Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions


During the Early Bronze Age, populations of the western Eurasian steppe expanded across an immense area of northern Eurasia. Combined archaeological and genetic evidence supports widespread Early Bronze Age population movements out of the Pontic–Caspian steppe that resulted in gene flow across vast distances, linking populations of Yamnaya pastoralists in Scandinavia with pastoral populations (known as the Afanasievo) far to the east in the Altai Mountains1,2 and Mongolia3. Although some models hold that this expansion was the outcome of a newly mobile pastoral economy characterized by horse traction, bulk wagon transport4,5,6 and regular dietary dependence on meat and milk5, hard evidence for these economic features has not been found. Here we draw on proteomic analysis of dental calculus from individuals from the western Eurasian steppe to demonstrate a major transition in dairying at the start of the Bronze Age. The rapid onset of ubiquitous dairying at a point in time when steppe populations are known to have begun dispersing offers critical insight into a key catalyst of steppe mobility. The identification of horse milk proteins also indicates horse domestication by the Early Bronze Age, which provides support for its role in steppe dispersals. Our results point to a potential epicentre for horse domestication in the Pontic–Caspian steppe by the third millennium bc, and offer strong support for the notion that the novel exploitation of secondary animal products was a key driver of the expansions of Eurasian steppe pastoralists by the Early Bronze Age.


The pastoralist populations of the Eurasian steppe have long been a source of archaeological and historical fascination. Although the later history of steppe pastoralists—including the rise of the Xiongnu and Mongol empires in the east—is reasonably well-established, the early emergence and expansion of pastoralist groups in the steppe occurred before the historical era and has largely been reconstructed on the basis of archaeological and linguistic data1,6,7. More recently, ancient DNA evidence has provided insights into early steppe populations, revealing evidence for a major influx of steppe ancestry into Europe in the Late Neolithic that effectively transformed the European genetic landscape1,2,8. Archaeogenetic data also link these same populations (referred to as Yamnaya) with pastoral Afanasievo populations far to the east in the Altai Mountains1,2 and Mongolia3. Combined archaeological and genetic evidence supports widespread population movements in the Early Bronze Age (about 3300 to 2500 bc) from the Pontic–Caspian steppe that resulted in gene flow across vast distances, linking Yamnaya pastoralist populations in Scandinavia with groups that expanded into Siberia9.

Although the Yamnaya expansions are well-established, the driving forces behind them remain unclear. A widely cited theory holds that the early spread of herders across Eurasia was facilitated by a newly mobile pastoral economy that was made possible by a combination of horse traction and bulk wagon transport4,5,6. Together with regular dietary dependence on meat and milk5, this opened up the steppe to exploitation and occupation by pastoralist communities. Yet for all its persuasiveness, the model remains inadequately supported by direct archaeological or biomolecular data. Archaeological evidence for the use of bulk wagon transport by the Eneolithic Maikop and Early Bronze Age Yamnaya groups exists in the form of carts and bridling materials10, but two other critical components of the model—a reliance on domesticated horses and ruminant dairying—remain archaeologically unproven.

The domestication status of Eurasian horses has long been debated5,6,11,12,13,14, and recent archaeogenetic findings15 have shifted our understanding of early horses at the Eneolithic site of Botai in northern Kazakhstan by identifying them as Equus przewalskii rather than the modern-day domestic horse (Equus caballus)5,6. Although horses do appear in Early Bronze Age assemblages on the steppe, it remains unclear whether they were being ridden7,11,16,17, or indeed whether they were part of pastoral herds or simply hunted. On the eastern Eurasian steppe, growing evidence suggests that horses were not ridden11,12,18 or milked19 before about 1200 bc, and horses may have been uncommon in early pastoralist assemblages20. Early ruminant dairying on the western steppe has also been inadequately demonstrated, as human stable isotope data from the region suggests—but cannot confirm—dairy consumption21,22. Palaeoproteomics, which is the only method that is able to evince individual dairy consumption (rather than milk production) and provide taxonomic resolution, has so far been minimally applied to steppe populations. Across Yamnaya and Afanasievo populations, dairying evidence is available only for a few individuals from the eastern steppe who have ancestry from western steppe groups; the earliest individual provides only a taxonomically ambiguous ruminant (Ovis/Bos) peptide result19.

To address the heavily debated question of what drove Yamnaya expansions across the steppe6,23,24,25, we conducted proteomic analysis of dental calculus sampled from 56 steppe individuals who span the Eneolithic to Late Bronze Age, and who date from between 4600 and 1700 bc. Our samples from the Eneolithic (about 4600 to 3300 bc) are from 19 individuals from 5 sites: Murzikha 2 (6 individuals), Khvalynsk 1 and Khvalynsk 2 (9 individuals), Ekaterinovka Mys (1 individual), Lebyazhinka 5 (1 individual) and Khlopkov Bugor (2 individuals) (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Ancient DNA results from Khvalynsk and other Eneolithic sites in the Volga and northern Caucasus2,7,26 support the existence of an Eneolithic population across this region that was genetically similar to the Yamnaya population, but who lacked the additional farmer (Anatolian) ancestry that would arrive later on the steppe7. Published stable isotope and archaeological studies applied to Eneolithic populations from the Pontic region point to an economy based on fishing, the gathering of local plants and the keeping of domesticated animals6,21,27,28.Given the importance of the horse in reconstructions of early pastoralist expansions, we also examined dental calculus from two individuals from the well-known site of Botai. With faunal assemblages dominated by horse remains11,12,13 and early lipid studies of ceramics indicating horse milking at the site by 3500 bc13, the site is central to discussions of early horse milking and dairying in the Eurasian steppe.

Fig. 1: Map showing sites that yielded individuals with preserved ancient proteins.

ac, Eneolithic (a), Early Bronze Age (b) and Middle–Late Bronze Age (c) sites in the Pontic–Caspian region, showing the number of individuals with a positive dairy identification out of the total number of individuals with preserved ancient proteins for each site. Strong evidence of preservation of equine or ruminant milk protein identifiers are depicted with black animal icons; the single individual with equivocally identified casein peptides is shown with a grey icon. For a map of all sites (including those without preserved proteins), see Supplementary Fig. 1. Base maps were created using QGIS 3.12 (, and use Natural Earth vector map data from The horse image is reproduced from ref. 33; sheep silhouette, public domain (

Our Bronze Age samples come from 35 individuals from 20 sites in the Volga–Ural steppes that can be divided into two chronological groups: the Early Bronze Age (about 3300 to 2500 bc) era of Yamnaya-culture mobile pastoralism29,30; and the Middle–Late Bronze Age transition (about 2500–1700 bc), when chariots, fortified settlements and new western-derived influence genetic ancestries appeared with the Sintashta culture31. The cemetery sites and the number of individuals (in parentheses) from the Early Bronze Age are: Krasikovskyi 1 (2) Krasnokholm 3 (1), Krivyanskiy 9 (2), Kutuluk 1 (2), Leshchevskoe 1 (1), Lopatino 1 (1), Mustayevo 5 (2), Nizhnaya Pavlovka (1), Panitskoe (1), Podlesnoe (1), Pyatiletka (1) and Trudovoy (1); and, from the Middle–Late Bronze Age transition, Bolshekaraganskyi (1), Kalinovsky 1 (2), Kamennyi Ambar 5 (3), Krasikovskyi I (1), Krivyanskiy 9 (3), Lopatino 1 and Lopatino 2 (2), Potapovka 1 (1), Shumayevo 2 (1) and Utevka 6 (5) (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Archaeological and stable isotope findings6,22 indicate that the diet of Early Bronze Age Yamnaya groups was focused on herd animals, specifically cattle, sheep and goat. Horse remains also appear in quantity on a few steppe archaeological sites, but the status of Early Bronze Age horses—whether domesticated or hunted—has remained unclear32,33. The Middle–Late Bronze Age transition saw a shift to greater horse exploitation and chariot use, within the context of an ongoing dietary focus on domesticated livestock.

Of the 56 ancient human dental calculus samples we tested, 55 were successfully extracted and produced identifiable protein data. Of these 55, 48 (87%) were determined to have strong signals for preservation through an assessment of proteins commonly found within the oral cavity; detailed information on this assessment is provided in Methods, Supplementary Table 3.

The earliest samples in our study (about 4600 to 4000 bc) are from 5 Eneolithic sites in southwestern Russia located on or close to the Volga River and its tributaries. Of the samples from these 19 individuals, 11 were successfully extracted and well-preserved, and 10 of these did not show any evidence for dairy consumption (Figs. 1a, 2a). The calculus of one individual contained two peptides specific to bovine (Bos, Bubalis and Bison) α-S1-casein, a milk curd protein. However, as the only dietary peptides contained in this sample were specific to casein and evidence for the most commonly recovered dairy protein β-lactoglobulin (BLG) was lacking, dairy consumption in this individual could not be confidently confirmed. In general, casein peptides appear to preserve more poorly than BLG in archaeological calculus, and thus are most often identified together with other dairy protein peptides rather than alone19,34,35,36,37. Additionally, within the two identified casein peptides, there is only one possible amino acid deamidation site, which renders any estimation of the antiquity of these peptides exceedingly challenging. A previously published paper38 demonstrates the extreme variability in deamidation of amino acids in milk proteins, which further limits our ability to confirm the authenticity of this dairy finding. The calculus from the two additional Botai individuals demonstrated adequate preservation, but also lacked evidence for dairy consumption.

Fig. 2: Histogram of taxonomic specificity of dairy peptide spectral matches per individual.

ac, Histograms for individuals with evidence for consumption of dairy, from the Eneolithic (a), Early Bronze Age (b) and Middle and Late Bronze Age (c). PSM, peptide spectral match.

For the Early Bronze Age individuals (dating to the onset of the Yamnaya cultural horizon), dairy peptides were recovered from 15 of the 16 individual calculus samples we analysed (Fig. 1b, 2b). All 15 individuals with positive dairy results contained multiple peptide spectral matches to ruminant dairy proteins (including BLG), and some individuals also contained α-S1 casein, α-S2-casein or both. Although many of the milk peptides were only specific to higher taxonomic levels (such as Pecora, an infraorder within Artiodactyla (cow, sheep, goat, buffalo, yak, reindeer, deer and antelope)), others enabled more specific taxonomic classifications, including to family, genus or species. We found Ovis, Capra and Bos attributions, and the calculus of many individuals contained dairy peptides from several species. Notably, we identified Equus milk peptides from the protein BLGI in 2 of 17 Early Bronze Age individuals, both from the southwestern site of Krivyanskiy 9 (3305 to 2633 calibrated years bc (Supplementary Table 5 provides individual accelerator mass spectrometry dating information)). Although the genus Equus includes horse, donkey and kiang, only horse species (E. caballus, E. przewalskii, Equus hemionus and Equus ferus) are archaeologically attested in the steppe in the Early Bronze Age, supporting the Equus identification as horse.

