Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A population of luminous accreting black holes with hidden mergers

An Author Correction to this article was published on 21 March 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Major galaxy mergers are thought to play an important part in fuelling the growth of supermassive black holes1. However, observational support for this hypothesis is mixed, with some studies showing a correlation between merging galaxies and luminous quasars2,3 and others showing no such association4,5. Recent observations have shown that a black hole is likely to become heavily obscured behind merger-driven gas and dust, even in the early stages of the merger, when the galaxies are well separated6,7,9 (5 to 40 kiloparsecs). Merger simulations further suggest that such obscuration and black-hole accretion peaks in the final merger stage, when the two galactic nuclei are closely separated10 (less than 3 kiloparsecs). Resolving this final stage requires a combination of high-spatial-resolution infrared imaging and high-sensitivity hard-X-ray observations to detect highly obscured sources. However, large numbers of obscured luminous accreting supermassive black holes have been recently detected nearby (distances below 250 megaparsecs) in X-ray observations11. Here we report high-resolution infrared observations of hard-X-ray-selected black holes and the discovery of obscured nuclear mergers, the parent populations of supermassive-black-hole mergers. We find that obscured luminous black holes (bolometric luminosity higher than 2 × 1044 ergs per second) show a significant (P < 0.001) excess of late-stage nuclear mergers (17.6 per cent) compared to a sample of inactive galaxies with matching stellar masses and star formation rates (1.1 per cent), in agreement with theoretical predictions. Using hydrodynamic simulations, we confirm that the excess of nuclear mergers is indeed strongest for gas-rich major-merger hosts of obscured luminous black holes in this final stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Example images of final-stage mergers.
Fig. 2: Fraction of close mergers.

Data availability

The reduced imaging datasets from the HST are available from the Hubble Legacy Archive. The raw imaging datasets from the near-infrared adaptive optics programmes are available from the Keck Observatory Archive. Other reduced datasets generated or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 21 March 2019

    In this Letter, the spelling of author Benny Trakhtenbrot was corrected; the affiliation for author Sylvain Veilleux was amended; and a new ref. 9 was added to the Abstract with subsequent references renumbered; these errors have been corrected online.

