Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

My cell is better than yours

Scientists encounter pressure to validate their research work, leading to varied benchmarks and methods for performance assessment in the broad energy research field. Interlaboratory studies help highlight discrepancies in reported figures of merit, underscoring the need for standardized protocols, transparent reporting, and detailed analysis for fair comparisons. Here, we discuss this topic, focusing on battery materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Expected workflow to evaluate a material’s electrochemical performance.

References

  1. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart NREL https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html

  2. Saliba, M., Unger, E., Etgar, L., Luo, J. & Jacobsson, T. J. Nat. Commun. 14, 5445 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, C. et al. J. Raman Spectrosc. 45, 22–31 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, R. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 589–610 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohno, S. et al. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 910–915 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Müller, M. et al. J. Power Sources 531, 231323 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tesch, M. F., Neugebauer, S., Narangoda, P. V., Schlögl, R. & Mechler, A. K. Energy Adv. 2, 1823–1830 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehelebe, K. et al. ACS Energy Lett 7, 816–826 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gittins, J. W. et al. J. Power Sources 585, 233637 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Randau, S. et al. Nat. Energy 5, 259–270 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrenot, P., Bayle-Guillemaud, P. & Villevieille, C. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 4957–4965 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bielefeld, A., Weber, D. A. & Janek, J. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 1626–1634 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. El‐Bousiydy, H. et al. Batter. Supercaps 4, 758–766 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frith, J. T., Lacey, M. J. & Ulissi, U. Nat. Commun. 14, 420 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges financial support within the cluster of competence FESTBATT funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF; project 13XP0428A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nella M. Vargas-Barbosa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas-Barbosa, N.M. My cell is better than yours. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 419–420 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01607-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01607-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing