Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system

Nature Physics volume 17, pages 559–563 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Gaussian models provide an excellent effective description of many quantum many-body systems ranging from condensed-matter systems1,2 all the way to neutron stars3. Gaussian states are common at equilibrium when the interactions are weak. Recently it was proposed that they can also emerge dynamically from a non-Gaussian initial state evolving under non-interacting dynamics4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Here we present the experimental observation of such a dynamical emergence of Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system. This non-equilibrium evolution is triggered by abruptly switching off the effective interaction between the observed collective degrees of freedom, while leaving the interactions between the microscopic constituents unchanged. Starting from highly non-Gaussian correlations, consistent with the sine–Gordon model12, we observe a Gaussian state emerging over time as revealed by the decay of the fourth- and sixth-order connected correlations in the quantum field. A description of this dynamics requires a novel mechanism for the emergence of Gaussian correlations, which is relevant for a wide class of quantum many-body systems. In our closed system with non-interacting effective degrees of freedom, we do not expect full thermalization13,14,15,16,17,18,19. This memory of the initial state is confirmed by observing recurrences20 of non-Gaussian correlations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of the experimental procedure.
Fig. 2: Time evolution of the relative size of the fourth-order connected correlation functions.
Fig. 3: Recurrence of the non-Gaussian phase fluctuations.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. The experimental raw data (absorption images) for Figs. 2 and 3 can be found in ref. 42. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Girvin, S. M. & Yang, K. Modern Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  2. Altland, A. & Simons, B. D. Condensed Matter Field Theory 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  3. Gandolfi, S., Gezerlis, A. & Carlson, J. Neutron matter from low to high density. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 303–328 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haag, R., Kadison, R. V. & Kastler, D. Asymptotic orbits in a free Fermi gas. Commun. Math. Phys. 33, 1–22 (1973).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cramer, M., Dawson, C. M., Eisert, J. & Osborne, T. J. Exact relaxation in a class of nonequilibrium quantum lattice systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030602 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer, M. & Eisert, J. A quantum central limit theorem for non-equilibrium systems: exact local relaxation of correlated states. New J. Phys. 12, 055020 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sotiriadis, S. & Calabrese, P. Validity of the GGE for quantum quenches from interacting to noninteracting models. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2014, P07024 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gluza, M., Eisert, J. & Farrelly, T. Equilibration towards generalized Gibbs ensembles in non-interacting theories. SciPost Phys. 7, 38 (2019).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Murthy, C. & Srednicki, M. Relaxation to Gaussian and generalized Gibbs states in systems of particles with quadratic Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. E 100, 012146 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Monnai, T., Morodome, S. & Yuasa, K. Relaxation to Gaussian generalized Gibbs ensembles in quadratic bosonic systems in the thermodynamic limit. Phys. Rev. E 100, 022105 (2019).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishii, T. & Mori, T. Strong eigenstate thermalization within a generalized shell in noninteracting integrable systems. Phys. Rev. E 100, 012139 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schweigler, T. et al. Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correlations. Nature 545, 323–326 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gring, M. et al. Relaxation and prethermalization in an isolated quantum system. Science 337, 1318–1322 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langen, T., Geiger, R., Kuhnert, M., Rauer, B. & Schmiedmayer, J. Local emergence of thermal correlations in an isolated quantum many-body system. Nat. Phys. 9, 640–643 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Langen, T. et al. Experimental observation of a generalized Gibbs ensemble. Science 348, 207–211 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schreiber, M. et al. Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice. Science 349, 842–845 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Calabrese, P., Essler, F. H. L. & Fagotti, M. Quantum quench in the transverse-field Ising chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 227203 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A. & Vengalattore, M. Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863–883 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisert, J., Friesdorf, M. & Gogolin, C. Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium. Nat. Phys. 11, 124–130 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rauer, B. et al. Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system. Science 360, 307–310 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Cuevas-Maraver, J., Kevrekidis, P. G. & Williams, F. (eds) The Sine–Gordon Model and its Applications (Springer Series in Nonlinear Systems and Complexity Vol. 10, Springer, 2014).

  22. Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation. Nat. Phys. 8, 264–266 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Nascimbène, S. Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases. Nat. Phys. 8, 267–276 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gritsev, V., Polkovnikov, A. & Eugene, D. Linear response theory for a pair of coupled one-dimensional condensates of interacting atoms. Phys. Rev. B 75, 174511 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Calabrese, P. & Cardy, J. Time dependence of correlation functions following a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136801 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reichel, J. & Vuletić, V. (eds) Atom Chips (Wiley-VCH, 2011).

  27. Schumm, T. et al. Matter–wave interferometry in a double well on an atom chip. Nat. Phys. 1, 57–62 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zinn-Justin, J. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena 4th edn (International Series of Monographs on Physics, Clarendon, 2002).

  29. Kitagawa, T., Imambekov, A., Schmiedmayer, J. & Demler, E. The dynamics and prethermalization of one-dimensional quantum systems probed through the full distributions of quantum noise. New J. Phys. 13, 073018 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Langen, T., Schweigler, T., Demler, E. & Schmiedmayer, J. Double light-cone dynamics establish thermal states in integrable 1D Bose gases. New J. Phys. 20, 023034 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beck, S., Mazets, I. E. & Schweigler, T. Nonperturbative method to compute thermal correlations in one-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. A 98, 023613 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geiger, R., Langen, T., Mazets, I. E. & Schmiedmayer, J. Local relaxation and light-cone-like propagation of correlations in a trapped one-dimensional Bose gas. New J. Phys. 16, 053034 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Srednicki, M. Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  34. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1, 54–75 (1986).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuhnert, M. Thermalization and Prethermalization in an Ultracold Bose Gas. PhD thesis, TU Wien (2013).

  36. Tajik, M. et al. Designing arbitrary one-dimensional potentials on an atom chip. Opt. Express 27, 33474–33487 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rauer, B. Non-Equilibrium Dynamics Beyond Dephasing: Recurrences and Loss Induced Cooling in One-Dimensional Bose Gases. PhD thesis, TU Wien (2018).

  38. Shiryaev, A. N. Probability-1 3rd edn, 349 (Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol. 95, Springer, 2016).

  39. Grišins, P. & Mazets, I. Coherence and Josephson oscillations between two tunnel-coupled one-dimensional atomic quasicondensates at finite temperature. Phys. Rev. A 87, 013629 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schweigler, T. Correlations and Dynamics of Tunnel-Coupled One-Dimensional Bose Gases. PhD thesis, TU Wien (2019).

  41. van Kempen, E. G. M., Kokkelmans, S. J. J. M. F., Heinzen, D. J. & Verhaar, B. J. Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schweigler, T. et al. Raw data to ‘Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system’, arxiv:2003.01808. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3753155 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank I. Mazets, S. Erne, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges and T. Langen for helpful discussions. This work is supported by the DFG/FWF Collaborative Research Centre ‘SFB 1225 (ISOQUANT)’, and the ESQ Discovery Grant ‘Emergence of physical laws: from mathematical foundations to applications in many body physics’ of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW). F.C., F.S.M., B.R., J. Sabino and T.S. acknowledge support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in the framework of the Doctoral School on Complex Quantum Systems (CoQuS). S.S. acknowledges support by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) under grant QTE (N1-0109) and by the ERC Advanced Grant OMNES (694544). S.-C.J. acknowledges support by an Erwin Schrödinger Quantum Science & Technology (ESQ) Fellowship funded through the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant 801110. J. Sabino acknowledges support by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/128641/2017). J.E. acknowledges funding from the DFG (FOR 2724, EI 519/9-1, EI 519/7-1, CRC 183), the FQXi and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant 817482 (PASQuanS). J.E., M.G., J. Schmiedmayer and S.S. thank the Erwin Schrödinger Institute for its hospitality and support under the programme ‘Quantum Simulation—from Theory to Application’ (LCW 2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Thomas Schweigler, Mohammadamin Tajik, Federica Cataldini, Si-Cong Ji, Frederik S. Møller, João Sabino, Bernhard Rauer & Jörg Schmiedmayer

  2. Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Marek Gluza & Jens Eisert

  3. Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Spyros Sotiriadis

  4. Instituto de Telecomunicações, Physics of Information and Quantum Technologies Group, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Sabino

  5. Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Sabino

  6. Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Collège de France, CNRS UMR 8552, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

    Bernhard Rauer

Authors
  1. Thomas Schweigler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Gluza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammadamin Tajik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Spyros Sotiriadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Federica Cataldini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Si-Cong Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frederik S. Møller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. João Sabino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bernhard Rauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jens Eisert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jörg Schmiedmayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.S. performed the experiment and data analysis with contributions by M.T., B.R., F.C., S.-C.J., F.S.M. and J. Sabino. T.S. did the theory calculations with contributions by M.G. and S.S. J. Schmiedmayer and J.E. provided scientific guidance in experimental and theoretical questions. J. Schmiedmayer conceived the experiment. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas Schweigler or Jörg Schmiedmayer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Additional results for the time evolution of the relative size of the fourth-order connected correlation functions.

As for Fig. 2 (see there for the meaning of the plotted quantities and error bars), but for several different initial phase-locking strengths (quantified by \({\langle \cos (\varphi )\rangle }_{{\rm{init}}}\)) and different trapping geometries. The results for a \({\langle \cos (\varphi )\rangle }_{{\rm{init}}}\) of 0.81 and 0.88 have been obtained with a harmonic confinement. For all other results, a 75 μm long box trap has been superimposed onto the harmonic confinement (Methods). We find that Gaussian correlations emerge dynamically for all measurements, independent of the initial phase-locking strength or the trapping geometry. The speed for the decay of M(4) increases with the initial phase-locking in agreement with our theoretical model. One can understand the trend by realizing that the phase-fluctuations of the initial state get smaller with increasing phase-locking and are therefore more quickly overshadowed by the mixed-in initial density fluctuations.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5, discussion of the experimental results and theoretical model.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical values of the plotted quantities.

Source Data Fig. 3

Numerical values of the plotted quantities.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Numerical values of the plotted quantities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schweigler, T., Gluza, M., Tajik, M. et al. Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system. Nat. Phys. 17, 559–563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01139-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01139-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing