Article | Published:

Surface erosion events controlled the evolution of plate tectonics on Earth

Abstract

Plate tectonics is among the most important geological processes on Earth, but its emergence and evolution remain unclear. Here we extrapolate models of present-day plate tectonics to the past and propose that since about three billion years ago the rise of continents and the accumulation of sediments at continental edges and in trenches has provided lubrication for the stabilization of subduction and has been crucial in the development of plate tectonics on Earth. We conclude that the two largest surface erosion and subduction lubrication events occurred after the Palaeoproterozoic Huronian global glaciations (2.45 to 2.2 billion years ago), leading to the formation of the Columbia supercontinent, and after the Neoproterozoic ‘snowball’ Earth glaciations (0.75 to 0.63 billion years ago). The snowball Earth event followed the ‘boring billion’—a period of reduced plate tectonic activity about 1.75 to 0.75 billion years ago that was probably caused by a shortfall of sediments in trenches—and it kick-started the modern episode of active plate tectonics.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data and code availability

The executable file, as well as all input and output files, used in the calculations of the global plate velocities are available on request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hawkesworth, C. J. & Brown, M. Earth dynamics and the development of plate tectonics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20180228 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Stern, R. J. The evolution of plate tectonics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170406 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Herzberg, C., Condie, K. & Korenaga, J. Thermal history of the Earth and its petrological expression. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292, 79–88 (2010).

  4. 4.

    Cawood, P. A. & Hawkesworth, C. J. Earth’s middle age. Geology 42, 503–506 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Brown, M. & Johnson, T. Secular change in metamorphism and the onset of global plate tectonics. Am. Mineral. 103, 181–196 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Spencer, C. J. et al. A Palaeoproterozoic tectono-magmatic lull as a potential trigger for the supercontinent cycle. Nat. Geosci. 11, 97–101 (2018).

  7. 7.

    Ricard, Y. & Vigny, C. Mantle dynamics with induced plate tectonics. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 17543–17559 (1989).

  8. 8.

    Zhong, S. & Gurnis, M. Viscous flow model of a subduction zone with a faulted lithosphere: long and short wavelength topography, gravity and geoid. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1891–1894 (1992).

  9. 9.

    Tackley, P. J. Self-consistent generation of tectonic plates in three-dimensional mantle convection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 157, 9–22 (1998).

  10. 10.

    Moresi, L. & Solomatov, V. Mantle convection with a brittle lithosphere: thoughts on the global tectonic style of the Earth and Venus. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 669–682 (1998).

  11. 11.

    Bercovici, D. The generation of plate tectonics from mantle convection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 205, 107–121 (2003).

  12. 12.

    O’Neill, C. et al. Episodic Precambrian subduction. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262, 552–562 (2007).

  13. 13.

    van Hunen, J. & van den Berg, A. P. Plate tectonics on the early Earth: limitations imposed by strength and buoyancy of subducted lithosphere. Lithos 103, 217–235 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).

  15. 15.

    Byerlee, J. Friction of rocks. Pure Appl. Geophys. 116, 615–626 (1978).

  16. 16.

    Shreve, R. T. & Cloos, M. Dynamics of sediment subduction, melange formation, and prism accretion. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 10229–10245 (1986).

  17. 17.

    Lamb, S. & Davis, P. Cenozoic climate change as a possible cause for the rise of the Andes. Nature 425, 792–797 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Sobolev, S. V. & Babeyko, A. Y. What drives orogeny in the Andes? Geology 33, 617–620 (2005).

  19. 19.

    Sobolev, S. V. & Muldashev, I. Modelling seismic cycles of great megathrust earthquakes across the scales with focus at postseismic phase. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 4387–4408 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Behr, W. M. & Becker, T. W. Sediment control on subduction plate speeds. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 502, 166–173 (2018).

  21. 21.

    Gurnis, M., Hall, C. & Lavier, L. Evolving force balance during incipient subduction. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5, Q07001 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Baes, M. & Sobolev, S. V. Mantle flow as a trigger for subduction initiation: a missing element of the Wilson Cycle concept. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 4469–4486 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Sizova, E. et al. Generation of felsic crust in the Archean: a geodynamic modeling perspective. Precambr. Res. 271, 198–224 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Cawood, P. A. et al. Geological archive of the onset of plate tectonics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170405 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Bradley, D. C. Passive margins through earth history. Earth Sci. Rev. 91, 1–26 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Condie, K. C. A planet in transition: the onset of plate tectonics on Earth between 3 and 2 Ga? Geosci. Front. 9, 51–60 (2018).

  27. 27.

    Li, Z. X. et al. Decoding Earth’s rhythms: modulation of supercontinent cycles by longer superocean episodes. Precambr. Res. 323, 1–5 (2019).

  28. 28.

    Dal Zilio, L. et al. The role of deep subduction in supercontinent breakup. Tectonophysics 746, 312–324 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Shields, G. A. A normalised seawater strontium isotope curve: possible implications for Neoproterozoic-Cambrian weathering rates and the further oxygenation of the Earth. eEarth 2, 35–42 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Cawood, P. A., Hawkesworth, C. J. & Dhuime, B. The continental record and the generation of continental crust. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 125, 14–32 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Spencer, C. J., Roberts, N. M. W. & Santosh, M. Growth, destruction, and preservation of Earth’s continental crust. Earth Sci. Rev. 172, 87–106 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Flament, N., Coltice, N. & Rey, P. F. A case for late-Archaean continental emergence from thermal evolution models and hypsometry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 275, 326–336 (2008).

  33. 33.

    Korenaga, J., Planavsky, N. J. & Evans, D. A. D. Global water cycle and the coevolution of the Earth’s interior and surface environment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150393 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Bindeman, I. N. et al. Rapid emergence of subaerial landmasses and onset of a modern hydrologic cycle 2.5 billion years ago. Nature 557, 545–548 (2018).

  35. 35.

    Hoffman, P. F. & Schrag, D. P. The snowball Earth hypothesis: testing the limits of global change. Terra Nova 14, 129–155 (2002).

  36. 36.

    Keller, C. B. et al. Neoproterozoic glacial origin of the Great Unconformity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1136–1145 (2019).

  37. 37.

    Bleeker, W. The late Archean record: a puzzle in ca. 35 pieces. Lithos 71, 99–134 (2003).

  38. 38.

    Domeier, M. & Torsvik, T. H. Plate tectonics in the late Paleozoic. Geosci. Front. 5, 303–350 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Matthews, K. J. et al. Global plate boundary evolution and kinematics since the late Paleozoic. Global Planet. Change 146, 226–250 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Torsvik, T. H., Smethurst, M. A., Burke, K. & Steinberger, B. Large igneous provinces generated from the margins of the large low-velocity provinces in the deep mantle. Geophys. J. Int. 167, 1447–1460 (2006).

  41. 41.

    Tan, E., Leng, W., Zhong, S. & Gurnis, M. On the location of plumes and lateral movement of thermochemical structures with high bulk modulus in the 3-D compressible mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, Q07005 (2011).

  42. 42.

    Steinberger, B. & Torsvik, T. H. A geodynamic model of plumes from the margins of Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q01W09 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Dhuime, B. et al. A change in the geodynamics of continental growth 3 billion years ago. Science 335, 1334–1336 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Clift, P. & Vannucchi, P. Controls on tectonic accretion versus erosion in subduction zones: implications for the origin and recycling of the continental crust. Rev. Geophys. 42, RG2001 (2004).

  45. 45.

    Johnson, T. E. et al. Delamination and recycling of Archaean crust caused by gravitational instabilities. Nat. Geosci. 7, 47–52 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Rozel, A. B. et al. Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism. Nature 545, 332–335 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Arndt, N. & Davaille, A. Episodic Earth evolution. Tectonophysics 609, 661–674 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Gerya, T. V. et al. Plate tectonics on the Earth triggered by plume-induced subduction initiation. Nature 527, 221–225 (2015).

  49. 49.

    O’Neill, C. et al. Impact-driven subduction on the Hadean Earth. Nat. Geosci. 10, 793–797 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Rey, P. F., Coltice, N. & Flament, N. Spreading continents kick-started plate tectonics. Nature 513, 405–408 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Heuret, A., Lallemand, S., Funiciello, S., Piromallo, C. & Faccenna, C. Physical characteristics of subduction interface type seismogenic zones revisited. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, Q01004 (2011).

  52. 52.

    England, P. & Wilkins, C. A. simple analytical approximation to the temperature structure in subduction zones. Geophys. J. Int. 159, 1138–1154 (2004).

  53. 53.

    Syracuse, E. M., van Keken, P. E. & Abers, G. A. The global range of subduction zone thermal models. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 183, 73–90 (2010).

  54. 54.

    Nakagawa, T. & Tackley, P. J. Influence of plate tectonic mode on the coupled thermochemical evolution of Earth’s mantle and core. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 16, 3400–3413 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Bürgmann, R. & Dresen, G. Rheology of the lower crust and upper mantle: evidence from rock mechanics, geodesy, and field observations. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 531–567 (2008).

  56. 56.

    Popov, A. A. & Sobolev, S. V. SLIM3D: a tool for three-dimensional thermo mechanical modeling of lithospheric deformation with elasto-visco-plastic rheology. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 171, 55–75 (2008).

  57. 57.

    Steinberger, B. & Calderwood, A. Models of large-scale viscous flow in the Earth’s mantle with constraints from mineral physics and surface observations. Geophys. J. Int. 167, 1461–1481 (2006).

  58. 58.

    Osei Tutu, A. et al. Evaluating the influence of plate boundary friction and mantle viscosity on plate velocities. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 642–666 (2018).

  59. 59.

    Hirth, G. & Kohlstedt, D. L. in Inside the Subduction Factory (ed. Eiler, J.) 83–105 (American Geophysical Union, 2004).

  60. 60.

    Artemieva, I. Global thermal model TC1 for the continental lithosphere: implications for lithosphere secular evolution. Tectonophysics 416, 245–277 (2006).

  61. 61.

    Parsons, B. & Sclater, J. G. An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 803–827 (1977).

  62. 62.

    Steinberger, B. Slabs in the lower mantle – results of dynamic modelling compared with tomographic images and the geoid. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 118, 241–257 (2000).

  63. 63.

    Wu, B. et al. Reconciling strong slab pull and weak plate bending: the plate motion constraint on the strength of mantle slabs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 272, 412–421 (2008).

  64. 64.

    DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G. & Argus, D. F. Geologically current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int. 181, 1–80 (2010).

  65. 65.

    Oncken, O., Boutelier, D., Dresen, G. & Schemmann, K. Strain accumulation controls failure of a plate boundary zone: linking deformation of the Central Andes and lithosphere mechanics. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q12007 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge comments by N. Arndt, A. Sobolev and colleagues from the Geodynamic Modeling Section in GFZ: A. Babeyko, S. Brune and B. Steinberger. We thank W. Behr for comments that prompted us to strengthen the arguments presented in the Article. We are grateful to R. Ernst who provided the LIP dataset and to Z.-X. Li who provided the orogen dataset27. S.V.S. is grateful to R. Stern, who brought to his attention the problems of the origin and evolution of plate tectonics. Deep Carbon Observatory supported S.V.S.’s participation in the Workshop on the Origin and Evolution of Plate Tectonics, Locarno, Switzerland in 2016, where he first presented the hypothesis discussed in the paper.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Whitney Behr and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

S.V.S. conceived the study, suggested the hypothesis, designed and computed the models and produced the figures. S.V.S. and M.B. interpreted the data and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Stephan V. Sobolev.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Strength in the subduction channel.

ac, The subduction channel of the seismic cycle model for the southern Andes19. Shown are the stress distribution (a) and the strain rate distribution (b) during the inter-seismic phase of the seismic cycle, 320 years after the great earthquake, as well as a magnified image of the subduction channel (c). Temperature isolines are shown in degrees Celsius, and the location of the maximum shear stress in the channel is given as a proxy for the brittle–ductile transition. d, Sketch of the stress distribution inside the subduction channel, showing the friction-controlled (brittle) and ductile deformation domains.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source Data Fig. 2

Source Data Fig. 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1: Global and regional models showing the effect of sediments on contemporary subduction.
Fig. 2: Geological proxies for subduction and plate tectonic activity.
Fig. 3: Geodynamic interpretation of geochemical proxies for recycling of sediments.
Fig. 4: Plume-induced retreating subduction generating a regional ‘plate tectonics’ cell48.
Fig. 5: Summary of the factors that control the emergence and evolution of plate tectonics on Earth.
Extended Data Fig. 1: Strength in the subduction channel.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.