene expression patterns used to identify known cell subtypes. F) Contribution of proximal and distal samples to each cell type, demonstrating that some groups are unique to each region while some are shared. G) Heat map showing gene expression of Secretory, RAS cell, and AT2 cell gene signatures from proximal and distal concatenated data set. Of note, these pairwise comparisons were done between the displayed groups only, as such the resultant gene expression is distinct from the cluster-defining genes we observed in Extended Data Fig. 2a, where the comparisons were done between all epithelial populations. Origin of cells shown in blue (proximal) and orange (distal) bar across top of heat map.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Trajectory of primary human proximal and distal epithelium demonstrates both anticipated and novel epithelial progenitor relationships.
A) Proximal airways epithelium clustering and resultant cell populations shown for reference for following analysis. B) Trajectory analysis in the proximal human airways results in 3 putative lineage relationships. UMAP plots show trajectories, color represents cell localization along pseudotime. Heatmaps showing expression of trajectory defining genes across pseudotime. C) Trajectory analysis of scRNAseq gene expression across distal epithelial populations suggests several epithelial relationship, including D) a putative relationship between RAS cells and AT2 cells. E) Heatmap of defining gene expression changes along pseudotemporal ordering of cells from RAS cell-to-AT2 cell trajectory. Pseudotemporal ordering shown in bar above heatmap. F) Additional epithelial trajectories were identified by slingshot analysis within the distal epithelium. For the additional trajectories that are not a focus of this current study, the individual trajectory is shown along with the corresponding heatmap of trajectory defining genes. Top indicated position along trajectory as color coded by position of the cell along pseudotemporal ordering. G) Gene expression in UMI count of selected genes along pseudotemporal ordering of distal trajectory 1 (panel d, e) on the x-axis.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Human ES cell model of RAS cells demonstrates capacity to differentiate into AT2-like cells in vitro.
A) General experimental schematic of development of iRAS cells and propagation in airway or transition to alveolar media. B) Brightfield microscopy showing organoid formation and fluorescence after sorted iRAS cells were grown in airway (top) or alveolar (bottom) media. Scale bar = 100 µm. C) Corresponding flow cytometry analysis of endogenous mCherry reporter. D) Organoids from 3D culture with EPCAM or SCGB3A2 and SFTPC staining demonstrating SFTPC expression in alveolar organoids (bottom) and retention of SCGB3A2 expression in airways organoids (top). Scale bar = 100 µm, 20 µM for enlarged regions. N = 3 for panels B–D. E) Schematic of SFTPC protein processing in AT2 cells and F) western blot of primary translation product and processing intermediates (top, bands 1 and 2) and mature S-PC protein (band 3) in NKX2.1 progenitors, iRAS cells propagated in airway media, iRAS cells grown in alveolar media, and primary human AT2 cells (HT2-280+ cells). Molecular weights indicated on left. N = 3. G) SFTPC staining in individual iAT2 cells (top) and primary human AT2 cells (bottom) showing punctate nature of SFTPC staining. Scale bar 10 µm. N = 4. H) q-RT-PCR from iRASC grown in airway (red) or alveolar (green) media demonstrates differential gene expression of known RAS cell and AT2 cell marker genes. Data presented as box with median (bar) and upper and lower quartiles (box bounds) and whiskers for min and max values (n = 5). Unpaired Student’s test performed *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. I) Gene expression based on scRNA sequencing of iRAS cells, and iRAS cells after 14 days in alveolar media showing downregulation of primary RAS cell defining genes and upregulation of AT2 defining genes. All N refer to biological replicates
Extended Data Fig. 7 Reference based integration of primary epithelium and hES cell derived epithelial populations.
A) UMAP analysis showing the distribution of primary human epithelial populations within the concatenated data set of primary human epithelium, iRAS cells, and iAT2 cells. Grey cells represent non-primary human cells (ES derived populations). Colors correspond to primary human cell populations as indicated. All primary epithelial populations are shown. B) UMAP showing distribution of the hES cell populations included in the concatenated data set. Colors correspond to hES cell populations based on gene expression of SCGB3A2 and SFTPC as indicated. C) Percentage of hES cells within primary cell defined clusters within concatenated data set. Clusters were identified based on localization of primary human epithelium. D) Venn diagram of Transcription factors identified as upregulated in primary RAS and iRAS cells compared to primary AT2 and iAT2 cells, respectively. E) Expression of Notch pathway genes HES1 and HES4 in primary RAS and iRAS cells compared to AT2 cell counterparts. F) Reference based integration of primary adult human epithelium, fetal human lung epithelial from day 11.5, 15, 18, and 21 (the days which included SCGB3A2+ secretory cell progenitor populations) from published fetal lung data set32, and iRAS cells. All three SCGB3A2+ populations clustered together, and SCGB3A2+ cells are shown in red. G) SCGB3A2+ cells were selected and re-clustered. H) A stacked bar graph of the contribution of each population to each resultant cluster.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Dual reporter system demonstrates SFTPC expression in iAT2 cells and highlights dynamics of cell transitions in vitro.
A) Schematic of vectors for SFTPC-eGFP targeting in the dual reporter hES cell line. B) Brightfield microscopy showing mCherry and eGFP expression in 3D cultures of sorted iRAS cells grown in either airway (top) or alveolar (bottom) media for 14 days. Scale bar = 100 µm. N = 3. C) Flow cytometry showing endogenous SCGB3A2-mCherry and SFTPC-eGFP expression in iRAS cells grown in airway (top) or alveolar (bottom) media compared to NKX2.1 progenitor controls. D) Gating strategy for all hES cell flow cytometry and FACS experiments shown in Extended Data Figs. 6c, 8b, and 9h, i and n. E) Flow cytometry corresponding to experiment in Fig. 2a, of SCGB3A2-mCherry and SFTPC-eGFP expression over time as iRASC were propagated in Alveolar media. N = 3. F) UMAP of scRNA-seq analysis of all populations derived from iRAS cells at day 14 of differentiation in alveolar media reveals several clusters. G) The resulting culture was heterogenous and included both iAT2 lung endoderm progenitors as well as a small number of other foregut endoderm cell types. Feature plots showing expression of canonical AT1 and AT2 cell alveolar epithelial markers, Airway cell markers, Lung endoderm progenitor markers, neuroendocrine and tuft cell markers, and gastric fate markers, allowing putative identification of all observed clusters.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Transition of iRAS cells to iAT2 cells is similar to the primary RAS cell-AT2 transition and is partially regulated by Notch and Wnt.
A) Schematic of time-course of scRNA-seq experiment. B) Integration of entire time course showing cell origin, cell-cycle phase, and gene expression of SCGB3A2 and SFTPC. C) Clustering of complete time course from iRAS to iAT2 cells development shows multiple clusters within the various time points. D) Trajectory analysis showed multiple putative pseudotemporal orderings (top), and selected curve for further analysis based on termination in day 14 non-mitotic iAT2 cells (bottom). E) Heatmap of iRAS cell to iAT2 cell trajectory displaying genes defining the primary RAS to AT2 cell transition from Extended Data Fig. 5e. F) Expression of a subset of genes identified in primary RAS to AT2 cell transition shown over pseudotime in iRAS to iAT2 cell transition. G) Canonical airway and alveolar epithelial marker genes expression within the resultant UMAP. H) Flow cytometry of mCherry and eGFP expression in iRAS cells grown in Airway media in the presence or absence of DAPT, and corresponding percent fold change in mCherry expression and MFI. N = 4. I) Flow cytometry of mCherry and eGFP expression of iRAS cells grown in Alveolar media in the presence or absence of DAPT showing percent change in eGFP expression and MFI. J) q-RT-PCR of bulk populations from iRAS cells grown in airway media with or without DAPT. N = 3. K) q-RT-PCR from iRAS cells gown in alveolar media with or without DAPT. N = 3. Quantification of flow cytometry analysis of L) mCherry and M) eGFP positive single cells in culture after iRAS cells were grown in either Airway media or Airway media supplemented with CHIR99021. Data are represented as mean +/- SD and unpaired two-tailed t-tests perfomed. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. N) Representative flow cytometry plots (representative of n = 4). O) The heat map of each observed trajectory in panel d is presented with the top trajectory defining genes identified, and cell are ordered by pseudotemporal order on x-axis. All N represent biological replicates
Extended Data Fig. 10 Identification and isolation of CEACAM6+ distal lung epithelial cells and demonstration that SCGB3A2+ cells can be identified by CEACAM6 and isolated from distal lung parenchyma.
A) scRNA sequencing was performed on flow sorted Epcam+ HT2-280neg cells in order to enrich for epithelial cells of the human distal airways. B) UMAP of re-clustering of selected secretory airway cell populations demonstrate refined heterogeneity in SCGB3A2 expressing cells. C) View of distal airway showing distribution of SCGB3A2, CEACAM6, and SFTPC expression and D) Zoom in of region highlighting SCGB3A2 and CEACAM6 staining. White arrows indicate double positive cells. Of note, there are a small minority of CEACAM+/SCGB3A2low cells present in some sections. Scale bars = 100 µm, 50 µm for enlarged regions. N = 5. E) Representative cytospins and associated F) quantification of CEACAM6+ population for pro-SFTPC reveals that <5% of cells are positive for this canonical AT2 cell marker (n = 3), compared to HT2-280+ cells where over 90% of cells are positive for Pro-SFTPC (n = 2). Data presented as mean +/- SD. White arrow indicates rare SFTPC+ cell in CEACAM+ population. Scale bar = 50 µm. G) Feature plots demonstrates that surface marker CEACAM6 expression overlaps SCGB3A2 expression. H) FACS approach to isolate CEACAM6+/HT2-280-/NGFR- airway cells. HT2-280 neg population was sorted for a CEACAM6+ and NGFR- population. I) Gating strategy for obtaining populations in panel H. After gating on single cells, immune cells, endothelial cells and dead cells were excluded prior to selecting EPCAM+ cells for further subsetting as shown in H
Extended Data Fig. 11 All COPD patients contributed to all resultant clusters and gene expression within the COPD epithelium highlights the various epithelial cell clusters.
Each patient contribution is shown overlying the entire concatenated UMAP for A) the entire data set (top row), and the subset of epithelial cells (bottom row). B) Stacked bar graph showing the patient contribution to each epithelial cell cluster, demonstrating that all patients contributed to all resultant clusters. RAS cell cluster marked with red asterisk. C) Canonical marker genes used to identify epithelial clusters are shown. D) Violin plots demonstrate distribution of known canonical marker genes across the various epithelial populations. E) Cluster defining genes within the COPD epithelium are shown in dot plot format. There are distinct changes in the transcriptome of non-epithelial populations in COPD. GO analysis of inter-cluster gene expression comparing select endothelial (F) and mesenchymal (G) populations suggests that the differential gene expression seen in the epithelium is distinct to that population.
Extended Data Fig. 12 Epithelial cell gene expression differences in disease and the RAS cell to AT2 cell transition is altered in COPD.
A) Concatenation of normal and COPD peripheral samples and subset of epithelium showing expected epithelial populations. B) Identification of RAS cell and SCGB3A2+ AT2 populations based on expression of markers indicated. C) GO analysis of intra-cluster gene expression of RAS cells comparing COPD and healthy patient derived cells. D) Violin plots of selected genes contributing to GO processes in (C). E) GO analysis of inter-cluster gene expression comparing SCGB3A2+ AT2 cells from COPD donors and AT2 cells from healthy donors and F) corresponding selected gene expression. G) GO analysis of intra-cluster gene expression of AT2 cells from COPD and healthy controls. H) Violin plots of selected genes from GO processes in (G). For all, up regulated is COPD compared to healthy controls. I)Transcriptional inference analysis of the concatenated data set revealing multiple trajectories initiating at RAS cells. J, K) Comparison of gene expression along trajectory 1 (T1) versus trajectory 2 (T2) demonstrating differential gene expression changes along pseudotemporal ordering between the RAS to AT2 cell trajectory and the RAS to SCGB3A2+ AT2 cell trajectory. L) Distribution of individual patient data is shown overlaying concatenated UMAP of the COPD and healthy peripheral data sets. All cells are shown in top two rows, and epithelial subsets in bottom rows. M) Stacked bar graphs highlight patient level contribution to each cluster. RAS cells are indicated in red asterisk.
Source gels. Source gels for Extended Data Fig. 6f. Molecular mass values are reprinted adjacent to the panels.
Patient characteristics. A list of all of the patients who were included in the analyses presented herein. Age, gender, self-identified race, and cause of death or disease at time of transplantation are provided. Where available, smoking history, FEV1, and/or arterial partial pressure of O2 to fraction of inspired O2 (P/F ratio) is also reported. The use of tissue is indicated by the type of experiment.
Transcription factor analysis in RAS cells. Transcription factors upregulated in the hES cell model system (iRAS cells) compared wtih iAT2 cells and transcription factors upregulated in primary RAS cells compared with in primary AT2 cells are listed by log-transformed fold change between RAS cell and AT2 cell populations, with adjusted P values. We used MAST, which uses generalized linear model to perform univariate differential expression analysis, and P values were determined using a two-sided test. Multiple-testing correction was perform using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.
RT–qPCR primers. A list of all of the RT–qPCR primers used in the included experiments listed.
About this article
Cite this article
Basil, M.C., Cardenas-Diaz, F.L., Kathiriya, J.J. et al. Human distal airways contain a multipotent secretory cell that can regenerate alveoli. Nature 604, 120–126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04552-0
This article is cited by
Respiratory Research (2022)