For the Middle–Late Bronze Age transition, calculus samples from 15 of 19 individuals were positive for evidence of ruminant milk consumption (Figs. 1c, 2c). Similar to the Early Bronze Age, we identified BLG, α-S1-casein and α-S2-casein, as well as the whey protein α-lactalbumin. Taxonomic identifications again ranged from the Pecora infraorder to genus-level identifications (including Ovis and Bos), but without any specific identifications for Capra or Equus. Supplementary Table 4 provides a full accounting of all identified dairy proteins for each individual.

Overall, our results point to a clear and marked shift in milk consumption patterns between the Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age in the Pontic–Caspian Steppe. The majority of Eneolithic individuals (10 out of 11 (92%)) in our assemblage lack any evidence for milk consumption, whereas the overwhelming majority of Early Bronze Age individuals (15 out of 16 (94%)) contain ample proteomic evidence for dairy consumption in their calculus. Although a single individual at Eneolithic Khvalynsk with somewhat equivocal evidence for the consumption of dairy from cattle may indicate small-scale dairy use, the reliability of this single identification is questionable. Our findings suggest that regular dairy consumption in the Pontic–Caspian Steppe began only at the time of the Eneolithic-to-Early Bronze Age transition. Although neighbouring Eneolithic farming populations in Europe appear to have been dairying39, those living across the steppe frontier did not adopt milking practices, which suggests the presence of a cultural frontier. The proteomic data are in broad agreement with findings from lipid analyses in the Ukraine (Supplementary Information section 2, Supplementary Table 2). They also agree with stable isotope analysis of individuals from Eneolithic-to-Bronze-Age Samara showing a corresponding shift from a heavy reliance on fish, deer and other riverine forest (C3) resources to a greater reliance on terrestrial and grassland (C3 and C4) animal products22,40.

One important advantage of proteomic data is their ability, in some cases, to provide species-specific protein identifications. Our study offers evidence for the Bronze Age milking of sheep, goat and cattle, which fits with evidence for the herding of these animals. The lush valleys of the Pontic–Caspian Steppe provided ample forage and hydration for mixed herds of arid-adapted sheep and goat, as well as more water-reliant cattle41,42. Although a recent study has shown that lactase persistence—which results from the presence of an allele that enables production of lactase into adulthood—was rare in steppe populations of the Early Bronze Age43, we find that the western steppe community was regularly consuming dairy that could have included fresh milk and/or other processed products with reduced lactose, such as yogurts, cheeses or fermented milk beverages.

Our study of dental calculus from the Eneolithic site of Botai to the east, where early horse milking has been suggested by lipid analysis (albeit equivocally44), did not yield milk proteins. Although two samples are insufficient for drawing broad conclusions, this finding does not support widespread milk consumption at the site13,45,46. However, two calculus samples from Early Bronze Age individuals of the Pontic–Caspian region do provide evidence for the consumption of horse milk. Combined with archaeogenetic evidence15 that places the Botai horses on a different evolutionary trajectory than the domesticated DOM2 E. caballus lineage, this finding—if backed up by further sampling and analysis—would seem to firmly shift the focus of sustained early horse domestication on the Eurasian steppe to the Pontic–Caspian region. So far, the oldest horse specimens that carry the DOM2 lineage date to between 2074 to 1625 calibrated years bc, at which time the lineage is archaeologically attested in present-day Russia, Romania and Georgia15. Our identification of—to our knowledge—the earliest horse milk proteins yet identified on the steppe or anywhere else reveals the presence of domestic horses in the western steppe by the Early Bronze Age, which suggests that the region (where the first evidence for horse chariots later emerged at about 2000 bc47) may have been the initial epicentre for domestication of the DOM2 lineage during the late fourth or third millennium bc.

Overall, our findings offer strong support to the notion of a secondary products revolution48,49 in the Eurasian steppe by the Early Bronze Age. This change in subsistence economy, indicated by dietary stable isotopes in human bones as well as by proteomics, was accompanied by the widespread abandonment of Eneolithic riverine settlement sites, the appearance of kurgan cemeteries in the previously unexploited arid plateaus between the river valleys, and the inclusion of wheeled vehicles and occasional horse bones in Yamnaya graves. At the same time, the steppe Yamnaya population expanded westward into Europe and eastward to the Altai Mountains (a range of 6,000 km)1,3,50. Although we cannot offer direct insight into the question of horse riding or traction on the basis of our data, evidence for milked horses certainly makes horse domestication more likely, and may indicate that horses had a role in the spread of Yamnaya groups. The triad of animal traction, dairying and horse domestication appears to have had an instrumental role in transforming Pontic–Caspian economies and opening up the broader steppe to human habitation by the Early Bronze Age. If some or even all of these elements were present before the Bronze Age, it is only from this latter period that we witness their intensive and sustained exploitation amongst numerous groups. Although other factors will no doubt also have been important, the emergence of more mobile, pastoralist societies adapted to survival on the cold and arid steppe—where horses may have opened up snow-covered pasturage for other animals18, and milk would have provided a sustained source of protein, nutrients and fluids—was undoubtedly critical to the expansion of Bronze Age pastoralists such the Yamnaya groups.


No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized, and investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.

Protein extraction and data analysis methods

Sample collection

Dental calculus was collected at the Department of Archaeology at Samara State University and the Museum at the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology at the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Calculus was collected in sterile tubes and hand-carried to the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (MPI-SHH) in Jena. Calculus from the Botai site was sampled at the site; it was collected in sterile tubes and shipped to MPI-SHH. Each calculus sample was removed using a clean dental scaler, and implements were cleaned with alcohol swabs between the sampling of different individuals. Contamination from modern human keratin and environmental collagen that may have occurred owing to previous sampling for ancient DNA or stable isotope analysis was reduced through the use of nitrile gloves during collection, and samples were taken directly from the teeth into clean, 2-ml Eppendorf tubes, in which they were stored until protein extraction in the Palaeoproteomics Laboratory at the MPI-SHH.

Protein extraction

For samples with a ‘Z’ designation, proteins were extracted using a modified low-volume filter-aided sample preparation that has previously been described35. To decrease contamination, 1 ml of 0.5 M EDTA was then added to each sample tube, samples were rotated for 5 min followed by centrifugation at 20,000 rcf for 10 min to remove the any contamination on the outer layer of calculus; the supernatant was then removed and retained. Then, 1 ml of 0.5 M EDTA was added to each decontaminated sample, and the sample was allowed to decalcify on a rotator for 5–7 days at room temperature until completion. After demineralization, samples were centrifuged at top speed (20,000 rcf) for 5 min. Eight hundred μl of EDTA supernatant was removed and stored for future analysis. Separately, 50 μl of urea solution (8 M) was added to a 30-kDa Millipore Microcon filter unit. Samples were denatured, reduced and alkylated with 30 μl of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-lysis buffer (4% w/v SDS, 100 mM Tris/HCL pH 8.2 and 0.1 M DTT), incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, and 100 μl of iodoacetamide (IAA) solution (0.5 M IAA and 8 M UA) was added to the filter units and was mixed at 600 rpm for 1 min in the dark. Following incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 14,000g for 10 min. Two hundred μl of UA (8 M) was added to the filter unit, followed by the lysed sample supernatant and units centrifuged for 20 min at 14,000g. UA was used twice to remove the IAA and followed by centrifugation for 12–15 min at top speed. One hundred μl of 0.5 M NaCl was added to each filter unit, spun for 12 min at 14,000g. This step was repeated and the flowthrough discarded. The filter units were transferred to new units, and 120 μl of trypsin solution (3 μl of 0.4 μg μl−1 trypsin in 117 μl of 0.05 M triethylammoniumbicarbonate) was added to each unit. Units were thermomixed at 600 rpm for 1 min and then incubated overnight at 37 °C. Following digestion, samples centrifuged for 20 min at 14,000g and acidified with 5% TFA to a pH of <2.

Stage tips (Thermo Scientific StageTips 200 μl C18 tips) were cleaned with 100% methanol, followed by 60% acetonitrile (ACN) solution (60% ACN, 0.1% TFA and 39.9% ddH2O). Then, each was equilibrated with 2 washes of 150 μl of 3% ACN solution (3% ACN, 0.1% TFA and 96.9% ddH2O). Samples were then loaded onto the tips and twice washed with 3% ACN and 0.1% TFA and the flowthrough discarded. Peptides were collected in new tubes from the stage tip with 150 μl 60% ACN solution and each was dried in an evaporator and stored at −80 °C until liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis.

Samples with a ‘DA’ were extracted using a single pot, solid phase enhanced sample preparation (SP3) modified for archaeological dental calculus samples. One millilitre of 0.5 M EDTA was added to each sample, and samples were then placed on a rotator for 5 min and centrifuged at top speed (20,000 rcf) for 10 min. The entire supernatant was removed and retained, and an additional 500 μl of 0.5 M EDTA for demineralization was added and samples were placed back onto the rotator for 5–7 days.

Following demineralization, samples were centrifuged at 20,000 rcf for 10 min, and 400 μl of the supernatant was removed and retained. To increase denaturation, reduce and alkylate, 200 μl of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride and 30 μl of 40 mM CAA, 100 mM TCEP were added to the pellet and remaining supernatant and mixed through resuspension. Samples were then placed on a heating block (Cell Media, Thermoshaker Pro) and heated to 99 °C for 10 min. Upon removing samples from heat, 20 μl of a 20 μg μl−1 50/50 mixture of hydrophilic and hydrophobic SeraMag SpeedBeads was added to each sample, and to increase protein–bead adhesion, 350 μl of 100% ethanol was then added to each tube. Samples were then placed on the ThermoMixer for 5 min at 1,000 rpm at 24 °C. Upon removal from the ThermoMixer, tubes were placed on a magnetic rack, which moved the beads to the wall side of the tube. With the proteins now adhering to the beads, the entire supernatant was removed and retained for possible later analysis. To remove any non-proteinaceous materials, 3 washes of 200 μl 80% ethanol were carried out. Once the beads were thoroughly washed, 100 μl of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to each tube, as well as 0.2 μg of trypsin. Samples were then placed on the ThermoMixer at 37 °C at 750 rpm. After 10 min, samples were resuspended and left on the ThermoMixer overnight (18 h) for protein digestion. Following digestion, sample tubes were centrifuged at 20,000 rcf for 1 min, and then placed back onto the magnetic rack. The entire supernatant was removed and transferred to a clean tube. Each sample was then acidified with 5% TFA to reduce the pH to <2. Acidified sample tubes were again centrifuged at top speed for five minutes to push any remaining non-proteinaceous materials into a pellet and improve stage tip clean up. Stage tips were prepared with 150 μl MeOH, and centrifuged at 2,000 rcf, followed by 60% ACN, 0.1% TFA and another round of centrifugation. To equilibrate the stage tips, we added 150 μl 3% ACN, 0.1% TFA, followed by another centrifugation step, and these steps were then repeated. Samples were added to each stage tip, and centrifuged for 3 min at 2000 rcf, or until the entire sample had passed the stage tip. This was followed by an additional 2 rinse steps with 3% ACN, 0.1% TFA. Samples were not eluted at the MPI-SHH, but retained on stage tips in the −20°C freezer until shipment to the Functional Genomics Center Zürich at the University of Zürich. A full detailed protocol is available at (

High performance LC–MS/MS analysis

The samples were sent on stage tips to the Functional Genomics Center. There, the peptides were eluted from the stage tips and dried. After resolubilization in 10 μl of 3% ACN, 0.1% formic acid, the peptide level was normalized using the DeNovix DS-11 Series Spectrophotometer.

LC–MS/MS analysis

For samples with a laboratory identifier that starts with Z (Supplementary Table 3), mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a Digital PicoView source (New Objective) and coupled to a M-Class UPLC (Waters). Solvent composition at the two channels was 0.1% formic acid for channel A and 0.1% formic acid, 99.9% ACN for channel B. Column temperature was 50 °C. For each sample, 4 μl of peptides were loaded on a commercial ACQUITY UPLC M-Class Symmetry C18 Trap column (100 Å, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm, Waters) followed by ACQUITY UPLC M-Class HSS T3 column (100 Å, 1.8 μm, 75 μm × 250 mm, Waters). The peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1 by a gradient from 5 to 40% B in 62 min. Column was cleaned after the run by increasing to 98% B and holding 98% B for 5 min before re-establishing the loading condition. Samples were acquired in a given order.

The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, acquiring full-scan mass spectra (350−1,500 m/z) at a resolution of 120,000 at 200 m/z after accumulation to a target value of 3,000,000, and a maximum injection time of 50 ms, followed by higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD) fragmentation on the six most intense signals per cycle. HCD spectra were acquired at a resolution of 120,000 using a normalized collision energy of 28 and a maximum injection time of 247 ms. The automatic gain control was set to 100,000 ions. Charge state screening was enabled. Singly, unassigned and charge states higher than six were rejected. Only precursors with intensity above 18,000 were selected for MS/MS. Precursor masses previously selected for MS/MS measurement were excluded from further selection for 30 s, and the exclusion window was set at 10 ppm. The samples were acquired using internal lock mass calibration on m/z 371.1012 and 445.1200.

For samples with laboratory identifiers starting with DA (Supplementary Table 3), mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a Digital PicoView source (New Objective) and coupled to a nanoAcquity UPLC (Waters). Solvent composition at the two channels was 0.1% formic acid for channel A and 0.1% formic acid, 99.9% ACN for channel B. Column temperature was 50 °C. For each sample, 4 μl of peptides were loaded on a commercial ACQUITY UPLC M-Class Symmetry C18 Trap column (100 Å, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm, Waters) followed by ACQUITY UPLC M-Class HSS T3 column (100 Å, 1.8 μm, 75 μm × 250 mm, Waters). The peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1 by a gradient from 8 to 22% B in 49 min and to 32% B in additional 11 min. Column was cleaned after the run by increasing to 95% B and holding 95% B for 5 min before re-establishing the loading condition. Samples were acquired in a given order.

The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, acquiring a full-scan mass spectra (300−1,700 m/z) at a resolution of 70,000 at 200 m/z after accumulation to a target value of 3,000,000, and a maximum injection time of 110 ms followed by HCD fragmentation on the 12 most intense signals per cycle. HCD spectra were acquired at a resolution of 35,000 using a normalized collision energy of 25 and a maximum injection time of 110 ms. The automatic gain control was set to 50,000 ions. Charge state screening was enabled. Singly, unassigned and charge states higher than seven were rejected. Only precursors with intensity above 9,100 were selected for MS/MS. Precursor masses previously selected for MS/MS measurement were excluded from further selection for 30 s, and the exclusion window was set at 10 ppm. The samples were acquired using internal lock mass calibration on m/z 371.1012 and 445.1200.

As all samples in our study were digested with trypsin, peptides had either an arginine or lysine at the C terminus. This resulted in the C-terminal fragments remaining charged, and therefore identified at a higher intensity than b-ions (Extended Data Fig. 1). The mass spectrometry proteomics data were handled using the local laboratory information management system51 and all relevant data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE ( partner repository.

Data analysis

To account for as much variation of milk-associated proteins as possible during MS/MS ion searches, a supplementary database of milk protein sequences that had not been reviewed was curated from UniProtKB in addition to those from ancient horses, as previously generated19. As a previous publication19, peak lists were generated from raw files by selecting the top 100 peaks using MSConvert from the ProteoWizard software package version 3.0.1178152. Sample analysis results were searched using Mascot53 (version 2.6.0) against the Swiss-Prot database in combination with a curated milk protein database19. Results were exported from Mascot as .csv files, and further processed through an internally created tool, MS-MARGE19,54, to estimate the validity of peptide identifications and summarize the findings. False-discovery rates at both the peptide spectral match and protein level were calculated using MS-MARGE by counting the number of decoy hits after filtering for e-value and minimum peptide support, then dividing this value by the number of target hits minus the number of decoys. The resulting value is multiplied by 100 to provide an estimate of the false-discovery rate. For each individual sample, we aimed for a protein false-discovery rate of under 5% and a peptide false-discovery rate of under 2% (Supplementary Table 4). A minimum of two individual peptide spectral matches were required for each specific protein identification, and only peptide spectral matches with an e value of below 0.01 were accepted. After filtering criteria were applied, we observed a range of variation in the numbers of proteins identified, with samples ranging from 25 to 196 confidently identified protein families.

Sequence similarities between casein and Jeotgalicoccus

During necessary BLAST searches to authenticate the taxonomic specificity of ruminant α-S1 casein peptides, we found identical sequence matches to theoretical proteins for the numerous bacterial firmicute species from the genus Jeotgalicoccus (NCBI reference sequence: WP_188349304.1). Upon further investigation, the full amino acid sequence for these hypothetical bacterial proteins is almost identical to ruminant casein sequences, which is probably due to laboratory contamination during the genomic sequencing. As its listing in the NCBI database is not associated with a publication, we assume this is probably contamination. Supplementary Figure 2 shows the alignment comparing the α-S1 casein sequence for Bos taurus, Bos grunniens, Bubalus bubalis and Jeotgalicoccus species.

Proteome preservation assessment with the Oral Signature Screening Database

To confirm the preservation of the calculus from individuals included in this study, the metaproteome from each sample was examined for a combination of specific protein types. Following a previous publication6 we compared the data from each sample against the Oral Signature Screening Database (OSSD) to determine the number of common laboratory contaminants, contaminants introduced during handling and curation, regularly recovered human immune proteins found in the oral cavity, and bacterial proteins common to the human oral microbiome. Supplementary Table 3 contains the overall count of OSSD proteins pulled from our filtered results, as well as the result of the oral microbiome protein identifiers + human immune proteins divided by the total number of OSSD proteins multiplied by 100 to find the ‘authenticity’ of oral signature proteins in comparison to the total proteins recovered. To determine who among the individuals passed our screening, we applied a different threshold to each time period. For the Early and Middle Bronze Age, we applied a previously published standard37, and for the Eneolithic period samples we lowered the standard to 40% to take into account increased protein degradation over time. Individuals who had calculus that fell below the authenticity threshold were excluded from the study, but remain listed on the preservation table. Sample authenticity is further supported by an absence of dietary proteins in all positive (archaeological sheep bone with known proteome) and negative controls (extraction blank), as well as the fact that none of the control samples showed any evidence of a typical oral protein signature. Protein preservation varies greatly between different environments and can even differ between individuals at the same site37,55, and this assessment should be conducted on a project-by-project basis.

Bayesian estimates of dietary contributions from freshwater protein and radiocarbon calibration adjusted for freshwater dietary radiocarbon reservoir effects for Eneolithic individuals

Chronologies based on human radiocarbon dates require estimates of individual aquatic dietary intakes, as well as estimates of aquatic radiocarbon reservoir effects of consumed aquatic protein56,57. For the latter, we considered a wide potential variability of between 0 and 1,000 years, which covers previously reported archaeological measurements of coeval terrestrial and aquatic samples and the majority of measurements made on modern freshwater species from our study region58. To estimate the dietary contributions from aquatic protein we used the Bayesian mixing model ReSources developed within the Pandora & IsoMemo initiatives ( ReSources is a R-based model that follows a similar implementation to the Bayesian mixing model FRUITS59. We defined a two-end member model (terrestrial versus freshwater animal protein) with stable nitrogen reference values for these (δ15Nterrestrial = 7.1 ± 2‰, δ15Nfreshwater = 10.6 ± 1‰) calculated following a literature review of previously reported values for bone collagen extracted from terrestrial and freshwater animal species within the study region26,60. As with previous similar models, protein reference values are corrected for offsets between bone collagen and edible meat, and the implemented model also included a dietary to consumer isotopic offset56,57. For each human bone collagen δ15N value, ReSources provided an estimate (expressed as a mean and s.d.) of the dietary intake of freshwater protein. This estimate was included within the Bayesian chronological model OxCal v.4.4 to express the degree of mixing between the terrestrial radiocarbon calibration curve IntCal20 and a freshwater radiocarbon curve61,62. The latter was defined from IntCal20 by adding a uniform prior of between 0 and 1,000 years. Calibrated radiocarbon dates for each individual are expressed as 95% credible intervals. An example of the OxCal code is given below.





Delta_R(“LocalFRE”, U(0,1000));

Mix_Curves(“Date1”, “IntCal20”,”LocalFRE”, 63,26);

R_Date(“OxA-35976”, 5965, 20);

Mix_Curves(“Date2”, “IntCal20”,”LocalFRE”, 36,22);

R_Date(“OxA-37350”, 4390, 20);


Radiocarbon sample preparation methods

Bone sample preparation methods for radiocarbon data followed previously described methods63. In brief, the outer bone surfaces were removed manually and all samples were soaked in successive washes of methanol, acetone and dichloromethane for 30 min each at room temperature to remove adhesives and consolidants, and rinsed in >18.2 MΩ cm−1 water. Bones were demineralized in 0.5 N HCl for 24-36 h at 5 °C, and then gelatinized in 0.01 N HCl for 12 h at 60 °C. On the basis of crude gelatin yield and quality, the gelatin was either ultrafiltered (30-kDa MWCO), or hydrolysed for XAD purification. Resulting material was then combusted under vacuum in sealed quartz tubes with CuO and Ag wire, and the resulting CO2 was converted to graphite using H2 reduction over an iron catalyst. Radiocarbon content was measured on a 500-kV NEC 1.5SDH-1 compact accelerator, and conventional ages were calculated by normalizing to OXII oxalic acid standards and correcting for fractionation using the δ13C ratio measure on the AMS64.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.

Data availability

All raw, peak and result protein data have been uploaded to ProteomExchange ( Files are available under the project accession: PXD022300, and the project DOI is S.W. can also be contacted at


  1. 1.

    Haak, W. et al. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522, 207–211 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mathieson, I. et al. Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians. Nature 528, 499–503 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jeong, C. et al. A dynamic 6,000-year genetic history of Eurasia’s eastern steppe. Cell 183, 890–904 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Anthony, D. W. & Ringe, D. The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archaeological perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1, 199–219 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anthony, D. W. & Brown, D. R. The secondary products revolution, horse-riding, and mounted warfare. J. World Prehist. 24, 131 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Anthony, D. W. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language (Princeton Univ. Press, 2007).

  7. 7.

    Anthony, D. W. et al. The Eneolithic cemetery at Khvalynsk on the Volga River. Praehistorische Zeitschrift (in the press).

  8. 8.

    Wang, C.-C. et al. Ancient human genome-wide data from a 3000-year interval in the Caucasus corresponds with eco-geographic regions. Nat. Commun. 10, 590 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Allentoft, M. E. et al. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522, 167–172 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Reinhold, S. et al. in Appropriating Innovations: Entangled Knowledge in Eurasia 5000–1500BCE (eds Stockhammer, P. & Maran, J.) 78–97 (Oxbow Books, 2017).

  11. 11.

    Rassamakin, Y. in Late Prehistoric Exploration of the Eurasian Steppe (eds Levine, M. et al.) 59–182 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 1999).

  12. 12.

    Levine, M. A. Botai and the origins of horse domestication. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 18, 29–78 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Outram, A. K. et al. The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323, 1332–1335 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Outram, A. K. et al. Patterns of pastoralism in later Bronze Age Kazakhstan: new evidence from faunal and lipid residue analyses. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 2424–2435 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gaunitz, C. et al. Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses. Science 360, 111–114 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kohl, P. L. The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  17. 17.

    de Barros Damgaard, P. et al. The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 360, eaar7711 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Taylor, W. T. T. et al. Early pastoral economies and herding transitions in eastern Eurasia. Sci. Rep. 10, 1001 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wilkin, S. et al. Dairy pastoralism sustained Eastern Eurasian steppe populations for 5000 years. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 346–355 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Frachetti, M. & Benecke, N. From sheep to (some) horses: 4500 years of herd structure at the pastoralist settlement of Begash (south-eastern Kazakhstan). Antiquity 83, 1023–1037 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schulting, R. J. & Richards, M. P. in A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project (eds Anthony, D. W. et al.) 127–148 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA, 2016).

  22. 22.

    Ventresca Miller, A. R. & Makarewicz, C. A. Intensification in pastoralist cereal use coincides with the expansion of trans-regional networks in the Eurasian Steppe. Sci. Rep. 9, 8363 (2019).

  23. 23.

    Gimbutas, M. The Kurgan Culture and the Indo-Europeanization of Europe: Selected Articles from 1952 to 1993 (Study of Man, 1997).

  24. 24.

    Gimbutas, M. in The Indo-Europeans in the Fourth and Third Millennium (ed. Polomé, E. C.) 1–60 (Karoma, 1982).

  25. 25.

    Mallory, J. P. In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth (Thames and Hudson, 1989).

  26. 26.

    Wang, C. C. et al. Ancient human genome-wide data from a 3000-year interval in the Caucasus corresponds with eco-geographic regions. Nat. Commun. 10, 590 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shishlina, N. I. et al. Paleoecology, subsistence, and 14C chronology of the Eurasian Caspian steppe Bronze Age. Radiocarbon 51, 481–499 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gerling, C. Prehistoric Mobility and Diet in the West Eurasian Steppes 3500 to 300 BC: An Isotopic Approach (Walter de Gruyter, 2015).

  29. 29.

    Anthony, D. W. et al. (eds). A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA, 2016).

  30. 30.

    Kuznetsov, P. F. & Mochalov, O. D. in A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project (eds Anthony, D. W. et al.) 71–90 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA, 2016).

  31. 31.

    Hanks, B. K., Epimakhov, A. V. & Renfrew, A. C. Towards a refined chronology for the Bronze Age of the southern Urals, Russia. Antiquity 81, 353–367 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kosintsev, P. A. in Horses and Humans: The Evolution of Human–Equine Relationships (eds. Olsen, S. L. et al.) 127–135 (BAR, 2006).

  33. 33.

    Hanks, B. et al. Bronze Age diet and economy: new stable isotope data from the Central Eurasian steppes (2100–1700 BC). J. Archaeolog. Sci. 97, 14–25 (2018).

  34. 34.

    Hendy, J. et al. Ancient proteins from ceramic vessels at Çatalhöyük West reveal the hidden cuisine of early farmers. Nat. Commun. 9, 4064 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jeong, C. et al. Bronze Age population dynamics and the rise of dairy pastoralism on the eastern Eurasian steppe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11248–E11255 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Charlton, S. et al. New insights into Neolithic milk consumption through proteomic analysis of dental calculus. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 11, 6183–6196 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bleasdale, M. et al. Ancient proteins provide evidence of dairy consumption in eastern Africa. Nat. Commun. 12, 632 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ramsøe, A. et al. Assessing the degradation of ancient milk proteins through site-specific deamidation patterns. Sci. Rep. 11, 7795 (2021).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Salque, M. et al. Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe. Nature 493, 522–525 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Knipper, C. et al. Diet and subsistence in Bronze Age pastoral communities from the southern Russian steppes and the North Caucasus. PLoS ONE 15, e0239861 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Frachetti, M. D. Multiregional emergence of mobile pastoralism and nonuniform institutional complexity across Eurasia. Curr. Anthropol. 53, 2–38 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bendrey, R. Some like it hot: environmental determinism and the pastoral economies of the later prehistoric Eurasian steppe. Pastoralism: Research, Policy Pract. 1, 8 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Burger, J. et al. Low prevalence of lactase persistence in Bronze Age Europe indicates ongoing strong selection over the last 3,000 years. Curr. Biol. 30, 4307–4315.e13 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Didier, J. C. In and Outside the Square: The Sky and the Power of Belief in Ancient China and the World, c. 4500 BC-AD 200 (Sino-Platonic Papers 192) (3 vols) (ed. Mair, V. H.) (2009).

  45. 45.

    Mileto, S., Kaiser, E., Rassamakin, Y. & Evershed, R. P. New insights into the subsistence economy of the Eneolithic Dereivka culture of the Ukrainian North-Pontic region through lipid residues analysis of pottery vessels. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 13, 67–74 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mileto, S., Kaiser, E., Rassamakin, Y., Whelton, H. & Evershed, R. P. Differing modes of animal exploitation in North-Pontic Eneolithic and Bronze Age societies. Sci. Technol. Archaeol. Res. 3, 112–125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chechushkov, I. V. & Epimakhov, A. V. Eurasian steppe chariots and social complexity during the Bronze Age. J. World Prehist. 31, 435–483 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sherratt, A. The secondary exploitation of animals in the Old World. World Archaeol. 15, 90–104 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Greenfield, H. J. The secondary products revolution: the past, the present and the future. World Archaeol. 42, 29–54 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wang, C.-C. et al. Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia. Nature 591, 413–419 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Türker, C. et al. B-Fabric: the Swiss Army Knife for life sciences. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (eds. Manolescu, I. et al.) 717–720 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2010).

  52. 52.

    Chambers, M. C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 918–920 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M. & Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hagan, R. MS-MARGE. Mpi-Shh-mascot report generator, (2018).

  55. 55.

    Bleasdale, M., Boivin, N. & Richter, K. K. Oral signature screening database for palaeoproteomic analyses of dental calculus, (2020).

  56. 56.

    Fernandes, R., Grootes, P., Nadeau, M.-J. & Nehlich, O. Quantitative diet reconstruction of a Neolithic population using a Bayesian mixing model (FRUITS): the case study of Ostorf (Germany). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 158, 325–340 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Fernandes, R. A simple (R) model to predict the source of dietary carbon in individual consumers. Archaeometry 58, 500–512 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Svyatko, S. V., Reimer, P. J. & Schulting, R. Modern freshwater reservoir offsets in the Eurasian steppe: implications for archaeology. Radiocarbon 59, 1597–1607 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fernandes, R., Millard, A. R., Brabec, M., Nadeau, M.-J. & Grootes, P. Food reconstruction using isotopic transferred signals (FRUITS): a Bayesian model for diet reconstruction. PLoS ONE 9, e87436 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Shishlina, N. I., van der Plicht, J. & Turetsky, M. A. The Lebyazhinka burial ground (Middle Volga Region, Russia): new 14C dates and the reservoir effect. Radiocarbon 60, 681–690 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ramsey, C. B. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337–360 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Reimer, P. J. et al. The IntCal20 northern hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62, 725–757 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Narasimhan, V. M. et al. The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia. Science 365, eaat7487 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P. J. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Max Planck Society for providing the funding for this project. D.R. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A.E. was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Federation, grant number 20-18-00402. We thank A. Dittman for insights on protein mass spectra.


Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.

Author information




S.W. and N.B. designed the study; S.W., A. Khokhlov, E.K., V.F.Z., A.K.O., D.R.B., P.K., A. Kitova and A.E. participated in sample collection; S.W. conducted the protein extractions and analysed the data; L.K. and C.F. ran the samples on the LC–MS/MS; D.R., R.F., B.J.C., D.K., A. Khokhlov and E.K. provided radiocarbon dates; S.W. and N.B. wrote the draft with the help of A.V.M., W.T.-T.T., R.S., D.A., E.K. and A. Khokhlov, and with input from all other co-authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shevan Wilkin or Nicole Boivin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks the anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 MS2 spectra for dairy proteins.

a, BLG peptide specific to Ovis or Bovinae for DA420. b, BLG I peptide specific to Equus for DA420. c, Equus BLG I peptide for Z438. d, MS2 spectra for a Capra-specific BLG peptide for Z438. e, α-S1 casein from DA430 specific to Bovinae. f, Second α-S1 casein peptide specific to Bovidae, also from DA430. Horse, goat and cow images are reproduced from ref. 37; sheep silhouette, public domain (

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains supplementary text, supplementary figures s1 – s2 and supplementary references.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table S1

List of all individuals in this study, site names, GPS coordinates.

Supplementary Table S2

Comparison of short and middle chronologies for the Eneolithic to Early Bronze transition in Ukraine and Russia.

Supplementary Table S3

Preservation of individual calculus samples.

Supplementary Table S4

Diary peptides per individual.

Supplementary Table S5

Results for: uncalibrated AMS 14C dates, Bayesian estimates of dietary contributions, and modeled radiocarbon dates.

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilkin, S., Ventresca Miller, A., Fernandes, R. et al. Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions. Nature 598, 629–633 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links