Abstract
Microtubules are dynamic polymers of αβ-tubulin that are essential for intracellular organization, organelle trafficking and chromosome segregation. Microtubule growth and shrinkage occur via addition and loss of αβ-tubulin subunits, which are biochemical processes. Dynamic microtubules can also engage in mechanical processes, such as exerting forces by pushing or pulling against a load. Recent advances at the intersection of biochemistry and mechanics have revealed the existence of multiple conformations of αβ-tubulin subunits and their central role in dictating the mechanisms of microtubule dynamics and force generation. It has become apparent that microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) selectively target specific tubulin conformations to regulate microtubule dynamics, and mechanical forces can also influence microtubule dynamics by altering the balance of tubulin conformations. Importantly, the conformational states of tubulin dimers are likely to be coupled throughout the lattice: the conformation of one dimer can influence the conformation of its nearest neighbours, and this effect can propagate over longer distances. This coupling provides a long-range mechanism by which MAPs and forces can modulate microtubule growth and shrinkage. These findings provide evidence that the interplay between biochemistry and mechanics is essential for the cellular functions of microtubules.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Desai, A. & Mitchison, T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 83–117 (1997).
Carlier, M. F. & Pantaloni, D. Kinetic analysis of guanosine 5′-triphosphate hydrolysis associated with tubulin polymerization. Biochemistry 20, 1918–1924 (1981).
Akhmanova, A. & Steinmetz, M. O. Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 309–322 (2008).
Akhmanova, A. & Steinmetz, M. O. Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 711–726 (2015).
Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Microtubule polymerases and depolymerases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 31–35 (2007).
Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312, 237–242 (1984).
Inoue, S. & Salmon, E. D. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1619–1640 (1995).
Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature 422, 753–758 (2003).
Kueh, H. Y. & Mitchison, T. J. Structural plasticity in actin and tubulin polymer dynamics. Science 325, 960–963 (2009).
Gell, C. et al. Microtubule dynamics reconstituted in vitro and imaged by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 221–245 (2010).
Maurer, S. P. et al. EB1 accelerates two conformational transitions important for microtubule maturation and dynamics. Curr. Biol. 24, 372–384 (2014).
Duellberg, C., Cade, N. I., Holmes, D. & Surrey, T. The size of the EB cap determines instantaneous microtubule stability. eLife 5, e13470 (2016).
Gardner, M. K. et al. Rapid microtubule self-assembly kinetics. Cell 146, 582–592 (2011).
Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Growth, fluctuation and switching at microtubule plus ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 569–574 (2009).
Gittes, F., Mickey, B., Nettleton, J. & Howard, J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120, 923–934 (1993).
Gates, S. N. et al. Ratchet-like polypeptide translocation mechanism of the AAA+ disaggregase Hsp104. Science 357, 273–279 (2017).
Zhao, M. et al. Mechanistic insights into the recycling machine of the SNARE complex. Nature 518, 61–67 (2015).
Brouhard, G. J. & Rice, L. M. The contribution of alphabeta-tubulin curvature to microtubule dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 207, 323–334 (2014).
Bieling, P. et al. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 450, 1100–1105 (2007).
Mandelkow, E. M., Mandelkow, E. & Milligan, R. A. Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy study. J. Cell Biol. 114, 977–991 (1991).
Chretien, D., Fuller, S. D. & Karsenti, E. Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1311–1328 (1995).
Lodish, H. F. Molecular Cell Biology. 8th edn (W. H. Freeman–Macmillan Learning, New York, 2016).
Sept, D. & McCammon, J. A. Thermodynamics and kinetics of actin filament nucleation. Biophys. J. 81, 667–674 (2001).
Zhang, R., Alushin, G. M., Brown, A. & Nogales, E. Mechanistic origin of microtubule dynamic instability and its modulation by EB proteins. Cell 162, 849–859 (2015).
Guesdon, A. et al. EB1 interacts with outwardly curved and straight regions of the microtubule lattice. Nature Cell Biol. 18, 1102–1108 (2016).
Wang, H. W. & Nogales, E. Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly. Nature 435, 911–915 (2005).
Zakharov, P. et al. Molecular and mechanical causes of microtubule catastrophe and ageing. Biophys. J. 109, 2574–2591 (2015).
VanBuren, V., Cassimeris, L. & Odde, D. J. Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. Biophys. J. 89, 2911–2926 (2005).
Alushin, G. M. et al. High-resolution microtubule structures reveal the structural transitions in alphabeta-tubulin upon GTP hydrolysis. Cell 157, 1117–1129 (2014).This paper, along with reference 24, defines the expanded, compacted and twisted conformations of αβ-tubulin in the lattice.
Ravelli, R. B. et al. Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature 428, 198–202 (2004).
Coue, M., Lombillo, V. A. & McIntosh, J. R. Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 112, 1165–1175 (1991).
Koshland, D. E., Mitchison, T. J. & Kirschner, M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature 331, 499–504 (1988).
Buey, R. M., Diaz, J. F. & Andreu, J. M. The nucleotide switch of tubulin and microtubule assembly: a polymerization-driven structural change. Biochemistry 45, 5933–5938 (2006).
Rice, L. M., Montabana, E. A. & Agard, D. A. The lattice as allosteric effector: structural studies of alphabeta- and gamma-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5378–5383 (2008).
Nawrotek, A., Knossow, M. & Gigant, B. The determinants that govern microtubule assembly from the atomic structure of GTP-tubulin. J. Mol. Biol. 412, 35–42 (2011).
Howes, S. C. et al. Structural differences between yeast and mammalian microtubules revealed by cryo-EM. J. Cell Biol. 216, 2669–2677 (2017).
von Loeffelholz, O. et al. Nucleotide- and Mal3-dependent changes in fission yeast microtubules suggest a structural plasticity view of dynamics. Nat. Commun. 8, 2110 (2017).
Dogterom, M. & Yurke, B. Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science 278, 856–860 (1997).
Holy, T. E., Dogterom, M., Yurke, B. & Leibler, S. Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6228–6231 (1997).
Tolic-Norrelykke, I. M., Sacconi, L., Thon, G. & Pavone, F. S. Positioning and elongation of the fission yeast spindle by microtubule-based pushing. Curr. Biol. 14, 1181–1186 (2004).
Tran, P. T., Marsh, L., Doye, V., Inoue, S. & Chang, F. A mechanism for nuclear positioning in fission yeast based on microtubule pushing. J. Cell Biol. 153, 397–411 (2001).
Grishchuk, E. L., Molodtsov, M. I., Ataullakhanov, F. I. & McIntosh, J. R. Force production by disassembling microtubules. Nature 438, 384–388 (2005).
Powers, A. F. et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 136, 865–875 (2009).
Akiyoshi, B. et al. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468, 576–579 (2010). This study demonstrates that kinetochore particles purified from yeast form load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubules and that tension applied through the kinetochores alters microtubule dynamics.
Asbury, C. L., Gestaut, D. R., Powers, A. F., Franck, A. D. & Davis, T. N. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9873–9878 (2006).
Franck, A. D. et al. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 832–837 (2007).
Volkov, V. A. et al. Long tethers provide high-force coupling of the Dam1 ring to shortening microtubules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7708–7713 (2013).
Trushko, A., Schaffer, E. & Howard, J. The growth speed of microtubules with XMAP215-coated beads coupled to their ends is increased by tensile force. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14670–14675 (2013).
Wang, P. J. & Huffaker, T. C. Stu2p: a microtubule-binding protein that is an essential component of the yeast spindle pole body. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1271–1280 (1997).
Miller, M. P., Asbury, C. L. & Biggins, S. A. TOG protein confers tension sensitivity to kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Cell 165, 1428–1439 (2016). In this work, the authors discover that the microtubule polymerase Stu2 contributes to kinetochore–microtubule coupling in a tension-dependent way that is independent of polymerase activity.
Driver, J. W., Geyer, E. A., Bailey, M. E., Rice, L. M. & Asbury, C. L. Direct measurement of conformational strain energy in protofilaments curling outward from disassembling microtubule tips. eLife 6, e28433 (2017). In this study, the authors quantify the amount of mechanical work performed by a depolymerizing microtubule. They show that this work is not changed by a mutation that slows microtubule shrinking by altering the tubulin conformational cycle.
Gennerich, A., Carter, A. P., Reck-Peterson, S. L. & Vale, R. D. Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 131, 952–965 (2007).
Howard, J. The movement of kinesin along microtubules. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 58, 703–729 (1996).
Geyer, E. A. et al. A mutation uncouples the tubulin conformational and GTPase cycles, revealing allosteric control of microtubule dynamics. eLife 4, e10113 (2015).
Doodhi, H. et al. Termination of protofilament elongation by eribulin induces lattice defects that promote microtubule catastrophes. Curr. Biol. 26, 1713–1721 (2016).
Mohan, R. et al. End-binding proteins sensitize microtubules to the action of microtubule-targeting agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8900–8905 (2013).
Dixit, R. et al. Microtubule plus-end tracking by CLIP-170 requires EB1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 492–497 (2009).
Maurer, S. P., Bieling, P., Cope, J., Hoenger, A. & Surrey, T. GTPgammaS microtubules mimic the growing microtubule end structure recognized by end-binding proteins (EBs). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3988–3993 (2011).
Maurer, S. P., Fourniol, F. J., Bohner, G., Moores, C. A. & Surrey, T. EBs recognize a nucleotide-dependent structural cap at growing microtubule ends. Cell 149, 371–382 (2012).
Zanic, M., Stear, J. H., Hyman, A. A. & Howard, J. EB1 recognizes the nucleotide state of tubulin in the microtubule lattice. PloS ONE 4, e7585 (2009).
Hyman, A. A., Salser, S., Drechsel, D. N., Unwin, N. & Mitchison, T. J. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1155–1167 (1992).
Belmont, L. D. & Mitchison, T. J. Identification of a protein that interacts with tubulin dimers and increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules. Cell 84, 623–631 (1996).
Steinmetz, M. O. et al. Op18/stathmin caps a kinked protofilament-like tubulin tetramer. EMBO J. 19, 572–580 (2000).
Mulder, A. M. et al. A new model for binding of kinesin 13 to curved microtubule protofilaments. J. Cell Biol. 185, 51–57 (2009).
Hunter, A. W. et al. The kinesin-related protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule ends. Mol. Cell 11, 445–457 (2003).
Helenius, J., Brouhard, G., Kalaidzidis, Y., Diez, S. & Howard, J. The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature 441, 115–119 (2006).
Desai, A., Verma, S., Mitchison, T. J. & Walczak, C. E. Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell 96, 69–78 (1999).
Gardner, M. K., Zanic, M., Gell, C., Bormuth, V. & Howard, J. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3 and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe. Cell 147, 1092–1103 (2011).
Walczak, C. E., Mitchison, T. J. & Desai, A. XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 84, 37–47 (1996).
Varga, V. et al. Yeast kinesin-8 depolymerizes microtubules in a length-dependent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 957–962 (2006).
Gupta, M. L. Jr, Carvalho, P., Roof, D. M. & Pellman, D. Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 913–923 (2006).
Varga, V., Leduc, C., Bormuth, V., Diez, S. & Howard, J. Kinesin-8 motors act cooperatively to mediate length-dependent microtubule depolymerization. Cell 138, 1174–1183 (2009).
Arellano-Santoyo, H. et al. A tubulin binding switch underlies Kip3/kinesin-8 depolymerase activity. Dev. Cell 42, 37–51 e8 (2017).
Wang, W. et al. Insight into microtubule disassembly by kinesin-13s from the structure of Kif2C bound to tubulin. Nat. Commun. 8, 70 (2017).
Asenjo, A. B. et al. Structural model for tubulin recognition and deformation by kinesin-13 microtubule depolymerases. Cell Rep. 3, 759–768 (2013).
Al-Bassam, J. et al. Fission yeast Alp14 is a dose-dependent plus end-tracking microtubule polymerase. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2878–2890 (2012).
Brouhard, G. J. et al. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132, 79–88 (2008).
Hussmann, F., Drummond, D. R., Peet, D. R., Martin, D. S. & Cross, R. A. Alp7/TACC-Alp14/TOG generates long-lived, fast-growing MTs by an unconventional mechanism. Sci. Rep. 6, 20653 (2016).
Podolski, M., Mahamdeh, M. & Howard, J. Stu2, the budding yeast XMAP215/Dis1 homologue, promotes assembly of yeast microtubules by increasing growth rate and decreasing catastrophe frequency. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 28087–28093 (2014).
Matsuo, Y. et al. An unconventional interaction between Dis1/TOG and Mal3/EB1 in fission yeast promotes the fidelity of chromosome segregation. J. Cell Sci. 129, 4592–4606 (2016).
Ayaz, P. et al. A tethered delivery mechanism explains the catalytic action of a microtubule polymerase. eLife 3, e03069 (2014).
Ayaz, P., Ye, X., Huddleston, P., Brautigam, C. A. & Rice, L. M. A. TOG:alphabeta-tubulin complex structure reveals conformation-based mechanisms for a microtubule polymerase. Science 337, 857–860 (2012).
Hibbel, A. et al. Kinesin Kip2 enhances microtubule growth in vitro through length-dependent feedback on polymerization and catastrophe. eLife 4, e10542 (2015).
Chen, Y. & Hancock, W. O. Kinesin-5 is a microtubule polymerase. Nat. Commun. 6, 8160 (2015).
Guzik-Lendrum, S., Rayment, I. & Gilbert, S. P. Homodimeric kinesin-2 KIF3CC promotes microtubule dynamics. Biophys. J. 113, 1845–1857 (2017).
Sardar, H. S., Luczak, V. G., Lopez, M. M., Lister, B. C. & Gilbert, S. P. Mitotic kinesin CENP-E promotes microtubule plus-end elongation. Curr. Biol. 20, 1648–1653 (2010).
Akhmanova, A. et al. CLASPs are CLIP-115 and -170 associating proteins involved in the regional regulation of microtubule dynamics in motile fibroblasts. Cell 104, 923–935 (2001).
Al-Bassam, J. et al. CLASP promotes microtubule rescue by recruiting tubulin dimers to the microtubule. Dev. Cell 19, 245–258 (2010).
van Riel, W. E. et al. Kinesin-4 KIF21B is a potent microtubule pausing factor. eLife 6, e24746 (2017).
Atherton, J. et al. A structural model for microtubule minus-end recognition and protection by CAMSAP proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 931–943 (2017).
Petry, S. & Vale, R. D. Microtubule nucleation at the centrosome and beyond. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1089–1093 (2015).
Roostalu, J. & Surrey, T. Microtubule nucleation: beyond the template. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 702–710 (2017).
Gardner, M. K., Zanic, M. & Howard, J. Microtubule catastrophe and rescue. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 14–22 (2013).
Oosawa, F. & Asakura, S. Thermodynamics of the Polymerization of Protein (Academic Press, London, 1975).
Erickson, H. P. & Pantaloni, D. The role of subunit entropy in cooperative assembly. Nucleation of microtubules and other two-dimensional polymers. Biophys. J. 34, 293–309 (1981).
Voter, W. A. & Erickson, H. P. The kinetics of microtubule assembly. Evidence for a two-stage nucleation mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 10430–10438 (1984).
Kuchnir Fygenson, D., Flyvbjerg, H., Sneppen, K., Libchaber, A. & Leibler, S. Spontaneous nucleation of microtubules. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 51, 5058–5063 (1995).
Zheng, Y., Wong, M. L., Alberts, B. & Mitchison, T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a gamma-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 378, 578–583 (1995).
Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M. B., Sedat, J. W., Alberts, B. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleation by gamma-tubulin-containing rings in the centrosome. Nature 378, 638–640 (1995).
Lindeboom, J. J. et al. A mechanism for reorientation of cortical microtubule arrays driven by microtubule severing. Science 342, 1245533 (2013).
Wieczorek, M., Bechstedt, S., Chaaban, S. & Brouhard, G. J. Microtubule-associated proteins control the kinetics of microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 907–916 (2015). This study carefully quantifies the kinetics of microtubule nucleation on templates such as centrosomes and blunt microtubule seeds. It provides evidence for a common obstacle to microtubule nucleation that is related to the lack of a normal microtubule end structure and demonstrates that MAPs can regulate the efficiency of microtubule nucleation.
Kollman, J. M., Merdes, A., Mourey, L. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleation by gamma-tubulin complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 709–721 (2011).
Heald, R. et al. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 382, 420–425 (1996).
Bre, M. H. & Karsenti, E. Effects of brain microtubule-associated proteins on microtubule dynamics and the nucleating activity of centrosomes. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 15, 88–98 (1990).
Popov, A. V., Severin, F. & Karsenti, E. XMAP215 is required for the microtubule-nucleating activity of centrosomes. Curr. Biol. 12, 1326–1330 (2002).
Roostalu, J., Cade, N. I. & Surrey, T. Complementary activities of TPX2 and chTOG constitute an efficient importin-regulated microtubule nucleation module. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1422–1434 (2015).
Wittmann, T., Wilm, M., Karsenti, E. & Vernos, I. TPX2, A novel xenopus MAP involved in spindle pole organization. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1405–1418 (2000).
Gruss, O. J. et al. Ran induces spindle assembly by reversing the inhibitory effect of importin alpha on TPX2 activity. Cell 104, 83–93 (2001).
Gruss, O. J. et al. Chromosome-induced microtubule assembly mediated by TPX2 is required for spindle formation in HeLa cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 871–879 (2002).
Reid, T. A. et al. Suppression of microtubule assembly kinetics by the mitotic protein TPX2. J. Cell Sci. 129, 1319–1328 (2016).
Alfaro-Aco, R., Thawani, A. & Petry, S. Structural analysis of the role of TPX2 in branching microtubule nucleation. J. Cell Biol. 216, 983–997 (2017).
Petry, S., Groen, A. C., Ishihara, K., Mitchison, T. J. & Vale, R. D. Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. Cell 152, 768–777 (2013).
Zhang, R., Roostalu, J., Surrey, T. & Nogales, E. Structural insight into TPX2-stimulated microtubule assembly. eLife 6, e30959 (2017).
Moores, C. A. et al. Mechanism of microtubule stabilization by doublecortin. Mol. Cell 14, 833–839 (2004).
Bechstedt, S., Lu, K. & Brouhard, G. J. Doublecortin recognizes the longitudinal curvature of the microtubule end and lattice. Curr. Biol. 24, 2366–2375 (2014).
Fourniol, F. J. et al. Template-free 13-protofilament microtubule-MAP assembly visualized at 8 A resolution. J. Cell Biol. 191, 463–470 (2010).
Bechstedt, S. & Brouhard, G. J. Doublecortin recognizes the 13-protofilament microtubule cooperatively and tracks microtubule ends. Dev. Cell 23, 181–192 (2012).
Lazarus, J. E., Moughamian, A. J., Tokito, M. K. & Holzbaur, E. L. Dynactin subunit p150(Glued) is a neuron-specific anti-catastrophe factor. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001611 (2013).
Moores, C. A. et al. Distinct roles of doublecortin modulating the microtubule cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 25, 4448–4457 (2006).
Leano, J. B., Rogers, S. L. & Slep, K. C. A cryptic TOG domain with a distinct architecture underlies CLASP-dependent bipolar spindle formation. Structure 21, 939–950 (2013).
Schaedel, L. et al. Microtubules self-repair in response to mechanical stress. Nat. Mater. 14, 1156–1163 (2015).
Aumeier, C. et al. Self-repair promotes microtubule rescue. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1054–1064 (2016). References 121 and 122 demonstrate that microtubules ‘soften’ in response to repeated bending stress, that this damage can be repaired through incorporation of fresh tubulin into the damaged site and that this repair mechanism can promote microtubule rescue.
Xu, Z. et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science 356, 328–332 (2017).
Portran, D., Schaedel, L., Xu, Z., Thery, M. & Nachury, M. V. Tubulin acetylation protects long-lived microtubules against mechanical ageing. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 391–398 (2017).
Janosi, I. M., Chretien, D. & Flyvbjerg, H. Modelling elastic properties of microtubule tips and walls. Eur. Biophys. J. 27, 501–513 (1998).
Zanic, M., Widlund, P. O., Hyman, A. A. & Howard, J. Synergy between XMAP215 and EB1 increases microtubule growth rates to physiological levels. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 688–693 (2013).
Nogales, E., Whittaker, M., Milligan, R. A. & Downing, K. H. High-resolution model of the microtubule. Cell 96, 79–88 (1999).
Janke, C. & Bulinski, J. C. Post-translational regulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton: mechanisms and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 773–786 (2011).
Kuriyama, R. In vitro polymerization of flagellar and ciliary outer fibre tubulin into microtubules. J. Biochem. 80, 153–165 (1976).
Kilmartin, J. V. Purification of yeast tubulin by self-assembly in vitro. Biochemistry 20, 3629–3633 (1981).
Gupta, M. L. Jr et al. β-tubulin C354 mutations that severely decrease microtubule dynamics do not prevent nuclear migration in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 2919–2932 (2002).
Bode, C. J., Gupta, M. L., Suprenant, K. A. & Himes, R. H. The two alpha-tubulin isotypes in budding yeast have opposing effects on microtubule dynamics in vitro. EMBO Rep. 4, 94–99 (2003).
Gupta, M. L. Jr, Bode, C. J., Georg, G. I. & Himes, R. H. Understanding tubulin-Taxol interactions: mutations that impart Taxol binding to yeast tubulin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6394–6397 (2003).
Uchimura, S., Oguchi, Y., Hachikubo, Y., Ishiwata, S. & Muto, E. Key residues on microtubule responsible for activation of kinesin ATPase. EMBO J. 29, 1167–1175 (2010).
Uchimura, S. et al. Identification of a strong binding site for kinesin on the microtubule using mutant analysis of tubulin. EMBO J. 25, 5932–5941 (2006).
Johnson, V., Ayaz, P., Huddleston, P. & Rice, L. M. Design, overexpression, and purification of polymerization-blocked yeast alphabeta-tubulin mutants. Biochemistry 50, 8636–8644 (2011).
Minoura, I. et al. Overexpression, purification, and functional analysis of recombinant human tubulin dimer. FEBS Lett. 587, 3450–3455 (2013).
Ti, S. C. et al. Mutations in human tubulin proximal to the kinesin-binding site alter dynamic instability at microtubule plus- and minus-ends. Dev. Cell 37, 72–84 (2016).
Vemu, A. et al. Structure and dynamics of single-isoform recombinant neuronal human tubulin. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 12907–12915 (2016).
Sirajuddin, M., Rice, L. M. & Vale, R. D. Regulation of microtubule motors by tubulin isotypes and post-translational modifications. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 335–344 (2014).
Pamula, M. C., Ti, S. C. & Kapoor, T. M. The structured core of human beta tubulin confers isotype-specific polymerization properties. J. Cell Biol. 213, 425–433 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank S. Chaaban for his masterful work in rendering the microtubule end in Box 1. The authors thank members of the Brouhard and Rice laboratories for helpful discussions and feedback on the manuscript. Work in G.J.B.’s laboratory is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-148702 and MOP-137055), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2014-03791), the Fonds de recherche du Québec — Nature et technologies (FRQ-NT 191128), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and McGill University. L.M.R. is the Thomas O. Hicks Scholar in Medical Research; work in his laboratory is supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM098543), the National Science Foundation (MCB-1615938) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (I-1908).
Reviewer Information
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology thanks E. Nogales and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to all aspects of article preparation, including researching data for the article, discussion of content, and writing and editing of the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Glossary
- End-binding (EB) proteins
-
A family of evolutionarily conserved proteins that autonomously track the growing microtubule end. EB proteins regulate microtubule dynamics and are also responsible for recruiting the majority of other plus-end tracking proteins to the growing microtubule end.
- Microtubule polymerases
-
Regulatory factors that promote microtubule elongation, typically by making microtubules grow more quickly.
- Microtubule depolymerases
-
Regulatory factors that promote microtubule depolymerization. Well-studied microtubule depolymerases include the mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK)–kinesin 13 and the Kip3–kinesin 8 families.
- Kinesins
-
A large family of microtubule-associated proteins that use the energy from ATP hydrolysis to walk on microtubules and/or regulate their polymerization dynamics.
- Plus end
-
The end of the microtubule that is crowned by β-tubulin subunits. This more dynamic end of the polymer typically grows from the centre of the cell towards the periphery.
- Minus end
-
The end of the microtubule that is crowned by α-tubulin subunits. This less dynamic end of the polymer is typically capped or anchored in a microtubule-organizing structure such as the centrosome.
- Interpolation (morphing)
-
A computational procedure that creates a series of structural intermediates between two known conformations of a molecule. Conformations generated by morphing provide a useful way to visualize intermediate steps along a conformational change but do not always capture the actual pathway for the conformational change.
- Strain energy
-
Describes internal energy stored by a molecule when that molecule is held in an otherwise unfavourable conformation.
- Compressive stress
-
Strain energy resulting from forces that push against the growing microtubule end.
- Tensile stress
-
Strain energy resulting from forces that pull on the growing or shrinking microtubule end.
- Optical tweezers
-
Device in which radiation pressure from a laser beam focused by a microscope objective is used to trap a small bead or other object. Optical tweezers provide a sensitive way to measure both the position of the trapped object and the forces experienced by the trapped object.
- XMAP215 family
-
The best-studied family of microtubule polymerases. Polymerases in this family, which includes vertebrate XMAP215 and yeast Stu2, are the major factors that promote fast microtubule growth in cells, and their activity is important for proper formation of the mitotic spindle.
- Free energy
-
A thermodynamic quantity that describes the amount of energy that can do work in a given system. The change in free energy associated with a chemical reaction provides the amount of work that is released by that reaction or that must be inputted to drive that reaction.
- Baculovirus
-
A virus that infects invertebrate cells, engineered versions of which are used to direct the expression of heterologous proteins in insect cells.
- Allosteric effect
-
Describes a phenomenon in which the enzymatic or binding activity of one region of a protein can be influenced by binding events at other regions.
- Kinesin 13
-
Kinesin family proteins that act as microtubule depolymerases. These kinesins use ATP hydrolysis to induce outward curvature in protofilaments, triggering catastrophes. An example member of this family is mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK).
- Kinesin 8
-
Family of kinesins that combines the motility of conventional kinesins with depolymerase activity. Because of this unique combination, some members of the family have been shown to depolymerize microtubules in a length-dependent manner. A well-studied member of the family is yeast kinesin-like protein Kip3.
- Rescue factors
-
Regulatory factors that increase the likelihood of microtubule rescue. The best-studied rescue factors belong to the CLASP family.
- TPX2
-
A spindle assembly factor that functions in the Ran–GTP pathway. TPX2 is released from importins in the vicinity of chromosomes, where it stimulates microtubule nucleation and interacts with motor proteins.
- Microtubule nucleation
-
The process of forming a microtubule de novo (from unpolymerized αβ-tubulin subunits) or on a template such as the γ-tubulin ring complex or a severed microtubule end.
- γ-tubulin ring complex
-
(γ-TuRC). A conical oligomer of γ-tubulins and γ-ring complex proteins (GCPs) that creates a template for microtubule nucleation.
- Chromatin-mediated microtubule nucleation pathway
-
A pathway for microtubule nucleation wherein factors that promote nucleation are selectively activated in the vicinity of chromatin.
- Branching nucleation
-
A microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation pathway wherein new microtubules are nucleated from the sides of existing ones.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brouhard, G.J., Rice, L.M. Microtubule dynamics: an interplay of biochemistry and mechanics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19, 451–463 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0009-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0009-y
This article is cited by
-
Structure of the native γ-tubulin ring complex capping spindle microtubules
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
-
Structure of the γ-tubulin ring complex-capped microtubule
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
-
Compressive forces stabilize microtubules in living cells
Nature Materials (2023)
-
Phase separation of EB1 guides microtubule plus-end dynamics
Nature Cell Biology (2023)
-
Construction of functional microtubules and artificial motile systems based on peptide design
Polymer Journal (2023)