Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with health (physical and mental) and cognitive ability. Understanding and ameliorating the problems of low SES have long been goals of economics and sociology; in recent years, these have also become goals of neuroscience. However, opinion varies widely on the relevance of neuroscience to SES-related policy. The present article addresses the question of whether and how neuroscience can contribute to the development of social policy concerning poverty and the social and ethical risks inherent in trying. I argue that the neuroscience approach to SES-related policy has been both prematurely celebrated and peremptorily dismissed and that some of its possible social impacts have been viewed with excessive alarm. Neuroscience has already made modest contributions to SES-related policy, and its potential to have a more effective and beneficial influence can be expected to grow over the coming years.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Department of Health and Human Services. Annual update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines. Federal Register 83, (2642–2644 (2018).
Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R. & Kollar, M. A. Income and Poverty in the United States: 2016 (United States Census Bureau, 2017).
[No authors listed.] The World Factbook — Population Below Poverty Line. Central Intelligence Agency https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2046.html (2017).
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Inequality. Poverty Rate (indicator). OECD iLibrary https://doi.org/10.1787/0fe1315d-en (2015).
UNICEF. Child Poverty. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women https://data.unicef.org/topic/overview/child-poverty/ (2017).
Adler, N. E. et al. Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am. Psychol. 49, 15–24 (1994).
Amso, D. & Lynn, A. Distinctive mechanisms of adversity and socioeconomic inequality in child development: a review and recommendations for evidence-based policy. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 4, 139–146 (2017).
Duncan, G. J. & Magnuson, K. Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: moving from correlation to causation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cognitive Sci. 3, 377–386 (2012).
McEwen, B. S. & Gianaros, P. J. Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1186, 190–222 (2010).
Nusslock, R. & Miller, G. E. Early-life adversity and physical and emotional health across the lifespan: a neuro-immune network hypothesis. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 23–32 (2016).
The World Bank. World Development Report — Mind, Society, and Behavior (The World Bank, 2015).
UNICEF. Building Better Brains: New Frontiers in Early Childhood Development (UNICEF, 2014).
Black, M. M. et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course Lancet. 389, 7–13 (2017).
Brito, P. R. et al. Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development Lancet. 389, 91–102 (2017).
Richter, L. M. et al. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet. 389, 103–118 (2017).
Allen, G. Early Intervention: The Next Steps (Crown copyright, 2011).
Allen, G. & Smith, I. D. Early intervention: Good parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens (Centre for Social Justice and the Smith Institute, 2009).
Shonkoff, J. P. & Levitt, P. Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy: moving from why to what and how. Neuron 67, 689–691 (2010).
National Education Association. Teaching Children from Poverty and Trauma (National Education Association, 2016).
Babcock, E. D. Using brain science to design new pathways out of poverty (Crittenton Women’s Union, 2014).
Hayasaki, E. How poverty affects the brain. Newsweek (25 Aug 2016).
Bruer, J. T. The Myth of the First Three Years: A New Understanding of Early Brain Development and Lifelong Learning (Simon and Schuster, 1999).
Rose, H. & Rose, S. Can Neuroscience Change Our Minds? (Polity Press, 2016).
Wax, A. L. The poverty of the neuroscience of poverty: policy payoff or false promise? Jurimetr. J. 57, 239–287 (2017).
Nadesan, M. H. Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: brain science, infant development toys, and governmentality. Cultural Studies 16, 401–432 (2002).
Thornton, D. J. Neuroscience, affect, and the entrepreneurialization of motherhood. Commun. Crit./Cultural Studies 8, 399–424 (2011).
Lende, D. H. Poverty poisons the brain. Ann. Anthropol. Pract. 36, 183–201 (2012).
Hackman, D. A. & Farah, M. J. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cognitive Sci. 13, 65–73 (2009).
Farah, M. J. The neuroscience of socioeconomic status: correlates, causes and consequences. Neuron 96, 56–71 (2017).
Johnson, S. B., Riis, J. L. & Noble, K. G. State of the art review: poverty and the developing brain. Pediatrics 137, e20153075 (2016).
Lipina, S. J. & Segretin, M. S. Strengths and weaknesses of neuroscientific investigations of childhood poverty. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 53 (2015).
Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J. & Meaney, M. J. Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 651–659 (2010).
Rutter, M. & Solantaus, T. Translation gone awry: differences between commonsense and science. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 23, 247–255 (2014).
Sheridan, M. A. & McLaughlin, K. A. Dimensions of early experience and neural development: deprivation and threat. Trends Cognitive Sci. 18, 580–585 (2014).
Lawson, G. M. et al. Childhood socioeconomic status and childhood maltreatment: distinct associations with brain structure. PLoS ONE. 12, e0175690 (2017).
Felitti, V. J. et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am. J. Prevent. Med. 14, 245–258 (1998).
Evans, G. W., Li, D. & Whipple, S. S. Cumulate risk and child development. Psychol. Bull. 139, 1342–1396 (2013).
Noble, K. G. et al. Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 773–778 (2015).
Demir, Ö. E., Prado, J. & Booth, J. R. Parental socioeconomic status and the neural basis of arithmetic: differential relations to verbal and visuospatial representations. Dev. Sci. 18, 799–814 (2015).
Yang, J. et al. Regional gray matter volume mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and depression-related trait in a young healthy sample. Cognitive Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 16, 51–62 (2015).
Rutter, M. How the Environment affects mental health. Br. J. Psychiatry. 186, 4–6 (2005).
Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 371–399 (2002).
Guo, G. & Harris, K. M. The mechanisms mediating the effect of poverty on children’s intellectual development. Demography 37, 431–447 (2000).
McLoyd, V. C. Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. Am. Psychol. 53, 185–204 (1998).
Luby, J. et al. The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: The mediating effect of caregiving and stressful life events. JAMA Pediatr. 167, 1135–1142 (2013).
Swartz, J. R., Hariri, A. R. & Williamson, D. E. An epigenetic mechanism links socioeconomic status to changes in depression-related brain function in high-risk adolescents. Mol. Psychiatry. 22, 209–214 (2016).
Piccolo, L. R., Merz, E. C., He, X., Sowell, E. R. & Noble, K. G. Age-related differences in cortical thickness vary by socioeconomic status. PLoS ONE 11, e0162511 (2016).
Callaghan, B. L. & Tottenham, N. The stress acceleration hypothesis: effects of early-life adversity on emotion circuits and behavior. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 7, 76–81 (2016).
Elbejjani, M. et al. Life-course socioeconomic position and hippocampal atrophy in a prospective cohort of older adults. Psychosomat. Med. 79, 14–23 (2017).
Johnson, N. F., Kim, C. & Gold, B. T. Socioeconomic status is positively correlated with frontal white matter integrity in aging. Age 35, 2045–2056 (2013).
Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Kan, E. & Sowell, E. R. Neural correlates of socioeconomic status in the developing human brain. Dev. Sci. 15, 516–527 (2012).
D’Angiulli, A., Herdman, A., Stapells, D. & Hertzman, C. Children’s event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status. Neuropsychology 22, 293–300 (2008).
D’Angiulli, A. et al. Frontal EEG/ERP correlates of attentional processes, cortisol and motivational states in adolescents from lower and higher socioeconomic status. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 306 (2012).
Stevens, C., Lauinger, B. & Neville, H. Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related potential study. Dev. Sci. 12, 634–636 (2009).
Gabrieli, J. D. E., Ghosh, S. S. & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron 85, 11–26 (2015).
Fodor, J. A. Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology (Random House, 1968).
Hair, N. L., Hanson, J. L. & Wolfe, B. L. Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatr. 169, 822–829 (2015).
Mackey, A. P. et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of the income-achievement gap. Psychol. Sci. 26, 925–933 (2015).
Perera, F. et al. Children’s environmental health research — highlights from the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1076, 15–28 (2006).
Weiss, B. & Bellinger, D. C. Social ecology of children’s vulnerability to environmental pollutants. Environ. Health Persp. 114, 1479–1485 (2006).
Murray, C. & Herrnstein, R. The Bell Curve. Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (Free Press Paperbacks, 1994).
Turner, R. J. & Lloyd, D. A. The stress process and the social distribution of depression. J. Health Social Behav. 40, 374–404 (1999).
Gilman, S. E., Kawachi, I., Fitzmaurice, G. M. & Buka, S. L. Socioeconomic status in childhood and the lifetime risk of major depression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 31, 359–367 (2002).
McEwen, C. A. & McEwen, B. S. Social structure, adversity, toxic stress, and intergenerational poverty: an early childhood model. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43, 445–472 (2017).
Nestler, E. J., Peña, C. J., Kundakovic, M., Mitchell, A. & Akbarian, S. Epigenetic basis of mental illness. Neuroscientist 22, 447–463 (2016).
Curley, J. P. & Champagne, F. A. Influence of maternal care on the developing brain: mechanisms, temporal dynamics and sensitive periods. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 40, 52–66 (2016).
Brody, G. H. et al. Protective prevention effects on the association of poverty with brain development. JAMA Pediatr. 171, 46–52 (2017).
Morris, A. S. et al. Targeting parenting in early childhood: a public health approach to improve outcomes for children living in poverty. Child Dev. 88, 388–397 (2017).
Ioannidis, J. P. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).
Krimsky, S. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law. Am. J. Public Health. 95, S129–S136 (2005).
Crnic, K. A., Gaze, C. & Hoffman, C. Cumulative parenting stress across the preschool period: Relations to maternal parenting and child behaviour at age 5. Infant Child Dev. 14, 117–132 (2005).
Pavlakis, A. E., Noble, K., Pavlakis, S. G., Ali, N. & Frank, Y. Brain imaging and electrophysiology biomarkers: is there a role in poverty and education outcome research? Pediatr. Neurol. 52, 383–388 (2015).
Hampel, H. et al. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, (560–574 (2010).
Neville, H. J. et al. Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12138–12143 (2013).
Blair, C. & Raver, C. C. Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten. PLoS ONE 9, e112393 (2014).
Noble, K. G. Brain trust. Sci. Am. 316, 44 (2017).
Nelson, C. A. An international approach to research on brain development. Trends Cognitive Sci. 19, 424–426 (2015).
Perera, F. & Herbstman, J. Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease. Reproductive Toxicol. 31, 363–373 (2011).
Gilman, S. E. et al. Socioeconomic disadvantage, gestational immune activity, and neurodevelopment in early childhood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6728–6733 (2017).
Buss, C. et al. Maternal cortisol over the course of pregnancy and subsequent child amygdala and hippocampus volumes and affective problems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1312–E1319 (2012).
Walvoord, E. C. The timing of puberty: is it changing? Does it matter? J. Adolesc. Health. 47, 433–439 (2010).
Takesian, A. E. & Hensch, T. K. Balancing plasticity/stability across brain development. Progress Brain Res. 207, 3–34 (2013).
Harrison, C. A. & Taren, D. How poverty affects diet to shape the microbiota and chronic disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 279–287 (2017).
Richardson, R., Cowan, C. S. M., Callaghan, B. L. & Kan, J. M. Effects of early-life stress on fear memory in the developing rat. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 7, 15–20 (2016).
Borghol, N. et al. Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41, 62–74 (2011).
Uddin, M., Jansen, S. & Telzer, E. H. Adolescent depression linked to socioeconomic status? Molecular approaches for revealing premorbid risk factors. BioEssays 39, 1600194 (2017).
Turecki, G. & Meaney, M. J. Effects of the social environment and stress on glucocorticoid receptor gene methylation: a systematic review. Biol. Psychiatry. 79, 87–96 (2016).
Zhang, T. Y., Labonte, B., Wen, X. L., Turecki, G. & Meany, M. J. Epigenetic mechanisms for the early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression in rodents and humans. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rev. 38, 111–123 (2013).
Adwan, L. & Zawia, N. H. Epigenetics: A novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 139, 41–50 (2013).
Gavin, D. P. & Sharma, R. P. Histone modifications, DNA methylation, and schizophrenia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 882–888 (2010).
Lipina, S. J. & Evers, K. Neuroscience of childhood poverty: Evidence of impacts and mechanisms as vehicles of dialog with ethics. Front. Psychol. 8, 61 (2017).
Choudhury, S. & Slaby, J. Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).
Friedli, L. in Health Inequalities: Critical Perspectives (eds Smith, K. E., Bambra, C. & Hill, S. E.) 206–221 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Macvarish, J., Lee, E. & Lowe, P. The ‘First Three Years’ movement and the infant brain: a review of critiques. Sociol. Compass 8, 792–804 (2014).
Millei, Z. & Joronen, M. The (bio) politicization of neuroscience in Australian early years policies: Fostering brain-resources as human capital. J. Educ. Policy. 31, 389–404 (2016).
Katz, M. B. The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty: Fully Updated and Revised (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).
Lee, C. D. A voyeuristic view of possibilities and threats: neurosciences and education. Hum. Dev. 57, 1–4 (2014).
Becker, G. S. Human Capital: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics (Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008).
Blair, C. & Raver, C. C. Poverty, stress, and brain development: new directions for prevention and intervention. Academ. Pediatr. 16, S30–S36 (2016).
Hulbert, A. Raising America: Experts, Parents, and a Century of Advice About Children (Vintage Books, 2004).
Heckman, J. J. Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312, 1900–1902 (2006).
Vanderwert, R. E., Marshall, P. J., Nelson III, C. A., Zeanah, C. H. & Fox, N. A. Timing of intervention affects brain electrical activity in children exposed to severe psychosocial neglect. PLoS ONE 5, e11415 (2010).
Hübener, M. & Bonhoeffer, T. Neuronal plasticity: beyond the critical period. Cell 159, 727–737 (2014).
Singh, I. Human development, nature and nurture: working beyond the divide. BioSocieties 7, 308–321 (2012).
Shonkoff, J. P. & Bales, S. N. Science does not speak for itself: translating child development research for the public and its policymakers. Child Dev. 82, 17–32 (2011).
Kessler, R. C. et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 62, 593–602 (2005).
Sirin, S. R. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev. Educat. Res. 75, 417–453 (2005).
Dunham, H. W. Social structures and mental disorders: Competing hypotheses of explanation. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. 39, 259–311 (1961).
Jensen, A. R. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educat. Rev. 39, 1–123 (1969).
Herrnstein, R. J. I. Q. in the Meritocracy (Little, Brown, 1973).
Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. Moving beyond correlations in assessing the consequences of poverty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 413–434 (2017).
Costello, E. J., Compton, S. N., Keeler, G. & Angold, A. Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment. JAMA 290, 2023–2029 (2003).
Costello, E. J., Erklani, A., Copeland, W. & Angold, A. Association of family income supplements in adolescence with developments of psychiatric and substance use disorders in adulthood among an American Indian population. JAMA 303, 1954–1960 (2010).
Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: a Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4612–4617 (2015).
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G. & Gage, F. H. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 191–198 (2000).
Murgatroyd, C. A. & Nephew, B. C. Effects of early life social stress on maternal behavior and neuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 219–228 (2013).
Rosenblum, L. A. & Paully, G. S. The effects of varying environmental demands on maternal and infant behavior. Child Dev. 55, 305–314 (1984).
Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Liu, D. & Meaney, M. J. Nongenomic transmission across generations in maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science 286, 1155–1158 (1999).
Gianaros, P. J., Marsland, A. L., Sheu, L. K., Erikson, K. I. & Verstynen, T. D. Inflammatory pathways link socioeconomic inequalities to white matter architecture. Cereb. Cortex 23, 2058–2071 (2013).
Gianaros, P. J. et al. Community socioeconomic disadvantage in midlife relates to cortical morphology via neuroendocrine and cardiometabolic pathways. Cereb. Cortex 27, 460–473 (2017).
Kim, P. et al. Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18442–18447 (2013).
Krishnadas, R. et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and cortical morphology: psychological, social, and biological determinants of ill health study. Am. Psychosomat. Soc. 75, 616–623 (2013).
Holz, N. E. et al. The long-term impact of early life poverty on orbitofrontal cortex volume in adulthood: results from a prospective study over 25 years. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 996–1004 (2015).
Farah, M. J. et al. in Neuroscience 2017 524.16 / UU77 (Washington, DC, 2017).
Shonkoff, J. P. & Philips, D. A. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development (National Academy Press, 2000).
Satel, S. & Lillenfield, S. O. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. (Basic Books, 2013).
Legrenzi, P. & Umilta, C. Neuromania: On the Limits of Brain Science (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Tallis, R. Aping mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity (Routledge, 2014).
Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E. & Gray, J. R. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 20, 470–477 (2008).
Farah, M. J. & Hook, C. J. The seductive allure of “Seductive Allure”. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 8, 88–90 (2013).
Rostron, B. L., Boies, J. L. & Arias, E. Education reporting and classification on death certificates in the United States. Vital Health Statist., Series 2, Data Evalu. Methods Res. 151, 1–21 (2010).
Public Health Agency of Canada. in Health status of Canadians 2016: Report of the Chief Public Health Officer. 55–57 (Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Health, 2016).
The College Board. 2013 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Profile Report (College Board, 2013).
The author is grateful to many people for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, including S. Lipina, C. Nelson, T. Nichols, K. Noble, J. Shonkoff and four anonymous reviewers.
The author declares no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Farah, M.J. Socioeconomic status and the brain: prospects for neuroscience-informed policy. Nat Rev Neurosci 19, 428–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0023-2
How Does the Psychological Well-being (PWB) in the First Year of College Studies Predict Community College Students’ Academic Performance in Hong Kong?
Community College Journal of Research and Practice (2021)
Gestational Age-Specific Distribution of the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination Scores Among Low-Risk Neonates in Ghana
Early Human Development (2021)
Childhood adversity and deviant peers: Considering behavioral selection and cultural socialization pathways
Children and Youth Services Review (2021)
The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Scalp Event-Related Potentials: A Systematic Review
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2021)
Association of Inflammatory Activity With Larger Neural Responses to Threat and Reward Among Children Living in Poverty
American Journal of Psychiatry (2021)