Uncontrolled transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the human population has contributed to the persistence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of new variants in largely immunologically naive populations suggests that adaptive mutations in the viral genome continue to improve the fitness of this zoonotic virus. In March 2020, a single amino acid change in the S protein at position 614 (S(D614G)) was identified in a small fraction of sequenced samples—this became the predominant variant worldwide within a few weeks4. The fitness advantage conferred by this single amino acid change was supported by major increases in infectivity, viral load and transmissibility in vitro and in animal models3,5,6.

In the second half of 2020, SARS-CoV-2 VOCs with a combination of several mutations emerged, including Alpha, first described in southeast England7, and Beta, first identified in South Africa8. In February–March 2021, Alpha rapidly became the prevailing variant in many regions of the world and a higher reproduction number was inferred from early epidemiological data9,10,11. Beyond S(D614G), Alpha has 18 further mutations in its genome compared with the progenitor, with two deletions and six substitutions within the S gene12. Some of the S mutations, such as N501Y and the H69/V70 deletion, have been hypothesized to enhance replication and transmission, but there is a lack of clear experimental evidence for this13,14. Beta has nine mutations in S, including N501Y, and two in the S receptor-binding domain (RBD), K417N and E484K. E484K is thought to be responsible for the ability of Beta to escape neutralization by plasma from convalescent individuals15,16,17. Whether S mutations are solely responsible for the putative fitness advantage and if so, which ones, remains unknown.

Here we investigate the fitness of Alpha and Beta VOCs relative to wt-S614G, the predominant parental strain containing the S(D614G) substitution—in relevant primary airway culture systems in vitro, and in ferrets, Syrian hamsters and two mouse models expressing human ACE2—to assess specific advantages in replication and transmission and to evaluate the effects of Alpha S mutations alone in vivo. Neither Alpha nor Beta showed enhanced replication in human airway epithelial cell (AEC) cultures compared with wt-S614G. Competitive transmission experiments in Syrian hamsters showed similar replication and transmission of wt-S614G and Alpha, which both outcompeted Beta. However, competitive experiments in ferrets and transgenic mice expressing human ACE2 controlled by the KRT18 promoter (hACE2-K18Tg), which overexpress human ACE2 in epithelial cells, showed increased fitness of Alpha compared with wt-S614G. Finally, Alpha and a recombinant clone of progenitor virus expressing the Alpha S protein (wt-SAlpha) both outcompeted the parental wt-S614G strain, resulting in higher virus load in the upper respiratory tract (URT) of mice expressing human ACE2 instead of mouse ACE2 under the endogenous mouse Ace2 promoter (hACE2-KI mice). Similar to results from AEC cultures, Beta showed lower fitness than wt-S614G in hACE2-KI mice. Infections with Alpha and wt-S614G virus resulted in similar pathologies in all the in vivo models.

Binding and replication of VOCs in vitro

The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants is associated with accumulation of mutations in the S protein. We determined dissociation constant (KD) values for recombinant trimeric S with immobilized dimeric human ACE2 using bio-layer interferometry. S protein from Alpha (SAlpha) or Beta (SBeta) exhibited a fourfold higher affinity for human ACE2 than that of S(D614G) protein (Extended Data Fig. 1a). Replication kinetics of Alpha, Beta and a wild-type clinical isolate with the S(D614G) mutation were similar in relation to viral copies and titres in AEC cultures incubated at 33 and 37 °C (Extended Data Fig. 1b). However, in direct competition experiments in AEC cultures, Alpha had no advantage over wt-S614G, whereas Beta was outcompeted by both Alpha and wt-S614G (Extended Data Fig. 1c), indicating that competition experiments can expose differences in replication that are not detected in individual growth kinetic assays.

Alpha and wt-S614G outcompete Beta in hamsters

We inoculated groups of six Syrian hamsters intranasally with a mixture of two SARS-CoV-2 strains comprising equivalent numbers of genome copies in three one-to-one competition experiments: Alpha versus Beta, Beta versus wt-S614G, and Alpha versus wt-S614G. All experimentally infected ‘donor’ hamsters were kept strictly in isolation cages to prevent intergroup spill-over infections. Each donor hamster was co-housed with a naive ‘contact 1’ hamster 1 day post infection (dpi), creating six donor–contact 1 pairs to evaluate shedding and transmission. At 4 dpi, donor hamsters were euthanized and six subsequent transmission pairs were set up by co-housing each contact 1 hamster with a naive contact 2 hamster (Extended Data Fig. 2a).

In two competition experiments, wt-S614G and Alpha outcompeted Beta, as indicated by nasal washes of the donor hamsters from 1 dpi until euthanasia at 4 dpi. The viral load reached 109 genome copies (gc) per ml for wt-S614G and Alpha, whereas Beta viral loads were tenfold lower at corresponding time points. Consequently, transmission of Beta was limited or undetectable in contact 1 and contact 2 hamsters compared with the competing variants wt-S614G (Fig. 1) and Alpha (Extended Data Fig. 3). Transmission to contact hamsters was associated with clinical signs and weight loss (Extended Data Fig. 4a, b). In donor and contact hamsters, viral genome loads in the URT (comprising nasal conchae and trachea) revealed increased replication of Alpha and wt-S614G compared with Beta (Extended Data Fig. 5a, b), which may explain the lower transmission rate of Beta in a competition context. Of note, Beta replicated to high titres in the lower respiratory tract (LRT; comprising cranial, medial and caudal lung lobes) of donor hamsters, similar levels as observed for the competing Alpha and wt-S614G virus (Extended Data Fig. 5a, b).

Fig. 1: Competitive replication and transmission of Beta and wt-S614G in Syrian hamsters.
figure 1

Six donor hamsters were each inoculated with a median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) of 104.25, determined by back titration and comprising a mixture of wt-S614G (orange) and Beta (green) at a 1:3.8 ratio, determined by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR). Donor, contact 1 and contact 2 hamsters were co-housed sequentially as shown in Extended Data Fig. 2a. Nasal washes were performed daily from 1–9 dpi and then every 2 days until 21 dpi. Pie charts show the ratio of variants detected in nasal washes at the indicated dpi. Pie chart sizes are proportional to the total number of viral genome copies per ml, as shown above or below each chart. Grey pies indicate values below the limit of detection (LOD; <103 viral genome copies per ml). Hamster silhouettes are coloured according to the dominant variant (>66%) detected in the last positive sample from each animal. Daggers indicate that the animal reached the humane endpoint; double daggers indicate a hamster that died during inhalation anaesthesia at 3 and 4 dpi. This required changes in the group composition in cage 6—the donor hamster was kept until 7 dpi and was co-housed in two different pairs: donor–contact 1a and donor–contact 1b.

Source data

Competition between Alpha and wt-S614G showed no clear difference in virus titres in nasal washes of donor hamsters, and both variants were detected at all time points in each donor with numbers of individual variants ranging from 105 to 109 gc ml−1 (Fig. 2). Of note, Alpha was dominant over wt-S614G in the donor hamsters at 1 dpi, but these strains were balanced by the endpoint at 4 dpi. In organ samples from the donor hamsters, the highest viral loads were found in the LRT, where Alpha was predominant (more than 66% of genome copies) overall with more than tenfold more viral genome copies than wt-S614G in 14 out of 18 lung samples from the 6 donor hamsters (Extended Data Fig. 5c). Sequential transmission to contact animals was associated with body weight loss (Extended Data Fig. 4c) and was highly efficient for Alpha and wt-S614G variants, which were both detected in nasal washes of almost all contact 1 hamsters (Fig. 2). Whereas all donor and contact 1 hamsters transmitted both viruses to their respective contacts, contact 2 hamsters mainly shed one variant at high levels in nasal washes, demonstrating similar transmission ability for wt-S614G and Alpha. At the individual endpoints for contact 1 hamsters, Alpha appeared to dominate in the LRT when both variants were found at similar levels in the nasal washes and URT. In contact 2 hamsters, the variant that was dominant in the URT was also dominant in the LRT (Extended Data Fig. 5c). High levels of SARS-CoV-2 replication in hamsters induced a rapid humoral immune response, as shown by serum reactivity in RBD-based ELISA in all but one of the contact hamsters (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c). We observed a twofold increase in in vitro binding affinity of recombinant trimeric SAlpha to hamster ACE2 compared with S(D614G) (Extended Data Fig. 1d). These findings suggest that alhough SAlpha has an increased binding affinity for ACE2, this factor was not predictive of the outcome of experimental infections in hamsters.

Fig. 2: Competitive replication and transmission of Alpha and wt-S614G in Syrian hamsters.
figure 2

Six donor hamsters were each inoculated with a TCID50 of 104.3, determined by back titration and comprising a mixture of wt-S614G and Alpha at a 1:1.6 ratio, determined by RT–qPCR. Donor, contact 1 and contact 2 hamsters were co-housed sequentially as shown in Extended Data Fig. 2a. Nasal washes were performed daily from 1–9 dpi and then every 2 days until 21 dpi. Pie charts show the ratio of variants detected in nasal washes at the indicated dpi. Pie chart sizes are proportional to the total number of viral genome copies per ml, as shown above or below each chart. Grey pies indicate values below the LOD. Hamster silhouettes are coloured to indicate the dominant variant (>66%) detected in the last positive sample from each hamster; a silhouette with two colours indicates that there is no dominant variant. Daggers indicate that the hamster reached the humane endpoint.

Source data

Alpha dominates wt-S614G in ferrets

In a similar approach, we inoculated six donor ferrets with a mixture of wt-S614G and Alpha at equivalent numbers of genome copies and monitored sequential transmission in naive contact 1 and contact 2 ferrets (Extended Data Fig. 2b). Alpha rapidly became the dominant variant in nasal washes from 2 dpi with up to 105 gc ml−1 (Fig. 3). Correspondingly, the nasal concha of donor ferrets revealed high levels of replication in the nasal epithelium and up to 100-fold higher load of Alpha (up to 108.2 gc ml−1) than wt-S614G (up to 106.5 gc ml−1) (Extended Data Fig. 7a). Although histopathological analysis clearly indicated viral replication in the nasal epithelium of the donor ferrets (Extended Data Fig. 7b–e), we did not observe severe clinical signs of infection (Extended Data Fig. 4d, e). Transmission to contact 1 ferrets was detected in only two pairs of ferrets, and only one contact 1 ferret transmitted the virus to the contact 2 ferret. However, in each of these three transmission events, the Alpha variant was highly dominant and replicated to similarly high titres as in donor ferrets (Fig. 3). The 3 contact ferrets with virus shedding seroconverted by 15–20 days post contact (dpc), confirming active infection (Extended Data Fig. 6d).

Fig. 3: Replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and wt-S614G in ferrets.
figure 3

Six donor ferrets were each inoculated with a TCID50 of 105.9, determined by back titration and comprising a mixture of wt-S614G and Alpha at a 1:1.2 ratio, determined by RT–qPCR. Donor, contact 1 and contact 2 ferrets were co-housed sequentially as shown in Extended Data Fig. 2b. Pie charts show the ratio of variants detected in nasal washes at the indicated dpi. Pie chart sizes are proportional to the total number of viral genome copies per ml, as shown above or below each chart. Grey pies indicate values below the LOD. Viral genome copies were below the LOD at 18 and 20 dpi (not shown). Ferret silhouettes are coloured to indicate the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant (>66%) detected in the last positive sample from each ferret.

Source data

Alpha dominates wt-S614G in K18Tg mice

To assess further adaptation of Alpha to human ACE2, four hACE2-K18Tg mice, which overexpress hACE2 in respiratory epithelium18, were inoculated with a mixture of SARS-CoV-2 wt-S614G and Alpha with equivalent numbers of genomic copies (Fig. 4a). Each inoculated mouse was co-housed with a contact hACE2-K18Tg mouse at 1 dpi. Alpha was dominant in the oropharyngeal samples of all four inoculated mice from 1 to 4 dpi with up to 106 gc ml−1. The increased replicative fitness of Alpha over wt-S614G was further reflected throughout the respiratory tract, with higher numbers of genome copies in nose, lungs, olfactory bulb and most brain samples at 4 dpi (Fig. 4a), and inoculated mice showed loss of body weight at 4 dpi (Extended Data Fig. 8a). A relatively high infectious dose was used to promote transmission in these experiments, and was associated with high viral load (up to 108 viral genome copies per sample) in the lung and brain, leading to encephalitis—as previously reported in hACE2-K18Tg mice19,20. Viral loads were lower in nasal and oropharyngeal swabs from these mice, and only limited transmission was observed from these samples (two out of four contacts). None of the contact mice lost weight, but only Alpha was detectable in the lungs of contact mice at 7 dpc (Extended Data Fig. 8b).

Fig. 4: Replication of Alpha, wt-SAlpha, and wt-S614G in hACE2-K18Tg mice.
figure 4

a, b, Two groups of four donor hACE2-K18Tg mice were inoculated with 1 × 104 PFU, determined by back titration and comprising a mixture of wt-S614G (orange) and Alpha (dark blue) at a 3:1 ratio (a), or a mixture of wt-S614G and wt-SAlpha (light blue) at a 1:1 ratio (b). Pie charts show the ratio of variants detected in each sample at the indicated dpi. Pie chart sizes are proportional to the total number of viral genome copies per ml (swabs) or per sample (tissues), as shown below each chart. Grey pies indicate values below the LOD. Mouse silhouettes are coloured to indicate the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant (>66%) in the last positive swab sample from the corresponding mouse; a silhouette with two colours indicates that there is no dominant variant. K18 nos. 1 to 8 denote individual hACE-K18Tg donor mice.

Source data

We performed a similar competition experiment between wt-S614G and an isogenic recombinant virus expressing SAlpha (wt-SAlpha). We inoculated hACE2-K18Tg mice with an equal mixture of wt-SAlpha and wt-S614G and housed them with a contact hACE2-K18Tg mouse at 1 dpi. The replicative advantage of wt-SAlpha was less clear in this experiment, and both wt-SAlpha and wt-S614G were present with similarly high numbers of viral genome copies in lung and brain samples (Fig. 4b). Transmission to contact mice was inefficient, and wt-SAlpha was the only virus detected in lungs of contact mice at 7 dpc (Extended Data Fig. 8b). These results indicate that the SAlpha spike mutations contribute to the replication advantage of Alpha over wt-S614G in the URT of mice that express high levels of human ACE2.

Competition in hACE2-KI mice

To further address this question, we next used hACE2-KI homozygous mice3. In contrast to hACE2-K18Tg mice, hACE2-KI mice show physiological expression of human ACE2, with no ectopic expression of human ACE2 in the brain, and no expression of mouse ACE2, which has been shown to be permissive to the spike mutation N501Y contained in SAlpha. We inoculated 4 groups of hACE2-KI mice intranasally with 104 plaque-forming units (PFU) per mouse of either wt-S614G, Alpha, wt-SAlpha or Beta (n = 8 mice per group) as individual virus infections. We observed significantly higher viral genome copy numbers in mice infected with Alpha, wt-SAlpha or Beta compared with wt-S614G in oropharyngeal swabs at 1 dpi (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Moreover, there were significantly higher numbers of viral genome copies of Alpha and wt-SAlpha in the nose at 2 dpi and in the olfactory bulb at 4 dpi compared with wt-S614G and Beta (Extended Data Fig. 9b). Of note, viral titres in the nasal airways and lungs showed SARS-CoV-2 persistence at 4 dpi in 3 out of 4 mice infected with either Alpha or with wt-SAlpha, but not in mice inoculated with wt-S614G, whereas Beta persisted in the lungs of 2 out of 4 mice (Extended Data Fig. 9c). The apparent discrepancy between genome copy number and PFU reflects the non-homogeneous distribution of the virus in the different samples processed for each assay. We observed no difference in weight loss (Extended Data Fig. 9d) or lung histopathology score (Supplementary Table 1) between groups.

Finally, we performed competition experiments to compare the replication of the VOCs in groups of hACE2-KI mice. We observed a complete predominance of Alpha and wt-SAlpha over wt-S614G (Fig. 5a–c). By contrast, Beta showed reduced fitness compared with wt-S614G (Fig. 5d). Together, the two mouse models support enhanced fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha VOC over its progenitor wt-S614G with increased replication and persistence in the URT and more systemic spread, mediated in part by changes in the Alpha S sequence.

Fig. 5: Replication of Alpha, wt-SAlpha, and Beta in competition with wt-S614G in hACE2-KI mice.
figure 5

ad, Groups of hACE2-KI male (a, c, d) and female (b) mice were inoculated with 1 × 104 PFU, determined by back titration and comprising a mixture of wt-S614G and Alpha at a 3:1 ratio (a, b), a mixture of wt-S614G and wt-SAlpha at a 1:1 ratio (c), and a mixture of wt-S614G and Beta at a 1:1.6 ratio (d). Pie charts show the ratio of variants detected in each sample at the indicated dpi. Pie chart sizes are proportional to the total number of viral genome copies per ml (swabs) or per sample (tissues), as shown below each chart. Grey pies indicate values below the LOD. Mouse silhouettes are coloured to indicate the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant (>66%) in the last positive swab sample from the corresponding mouse. KI nos. 1 to 24 denote individual hACE2-KI mice.

Source data


Epidemiological data indicate that new SARS-CoV-2 variant lineages with specific amino acid changes have a fitness advantage over contemporary strains. VOCs such as Alpha and Beta are particularly concerning for their hypothesized ability to supersede progenitor strains and establish immune escape properties, respectively. Here we provide experimental evidence that SARS-CoV-2 Alpha has a clear replication advantage over wt-S614G in ferrets and in two humanized mouse models. Moreover, Alpha was exclusively transmitted to contact animals in competition experiments, in which ferrets and hACE2-K18Tg mice were inoculated with mixtures of Alpha and wt-S614G. Because SARS-CoV-2 replicates to lower levels in ferrets and hACE2-KI mice, the inability to detect wt-S614G in some samples from inoculated animals also reflects the limit of detection of the assays using PCR with reverse transcription (RT–PCR) (approximately 103 gc ml−1).

We have shown that the molecular mechanism underlying the fitness advantage of Alpha in vivo is largely dependent on a few changes in S, including three amino acid deletions (H69, V70 and Y144) and six substitutions (N501Y, A570D, P681H, T716I, S982A and D1118H). In hACE2-KI mice, higher genome copies and/or titres of Alpha and wt-SAlpha compared with wt-S614G were found in the URT (oropharynx and nose) and olfactory bulb. Increased replication and transmission of wt-SAlpha over wt-S614G were also evident in hACE2-K18Tg mice. Transmission events are rare in mice; however, we observed transmission of Alpha and wt-SAlpha in 50% of the contact hACE2-K18Tg mice and no detection of wt-S614G in any contact mouse. In vitro, Alpha S mutations increased its affinity for hamster and human ACE2 by twofold and fourfold, respectively, indicating an overall improvement in binding abilities rather than a specialization towards human ACE2.

Beta showed a higher binding affinity for human ACE2 than its progenitor wt-S614G and an equal level of replication to Alpha and wt-S614G in single infections of AEC cultures and in hACE2-KI mice. However, Beta replication was outcompeted in direct competition with wt-S614G in vitro and in hACE2-KI mice. In hamsters, wt-S614G and Alpha also outcompeted Beta in relation to replication and transmission to contact animals, in which Beta was outnumbered by one or two orders of magnitude. This reduced fitness was also evident in previous experiments in K18-hACE2 mice21. The relative reduced intrinsic fitness of Beta in immunologically naive hosts supports the hypothesis that the epidemiological advantage of Beta may be principally owing to immune escape, as indicated by reduced efficiency in serum neutralization tests16. In convalescent or vaccinated populations, the immune escape advantage of Beta may prove to be sufficient to compensate its reduced intrinsic fitness and explains, for example, the low prevalence of this variant in regions with a mainly naive population.

Alpha and wt-S614G exhibited similar replication and transmission in hamsters, a model with very high susceptibility and replication efficacy, in which the impact of a marginally fitter SARS-CoV-2 variant may not become apparent. Indeed, efficient simultaneous transmission of both variants to contact hamsters was observed in association with high viral loads in infected animals. In models supporting high replication, such as human AEC cultures and hamsters, only major improvements in replication and transmission can be detected when the variants compared already have a high fitness. By contrast, in ferrets and mouse models—in which SARS-CoV-2 replication is overall less efficient—VOCs with modestly enhanced replication and transmission can be identified. The similar replication and transmission efficacies in hamsters are in line with recent publications using VOCs in the hamster model22.

The basal rate of replication is an important factor in the assertion of a variant over a contemporary variant in a naive population. Some individuals with higher bioaerosol exhalation levels can initiate disproportionate numbers of transmission events, possibly because of higher viral load in the URT, and are therefore called ‘superspreaders’23. The hamster model might thus resemble the human superspreader scenario, since there is no clear indication of a specific predominance in transmission between two SARS-CoV-2 variants with high fitness levels, such as wt-S614G and Alpha. However, we did not perform strict aerosol transmission studies, so this remains only a proposition. The ferret and hACE2-KI models are more restricted in that infection is predominantly in the URT. Therefore, these models more closely mimic the situation in humans, in which infections are predominantly mild. Although the rate of transmission was not high overall (3 out of 8 pairs in ferrets, and 4 out of 8 pairs in hACE2-K18Tg mice), the almost exclusive transmission of Alpha relative to wt-S614G mirrored increased transmission of Alpha in the human population; Alpha has been responsible for more than 90% of infections in most countries in Europe24.

Overall, our study demonstrates that multiple complementary models are necessary to comprehensively evaluate different aspects of human SARS-CoV-2 infection and the impact of emerging VOCs on the course of the ongoing pandemic. The hamster and ferret provide complementary models for transmission efficiency. The mouse models used here may become critical for VOCs demonstrating higher specificity for binding to human ACE2 relative to those from other species. Together, our results show the clear fitness advantage of Alpha and a concomitant disadvantage of Beta, in line with the observed epidemiological predominance of Alpha in the context of a relatively naive population. Notably and reassuringly, despite the apparent fitness differences of these VOCs, there is no indication of different pathologies.


Cell lines

Vero E6 cells (ATCC CRL-1586) (provided by D. Muth, M. Müller and C. Drosten) or Vero-TMPRSS225 (provided by S. Pöhlmann) were propagated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium-GlutaMAX supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, 100 IU ml−1 penicillin, 1% (w/v) nonessential amino acids and 15 mM HEPES (Gibco). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.


Viruses are listed in Extended Data Table 1 together with the corresponding in vitro and in vivo experiments in which they were used. Specific amino acid changes are shown schematically in Extended Data Fig. 10. Contemporary clinical isolates from the B.1.160 (SD614G) (EPI_ISL_414019), Alpha (EPI_ISL_2131446, EPI_ISL_751799 (L4549)) and Beta (EPI_ISL_803957 (L4550)) were isolated and minimally passaged on Vero E6 cells. Beta (EPI_ISL_981782) was initially isolated on A549 cells expressing human ACE2 before passaging on Vero E6 cells. SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (L4549) and Beta (L4550)21 were received from the Robert-Koch-Institut Berlin, Germany. Isogenic variants with the Alpha spike (wt-SAlpha) or individual Alpha spike mutations were introduced into a wild-type SARS-COV-2 ‘Wuhan’ backbone strain comprising the D614G amino acid change (wt-S614G), as described3,26. Isogenic viruses were grown on Vero-TMPRSS2 cells after one passage on human bronchial airway epithelial cells. All viruses were verified by performing whole-genome next generation sequencing (NGS). For SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (L4549, SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 NW-RKI-I-0026/2020 passage 3), one silent mutation in the ORF1a (sequence position 11741) was determined (C to T with 27% T, 57% strand bias). For SARS-CoV-2 Beta (L4550, available under ENA study accession number MZ433432), one nucleotide exchange was detected (A12022C) resulting in the amino acid exchange D3923A in ORF1a and one SNP at sequence position 11730 (C to T with 41%, stand bias 52%).