References

  1. Di Matteo, T., Springel, V. & Hernquist, L. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies. Nature 433, 604–607 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goulding, A. D. et al. Galaxy interactions trigger rapid black hole growth: an unprecedented view from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 70, S37 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donley, J. L. et al. Evidence for merger-driven growth in luminous, high-z, obscured AGNs in the CANDELS/COSMOS field. Astrophys. J. 853, 63 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Villforth, C. et al. Host galaxies of luminous z~0.6 quasars: major mergers are not prevalent at the highest AGN luminosities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 812–830 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, Y.-Y. et al. Infrared selection of obscured active galactic nuclei in the COSMOS field. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 233, 19 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glikman, E. et al. Major mergers host the most-luminous red quasars at z ~ 2: a Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/IR study. Astrophys. J. 806, 218 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocevski, D. et al. Are Compton-thick AGNs the missing link between mergers and black hole growth? Astrophys. J. 814, 104 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koss, M. et al. A new population of Compton-thick AGNs identified using the spectral curvature above 10 keV. Astrophys. J. 825, 85 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricci, C. et al. Growing supermassive black holes in the late stages of galaxy mergers are heavily obscured. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 21 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hopkins, P. F. et al. A physical model for the origin of quasar lifetimes. Astrophys. J. 625, L71–L74 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumgartner, W. H. et al. The 70 month Swift-BAT all-sky hard X-ray survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 207, 19 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koss, M. et al. BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. I. Spectral measurements, derived quantities, and AGN demographics. Astrophys. J. 850, 74 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricci, C. et al. BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. V. X-ray properties of the Swift/BAT 70- month AGN catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 233, 17 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohyama, Y., Terashima, Y. & Sakamoto, K. Infrared and X-ray evidence of an AGN in the NGC 3256 southern nucleus. Astrophys. J. 805, 162 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrows, R. S., Comerford, J. M., Greene, J. E. & Pooley, D. Spatially offset active galactic nuclei. II. Triggering in galaxy mergers. Astrophys. J. 838, 129 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu, H., Myers, A. D., Djorgovski, S. G. & Yan, L. Mergers in double-peaked [O iii] active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 733, 103 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haan, S. et al. The nuclear structure in nearby luminous infrared galaxies: Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS imaging of the GOALS sample. Astron. J. 141, 100 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Wassenhove, S. et al. Observability of dual active galactic nuclei in merging galaxies. Astrophys. J. 748, L7 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Springel, V. The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 364, 1105–1134 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopkins, P. F., Richards, G. T. & Hernquist, L. An observational determination of the bolometric quasar luminosity function. Astrophys. J. 654, 731–753 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt, L. K. & Malkan, M. A. Circumnuclear structure and black hole fueling: Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS imaging of 250 active and normal galaxies. Astrophys. J. 616, 707–729 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Capelo, P. R. et al. Growth and activity of black holes in galaxy mergers with varying mass ratios. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 2123–2143 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Verbiest, J. P. W. et al. The International Pulsar Timing Array: first data release. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 1267–1288 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang, Y., Haiman, Z. & MacFadyen, A. The late inspiral of supermassive black hole binaries with circumbinary gas discs in the LISA band. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 2249–2257 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sesana, A., Haiman, Z., Kocsis, B. & Kelley, L. Z. Testing the binary hypothesis: pulsar timing constraints on supermassive black hole binary candidates. Astrophys. J. 856, 42 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayer, L. Massive black hole binaries in gas-rich galaxy mergers; multiple regimes of orbital decay and interplay with gas inflows. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 244008 (2013).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lang, R. N. & Hughes, S. A. Advanced localization of massive black hole coalescences with LISA. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 094035 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Massaro, E. et al. Roma-BZCAT: a multifrequency catalogue of blazars. Astron. Astrophys. 495, 691–696 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117, 393–404 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Blanton, M. R., Kazin, E., Muna, D., Weaver, B. A. & Price-Whelan, A. Improved background subtraction for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey images. Astron. J. 142, 31 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. de Vaucouleurs, G. et al. Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Véron-Cetty, M. P. & Véron, P. A catalogue of quasars and active nuclei: 13th edition. Astron. Astrophys. 518, A10 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patton, D. & Atfield, J. The luminosity dependence of the galaxy merger rate. Astrophys. J. 685, 235 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weigel, A. K., Schawinski, K., Treister, E., Trakhtenbrot, B. & Sanders, D. B. The fraction of AGNs in major merger galaxies and its luminosity dependence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 2308–2317 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Davies, R. I. et al. Insights on the dusty torus and neutral torus from optical and X-ray obscuration in a complete volume limited hard X-ray AGN sample. Astrophys. J. 806, 127 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Koss, M. et al. Host galaxy properties of the Swift BAT ultra hard X-ray selected active galactic nucleus. Astrophys. J. 739, 57 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abazajian, K. N. et al. The seventh data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 182, 543–558 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Blanton, M. R., Eisenstein, D., Hogg, D. W., Schlegel, D. J. & Brinkmann, J. Relationship between environment and the broadband optical properties of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. 629, 143 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kauffmann, G. et al. Stellar masses and star formation histories for 105 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 341, 33–53 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brinchmann, J. et al. The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351, 1151–1179 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chary, R. & Elbaz, D. Interpreting the cosmic infrared background: constraints on the evolution of the dust-enshrouded star formation rate. Astrophys. J. 556, 562–581 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vivian, U. et al. Spectral energy distributions of local luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 203, 9 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. DasGupta, A., Cai, T. T. & Brown, L. D. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat. Sci. 16, 101–133 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Hung, C.-L. et al. A comparison of the morphological properties between local and z~1 infrared luminous galaxies: are local and high-z (U)LIRGs different? Astrophys. J. 791, 63 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Grogin, N. A. et al. CANDELS: the cosmic assembly near-infrared deep extragalactic legacy survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 197, 35 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Barden M., Jahnke K. & Häußler B. FERENGI: redshifting Galaxies from SDSS to GEMS, STAGES, and COSMOS. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 175, 105 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Springel, V. & Hernquist, L. Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 339, 289–311 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Narayan, R. & McClintock, J. E. Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon. New Astron. Rev. 51, 733–751 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 511–653 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jonsson, P. SUNRISE: polychromatic dust radiative transfer in arbitrary geometries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 2–20 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Jonsson, P., Groves, B. A. & Cox, T. J. High-resolution panchromatic spectral models of galaxies including photoionization and dust. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 17–44 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Snyder, G. F. et al. Modeling mid-infrared diagnostics of obscured quasars and starbursts. Astrophys. J. 768, 168 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Blecha, L., Civano, F., Elvis, M. & Loeb, A. Constraints on the nature of CID-42: recoil kick or supermassive black hole pair? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 1341–1350 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Leitherer, C. et al. Starburst99: synthesis models for galaxies with active star formation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 123, 3–40 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Narayanan, D. et al. A physical model for z~2 dust-obscured galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, 1701–1720 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Groves, B. et al. Modeling the pan-spectral energy distribution of starburst galaxies. IV. The controlling parameters of the starburst SED. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 176, 438–456 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is dedicated to the memory of our friend and collaborator N. Gehrels. We appreciate the help of R. M. McGurk with the initial night of Keck telescope observations and initial data reductions. M.J.K. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the Ambizione fellowship grant PZ00P2 154799/1 and from NASA through ADAP award NNH16CT03C. K.S., L.F.S. and A.W. acknowledge support from SNSF grants PP00P2 138979 and PP00P2 166159.  L.B. acknowledges support from NSF award number 1715413. We acknowledge the work of the Swift/BAT team to make this study possible. This paper is part of the Swift/BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS).

Reviewer information

Nature thanks D. Kocevski and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.J.K. drafted the manuscript, performed the observations and carried out much of the analysis. L.B. performed and interpreted the hydrodynamic simulations. P.B. carried out much of the initial data reduction. C.-L.H. ran the artificial redshifting code. J.R.L. provided the initial data reduction code and helped with the analysis. K.S. aided in the scientific interpretations and the reduction of the raw data. E.T. assisted in the initial observing runs. R.M., S.V. and D.B.S. aided in the initial proposal and scientific interpretations. B.T., L.F.S., A.W. and C.R. assisted in the scientific interpretations.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Koss.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Other close mergers.

ad, Tricolour optical images in the gri band from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey or the Kitt Peak survey with about 1″ angular resolution. The galaxies shown are NGC 6240 (a), 2MASX J00253292+6821442 (b), ESO 509-G027 (c) and Mrk 975 (d) from the AGN sample. The images are 60 kpc × 60 kpc in size. Red squares indicate the size of the zoomed-in AO image on the right. eh, High-spatial-resolution images of the nuclear mergers shown in ad, 4 kpc × 4 kpc in size.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Other close mergers.

ac, Tricolour optical images in the gri band from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey or the Kitt Peak survey with about 1″ angular resolution. The galaxies shown are 2MASX J16311554+2352577 (a) and 2MASX J08434495+3549421 (b) from the AGN sample and 2MASX J08370182-4954302 (c) from the inactive-galaxy sample. d, Lower-quality red Digitized Sky Survey image of UGC02369 NED01, for which no higher-quality imaging exists. The images in ad are 60 kpc × 60 kpc in size. Red squares indicate the size of the zoomed-in AO image on the right. eh, High-spatial-resolution near-infrared images of the nuclear mergers shown in ad, 4 kpc × 4 kpc in size.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Inactive-galaxy control sample.

ad, Tricolour optical images in the gri band from Pan-STARRS imaging with about1″ angular resolution. The images show inactive galaxies in the control sample that were matched in stellar mass and SFR to the AGN: NGC 214 (a), NGC 151 (b), NGC 2998 (c) and NGC 6504 (d). The images are 60 kpc × 60 kpc in size. Red squares indicate the size of the zoomed-in AO image on the right. eh, High-spatial-resolution near-infrared images of the nuclear mergers shown in ad, 4 kpc × 4 kpc in size. Some white lines are present in NICMOS and Pan-STARRS imaging owing to bad pixels with very low or zero response or with very high or erratic dark current.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Stellar mass, star formation rate and resolution of AGN and inactive galaxies.

a, H-band luminosity of the different AGN and inactive galaxies. Inactive galaxies with considerably lower stellarmasses than the AGN samples were excluded (〈log(LH/Lʘ)〉 < 9.7). b, 60-μm luminosity of the different AGN and inactive galaxies. Inactive galaxies with lower SFR were also excluded from the comparison (〈log(νLν)60μm〉 = 43.6). For observations in which a galaxy was not detected, we show a 3σ upper limit of the SFR, indicated by a downward arrow. c, Comparison of the maximum spatial resolution (in parsecs) of the different observations. The inactive-galaxy sample typically has higher physical spatial resolutions than the AGN samples. Many galaxies observed fall along a line because of the constant physical resolution of the HST.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Summary of programme types included in the HST control sample.

The majority of archival control sample observations are of high-SFR luminous infrared galaxies (‘LIRG’) or from studies of volume-limited samples of nearby galaxies (‘Nearby Galaxy’). The remaining samples originate from observations of spiral galaxies (‘Spiral’), galaxies in the merger sequence or late-stage mergers (‘Merger’), galaxies with large or small black holes (‘Black Hole’) and elliptical galaxies (‘Elliptical’). Finally, some nearby galaxies were observed serendipitously in observations of other sources or survey fields (‘Serendip’).

Extended Data Fig. 6 SFR and stellar mass.

Measurements of SFR and stellar mass for the BAT AGN sample (purple circles) and the HST-matched archival control sample of inactive galaxies (green diamonds). The full distribution of inactive galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is shown with grey shading and the full distribution of the HST archive with blue contours. The HST archival sample has an excess of high-stellar-mass, high-SFR inactive galaxies because of the large number of observations of luminous infrared galaxies.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Simulated HST images of nuclear mergers at high redshift.

Simulated images of three nuclear mergers (2MASXJ 01392400+2924067, CGCG 341-006, MCG+02-21-013) observed at z = 1 with the HST F160W filter as part of the CANDELS survey (60 mas pixel−1) using optical imaging and FERENGI software. The HST would be unable to detect these final stage mergers. All simulated images are displayed in the arcsinh scale in coupled-channel-device counts, as if observed in the HST F160W filter as part of the CANDELS survey.

Extended Data Table 1 Galaxies with companions within 10 kpc

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data

This file contains a machine readable table associated with the study. The first table, All High Resolution Observations, contains a list of all the galaxies in the study and the details of their high resolution observations, H-band emission as a proxy for star formation and 60 um emission as a proxy for their star formation.

Supplementary Data

This file also contains a machine readable table associated with the study. The second table, HST archival programs, contains a list of all the HST archival programs used in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koss, M.J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P. et al. A population of luminous accreting black holes with hidden mergers. Nature 563, 214–216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0652-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0652-7

Keywords

  • Black Hole
  • Inactive Galaxies
  • Star Formation Rate (SFR)
  • Merger Simulation
  • Stellar Mass

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing