Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Structure of the shutdown state of myosin-2


Myosin-2 is essential for processes as diverse as cell division and muscle contraction. Dephosphorylation of its regulatory light chain promotes an inactive, ‘shutdown’ state with the filament-forming tail folded onto the two heads1, which prevents filament formation and inactivates the motors2. The mechanism by which this happens is unclear. Here we report a cryo-electron microscopy structure of shutdown smooth muscle myosin with a resolution of 6 Å in the head region. A pseudo-atomic model, obtained by flexible fitting of crystal structures into the density and molecular dynamics simulations, describes interaction interfaces at the atomic level. The N-terminal extension of one regulatory light chain interacts with the tail, and the other with the partner head, revealing how the regulatory light chains stabilize the shutdown state in different ways and how their phosphorylation would allow myosin activation. Additional interactions between the three segments of the coiled coil, the motor domains and the light chains stabilize the shutdown molecule. The structure of the lever in each head is competent to generate force upon activation. This shutdown structure is relevant to all isoforms of myosin-2 and provides a framework for understanding their disease-causing mutations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Structure of the heads region of shutdown SmM and contributions of the RLCs to the shutdown state.
Fig. 2: Interactions of tail segment 2 with the blocked head.
Fig. 3: The levers of free and blocked heads and the head–tail junction.
Fig. 4: Interactions of segments 1 and 3 with blocked- and free-head motors.
Fig. 5: Cryo-EM density map and pseudo-atomic model of whole SmM molecule.

Data availability

The electron density maps for the SmM shutdown heads region and whole molecule have been deposited into EMDB, with accession codes EMD-11069 and EMD-11070, respectively. The pseudo-atomic model of the SmM shutdown heads region has been deposited in PDB, with accession code 6Z47. The following models were used for comparison purposes in our study: PDB 1I84, PDB 3JBH, PDB 5TBY, cardiac IHM model MS01 ( and cardiac IHM model SD232.


  1. 1.

    Lee, K. H. et al. Interacting-heads motif has been conserved as a mechanism of myosin II inhibition since before the origin of animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1991–E2000 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cross, R. A., Cross, K. E. & Sobieszek, A. ATP-linked monomer–polymer equilibrium of smooth muscle myosin: the free folded monomer traps ADP.Pi. EMBO J. 5, 2637–2641 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McLachlan, A. D. & Karn, J. Periodic charge distributions in the myosin rod amino acid sequence match cross-bridge spacings in muscle. Nature 299, 226–231 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Craig, R., Smith, R. & Kendrick-Jones, J. Light-chain phosphorylation controls the conformation of vertebrate non-muscle and smooth muscle myosin molecules. Nature 302, 436–439 (1983).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ikebe, M., Hartshorne, D. J. & Elzinga, M. Identification, phosphorylation, and dephosphorylation of a second site for myosin light chain kinase on the 20,000-dalton light chain of smooth muscle myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 36–39 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cross, R. A., Jackson, A. P., Citi, S., Kendrick-Jones, J. & Bagshaw, C. R. Active site trapping of nucleotide by smooth and non-muscle myosins. J. Mol. Biol. 203, 173–181 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wendt, T., Taylor, D., Trybus, K. M. & Taylor, K. Three-dimensional image reconstruction of dephosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin reveals asymmetry in the interaction between myosin heads and placement of subfragment 2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4361–4366 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Burgess, S. A. et al. Structures of smooth muscle myosin and heavy meromyosin in the folded, shutdown state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 1165–1178 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jung, H. S., Komatsu, S., Ikebe, M. & Craig, R. Head-head and head-tail interaction: a general mechanism for switching off myosin II activity in cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3234–3242 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sellers, J. R. Regulation of cytoplasmic and smooth muscle myosin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3, 98–104 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Woodhead, J. L. et al. Atomic model of a myosin filament in the relaxed state. Nature 436, 1195–1199 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Naber, N., Cooke, R. & Pate, E. Slow myosin ATP turnover in the super-relaxed state in tarantula muscle. J. Mol. Biol. 411, 943–950 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Stewart, M. A., Franks-Skiba, K., Chen, S. & Cooke, R. Myosin ATP turnover rate is a mechanism involved in thermogenesis in resting skeletal muscle fibers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 430–435 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Alamo, L. et al. Effects of myosin variants on interacting-heads motif explain distinct hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy phenotypes. eLife 6, e24634 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nag, S. et al. The myosin mesa and the basis of hypercontractility caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 525–533 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liu, J., Wendt, T., Taylor, D. & Taylor, K. Refined model of the 10S conformation of smooth muscle myosin by cryo-electron microscopy 3D image reconstruction. J. Mol. Biol. 329, 963–972 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jung, H. S. et al. Role of the tail in the regulated state of myosin 2. J. Mol. Biol. 408, 863–878 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ikebe, M. et al. Function of the NH2-terminal domain of the regulatory light chain on the regulation of smooth muscle myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28173–28180 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kast, D., Espinoza-Fonseca, L. M., Yi, C. & Thomas, D. D. Phosphorylation-induced structural changes in smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8207–8212 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Persechini, A. & Hartshorne, D. J. Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin: evidence for cooperativity between the myosin heads. Science 213, 1383–1385 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Persechini, A. & Hartshorne, D. J. Ordered phosphorylation of the two 20 000 molecular weight light chains of smooth muscle myosin. Biochemistry 22, 470–476 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ikebe, M., Ogihara, S. & Tonomura, Y. Nonlinear dependence of actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity on the extent of phosphorylation of gizzard myosin and H-meromyosin. J. Biochem. 91, 1809–1812 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Collins, J. H. Myoinformatics report: myosin regulatory light chain paralogs in the human genome. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 27, 69–74 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kamm, K. E. & Stull, J. T. Signaling to myosin regulatory light chain in sarcomeres. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 9941–9947 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bury, L. et al. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of MYH9-RD: predicting pathogenic variants. Hum. Mutat. 41, 277–290 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Harakalova, M. et al. Incomplete segregation of MYH11 variants with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections and patent ductus arteriosus. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 487–493 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kanematsu, T. et al. A case of MYH9 disorders caused by a novel mutation (p.K74E). Ann. Hematol. 95, 161–163 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zaninetti, C. et al. MYH9-related thrombocytopenia: four novel variants affecting the tail domain of the non-muscle myosin heavy chain IIA associated with a mild clinical evolution of the disorder. Hamostaseologie 39, 87–94 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang, S. et al. The central role of the tail in switching off 10S myosin II activity. J. Gen. Physiol. 151, 1081–1093 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yang, Y. et al. Rigor-like structures from muscle myosins reveal key mechanical elements in the transduction pathways of this allosteric motor. Structure 15, 553–564 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alamo, L. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of tarantula myosin filaments suggests how phosphorylation may regulate myosin activity. J. Mol. Biol. 384, 780–797 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Robert-Paganin, J., Auguin, D. & Houdusse, A. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy disease results from disparate impairments of cardiac myosin function and auto-inhibition. Nat. Commun. 9, 4019 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dominguez, R., Freyzon, Y., Trybus, K. M. & Cohen, C. Crystal structure of a vertebrate smooth muscle myosin motor domain and its complex with the essential light chain: visualization of the pre-power stroke state. Cell 94, 559–571 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Burgess, S. et al. The prepower stroke conformation of myosin V. J. Cell Biol. 159, 983–991 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Batchelor, M. et al. Myosin tails and single α-helical domains. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43, 58–63 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wolny, M. et al. Stable single α-helices are constant force springs in proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 27825–27835 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Blankenfeldt, W., Thomä, N. H., Wray, J. S., Gautel, M. & Schlichting, I. Crystal structures of human cardiac β-myosin II S2-Δ provide insight into the functional role of the S2 subfragment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17713–17717 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Behrmann, E. et al. Structure of the rigor actin-tropomyosin-myosin complex. Cell 150, 327–338 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Woodhead, J. L. & Craig, R. The mesa trail and the interacting heads motif of myosin II. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 680, 108228 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Alamo, L. et al. Conserved intramolecular interactions maintain myosin interacting-heads motifs explaining tarantula muscle super-relaxed state structural basis. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1142–1164 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Straussman, R., Squire, J. M., Ben-Ya’acov, A. & Ravid, S. Skip residues and charge interactions in myosin II coiled-coils: implications for molecular packing. J. Mol. Biol. 353, 613–628 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Thompson, R. F., Iadanza, M. G., Hesketh, E. L., Rawson, S. & Ranson, N. A. Collection, pre-processing and on-the-fly analysis of data for high-resolution, single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 14, 100–118 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fernandez-Leiro, R. & Scheres, S. H. W. A pipeline approach to single-particle processing in RELION. Acta Crystallogr. D 73, 496–502 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 218 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Topf, M. et al. Protein structure fitting and refinement guided by cryo-EM density. Structure 16, 295–307 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 54, 5.6.1–5.6.37 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Offer, G., Hicks, M. R. & Woolfson, D. N. Generalized Crick equations for modeling noncanonical coiled coils. J. Struct. Biol. 137, 41–53 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 352–367 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Pintilie, G. D., Zhang, J., Goddard, T. D., Chiu, W. & Gossard, D. C. Quantitative analysis of cryo-EM density map segmentation by watershed and scale-space filtering, and fitting of structures by alignment to regions. J. Struct. Biol. 170, 427–438 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Case, D. A. et al. Amber 2020 (Univ. California, 2020).

  59. 59.

    Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Joosten, R. P., Long, F., Murshudov, G. N. & Perrakis, A. The PDB_REDO server for macromolecular structure model optimization. IUCrJ 1, 213–220 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Olney, J. J., Sellers, J. R. & Cremo, C. R. Structure and function of the 10 S conformation of smooth muscle myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20375–20384 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Brito, R. et al. A molecular model of phosphorylation-based activation and potentiation of tarantula muscle thick filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 414, 44–61 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank staff at the Astbury Biostructure Laboratory for their support, namely R. Thompson for advice regarding cryo-EM grid preparation and D. Maskell for image acquisition; and members of the CryoEM community at Leeds for their help and guidance, particularly M. Byrne for advice on structure validation. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (grant numbers MR/S023593/1 to M.P. and MR/R009406/1 to M.P. and N.A.R.) and by the Wellcome Trust (WT 094231/Z/10/Z to P.J.K., M.P. and N.A.R.). The FEI Titan Krios microscopes were funded by the University of Leeds (UoL ABSL award) and Wellcome Trust (108466/Z/15/Z).

Author information




M.P. and N.A.R. designed the project. J.M.C. purified smooth muscle myosin. C.A.S., D.C.-M. and M.P. performed cryo-EM grid screening and optimization. C.A.S. and D.C.-M. prepared cryo-EM grids for data collection and recorded data. C.A.S., G.C. and D.C.-M. analysed and processed the data. G.C., D.C.-M. and C.A.S. built the model. G.C. performed molecular dynamic simulations. C.A.S., G.C., D.C.-M., M.P. and P.J.K. interpreted the data and the model. M.P. managed the project. M.P., P.J.K. and C.A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Peckham.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Gregory M. Alushin and Robert Cross for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Micrograph, 2-D classification, angular distribution and resolution parameters.

a, Representative micrograph of shutdown SmM molecules from 28,817 micrographs. Scale bar 50 nm. b, Representative 2D classes (representing approximately 25% of particles that contributed to the final reconstruction). Scale bar 10 nm. c, Local resolution of SmM shutdown heads region cryo-EM map. d, FSC curve of the heads region reconstruction, illustrating 6.3 Å resolution at 0.143 FSC. e, Angular distribution of particles in the heads region 3D reconstruction. f, FSC curve of the whole molecule reconstruction. g, Angular distribution of particles contributing to the whole molecule 3D reconstruction.

Extended data Fig. 2 Interaction of segment 3 with blocked-head RLC and analysis of RLC photo-crosslink.

a, Segmented map highlighting latch and mortar regions (boxed), which are shown in more detail in panels b and c respectively. The position of phosphorylated serine (S20) in the latch (b) and in the mortar (c) are shown. This illustrates how phosphorylation would disrupt latch-segment 3 and mortar-RLC interactions respectively. d, Segmented map showing region of interest for panels e-g. e, ionic interactions between segment 3 and blocked-head RLC inter-lobe linker and blocked-head heavy chain. f, Hydrophobic interface where segment 3 crosses the blocked head RLC. g, Same view as e and f showing photo-crosslinker benzophenone-4-acetamide attached to C109 of blocked-head RLC and in close proximity to the aliphatic side chain of K1579 of segment 3 chain H. K1579 lies within crosslinked peptide L1554-E158361. h, Segmented map (face view) to show the location (boxed) of i, which shows an alternative view of photo-crosslinker interaction and the ionic interaction between blocked head RLC E112 and segment 3 R1584. For clarity the non-involved chain of the coiled coil has been omitted in the close-up panels.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Annotated sequence alignment of heavy chains of human non-muscle myosin 2A (NM2A) and smooth muscle myosin (SmM) with Turkey SmM, showing sites of mutation.

HsNM2A: Homo sapiens MYH9; MgSmM: Meleagris gallopavo MYH11; HsSmM: Homo sapiens MYH11. Boxes delimit structural features. Grey background identifies residues in the d position of the coiled coil heptad repeat. Skip residues and bend positions are highlighted. Arrowheads and magenta letters denote known sites of mutation, obtained from the Human Genome Mutation Database (HGMD), Variant of unknown significance: retrieved from the Leiden mutation database.

Extended data Fig. 4 Comparisons of IHM pseudo-atomic models, free- and blocked-heads and the SAH-domain character of start of segment 1.

a-f, Comparison of pseudo-atomic models of the IHM with LCs omitted to allow comparison of LCD heavy-chain structure. a, Pseudo-atomic model of SmM from the present study. b, Model (PDB id 1I84) produced from SmM heavy meromyosin IHM 2D crystal 20Å map7; tentative assignment of tail omitted. c, Model (PDB id 3JBH) produced from IHM of tarantula thick filament 20Å map40, fitted with tarantula sequence. d, Model (PDB id 5TBY) proposed for human cardiac IHM by homology modelling the cardiac amino acid sequences on the tarantula model14. e, Model (downloaded from Spudich lab website as MS01.pdb) of human cardiac myosin IHM (produced by use of homology models fitted to tarantula IHM model 3DTP15). f, Model (downloaded as Supplementary Data 2) for cardiac IHM produced by use of a cardiac motor domain-ELC crystal structure (5N69) and homology model of RLC fitted into the tarantula thick filament IHM 20Å map31. g, Superposition of free- and blocked-head motors (up until pliant region) showing how the LCD regions differ between the heads (without light chains shown), segmented maps and model for motor domains shown. h, Blocked-head motor, model in map, i morph between blocked-head and free-head model and maps (shown without light chains), j Free-head model in map. Map contour level 0.28 (Supplementary Video 3). k, SmM heavy-chain sequence at the start of the predicted coiled coil. Coiled-coil seam a and d residues marked by grey stripes; acidic residues red, basic residues blue. l, Heptad net projection of sequence35 in which the dashed line shows the path of the polypeptide backbone as α-helix, circles and squares indicate the a and d positions of the heptad repeat and every seventh residue is repeated (in brackets) to allow all ionic interactions to be mapped.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Interaction between loop 2 (blocked-head motor) and segment 1, the motor-motor interface of the IHM and fit of the SmM IHM structure into filament cryo-EM density maps for tarantula and cardiac myosin filaments.

a-b, EM density map reveals an interaction interface between segment 1 and density attributable to the blocked-head motor loop 2 (dashed line). E913 in segment 1 is highlighted for reference. Map contour level 0.17. c. Overall model to show region of interest, the motor-motor interface (boxed). d, Ionic interactions across this interface, involving Helix N and HCM loop of the blocked-head motor with 3 successive residues (168-170) close to Helix E in the free-head motor (Supplementary Video 5). e, The same region of interest from a recent cardiac IHM pseudo-atomic model15. f, Superimposition of the motor domains for our structure, and for the cardiac IHM pseudo-atomic model15 aligned on the free-head (red/pink) with view as in d. The blocked head of the cardiac IHM (cyan) is rotated counter-clockwise compared to that for SmM (blue) g, h, Fit of the paired heads of the pseudo-atomic model of shutdown SmM into the IHM motifs of reconstructions of thick filaments, using Chimera. The filament axis is vertical and the filament tip is at the top of the page. g, The fit to 20 Å map of tarantula thick filaments (EMD-195062, contour level 28.6). h. The fit to 28 Å map of cardiac thick filaments (EMD-224014, contour level 0.14).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Flexibility of SmM tail ribbon.

a, Representative class averages showing flexibility of the tail of myosin molecules (Supplementary Video 7), after alignment of the heads. Numbers at lower left indicate the chord angle of the tail at a position 29.7 nm along the tail from its emergence point from the head (taken to be the fulcrum). The angle is defined in relation to the path of the tail between bend 2 and the fulcrum, see the cartoon at the right. 4895 face view particles were classified into 50 classes of which 5 are shown to represent the range of motion of the tail. b, Cumulative frequency plot of tail angles for myosin with fitted Gaussian curve, yielding a variance value of 34°. Scale bar in a: 20 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 7

Diagram to show the dynamic relationship of the shutdown state (10S) to the open ‘active’ state (6S) and filament assembly. The shutdown state and filaments can both compete for 6S.

Extended Data Table 1 Putative residues for stabilizing ionic interactions between regions of the myosin molecule
Extended Data Table 2 Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Video 1

: Shutdown state of SMM (a) Cryo-EM density of SmM (grey) shutdown heads region at an average resolution of 6 Å. Segmented map representation showing heavy chain (blue, red), ELC (purple, orange), and RLC (magenta, green) in complex with segments 2 and 3 (light blue, pink) and fitted pseudo-atomic model. (b) Closeup view of blocked-head RLC latch (lilac) with potential interactions with ring of acidic residues (red spheres) in segment-3 and D132 in its own RLC highlighted. (c) Close up view of the free-head RLC mortar (dark green) with potentially interacting acidic residues (red spheres) in both RLCs.

Video 2

: Interactions between Segment-2 and the blocked head motor (a) Segmented map density with fitted quasi-atomic model showing ionic interactions between segment-2 (chain G, light blue) and the blocked head motor (blue). (b) Ionic interactions between segment-2 (chain H, pink) and the blocked head ELC (orange). (c) Ionic interactions between segment-2 (chain H, pink) and segment-3 (chain G, light blue) around bend 2.

Video 3

: Morphing of the free-head motor domain to blocked-head motor domain This shows changes in LCD and converter position (extended fig 4g-j). Motors aligned up until the pliant point (residues 30-787).

Video 4

: Closeup view of the head-tail junction This shows nearly unbroken α-helices (red, blue) between the LCD, ending at P849, and the coiled-coil tail.

Video 5

: Motor-motor domain interactions that stabilise the shutdown state Related to Extended Data Fig. 5.

Video 6

: Whole Molecule SMM 6 Å map fitted to our 9 Å map, which reveals more of the tail domain. Full length model of SmM fitted to 9Å map, with skip residues (yellow) showing the perturbation to the super-helical twist of the coiled coil.

Video 7

: Flexing of whole molecule SMM 2D class averages of the whole molecule SmM arranged to show the range of flexing of the tail in plane. Particles in each class shown bottom left. Scale bar 20 nm.

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scarff, C.A., Carrington, G., Casas-Mao, D. et al. Structure of the shutdown state of myosin-2. Nature 588, 515–520 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links