Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Interacting multi-channel topological boundary modes in a quantum Hall valley system

Abstract

Symmetry and topology are central to understanding quantum Hall ferromagnets (QHFMs), two-dimensional electronic phases with spontaneously broken spin or pseudospin symmetry whose wavefunctions also have topological properties1,2. Domain walls between distinct broken-symmetry QHFM phases are predicted to host gapless one-dimensional modes—that is, quantum channels that emerge because of a topological change in the underlying electronic wavefunctions at such interfaces. Although various QHFMs have been identified in different materials3,4,5,6,7,8, interacting electronic modes at these domain walls have not been probed. Here we use a scanning tunnelling microscope to directly visualize the spontaneous formation of boundary modes at domain walls between QHFM phases with different valley polarization (that is, the occupation of equal-energy but quantum mechanically distinct valleys in the electronic structure) on the surface of bismuth. Spectroscopy shows that these modes occur within a topological energy gap, which closes and reopens as the valley polarization switches across the domain wall. By changing the valley flavour and the number of modes at the domain wall, we can realize different regimes in which the valley-polarized channels are either metallic or develop a spectroscopic gap. This behaviour is a consequence of Coulomb interactions constrained by the valley flavour, which determines whether electrons in the topological modes can backscatter, making these channels a unique class of interacting one-dimensional quantum wires. QHFM domain walls can be realized in different classes of two-dimensional materials, providing the opportunity to explore a rich phase space of interactions in these quantum wires.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Boundary modes in a quantum Hall valley system.
Fig. 2: Imaging a quantum Hall nematic domain wall.
Fig. 3: Spectroscopic characterization of topological boundary modes.
Fig. 4: Interacting multi-channel boundary modes.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Girvin, S. M. in Topological Aspects of Low Dimensional Systems, Les Houches Session LXIX (eds Comtet, A. et al.) 53–175 (Springer, Berlin, 1999).

  2. 2.

    Ezawa, Z. F. & Tsitsishvili, G. Quantum Hall ferromagnets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 086502 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barrett, S. E., Dabbagh, G., Pfeiffer, L. N., West, K. W. & Tycko, R. Optically pumped NMR evidence for finite-size skyrmions in GaAs quantum wells near Landau level filling v = 1. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5112–5115 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schmeller, A., Eisenstein, J. P., Pfeiffer, L. N. & West, K. W. Evidence for skyrmions and single spin flips in the integer quantized Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4290–4293 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shayegan, M. et al. Two-dimensional electrons occupying multiple valleys in AlAs. Phys. Status Solidi B 243, 3629–3642 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kott, T. M., Hu, B., Brown, S. H. & Kane, B. E. Valley-degenerate two-dimensional electrons in the lowest Landau level. Phys. Rev. B 89, 041107 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Young, A. F. et al. Spin and valley quantum Hall ferromagnetism in graphene. Nat. Phys. 8, 550–556 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhu, Z., Collaudin, A., Fauqué, B., Kang, W. & Behnia, K. Field-induced polarization of Dirac valleys in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 8, 89–94 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Abanin, D. A., Parameswaran, S. A., Kivelson, S. A. & Sondhi, S. L. Nematic valley ordering in quantum Hall systems. Phys. Rev. B 82, 035428 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Li, X., Zhang, F. & MacDonald, A. H. SU(3) Quantum Hall Ferromagnetism in SnTe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 026803 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kane, C. L. & Fisher, M. P. A. Transport in a one-channel Luttinger liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1220–1223 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bockrath, M. et al. Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature 397, 598–601 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ishii, H. et al. Direct observation of Tomonaga–Luttinger-liquid state in carbon nanotubes at low temperatures. Nature 426, 540–544 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Auslaender, O. M. et al. Spin-charge separation and localization in one dimension. Science 308, 88–92 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chang, A. M., Pfeiffer, L. N. & West, K. W. Observation of chiral Luttinger behavior in electron tunneling into fractional quantum Hall edges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2538–2541 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Feldman, B. E. et al. Observation of a nematic quantum Hall liquid on the surface of bismuth. Science 354, 316–321 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Randeria, M. T. et al. Ferroelectric quantum Hall phase revealed by visualizing Landau level wavefunction interference. Nat. Phys. 14, 796–800 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Callan, C. G. & Harvey, J. A. Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls. Nucl. Phys. B 250, 427–436 (1985).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Agarwal, K., Randeria, M. T., Yazdani, A., Sondhi, S. L. & Parameswaran, S. A. Symmetry-protected Luttinger liquids at domain walls in quantum Hall nematics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.10293 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Hofmann, P. The surfaces of bismuth: structural and electronic properties. Prog. Surf. Sci. 81, 191–245 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Misra, S. et al. Design and performance of an ultra-high vacuum scanning tunneling microscope operating at dilution refrigerator temperatures and high magnetic fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 103903 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ju, L. et al. Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls. Nature 520, 650–655 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yin, L.-J., Jiang, H., Qiao, J.-B. & He, L. Direct imaging of topological edge states at a bilayer graphene domain wall. Nat. Commun. 7, 11760 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Huang, S. et al. Emergence of topologically protected helical states in minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 037702 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kumar, A., Parameswaran, S. A. & Sondhi, S. L. Microscopic theory of a quantum Hall Ising nematic: domain walls and disorder. Phys. Rev. B 88, 045133 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Maher, P. et al. Evidence for a spin phase transition at charge neutrality in bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 9, 154–158 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dziawa, P. et al. Topological crystalline insulator states in Pb1−xSnxSe. Nat. Mater. 11, 1023–1027 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hsieh, T. H. et al. Topological crystalline insulators in the SnTe material class. Nat. Commun. 3, 982 (2012); erratum 4, 1901 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chamon, C., Oshikawa, M. & Affleck, I. Junctions of three quantum wires and the dissipative Hofstadter model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 206403 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiments in this project were primarily supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation as part of the EPiQS initiative (GBMF4530) (B.E.F., H.D., A.Y.) and DOE-BES grant DE-FG02-07ER46419 (M.T.R., A.Y.). Other financial support for the experimental effort came from NSF-DMR-1608848 (A.Y.), NSF-MRSEC programs through the Princeton Center for Complex Materials DMR-142054 (A.Y., R.J.C.) and a Dicke fellowship (B.E.F.). A.Y. acknowledges the hospitality of The Aspen Center for Physics supported under NSF grant PHY-1607611. K.A. acknowledges support from DOE-BES grant no. DE-SC0002140 and from a private bequest to Princeton University by the UK foundation. S.A.P. acknowledges support from NSF DMR-1455366 during the early stages of this project. We acknowledge discussions with S. Kivelson and E. Fradkin.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Brian LeRoy and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.T.R., B.E.F., H.D. and A.Y. designed and conducted the STM measurements and their analysis. K.A., S.L.S. and S.A.P performed the theoretical calculations. H.J. and R.J.C. synthesized the samples. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Yazdani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Role of electron–electron interactions in domain-wall formation.

a, Spectrum away from the domain wall at B = 13.1 T and T = 250 mK, where the effective filling factor \(\widetilde{\nu }=0\), so the fourfold-degenerate Landau level is not split by exchange. b, Conductance map at the fourfold-degenerate Landau level peak energy E = 700 μeV in the same area as in Fig. 2. The presence of cyclotron orbits of both orientations throughout the image indicates the absence of a domain wall under these conditions. c, Spectroscopic line-cut along the dashed line in b also show a fourfold-degenerate Landau level that does not change across the original location of the domain wall, in stark contrast to the line-cut in Fig. 3a. d, Spectrum away from the domain wall at B = 14 T corresponding to the \(\widetilde{\nu }=2\) domain wall but at a higher temperature of T = 2 K. Again, we do not resolve any exchange splitting, and the Landau level is fourfold degenerate. e, Topography of the same area (identical to Fig. 2d) overlaid with a dI/dV map at E = −100 μeV. We observe cyclotron orbits of both orientations at this increased temperature, and no domain wall is visible. f, Line-cut along the dashed line in e. The absence of splitting in the fourfold-degenerate Landau level confirms that the domain wall is not present at 2 K.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Schematic of strain field and comparison to experimental line-cut.

a, Schematic of possible strain field (top) and the resulting energies of the different valley states (bottom). A large component of the strain in the direction of valleys C and \(\bar{{\rm{C}}}\) lowers the energy of these two valleys compared with the other four. In the presence of exchange interactions, the switch in strain field from a slight favouring of valleys A and \(\bar{{\rm{A}}}\) to valleys B and \(\bar{{\rm{B}}}\) gives rise to the nematic domain wall. b, Experimental line-cut across the \(\widetilde{\nu }=2\) domain wall showing that the energy of the twofold-degenerate valley state (corresponding to C and \(\bar{{\rm{C}}}\) at E ≈ −1.25 meV) is split off from the other valley states by strain, and does not change substantially across the domain wall associated with the crossing between pairs of valleys (A, \(\bar{{\rm{A}}}\)) and (B, \(\bar{{\rm{B}}}\)) at the Fermi level.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Energy-dependence of the domain-wall behaviour at \(\widetilde{{\boldsymbol{\nu }}}{\bf{=\; 2}}\).

ai, Differential conductance maps measured in the same location and under identical conditions to those in Fig. 2c. Each panel shows dI/dV at a different energy, ranging from the lower-energy exchange-split Landau level at E = −400 μeV (a) to the higher-energy Landau level peak at E = 400 μeV (i). The data demonstrate the different preferred wavefunction orientations for each respective domain as well as the different orientations of occupied and unoccupied states within a given domain.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Energy-dependence of the domain-wall behaviour at \(\widetilde{{\boldsymbol{\nu }}}{\bf{=\; 1}}\).

ad, Differential conductance maps measured in the same location and under identical conditions to those in Fig. 2e. Each panel shows dI/dV at a different energy, ranging from the singly degenerate LL at E = −120 μeV (a) to the triply degenerate LL peak at E = 330 μeV (d).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Additional spectroscopic line-cuts across the domain wall.

af, Spectroscopic line-cuts across the \(\widetilde{\nu }=2\) domain wall. The six different line-cut trajectories are indicated by the dashed lines in m. Although minor variations in the spectra are seen, probably due to the effects of local disorder, the key features of exchange gap closing and Landau level crossing at the domain wall are consistent. gl, Spectroscopic line-cuts across the \(\widetilde{\nu }=1\) domain wall. Again, the same features of the change in topological invariant are present in each line-cut. m, n, dI/dV maps reproduced from Fig. 2c and Fig. 2e, respectively, overlaid with dashed lines showing the locations of the spectroscopic line-cuts in al.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Variation in individual spectra at the domain wall.

a, Individual spectra (blue, green, brown, purple, black, red) measured for \(\widetilde{\nu }=2\) (a) and \(\widetilde{\nu }=1\) (b), at domain-wall positions corresponding to line 1 to line 6 (Extended Data Fig. 5). All spectra in a show a charge gap Δcharge that is smaller than the exchange gap far from the domain wall (grey dashed spectrum). No Landau level splitting is visible at the \(\widetilde{\nu }=1\) domain wall (b), in contrast to the behaviour in a and far from the domain wall (grey dashed spectrum).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Line-cut along \(\widetilde{{\boldsymbol{\nu }}}{\bf{=\; 2}}\) domain wall.

a, Line-cut parallel to the \(\widetilde{\nu }=2\) domain wall, along the white line in b, showing spatial variation in the spectra. b, Conductance map reproduced from Fig. 2c, with the location of the spectroscopic line-cut in a marked by the white line.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the theoretical modelling of nematic domain-wall behaviour, including Hartree–Fock calculations and modelling of boundary modes using symmetry based Luttinger liquid analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Randeria, M.T., Agarwal, K., Feldman, B.E. et al. Interacting multi-channel topological boundary modes in a quantum Hall valley system. Nature 566, 363–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0913-0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing