Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Pairing of segmentation clock genes drives robust pattern formation

Nature volume 589, pages 431–436 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Gene expression is an inherently stochastic process1,2; however, organismal development and homeostasis require cells to coordinate the spatiotemporal expression of large sets of genes. In metazoans, pairs of co-expressed genes often reside in the same chromosomal neighbourhood, with gene pairs representing 10 to 50% of all genes, depending on the species3,4,5,6. Because shared upstream regulators can ensure correlated gene expression, the selective advantage of maintaining adjacent gene pairs remains unknown6. Here, using two linked zebrafish segmentation clock genes, her1 and her7, and combining single-cell transcript counting, genetic engineering, real-time imaging and computational modelling, we show that gene pairing boosts correlated transcription and provides phenotypic robustness for the formation of developmental patterns. Our results demonstrate that the prevention of gene pairing disrupts oscillations and segmentation, and the linkage of her1 and her7 is essential for the development of the body axis in zebrafish embryos. We predict that gene pairing may be similarly advantageous in other organisms, and our findings could lead to the engineering of precise synthetic clocks in embryos and organoids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Negative feedback loop drives correlated transcription.
Fig. 2: Segmentation is robust against perturbations by chromosomal linkage of two clock genes.
Fig. 3: Impaired oscillations of the segmentation clock underlie segmentation defects.

Data availability

Datasets containing RNA counts in each cell for each embryo are provided as Excel files in Supplementary Tables 1–7, 9, 10. Original microscopy image files are provided at the BioStudies (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/) (accession number S-BSST434). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Matlab and Python codes are provided at GitHub (https://github.com/ozbudak/zinani_genepairing).

References

  1. Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D. & van Oudenaarden, A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat. Genet. 31, 69–73 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adachi, N. & Lieber, M. R. Bidirectional gene organization: a common architectural feature of the human genome. Cell 109, 807–809 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, L. & Yu, J. A comparative analysis of divergently-paired genes (DPGs) among Drosophila and vertebrate genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 55 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnone, J. T., Robbins-Pianka, A., Arace, J. R., Kass-Gergi, S. & McAlear, M. A. The adjacent positioning of co-regulated gene pairs is widely conserved across eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 13, 546 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan, C., Wu, S., Pocetti, C. & Bai, L. Regulation of cell-to-cell variability in divergent gene expression. Nat. Commun. 7, 11099 (2016).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubaud, A. & Pourquié, O. Signalling dynamics in vertebrate segmentation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 709–721 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, J. Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: a simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator. Curr. Biol. 13, 1398–1408 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giudicelli, F., Ozbudak, E. M., Wright, G. J. & Lewis, J. Setting the tempo in development: an investigation of the zebrafish somite clock mechanism. PLoS Biol. 5, e150 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harima, Y., Takashima, Y., Ueda, Y., Ohtsuka, T. & Kageyama, R. Accelerating the tempo of the segmentation clock by reducing the number of introns in the Hes7 gene. Cell Rep. 3, 1–7 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ay, A., Knierer, S., Sperlea, A., Holland, J. & Özbudak, E. M. Short-lived Her proteins drive robust synchronized oscillations in the zebrafish segmentation clock. Development 140, 3244–3253 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schröter, C. et al. Topology and dynamics of the zebrafish segmentation clock core circuit. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001364 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanisch, A. et al. The elongation rate of RNA polymerase II in zebrafish and its significance in the somite segmentation clock. Development 140, 444–453 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keskin, S. et al. Noise in the vertebrate segmentation clock is boosted by time delays but tamed by Notch signaling. Cell Rep. 23, 2175–2185 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choorapoikayil, S., Willems, B., Ströhle, P. & Gajewski, M. Analysis of her1 and her7 mutants reveals a spatio temporal separation of the somite clock module. PLoS ONE 7, e39073 (2012).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Henry, C. A. et al. Two linked hairy/Enhancer of split-related zebrafish genes, her1 and her7, function together to refine alternating somite boundaries. Development 129, 3693–3704 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lleras Forero, L. et al. Segmentation of the zebrafish axial skeleton relies on notochord sheath cells and not on the segmentation clock. eLife 7, e33843 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Becskei, A., Kaufmann, B. B. & van Oudenaarden, A. Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression. Nat. Genet. 37, 937–944 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y. & Tyagi, S. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e309 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukaya, T., Lim, B. & Levine, M. Enhancer control of transcriptional bursting. Cell 166, 358–368 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schröter, C. et al. Dynamics of zebrafish somitogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 237, 545–553 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawamura, A. et al. Zebrafish hairy/enhancer of split protein links FGF signaling to cyclic gene expression in the periodic segmentation of somites. Genes Dev. 19, 1156–1161 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Novák, B. & Tyson, J. J. Design principles of biochemical oscillators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 981–991 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trofka, A. et al. The Her7 node modulates the network topology of the zebrafish segmentation clock via sequestration of the Hes6 hub. Development 139, 940–947 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Delaune, E. A., François, P., Shih, N. P. & Amacher, S. L. Single-cell-resolution imaging of the impact of Notch signaling and mitosis on segmentation clock dynamics. Dev. Cell 23, 995–1005 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moreno-Mateos, M. A. et al. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR–Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat. Methods 12, 982–988 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jao, L. E., Wente, S. R. & Chen, W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13904–13909 (2013).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooper, M. S. et al. Visualizing morphogenesis in transgenic zebrafish embryos using BODIPY TR methyl ester dye as a vital counterstain for GFP. Dev. Dyn. 232, 359–368 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarkans, U. et al. The BioStudies database-one stop shop for all data supporting a life sciences study. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (D1), D1266–D1270 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riedel-Kruse, I. H., Müller, C. & Oates, A. C. Synchrony dynamics during initiation, failure, and rescue of the segmentation clock. Science 317, 1911–1915 (2007).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gomez, C. et al. Control of segment number in vertebrate embryos. Nature 454, 335–339 (2008).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Soroldoni, D. et al. Genetic oscillations. A Doppler effect in embryonic pattern formation. Science 345, 222–225 (2014).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson, D. F. A modified next reaction method for simulating chemical systems with time dependent propensities and delays. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 214107 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988).

  36. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Keskin, I. Ejikeme, M. Evren, H. Seawall, L. Tweedie, Y. Y. Lee, E. Meyer, M. Kofron, and Cincinnati Children’s Imaging Core and Veterinary Services for technical assistance, M. Simsek, A. Singh, T. Zhang, C. Hong, D. Spinzak and members of Özbudak laboratory for discussions, and B. Gebelein and R. Kopan for editing the manuscript. This work was funded by an NIH grant (GM122956) to E.M.Ö.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Oriana Q. H. Zinani & Ertuğrul M. Özbudak

  2. Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Oriana Q. H. Zinani, Kemal Keseroğlu & Ertuğrul M. Özbudak

  3. Department of Biology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA

    Ahmet Ay

  4. Department of Mathematics, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA

    Ahmet Ay

Authors
  1. Oriana Q. H. Zinani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kemal Keseroğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmet Ay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ertuğrul M. Özbudak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.M.Ö. designed and supervised the project. K.K. performed real-time imaging and O.Q.H.Z. performed all other experiments. A.A. performed simulations. A.A. and O.Q.H.Z. performed statistical analysis. O.Q.H.Z., K.K., A.A. and E.M.Ö. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ertuğrul M. Özbudak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Andrew Oates, Michael Levine and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Single RNA molecules are quantified in single cells in the zebrafish PSM.

a, Top, a single z-section of PSM of a wild-type embryo. her7 mRNAs and nuclei are coloured in red and blue, respectively. Scale bar, 30 μm. n = 24, N = 2. Bottom, the PSM is divided into single-cell-wide slices. Cells containing higher or lower RNA than an arbitrary threshold are plotted as red or grey circles, respectively. Left and right halves of the PSM are located at the top and bottom portions of the image, respectively. Three oscillatory waves of her7 are visible. b, her7 RNA counts are plotted along the posterior-to-anterior direction at the left half of PSM. Each dot corresponds to the average RNA number in a spatial cell population (slice). Data are mean and two s.e.m. c, All embryos are aligned from their posterior ends and slices corresponding to the same anterior-posterior positions are grouped (blue dashed lines). d, The spatial amplitudes of oscillations of total her (her1 + her7) RNA. Data are mean and s.e.m. e, The spatial amplitudes are averaged over all positions in the PSM. Comparison of new wild-type (silver, n = 24, N = 2) data obtained with a Nikon confocal microscope versus previously published data (dark grey, n = 18, N = 4) obtained by a Zeiss Apotome14. The box spans the interquartile range, line labels median, the whiskers extend to maximal and minimal observations. Difference assessed by two-sided independent t-test with Bonferroni correction, her1 P = 0.48; her7 P = 0.106. f, Comparison of histograms of total her RNA obtained by two different microscopes. g, Spatial Spearman correlation scores for wild-type embryos. Thick line denotes the median; thin black lines denote the 25th and 75th percentiles. h, Sequencing showing two base pairs deletion in the her1 coding sequence in her1ci301 her7hu2526 and her1ci302 fish. n is the number of embryos; N is the number of independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Gene pairing boosts correlated transcription.

a, A her1b567/+ her7b567/+ embryo with oscillatory waves of her7 transcription. Scale bar, 30 μm. b, One of the chromosomes has a large deletion including the her1–her7 locus. c, The boundaries of somite segments are marked by xirp2a in situ hybridization staining in sibling wild-type or heterozygous her1b567/+ her7b567/+ (top) and homozygous her1b567her7b567 (bottom) embryos. Scale bar, 100 μm. d, her1b567/+her7b567/+ embryos (n = 24, N = 2) have reduced spatial amplitude from wild-type (n = 14, N = 2) as assessed by two-sided Welch’s t-test with Bonferroni correction for her1 and the independent samples two-sided t-test for her7 (28% her1 amplitude t(13.6) = 2.6, *P = 0.04, 28% her7 amplitude t(18) = 5.3, ***P = 9.800 × 10−5). The box spans the interquartile range, line labels median, the whiskers extend to maximal and minimal observations. e, The histogram of total her (her1+her7) RNA per cell is plotted in wild-type (grey) and her1b567/+her7b567/+ (blue) embryos. her1b567/+her7b567/+embryos have 38% less total her mRNA than wild-type. f, Spatial Spearman correlation scores reflecting correlated expression of her1 and her7 in wild-type (grey) and her1b567/+her7b567/+ (blue) embryos as assessed by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test (U = 392.5, z = −3.0, **P = 0.003). Median is the thick line, and 25% and 75% are thin black lines. g, The nascent transcription loci (dots) are detected in nuclei (blue) of cells located in a stripe-region in the anterior PSM of a her1b567/+her7b567/+ embryo. Scale bar, 5 μm. h, The histogram of the distance between two-closest loci in wild-type embryos. i, The histogram of the distance between two-closest loci in her1b567/+her7b567/+ embryos. n is the number of embryos; N is the number of independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Spatial Pearson correlation scores for all genotypes.

a, Spatial Pearson correlation scores of her1 and her7 in wild-type (dark grey), her1ci301/+her7hu2526/+ (silver), her1ci301her7hu2526 (red) embryos differences are assessed by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction (wild-type, her1ci301/+her7hu2526/+, U = 615, z = −2.3, P = 0.072; wild-type, her1ci301 her7hu2526, U = 576, z = −5.0, ***P = 1.652 × 10−6; her1ci301/+her7hu2526/+, her1ci301her7hu2526, U = 841, z = −1.3, P = 0.546). b, Spatial Pearson correlation scores of her1 and her7 in wild-type (grey) and her1b567/+ her7b567/+ (blue) embryos (U = 410, z = −2.8, **P = 0.005). c, Spatial Pearson correlation scores of her1 and her7 in wild-type embryos raised at 21.5 °C or 28 °C (U = 772, z = −2.23, *P = 0.026). d, Spatial Pearson correlation scores for gene-paired and gene-unpaired embryos raised at 21.5 °C (U = 1039, z = −4.6, ***P = 4.000 × 10−6). a–d, Differences in Pearson correlation scores are assessed by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. Thick line denotes the median; thin black lines denote the 25th and 75th percentiles.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Simulation of alternative scenarios.

a, b, Scenario 2. a, Average transcription firing rates of her1 and her7 were kept constant. But, at each incidence of firing, the firing rate for each gene was separately and randomly chosen from a distribution that has the same average rate. b, Spatial Spearman correlation score of her1 and her7 expression over time (U = 3, z = −6.6, ***P = 3.879 × 10−11). Differences in Spearman correlation scores are assessed by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. c, d, Scenario 3. c Transcription and RNA degradation rates of her7 were set to 50% higher than those of her1 which led to similar average RNA numbers of two genes. d, Spatial Spearman correlation score of her1 and her7 expression over time (U = 0, z = −6.7, ***P = 2.872 × 10−11). Differences in Spearman correlation scores are assessed by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. Thick line denotes the median; thin black lines denote the 25th and 75th percentiles.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 1: Excel file of single molecule FISH (smFISH) data for wild-type embryos. The file includes cell positions, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 24 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 2: Excel file of smFISH data for her1ci301/+ her7 hu2526/+ embryos. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 18 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 3: Excel file of smFISH data for her1ci301 her7 hu2526 embryos. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 28 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 4: Excel file of smFISH data for wild-type sibling of her1b567/+ her7b567/+ embryos. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 14 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 5: Excel file of smFISH data for her1b567/+ her7b567/+ embryos. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 24 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 6: Excel file of smFISH data for wild-type embryos grown at 28 °C. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 23 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 7: Excel file of smFISH data for wild-type embryos grown at 21.5 °C. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 23 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 8: The scores of segmentation defects.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 9: Excel file of smFISH data for gene-paired embryos grown at 21.5 °C. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 27 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 10: Excel file of smFISH data for gene-unpaired embryos grown at 21.5 °C. The file includes cell position, her1 and her7 expression spot count in that cell, cell volume. Each sheet is one embryo, there are 37 sheets in total.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 11: The list of primers and smFISH probes.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 12: The list of molecules simulated in the model.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 13: The list of the reaction rates used in the model. The mRNA degradation rates mdh1 and mdh7 were changed in different model scenarios.

Supplementary Table

Supplementary Table 14: The list of the reactions simulated in the model. The propensity for each reaction is calculated as shown in the last column. For the gene-paired mutant, we changed the first and second reactions to c1->c1+mh1+mh7 and c2->c2, respectively. For model scenario 1, her1/her7 transcription led to one her1 and one her7 mRNA molecules. For scenario 2, her1/her7 transcription led to 1-2 (randomly chosen for each gene in each firing) her1 and her7 mRNA molecules. For scenario 3, her1 and her7 transcription led to 2 and 3 mRNA molecules, respectively.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zinani, O.Q.H., Keseroğlu, K., Ay, A. et al. Pairing of segmentation clock genes drives robust pattern formation. Nature 589, 431–436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03055-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03055-0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing