45.5-tesla direct-current magnetic field generated with a high-temperature superconducting magnet

Abstract

Strong magnetic fields are required in many fields, such as medicine (magnetic resonance imaging), pharmacy (nuclear magnetic resonance), particle accelerators (such as the Large Hadron Collider) and fusion devices (for example, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, ITER), as well as for other diverse scientific and industrial uses. For almost two decades, 45 tesla has been the highest achievable direct-current (d.c.) magnetic field; however, such a field requires the use of a 31-megawatt, 33.6-tesla resistive magnet inside 11.4-tesla low-temperature superconductor coils1, and such high-power resistive magnets are available in only a few facilities worldwide2. By contrast, superconducting magnets are widespread owing to their low power requirements. Here we report a high-temperature superconductor coil that generates a magnetic field of 14.4 tesla inside a 31.1-tesla resistive background magnet to obtain a d.c. magnetic field of 45.5 tesla—the highest field achieved so far, to our knowledge. The magnet uses a conductor tape coated with REBCO (REBa2Cu3Ox, where RE = Y, Gd) on a 30-micrometre-thick substrate3, making the coil highly compact and capable of operating at the very high winding current density of 1,260 amperes per square millimetre. Operation at such a current density is possible only because the magnet is wound without insulation4, which allows rapid and safe quenching from the superconducting to the normal state5,6,7,8,9,10. The 45.5-tesla test magnet validates predictions11 for high-field copper oxide superconductor magnets by achieving a field twice as high as those generated by low-temperature superconducting magnets.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Design and construction of LBC.
Fig. 2: Magnetic fields measured at the centre of LBC3 and power-supply current during the test.
Fig. 3: Voltages of DPs during the quench of LBC3 at 45.5 T.
Fig. 4: Post-mortem analysis of the superconducting tape.
Fig. 5: Scanning electron microscope images of pancakes P1 and P2 after quenching.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Miller, J. R. The NHMFL 45-T hybrid magnet system: past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 13, 1385–1390 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Toth, J. & Bole, S. T. Design, construction, and first testing of a 41.5 T all-resistive magnet at the NHMFL in Tallahassee. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 4300104 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sundaram, A. et al. 2G HTS wires made on 30 μm thick Hastelloy substrate. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 104007 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hahn, S., Park, D. K., Bascuñán, J. & Iwasa, Y. HTS pancake coils without turn-to-turn insulation. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21, 1592–1595 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hahn, S. et al. No-insulation multi-width winding technique for high temperature superconducting magnet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 173511 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yoon, S. et al. 26 T 35 mm all-GdBa2Cu3O7−x multi-width no-insulation superconducting magnet. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 04LT04 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bascuñán, J., Michael, P., Hahn, S., Lecrevisse, T. & Iwasa, Y. Construction and test results of coil 2 of a three-coil 800-MHz REBCO insert for the 1.3-GHz high-resolution NMR magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 4300504 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jang, J. Y. et al. Design, construction and 13 K conduction-cooled operation of a 3 T 100 mm stainless steel cladding all-REBCO magnet. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 105012 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu, J., Wang, L., Qin, L., Wang, Q. & Dai, Y. Recent development of the 25 T all-superconducting magnet at IEE. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 4301305 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lécrevisse, T. et al. Metal-as-insulation variant of no-insulation HTS winding technique: pancake tests under high background magnetic field and high current at 4.2 K. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 055008 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Halperin, B. et al. High Magnetic Field Science and Its Application in the United States: Current Status and Future Directions (National Academies Press, 2013).

  12. 12.

    Wang, X. et al. Turn-to-turn contact characteristics for an equivalent circuit model of no-insulation ReBCO pancake coil. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 035012 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lu, J., Goddard, R., Han, K. & Hahn, S. Contact resistance between two REBCO tapes under load and load cycles. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 045005 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bonura, M. et al. Systematic study of the contact resistance between REBCO tapes: pressure dependence in the case of no-insulation, metal co-winding and metal-insulation. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29, 6600305 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim, S., Hahn, S., Kim, K. & Larbalestier, D. Method for generating linear current-field characteristics and eliminating charging delay in no-insulation superconducting magnets. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 035020 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bai, H., Hannahs, S. T., Markiewicz, W. D. & Weijers, H. W. Helium gas bubble trapped in liquid helium in high magnetic field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 133511 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hahn, S. et al. Field mapping, NMR lineshape, and screening currents induced field analyses for homogeneity improvement in LTS/HTS NMR magnets. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 18, 856–859 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Amemiya, N. & Akachi, K. Magnetic field generated by shielding current in high T c superconducting coils for NMR magnets. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 095001 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ahn, M. C. et al. Spatial and temporal variations of a screening current induced magnetic field in a double-pancake HTS insert of an LTS/HTS NMR magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 19, 2269–2272 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Koyama, Y. et al. Towards beyond 1 GHz NMR: mechanism of the long-term drift of screening current-induced magnetic field in a Bi-2223 coil. Physica C 469, 694–701 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ueda, H. et al. Measurement and simulation of magnetic field generated by screening currents in HTS coil. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 4701505 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kajikawa, K. et al. Designs and tests of shaking coils to reduce screening currents induced in HTS insert coils for NMR magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 4300305 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, L. et al. Screening current-induced magnetic field in a noninsulated GdBCO HTS coil for a 24 T all-superconducting magnet. Appl. Supercond. 27, 8200106 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Song, J.-B. & Hahn, S. “Leak Current” correction for critical current measurement of no-insulation HTS coil. Prog. Supercond. Cryog. 19, 48–52 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Weijers, H. W. et al. Progress in the development and construction of a 32-T superconducting magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4300807 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bhattarai, K. R., Kim, K., Kim, S., Lee, S.-G. & Hahn, S. Quench analysis of a multiwidth no-insulation 7-T 78-mm REBCO magnet. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 4603505 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Song, J.-B. et al. Over-current quench test and self-protecting behavior of a 7 T/78 mm multi-width no-insulation REBCO magnet at 4.2 K. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 28, 114001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yanagisawa, Y. et al. Basic mechanism of self-healing from thermal runaway for uninsulated REBCO pancake coils. Physica C 499, 40–44 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, T. et al. Analyses of transient behaviors of no-insulation REBCO pancake coils during sudden discharging and overcurrent. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 4603409 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Markiewicz, W. D., Jaroszynski, J. J., Abraimov, D. V., Joyner, R. E. & Khan, A. Quench analysis of pancake wound REBCO coils with low resistance between turns. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 025001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, Y., Chan, W. K. & Schwartz, J. Self-protection mechanisms in no-insulation (RE)Ba2Cu3Ox high temperature superconductor pancake coils. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 045007 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Coulter, J. Y., Ugurlu, O., Willis, J. O., Holesinger, T. G. & Xie, Y.-Y. Identifying and investigating Jc variations in coated conductors fabricated by MOCVD/IBAD. AIP Conf. Proc. 1219, 347–354 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yanagisawa, Y. et al. Remarkable weakness against cleavage stress for YBCO-coated conductors and its effect on the YBCO coil performance. Physica C 471, 480–485 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Markiewicz, W. D. et al. 33.8 tesla with a YBa2Cu3O7−x superconducting test coil. AIP Conf. Proc. 1218, 225–230 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Trociewitz, U. P. et al. 35.4 T field generated using a layer-wound superconducting coil made of (RE)Ba2Cu3O7−x (RE = rare earth) coated conductor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 202506 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Brandt, E. H. & Indenbom, M. Type-II-superconductor strip with current in a perpendicular magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 48, 12893–12906 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Furtner, S., Nemetschek, R., Semerad, R., Sigl, G. & Prusseit, W. Reel-to-reel critical current measurement of coated conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17, S281–S284 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to many for help in the coil construction phase, including B. Jarvis (winding), P. Noyes (testing), S. Bole and G. Miller (design), and D. Hazelton at SuperPower Inc. for helping to procure this special coated conductor from early production. This work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement DMR-1644779 and the State of Florida. A part of S.H.’s analysis work was supported by the Samsung Research Funding and Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics under project number SRFC-IT1801-09 and the National Research Foundation of Korea as part of the Mid-Career Research Program (number 2018R1A2B3009249).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.H. and D.C.L. conceived the idea and supervised the work and the writing; S.H. performed the initial electromagnetic and mechanical design of LBC; T.P. and I.D. supervised the coil construction; Kwanglok Kim and Kwangmin Kim contributed to the coil construction and handled the instrumentation; J.J. and T.P. supervised the cryogenic system; K.B., S.N., S.K. and S.H. performed the modelling and analysis; and X.H. performed the coil post-mortem.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Larbalestier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Geometry of three single pancake test coils.

The test coils were made with the same 30-μm-thick substrate tape used in LBC3 and were built to simulate the outermost 25 turns of LBC3. The tapes in Coil A and Coil B have only one slit edge, where their orientation and position is varied from the supposed damage-free orientations of Fig. 4. Coil A is positioned with its slit edge facing inwards towards the magnet centre, whereas Coil B has the reverse and unsafe orientation. Coils A and B are placed into the same 31-T magnet used for the LBC3 coil test in a position similar to that of pancake P1, where the radial field is highest. Coil C is placed in the central field region, where the radial field is essentially zero and only hoop tension operates, mimicking the central pancakes P6 and P7.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Two-dimensional Hall magnetization maps and reconstructed transport critical current, Ic.

The maps were obtained for coils A, B and C before (top) and after (bottom) the high-field tests, and Ic was reconstructed for 77 K, B||c and 0.6 T. None of the coils was quenched. Coils A and B were cycled eight and five times, respectively, between 225–250 A in a background field of 31 T. The peak hoop strain (magnetic plus bending) was 0.27%. Coil A showed no Ic degradation, but coil B developed obvious damage on its slit edge (see circled region), which also suffered permanent rippling damage. The arrowed defects in coil B have a period matching the coil circumference, which we attribute to a periodic stress concentration. Coil C was cycled five times between 220–240 A and 240–250 A. The current was raised to 295 A at the end of the test, which corresponds to a hoop strain of 0.5%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahn, S., Kim, K., Kim, K. et al. 45.5-tesla direct-current magnetic field generated with a high-temperature superconducting magnet. Nature 570, 496–499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1293-1

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing