Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Reviving regenerative urology

Despite initial enthusiasm, poor translation of preclinical studies and high-profile scandals involving stem cell research have hindered the field of regenerative urology in recent years. However, consideration of the potential of regenerative approaches to revolutionize patient care ought to reignite interest and begin a renaissance in regenerative urology research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Wezel, F., Southgate, J. & Thomas, D. F. M. Regenerative medicine in urology. BJU Int. 108, 1046–1065 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Coppi, P. & Grikscheit, T. C. Regenerative medicine: is this the biggest change in surgery? Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 23, 103–105 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garriboli, M., Radford, A. & Southgate, J. Regenerative medicine in urology. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 24, 227–236 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanematsu, A. Regenerative medicine for urological tissues: updated review 2018. Int. J. Urol. 25, 788–791 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Julian, K. et al. The “growing” reality of the neurological complications of global “stem cell tourism”. Semin. Neurol. 38, 176–181 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbott, A. Report finds grave flaws in urology trial. Nature 454, 922 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, N. F. et al. Biomaterials and regenerative medicine in urology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 3, 189–198 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson, K. E. & Williams, J. K. Regenerative pharmacology in urology. Investig. Clin. Urol. 58, 79–81 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tran, C. & Damaser, M. S. Stem cells as drug delivery methods: application of stem cell secretome for regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 82–83, 1–11 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tai, G., Tai, M. & Zhao, M. Electrically stimulated cell migration and its contribution to wound healing. Burns Trauma 6, 20 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.D. researched data for the article. Both authors made substantial contributions to discussion of content, wrote the manuscript, and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margot S. Damaser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.S.D. and K-.D.S. both hold patents in the field of regenerative urology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damaser, M.S., Sievert, KD. Reviving regenerative urology. Nat Rev Urol 16, 143–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0131-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0131-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research