For all in vivo virus competition experiments, we generated inoculum mixtures aiming for a 1:1 ratio of each variant based on virus stock titres. The reported mixture inoculum titres are based on back-titration of the inoculum mixtures and the indicated ratio of each variant was determined by standard RT–qPCR. SARS-CoV-2 wt-S614G (PRJEB45736; wt-S614G ID#49 vial 2) and SARS-CoV-2 Beta (L4550) were used to inoculate hamsters in the wt-S614G versus Beta study; SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (L4549), and SARS-CoV-2 Beta (L4550) were used for inoculation in the Alpha versus Beta hamster study. SARS-CoV-2 wt-S614G, wt-SAlpha, Alpha (L4549) and Beta (L4550) were used to inoculate hACE2 humanized mice in all single virus or mixed virus competition experiments.

Next-generation sequencing

NGS was used to verify the sequence of isolates and isogenic clones prior to experimentation. RNA was extracted using the RNAdvance Tissue kit (Beckman Coulter) and the KingFisher Flex System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, RNA was transcribed into cDNA and sequencing libraries were generated as described27 and were sequenced using the Ion Torrent S5XL Instrument (ThermoFisher). Samples with Ct values >20 for SARS-CoV-2 were additionally treated with RNA baits (myBaits, Arbor Biosciences) for SARS-CoV-2 enrichment before sequencing28. Sequence datasets were analysed by reference mapping with the Genome Sequencer Software Suite (version 2.6, Roche), default software settings for quality filtering and mapping using EPI_ISL_414019 (Alpha), EPI_ISL_2131446 (Alpha) and EPI_ISL_981782 (Beta) as references. To identify potential single nucleotide polymorphisms in the read data, the variant analysis tool integrated in Geneious Prime (2019.2.3) was applied (default settings).

AEC cultures

Human nasal AEC cultures were purchased from Epithelix (EP02MP Nasal MucilAir, pool of 14 donors). Maintenance of primary nasal AEC cultures were performed according to manufacturer’s guidelines. Individual SARS-CoV-2 infections with contemporary virus isolates were conducted at either 33 °C or 37 °C as described elsewhere29 using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.02, whereas all competition experiments and replication kinetics were performed with an MOI of 0.005 as described30. Quantification of viral load of individual SARS-CoV-2 infections with contemporary virus isolates was performed using the NucliSens easyMAG (BioMérieux) and RT–qPCR targeting the E gene of SARS-CoV-2 as described31,32. In competition experiments, nucleic acids were extracted using the Quick-RNA Viral 96 kit (Zymo research) and RT–qPCR primers and probe sequences are shown in Extended Data Table 2. The viral replication of individual isogenic variants was monitored by plaque assay.

Plaque titration assay

Viruses released into the apical compartments were titrated by plaque assay on Vero E6 cells as described30,33. In brief, 2 × 105 cells per ml were seeded in 24-well plates 1 day prior to titration and inoculated with tenfold serial dilutions of virus solutions. Inocula were removed 1 h post-infection and replaced with overlay medium consisting of DMEM supplemented with 1.2% Avicel (RC-581, FMC biopolymer), 15 mM HEPES, 5 or 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 100 IU ml−1 penicillin. Cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48 h, fixed with 4% (v/v) neutral buffered formalin, and stained with crystal violet.

Protein expression, purification and bio-layer interferometry assay

SARS-CoV-2 S protein expression plasmids were constructed to encode the ectodomain of S protein S(D614G) or SAlpha (residues 1–1208, with a mutated furin cleavage site and K986P/V987P substitutions) followed by a T4 fold on the trimerization domain and a polyhistidine purification tag. ACE2 protein (human, hamster or ferret) expression plasmids were constructed to encode the ectodomain of ACE2 followed by a human IgG1 Fc purification tag. The recombinant proteins were expressed using the Expi293 Expression system (ThermoFisher Scientific) and purified with HisTrap FF columns (for polyhistidine-tagged spike proteins) or with HiTrap Protein A column (for Fc-tagged ACE2 proteins) in FPLC (Cytiva) system. Recombinant proteins were further purified with Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL column (Cytiva) as needed.

Binding affinity between the trimeric spike and dimeric ACE2 was evaluated using an Octet RED96e instrument at 30 °C with a shaking speed of 1,000 rpm (ForteBio). Anti-human IgG Fc biosensors (ForteBio) were used. Following 20 min of pre-hydration of anti-human IgGFc biosensors and 1 min of sensor check, 7.5 nM of human ACE2–Fc, 7.5 nM of hamster ACE2–Fc in 10× kinetic buffer (ForteBio) were loaded onto the surface of anti-human IgG Fc biosensors for 5 min. After 1.5 min of baseline equilibration, 5 min of association was conducted at 10–100 nM S(D614G), SAlpha or SBeta, followed by 5 min of dissociation in the same buffer, which was used for baseline equilibration. The data were collected using ForteBio Data Acquisition Software 12.0.1 and corrected by subtracting signal from the reference sample and a 1:1 binding model with global fit was used for determination of affinity constants.

Animal experiment ethics declarations

All ferret and hamster experiments were evaluated by the responsible ethics committee of the State Office of Agriculture, Food Safety, and Fishery in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania (LALLF M-V) and gained governmental approval under registration number LVL MV TSD/7221.3-1-004/21. Mouse studies were approved by the Commission for Animal Experimentation of the Cantonal Veterinary Office of Bern and conducted in compliance with the Swiss Animal Welfare legislation and under license BE-43/20.

Hamster studies

Six Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) (Janvier Labs) were inoculated intranasally under a brief inhalation anaesthesia with a 70 μl mixture of two SARS-CoV-2 VOCs (wt-S614G and Alpha mixture, wt-S614G and Beta mixture, or Alpha and Beta mixture). Each inoculum was back-titrated and ratios of each variant were determined by RT–qPCR. The wt-S614G and Alpha mixture held a 1:1.6 ratio with TCID50 of 104.3 per hamster, the wt-S614G versus Beta mixture held a 1:3.8 ratio with TCID50 of 104.25 per hamster, and the Alpha versus Beta mixture held a 1.8:1 ratio with TCID50 of 105.06 per hamster.

Inoculated donor hamsters were isolated in individually ventilated cages for 24 h. Thereafter, contact hamster 1 was co-housed with each donor, creating six donor–contact 1 pairs (Extended Data Fig. 2a). The housing of each hamster pair was strictly separated in individual cage systems to prevent spillover between different pairs. At 4 dpi, the individual donor hamsters (inoculated animal) were euthanized. To simulate a second transmission cycle, the original contact hamsters (referred to as contact 1) were commingled with a further six naive hamsters (referred to as contact 2), which equates to another six contact 1 and contact 2 pairs (Extended Data Fig. 2a). These pairs were co-housed until the end of the study at 21 dpi. Because the first contact hamster (cage 6) in the competition trial wt-S614G versus Alpha, died at 2 dpc, the second contact hamster for this cage was also co-housed with the donor hamster; thus the first and second contact hamsters in this cage were labelled contact 1a and contact 1b, respectively. To enable sufficient contact between the donor hamster and contact 1b hamster, which was commingled routinely on 4 dpi, the donor hamster was euthanized at 7 dpi (instead of at 4 dpi), when it reached the humane end-point criterion for bodyweight (below 80% of 0 dpi body weight).

Viral shedding was monitored by nasal washes in addition to a daily physical examination and body weighing routine. Nasal wash samples were obtained under a short-term isoflurane anaesthesia from individual hamsters by administering 200 µl PBS to each nostril and collecting the reflux. Animals were sampled daily from 1 dpi to 9 dpi, and then every other day until 21 dpi. Under euthanasia, serum samples and an organ panel comprising representative URT and LRT tissues were collected from each hamster. All animals were observed daily for signs of clinical disease and weight loss. Hamsters reaching the humane endpoint, that is, falling below 80% of the initial body weight relative to 0 dpi, were humanely euthanized.

Ferret studies

Similar to the hamster study, 12 ferrets (six donor ferrets and six transmission 1 ferrets) from the FLI in-house breeding were housed pairwise in strictly separated cages to prevent spillover contamination. Of these, six ferrets were inoculated with an equal 250 µl mixture of SARS-CoV-2 wt-S614G and Alpha. The inoculum was back-titrated and the ratio of each variant was determined by RT–qPCR. The wt-S614G versus Alpha mixture held a 1:1.2 ratio with 105.875 TCID50 distributed equally into each nostril of donor ferrets. Ferrets were separated for the first 24 h following inoculation. Subsequently, the ferret pairs were co-housed again, allowing direct contact of donor to contact 1 ferrets. All ferrets were sampled via nasal washes with 750 µl PBS per nostril under a short-term inhalation anaesthesia. Donor ferrets were sampled until euthanasia at 6 dpi, which was followed by the introduction of one additional naive contact 2 ferret per cage (n = 6), resulting in a 1:1 pairwise setup with contact 1 and contact 2 ferrets (Extended Data Fig. 2b). All ferrets, which were in the study group on the respective days, were sampled on the indicated days. Bodyweight, temperature and physical condition of all ferrets were monitored daily throughout the experiment. URT and LRT organ samples, as well as blood samples of all ferrets were taken at respective euthanasia time points.

Full autopsy was performed on all animals under BSL3 conditions. The lung, trachea and nasal conchae were collected and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 21 days. The nasal atrium, decalcified nasal turbinates (cross-sections every 3–5 mm), trachea and all lung lobes were trimmed for paraffin embedding. Based on PCR results,tissue sections (3 μm) of all donors (day 6) and one recipient (no. 8, day 20) were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin for light microscopical examination. Immunohistochemistry was performed using an anti-SARS nucleocapsid antibody (Novus Biologicals NB100-56576, dilution 1:200) according to standardized avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex-method producing a red labelling and haematoxylin counterstain. For each immunohistochemistry staining, positive control slides and a negative control for the primary antibodies were included. Histopathology was performed on at least five consecutive tissue samples per animal, yielding comparable results in all cases. Lung tissue pathology was evaluated according to a detailed score sheet developed by Angele Breithaupt (DipECVP) (Supplementary Table 2). Evaluation and interpretation was performed by board-certified veterinary pathologists (DiplECVP) (AB, IBV).

Mouse studies

hACE2-KI mice (B6.Cg-Ace2tm1(ACE2)Dwnt) and hACE2-K18Tg mice (Tg(K18-hACE2)2Prlmn) were described previously3,18. All mice were produced at the specific-pathogen-free facility of the Institute of Virology and Immunology (Mittelhäusern), where they were maintained in individually ventilated cages (blue line, Tecniplast), with 12-h:12-h light:dark cycle, 22 ± 1 °C ambient temperature and 50 ± 5% humidity, autoclaved food and acidified water. At least 7 days before infection, mice were placed in individually HEPA-filtered cages (IsoCage N, Tecniplast). Mice (10 to 12 weeks old) were anaesthetized with isoflurane and infected intranasally with 20 μl per nostril with the virus inoculum described in the results section. One day after inoculation, infected hACE2-K18Tg mice were placed in the cage of another hACE2-K18Tg contact mouse. Mice were monitored daily for bodyweight loss and clinical signs. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected under brief isoflurane anaesthesia using ultrafine sterile flock swabs (Hydraflock, Puritan, 25-3318-H). The tips of the swabs were placed in 0.5 ml of RA1 lysis buffer (Macherey-Nagel, 740961) supplemented with 1% β-mercaptoethanol and vortexed. At 2 or 4 dpi, mice were euthanized, and organs were aseptically dissected. Systematic tissue sampling was performed as detailed previously3.

Animal specimens work up, viral RNA detection and quantification

Organ samples from ferrets and hamsters were homogenized in a 1 ml mixture composed of equal volumes of Hank’s balanced salts MEM and Earle’s balanced salts MEM containing 2 mM l-glutamine, 850 mg l−1 NaHCO3, 120 mg l−1 sodium pyruvate and 1% penicillin–streptomycin) at 300 Hz for 2 min using a Tissuelyser II (Qiagen) and centrifuged to clarify the supernatant. Organ samples from mice were either homogenized in 0.5 ml of RA1 lysis buffer supplemented with 1% β-mercaptoethanol using a Bullet Blender Tissue Homogenizer (Next-Advance) or in Tube M (Miltenyi Biotech, 130-096-335) containing 1 ml of DMEM using a gentleMACS Tissue Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotech). Nucleic acid was extracted from 100 μl of the nasal washes or 200 µl mouse oropharyngeal swabs after a short centrifugation step or 100 μl of organ sample supernatant using the NucleoMag Vet kit (Macherey Nagel). Nasal washes, oropharyngeal swabs, and organ samples were tested by RT–qPCR analysis for the ratio of the two different viruses used for inoculation, by applying two different assays, each of them specific for one variant: either the wt-S614G, Alpha or Beta variant (Extended Data Tables 2, 3). Viral RNA copies in swabs and organs in studies using a single variant inoculum in mice were determined using the E protein RT–qPCR exactly as described3.

Four specific RT–qPCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 wt-S614G, Alpha and Beta were designed based on the specific genome deletions within ORF1 and the S gene (Extended Data Table 2). Here, virus-specific primers were used to achieve a high analytical sensitivity (less than 10 genome copies per µl template) of the PCR assays, and in samples with a high genome load of the non-matching virus.

The RT–qPCR reaction was prepared using the qScript XLT One-Step RT–qPCR ToughMix (QuantaBio) (hamsters and ferrets) or the AgPath-ID One-Step RT–PCR (ThermoFisher Scientific) (hACE2-K18Tg and hACE2-KI mice) in a volume of 12.5 µl including 1 µl of the respective FAM mix and 2.5 µl of extracted RNA. The reaction was performed for 10 min at 50 °C for reverse transcription, 1 min at 95 °C for activation, and 42 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C for denaturation, 10 s at 60 °C for annealing and 20 s at 68 °C for elongation. Fluorescence was measured during the annealing phase. RT–qPCRs were performed on a BioRad real-time CFX96 detection system (Bio-Rad) (hamsters and ferrets) or an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific) (mice). Validation work was performed by comparison with established protocols ( and ref. 31).

Serological tests of hamsters and ferrets

Serum samples from the wt-S614G versus Alpha, wt-S614G versus Beta, and Alpha versus Beta co-inoculated hamsters and ferrets were tested by ELISA for sero-reactivity against the RBD domain34 using a Tecan i-control 2014 1.11 plate reader and data was analysed using Microsoft Excel 16.0. All samples were generated at the time point of euthanasia of the individual animal.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 or R35 (version 4.1), using the packages tidyverse36 (v1.3.1), ggpubr (v0.4.0) and rstatix (v.0.7.0). Unless noted otherwise, the results are expressed as mean ± s.d. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey honest significance differences post hoc test was used to compare competition results at different time points after infection in vitro. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare viral genome copies or titres at different time points post infection in individual virus mouse infection studies. Significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.