Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Effective study design for comparative functional genomics

Comparative studies struggle with the challenge of balancing technical properties with the requirement of obtaining samples from multiple species. Guidelines are needed to minimize the effect of confounders and increase the robustness of the inference. We argue for the paramount importance of extensive record keeping and reporting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Holloway, A. K., Bruneau, B. G., Sukonnik, T., Rubenstein, J. L. & Pollard, K. S. Accelerated evolution of enhancer hotspots in the mammal ancestor. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1008–1018 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blekhman, R., Marioni, J. C., Zumbo, P., Stephens, M. & Gilad, Y. Sex-specific and lineage-specific alternative splicing in primates. Genome Res. 20, 180–189 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. GTEx Consortium. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204–213 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake, L. E. et al. A comparison of gene expression and DNA methylation patterns across tissues and species. Genome Res. 30, 250–262 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilad, Y. & Mizrahi-Man, O. A reanalysis of mouse ENCODE comparative gene expression data. F1000Res. 4, 121 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deck, J. et al. The Genomic Observatories Metadatabase (GeOMe): a new repository for field and sampling event metadata associated with genetic samples. PLoS Biol. 15, e2002925 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S. J. et al. Effects of storage, RNA extraction, genechip type, and donor sex on gene expression profiling of human whole blood. Clin. Chem. 53, 1038–1045 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly, R. et al. RNA and DNA integrity remain stable in frozen tissue after long-term storage at cryogenic temperatures: a report from the ontario tumour bank. Biopreserv. Biobank 17, 282–287 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank N. Gonzales, W. Dowd, M. Tobler, L. Barreiro, A. Pai, L. Blake and J. Tung for helpful comments on the manuscript. Y.G is. supported by NIGMS MIRA R35GM131726; J.L.K. is supported by NSF 1557795, 1906015 and 1931650.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoav Gilad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelley, J.L., Gilad, Y. Effective study design for comparative functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 21, 385–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0242-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0242-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research