Since Bridgman’s discovery of five solid water (H2O) ice phases1 in 1912, studies on the extraordinary polymorphism of H2O have documented more than seventeen crystalline and several amorphous ice structures2,3, as well as rich metastability and kinetic effects4,5. This unique behaviour is due in part to the geometrical frustration of the weak intermolecular hydrogen bonds and the sizeable quantum motion of the light hydrogen ions (protons). Particularly intriguing is the prediction that H2O becomes superionic6,7,8,9,10,11,12—with liquid-like protons diffusing through the solid lattice of oxygen—when subjected to extreme pressures exceeding 100 gigapascals and high temperatures above 2,000 kelvin. Numerical simulations suggest that the characteristic diffusion of the protons through the empty sites of the oxygen solid lattice (1) gives rise to a surprisingly high ionic conductivity above 100 Siemens per centimetre, that is, almost as high as typical metallic (electronic) conductivity, (2) greatly increases the ice melting temperature7,8,9,10,11,12,13 to several thousand kelvin, and (3) favours new ice structures with a close-packed oxygen lattice13,14,15. Because confining such hot and dense H2O in the laboratory is extremely challenging, experimental data are scarce. Recent optical measurements along the Hugoniot curve (locus of shock states) of water ice VII showed evidence of superionic conduction and thermodynamic signatures for melting16, but did not confirm the microscopic structure of superionic ice. Here we use laser-driven shockwaves to simultaneously compress and heat liquid water samples to 100–400 gigapascals and 2,000–3,000 kelvin. In situ X-ray diffraction measurements show that under these conditions, water solidifies within a few nanoseconds into nanometre-sized ice grains that exhibit unambiguous evidence for the crystalline oxygen lattice of superionic water ice. The X-ray diffraction data also allow us to document the compressibility of ice at these extreme conditions and a temperature- and pressure-induced phase transformation from a body-centred-cubic ice phase (probably ice X) to a novel face-centred-cubic, superionic ice phase, which we name ice XVIII2,17.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 10 August 2022
Stability of high-temperature salty ice suggests electrolyte permeability in water-rich exoplanet icy mantles
Nature Communications Open Access 21 June 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 05 April 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Bridgman, P. W. Water, in the liquid and five solid forms, under pressure. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 47, 441–558 (1912).
Bartels-Rausch, T. et al. Ice structures, patterns, and processes: a view across the icefields. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 885–944 (2012).
Malenkov, G. Liquid water and ices: understanding the structure and physical properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 283101 (2009).
Pallares, G. et al. Anomalies in bulk supercooled water at negative pressure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7936–7941 (2014).
Mishima, O. & Stanley, H. E. The relationship between liquid, supercooled and glassy water. Nature 396, 329–335 (1998).
Demontis, P., LeSar, R. & Klein, M. L. New high-pressure phases of ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2284–2287 (1988).
Cavazzoni, C. et al. Superionic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions. Science 283, 44–46 (1999).
Mattsson, T. R. & Desjarlais, M. P. Phase diagram and electrical conductivity of high energy-density water from density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 017801 (2006).
Schwegler, E., Sharma, M., Gygi, F. & Galli, G. Melting of ice under pressure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14779–14783 (2008).
French, M., Mattsson, T., Nettelmann, N. & Redmer, R. Equation of state and phase diagram of water at ultrahigh pressures as in planetary interiors. Phys. Rev. B 79, 054107 (2009).
Redmer, R., Mattsson, T. R., Nettelmann, N. & French, M. The phase diagram of water and the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune. Icarus 211, 798–803 (2011).
Hernandez, J.-A. & Caracas, R. Superionic-superionic phase transitions in body-centered cubic H2O ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 135503 (2016).
Wilson, H. F., Wong, M. L. & Militzer, B. Superionic to superionic phase change in water: consequences for the interiors of Uranus and Neptune. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 151102 (2013).
Sun, J., Clark, B. K., Torquato, S. & Car, R. The phase diagram of high-pressure superionic ice. Nat. Commun. 6, 8156 (2015).
French, M., Desjarlais, M. P. & Redmer, R. Ab initio calculation of thermodynamic potentials and entropies for superionic water. Phys. Rev. E 93, 022140 (2016).
Millot, M. et al. Experimental evidence for superionic water ice using shock compression. Nat. Phys. 14, 297–302 (2018).
del Rosso, L., Celli, M. & Ulivi, L. A new porous water ice stable at atmospheric pressure obtained by emptying a hydrogen filled ice. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–19 (2016).
Rygg, J. R. et al. Powder diffraction from solids in the terapascal regime. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 113904 (2012).
Coppari, F. et al. Experimental evidence for a phase transition in magnesium oxide at exoplanet pressures. Nat. Geosci. 6, 926–929 (2013).
Dolan, D. H. & Gupta, Y. M. Nanosecond freezing of water under multiple shock wave compression: optical transmission and imaging measurements. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 9050–9057 (2004).
Chau, R., Mitchell, A. C., Minich, R. W. & Nellis, W. J. Electrical conductivity of water compressed dynamically to pressures of 70–180 GPa (0.7–1.8 Mbar). J. Chem. Phys. 114, 1361–1365 (2001).
Dolan, D. H., Knudson, M. D., Hall, C. A. & Deeney, C. A metastable limit for compressed liquid water. Nat. Phys. 3, 339–342 (2007).
Gleason, A. E. et al. Compression freezing kinetics of water to ice VII. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 025701 (2017).
Gleason, A. E. et al. Ultrafast visualization of crystallization and grain growth in shock-compressed SiO2. Nat. Commun. 6, 8191 (2015).
Shibuta, Y. et al. Heterogeneity in homogeneous nucleation from billion-atom molecular dynamics simulation of solidification of pure metal. Nat. Commun. 8, 10 (2017).
Sugimura, E. et al. Compression of H2O ice to 126 GPa and implications for hydrogen-bond symmetrization: synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements and density-functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 77, 214103 (2008).
French, M. & Redmer, R. Construction of a thermodynamic potential for the water ices VII and X. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014308 (2015).
Benoit, M., Bernasconi, M., Focher, P. & Parrinello, M. New high-pressure phase of ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2934–2936 (1996).
Caracas, R. Dynamical instabilities of ice X. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 085502 (2008).
Militzer, B. & Wilson, H. F. New phases of water ice predicted at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 195701 (2010).
Hermann, A., Ashcroft, N. W. & Hoffmann, R. High pressure ices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 745–750 (2012).
Nettelmann, N., Helled, R., Fortney, J. J. & Redmer, R. New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data. Planet. Space Sci. 77, 143–151 (2013).
Hemley, R. J. et al. Static compression of H2O-ice to 128 GPa (1.28 Mbar). Nature 330, 737–740 (1987).
Loubeyre, P., LeToullec, R., Wolanin, E., Hanfland, M. & Hausermann, D. Modulated phases and proton centring in ice observed by X-ray diffraction up to 170 GPa. Nature 397, 503–506 (1999).
Frank, M. R. M., Fei, Y. & Hu, J. Constraining the equation of state of fluid H2O to 80 GPa using the melting curve, bulk modulus, and thermal expansivity of ice VII. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 2781–2790 (2004).
Sugimura, E. et al. Simultaneous high-pressure and high-temperature volume measurements of ice VII and its thermal equation of state. Phys. Rev. B 82, 134103 (2010).
Sugimura, E. et al. Experimental evidence of superionic conduction in H2O ice. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 194505 (2012).
We acknowledge C. Davis, J. Emig, E. Folsom, R. Posadas Soriano, S. Uhlich, T. Uphaus and W. Unites for target preparation, the Omega Laser Facility management, staff and support crew for shot and diagnostic support and G. W. Collins, F. Datchi, R. Jeanloz and P. F. McMillan for discussions. This work was prepared by LLNL under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Omega shots were allocated through the LLE Laboratory Basic Science programme. Partial support was provided by LLNL LDRD programmes 12-SI-007, 14-SI-003 and 19-ERD-031 and the US Department of Energy through the joint FES/NNSA HEDLP programme.
Nature thanks Stephane Mazevet and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The Supplementary Information document contains a description of the methods, additional velocimetry and diffraction data and an extended discussion of the results with 24 supplementary figures and 2 tables.
About this article
Cite this article
Millot, M., Coppari, F., Rygg, J.R. et al. Nanosecond X-ray diffraction of shock-compressed superionic water ice. Nature 569, 251–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1114-6
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)