Multiple optical harmonic generation—the multiplication of photon energy as a result of nonlinear interaction between light and matter—is a key technology in modern electronics and optoelectronics, because it allows the conversion of optical or electronic signals into signals with much higher frequency, and the generation of frequency combs. Owing to the unique electronic band structure of graphene, which features massless Dirac fermions1,2,3, it has been repeatedly predicted that optical harmonic generation in graphene should be particularly efficient at the technologically important terahertz frequencies4,5,6. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed experimentally under technologically relevant operation conditions. Here we report the generation of terahertz harmonics up to the seventh order in single-layer graphene at room temperature and under ambient conditions, driven by terahertz fields of only tens of kilovolts per centimetre, and with field conversion efficiencies in excess of 10−3, 10−4 and 10−5 for the third, fifth and seventh terahertz harmonics, respectively. These conversion efficiencies are remarkably high, given that the electromagnetic interaction occurs in a single atomic layer. The key to such extremely efficient generation of terahertz high harmonics in graphene is the collective thermal response of its background Dirac electrons to the driving terahertz fields. The terahertz harmonics, generated via hot Dirac fermion dynamics, were observed directly in the time domain as electromagnetic field oscillations at these newly synthesized higher frequencies. The effective nonlinear optical coefficients of graphene for the third, fifth and seventh harmonics exceed the respective nonlinear coefficients of typical solids by 7–18 orders of magnitude7,8,9. Our results provide a direct pathway to highly efficient terahertz frequency synthesis using the present generation of graphene electronics, which operate at much lower fundamental frequencies of only a few hundreds of gigahertz.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data and code availability

The datasets generated and analysed during this study, and the corresponding computer codes, are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).

  2. 2.

    Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Das Sarma, S., Adam, S., Hwang, E. H. & Rossi, E. Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 407–470 (2011).

  4. 4.

    Mikhailov, S. A. Non-linear graphene optics for terahertz applications. Microelectronics J. 40, 712–715 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Al-Naib, I., Sipe, J. E. & Dignam, M. M. High harmonic generation in undoped graphene: interplay of inter- and intraband dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 90, 245423 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Al-Naib, I., Poschmann, M. & Dignam, M. M. Optimizing third-harmonic generation at terahertz frequencies in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 91, 205407 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd edn (Academic, New York, 2008).

  8. 8.

    Reyna, A. S. & de Araújo, C. B. High-order optical nonlinearities in plasmonic nanocomposites—a review. Adv. Opt. Photonics 9, 720–724 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Reshef, O. et al. Beyond the perturbative description of the nonlinear optical response of low-index materials. Opt. Lett. 42, 3225–3228 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Bowlan, P., Martinez-Moreno, E., Reimann, K., Elsaesser, T. & Woerner, M. Ultrafast terahertz response of multilayer graphene in the nonperturbative regime. Phys. Rev. B 89, 041408 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Yoshikawa, N., Tamaya, T. & Tanaka, K. High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation. Science 356, 736–738 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Zaks, B., Liu, R. B. & Sherwin, M. S. Experimental observation of electron–hole recollisions. Nature 483, 580–583 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Schubert, O. et al. Sub-cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical Bloch oscillations. Nat. Photon. 8, 119–123 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Mics, Z. et al. Thermodynamic picture of ultrafast charge transport in graphene. Nat. Commun. 6, 7655 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Green, B. et al. High-field high-repetition-rate sources for the coherent THz control of matter. Sci. Rep. 6, 22256 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Winnerl, S. et al. Ultrafast processes in graphene: from fundamental manybody interactions to device applications. Ann. Phys. 529, 1700022 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Jadidi, M. M. et al. Nonlinear terahertz absorption of graphene plasmons. Nano Lett. 16, 2734–2738 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Hafez, H. A. et al. Nonlinear terahertz field-induced carrier dynamics in photoexcited epitaxial monolayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 91, 035422 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Breusing, M. et al. Ultrafast nonequilibrium carrier dynamics in a single graphene layer. Phys. Rev. B 83, 153410 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Gierz, I. et al. Snapshots of non-equilibrium Dirac carrier distributions in graphene. Nat. Mater. 12, 1119–1124 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Gierz, I. et al. Tracking primary thermalization events in graphene with photoemission at extreme time scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 086803 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Winzer, T. & Malić, E. Impact of Auger processes on carrier dynamics in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 241404 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Song, J. C. W., Tielrooij, K. J., Koppens, F. H. L. & Levitov, L. S. Photoexcited carrier dynamics and impact-excitation cascade in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 87, 155429 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Tomadin, A., Brida, D., Cerullo, G., Ferrari, A. C. & Polini, M. Nonequilibrium dynamics of photoexcited electrons in graphene: collinear scattering, Auger processes, and the impact of screening. Phys. Rev. B 88, 035430 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Winnerl, S. et al. Carrier relaxation in epitaxial graphene photoexcited near the Dirac point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 237401 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Hwang, H. Y. et al. Nonlinear THz conductivity dynamics in p-type CVD-grown graphene. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 15819–15824 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Hendry, E., Hale, P. J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A. K. & Mikhailov, S. A. Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 097401 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Hong, S. et al. Optical third-harmonic generation in graphene. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021014 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Kumar, N. et al. Third harmonic generation in graphene and few-layer graphite films. Phys. Rev. B 87, 121406 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third-order nonlinearity of graphene: effects of phenomenological relaxation and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235320 (2015).

  31. 31.

    König-Otto, J. C. et al. Four-wave mixing in Landau-quantized graphene. Nano Lett. 17, 2184–2188 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Schwierz, F. Graphene transistors: status, prospects, and problems. Proc. IEEE 101, 1567–1584 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Wehling, T. O., Black-Schaffer, A. M. & Balatsky, A. V. Dirac materials. Adv. Phys. 63, 1–76 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Kuznetsov, S. A., Astafyev, M. A., Gelfand, A. V. & Arzhannikov, A. V. Microstructured frequency selective quasi-optical components for submillimeter-wave applications. In 44th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), 881 (IEEE, Rome, 2014).

  35. 35.

    Wu, Q., Litz, M. & Zhang, X. C. Broadband detection capability of ZnTe electro-optic field detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2924–2926 (1996).

  36. 36.

    Kovalev, S. et al. Probing ultra-fast processes with high dynamic range at 4th-generation light sources: arrival time and intensity binning at unprecedented repetition rates. Struct. Dyn. 4, 024301 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Steiger, A., Kehrt, M., Monte, C. & Müller, R. Traceable terahertz power measurement from 1 THz to 5 THz. Opt. Express 21, 14466–14473 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Müller, R. et al. Novel detectors for traceable THz power measurements. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 35, 659–670 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Gallot, G., Zhang, J., Mcgowan, R. W., Jeon, T. & Grischkowsky, D. Measurements of the THz absorption and dispersion of ZnTe and their relevance to the electro-optic detection of THz radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3450 (1999).

  40. 40.

    Wu, Q. & Zhang, X. Ultrafast electro-optic field sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1604 (1996).

  41. 41.

    Kampfrath, T. et al. Terahertz spin current pulses controlled by magnetic heterostructures. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 256–260 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Parker, T. J. & Ford, J. E. The optical constants of pure far-infrared. Infrared Phys. 18, 215–219 (1978).

  43. 43.

    Li, X. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009).

  44. 44.

    Hao, Y. et al. The role of surface oxygen in the growth of large single-crystal graphene on copper. Science 342, 720–723 (2013).

  45. 45.

    Ferrari, A. C. et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006).

  46. 46.

    Mak, K. F., Ju, L., Wang, F. & Heinz, T. F. Optical spectroscopy of graphene: from the far infrared to the ultraviolet. Solid State Commun. 152, 1341–1349 (2012).

  47. 47.

    Jnawali, G., Rao, Y., Yan, H. & Heinz, T. F. Observation of a transient decrease in terahertz conductivity of single-layer graphene induced by ultrafast optical excitation. Nano Lett. 13, 524–530 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Dawlaty, J. M. et al. Measurement of the optical absorption spectra of epitaxial graphene from terahertz to visible. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 131905 (2008).

  49. 49.

    Frenzel, A. J. et al. Observation of suppressed terahertz absorption in photoexcited graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 113111 (2013).

  50. 50.

    Wang, H. I. et al. Reversible photochemical control of doping levels in supported graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 4083–4091 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Glover, R. E. & Tinkham, M. Conductivity of superconducting films for photon energies between 0.3 and 40 kT c. Phys. Rev. 108, 243–256 (1957).

  52. 52.

    Suess, R. J. et al. Role of transient reflection in graphene nonlinear infrared optics. ACS Photonics 3, 1069–1075 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Hafez, H. A. et al. Intense terahertz field effects on photoexcited carrier dynamics in gated graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 251903 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Marder, M. P. in Condensed Matter Physics, 483–493 (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010).

  55. 55.

    Tielrooij, K. J. et al. Photoexcitation cascade and multiple hot-carrier generation in graphene. Nat. Phys. 9, 248–252 (2013).

  56. 56.

    Hwang, E. H. & Das Sarma, S. Acoustic phonon scattering limited carrier mobility in two-dimensional extrinsic graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115449 (2008).

  57. 57.

    Hwang, E. H. & Das Sarma, S. Screening-induced temperature-dependent transport in two-dimensional graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 165404 (2009).

  58. 58.

    Perebeinos, V. & Avouris, P. Inelastic scattering and current saturation in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 81, 195442 (2010).

  59. 59.

    Lundstrom, M. Fundamentals of Carrier Transport 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2000).

  60. 60.

    Liu, X., Laegsgaard, J. & Turchinovich, D. Self-stabilization of a mode-locked femtosecond fiber laser using a photonic bandgap fiber. Opt. Lett. 35, 913–915 (2010).

  61. 61.

    Lin, I. et al. Terahertz optical properties of multilayer graphene: experimental observation of strong dependence on stacking arrangements and misorientation angles. Phys. Rev. B 86, 235446 (2012).

  62. 62.

    Gosciniak, J. & Tan, D. T. H. Theoretical investigation of graphene-based photonic modulators. Sci. Rep. 3, 1897 (2013).

  63. 63.

    Saltiel, S. M., Sukhorukov, A. A. & Kivshar, Y. S. in Progress in Optics Vol. 47 (ed. Wolf, E.) 1–73 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005).

  64. 64.

    Shearer, C. J., Slattery, A. D., Stapleton, A. J., Shapter, J. G. & Gibson, C. T. Accurate thickness measurement of graphene. Nanotechnology 27, 125704 (2016).

  65. 65.

    Hohenleutner, M. et al. Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation. Nature 523, 572–575 (2015).

Download references


D.T. acknowledges financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1242 ‘Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of Condensed Matter in the Time Domain’, TP B08), European Commission (EU Career Integration Grant EU CIG 334324 LIGHTER) and the Max Planck Society. M.G. and B.G. acknowledge support from the European Cluster of Advanced Laser Light Sources (EUCALL) project which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no 654220. K.J.T. acknowledges support through the Mineco Young Investigator Grant (FIS2014-59639-JIN). J.T. and U.L. acknowledge support from the EuCARD-2 project, which has received funding from the European Commission under grant agreement No 312453. We thank J. Lægsgaard, K. Krewer, E. Unger, W. Zhang, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira and M. Mittendorff for discussions. We thank the ELBE team for the operation of the TELBE facility.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Hassan A. Hafez, Sergey Kovalev


  1. Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    • Hassan A. Hafez
    •  & Dmitry Turchinovich
  2. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany

    • Hassan A. Hafez
    • , Zoltán Mics
    • , Zhaoyang Liu
    • , Zongping Chen
    • , Akimitsu Narita
    • , Klaus Müllen
    • , Mischa Bonn
    •  & Dmitry Turchinovich
  3. Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

    • Hassan A. Hafez
  4. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany

    • Sergey Kovalev
    • , Jan-Christoph Deinert
    • , Bertram Green
    • , Nilesh Awari
    • , Min Chen
    • , Semyon Germanskiy
    • , Ulf Lehnert
    • , Jochen Teichert
    • , Zhe Wang
    •  & Michael Gensch
  5. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    • Nilesh Awari
  6. ICFO—Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain

    • Klaas-Jan Tielrooij


  1. Search for Hassan A. Hafez in:

  2. Search for Sergey Kovalev in:

  3. Search for Jan-Christoph Deinert in:

  4. Search for Zoltán Mics in:

  5. Search for Bertram Green in:

  6. Search for Nilesh Awari in:

  7. Search for Min Chen in:

  8. Search for Semyon Germanskiy in:

  9. Search for Ulf Lehnert in:

  10. Search for Jochen Teichert in:

  11. Search for Zhe Wang in:

  12. Search for Klaas-Jan Tielrooij in:

  13. Search for Zhaoyang Liu in:

  14. Search for Zongping Chen in:

  15. Search for Akimitsu Narita in:

  16. Search for Klaus Müllen in:

  17. Search for Mischa Bonn in:

  18. Search for Michael Gensch in:

  19. Search for Dmitry Turchinovich in:


D.T. and M.G. conceived and supervised the project. H.A.H., S.K., J.-C.D., Z.M., B.G., N.A., M.C., S.G., Z.W., D.T. and M.G. performed the nonlinear THz spectroscopy measurements and evaluated the experimental data. H.A.H. and D.T. performed the modelling, with contributions from Z.M. and K.-J.T. D.T., M.G. and M.B. interpreted the results, with contributions from all co-authors. Z.L., Z.C., A.N. and K.M. manufactured the samples. H.A.H. and D.T. characterized the linear THz properties of the graphene/fused silica samples. U.L. and J.T. provided for the special mode of high bunch charge operation of TELBE using the SRF photoinjector that enabled the observation of the seventh harmonic. M.B. initiated and supported the THz studies on graphene at MPI-P. D.T. and M.G. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from M.B., K.-J.T., S.K. and H.A.H. All co-authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael Gensch or Dmitry Turchinovich.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental set-up.

    Tunable multicycle THz pulses (red) from the undulator of the TELBE facility2 are used to irradiate the graphene sample. 100-fs pulses from a Ti:sapphire laser system (brown) are used to probe the transmitted and emitted THz pulses by free-space electro-optic sampling. PD, photodiode; BS, beamsplitter; Pol., polarizer.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Fundamental frequencies after bandpass filtering.

    The bandwidths were determined from Gaussian fits to the spectra. MSA, mean square amplitude.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Scheme of the set-up for detection of multiple harmonics up to the seventh order.

    Two 0.3-THz bandpass filters (BP) are used to suppress the undulator harmonic background. A single 2.1-THz bandpass filter after the sample attenuates the fundamental, third and fifth harmonics to an extent that they can still be detected by the EOS set-up.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 HHG signal from graphene, reference signal from the SiO2 substrate and filter function of the 2.1-THz bandpass.

    The red curve shows the as-measured HHG spectrum of the graphene sample. The black curve shows the reference spectrum taken from the bare SiO2 substrate. The measured transmission function of the 2.1-THz bandpass filter is also shown (grey line).

  5. Extended Data Fig. 5 Schemes of the experimental configurations to determine the electric fields of the fundamental, THG and FHG pulses.

    Measurements were performed with graphene/SiO2 and with the bare SiO2 substrate. a, Set-up for the THG experiment used to measure the fundamental and harmonic simultaneously. b, Set-up to measure the harmonic in the FHG experiment. Two filters were used before the sample and two after the sample, to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio. c, Set-up to determine the electric fields for the fundamental in the FHG experiment.

  6. Extended Data Fig. 6 Filter function of the 1.93-THz bandpass and raw spectra from the THG experiment.

    a, Amplitude transmission function of a single 1.93-THz bandpass filter. b, As-measured spectral amplitude in arbitrary units (a.u.), as determined from the bare SiO2 substrate (black) and from the graphene sample (red). The incident THz peak field of the fundamental at 0.68 THz was 61 kV cm−1.

  7. Extended Data Fig. 7 Raw spectra from the FHG experiment.

    These as-measured spectra show the spectral amplitude as determined from a measurement with the bare SiO2 substrate as a reference and a measurement of the graphene sample. The incident THz peak field in the fundamental at 0.37 THz was 40 kV cm−1 when using two filters in the incident beam. Insignificant transmission at the fundamental frequency and no spurious background at the FHG frequency band is observed in the reference field measurement.

  8. Extended Data Fig. 8

    Frequency-dependent phase difference induced by the 1.93-THz bandpass filter.

  9. Extended Data Fig. 9 The frequency-dependent response function.

    a, The bare substrate described by the amplitude transmission (black line) and the substrate-induced phase shift (blue line). b, A simulated acceptance function of the 1.9-mm-thick ZnTe detection crystal; amplitude (black curve) and phase shift (blue curve). Arrows indicate relevant axis.

  10. Extended Data Fig. 10 Reconstruction of the harmonic fields from the measured FEOS signals.

    This is an example of THG measurement with f = 0.68 THz → 3f = 2.04 THz. a, Measured FEOS signals (dimensionless). b, The corresponding fields transmitted through the incidence interface of the sample after deconvoluting the response functions of all the elements after the graphene film, including the 1.9-mm-thick ZnTe detection crystal, the 1.93-THz filter and the fused silica substrate from the FEOS signals in a. Black pulse is for the bare substrate, red for the graphene sample and blue for the difference. c, The pure THG field extracted from the blue field pulse in b.

  11. Extended Data Fig. 11 Characterization of the graphene sample.

    a, Raman spectrum of the graphene sample. b, Linear conductivity, real and imaginary, of the graphene film normalized to the universal conductivity σ0 = e2/(4ħ). The symbols represent the experimental data; the solid lines represent the Drude fit with a Fermi level energy EF = 170 meV (corresponding to a doping concentration Nc = 2.1 × 1012 cm−2) and a scattering time τ0 = 47 fs as fitting parameters. The error bars are the standard deviation in the measurements.

  12. Extended Data Fig. 12 The nonlinear (THz-field-dependent) refractive index of the graphene film.

    a, The THz refractive index of the graphene film as a function of frequency at various peak electric fields for the THz pump at 0.3 THz, showing reduction in the refractive index with both frequency and exciting field strength. b, The field dependence of the nonlinear THz refractive index at the harmonics 3f = 2.04 THz generated by 1f = 0.68 THz pump, 5f = 1.85 THz generated by 1f = 0.37 THz pump, and 7f = 2.1 THz generated by 1f = 0.3 THz pump.

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.