Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Layer-controlled single-crystalline graphene film with stacking order via Cu–Si alloy formation

An Author Correction to this article was published on 07 December 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Multilayer graphene and its stacking order provide both fundamentally intriguing properties and technological engineering applications. Several approaches to control the stacking order have been demonstrated, but a method of precisely controlling the number of layers with desired stacking sequences is still lacking. Here, we propose an approach for controlling the layer thickness and crystallographic stacking sequence of multilayer graphene films at the wafer scale via Cu–Si alloy formation using direct chemical vapour deposition. C atoms are introduced by tuning the ultra-low-limit CH4 concentration to form a SiC layer, reaching one to four graphene layers at the wafer scale after Si sublimation. The crystallographic structure of single-crystalline or uniformly oriented bilayer (AB), trilayer (ABA) and tetralayer (ABCA) graphene are determined via nano-angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, which agrees with theoretical calculations, Raman spectroscopy and transport measurements. The present study takes a step towards the layer-controlled growth of graphite and other two-dimensional materials.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Diffusion-to-sublimation growth of multilayer graphene in the Cu–Si alloy.
Fig. 2: Cu–Si alloy formation by heat treatment in the CVD chamber and uniform multilayer graphene growth.
Fig. 3: Controlling the number of graphene layers and the single-crystalline multilayer graphene film on the wafer scale.
Fig. 4: Relative crystallographic orientation between the layers of the graphene films.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are presented in the main text and the Supplementary Information, and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

  • 07 December 2020

    A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00821-z.

References

  1. 1.

    Latil, S. & Henrard, L. Charge carriers in few-layer graphene films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036803 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ohta, T. et al. Interlayer interaction and electronic screening in multilayer graphene investigated with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206802 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nair, R. R. et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320, 1308–1308 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ghosh, S. et al. Dimensional crossover of thermal transport in few-layer graphene. Nat. Mater. 9, 555–558 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kopnin, N. B., Heikkilä, T. T. & Volovik, G. E. High-temperature surface superconductivity in topological flat-band systems. Phys. Rev. B 83, 220503(R) (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kopnin, N. B., Ijäs, M., Harju, A. & Heikkilä, T. T. High-temperature surface superconductivity in rhombohedral graphite. Phys. Rev. B 87, 140503 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xu, Y. & Liu, J. Graphene as transparent electrodes: fabrication and new emerging applications. Small 12, 1400–1419 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, P.-A., Chiang, M.-H. & Hsu, W.-C. All-zigzag graphene nanoribbons for planar interconnect application. J. Appl. Phys. 122, 034301 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Randviir, E. P., Brownson, D. A. C. & Banks, C. E. A decade of graphene research: production, applications and outlook. Mater. Today 17, 426–432 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 4, 611–622 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liao, L. et al. High-speed graphene transistors with a self-aligned nanowire gate. Nature 467, 305–308 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Khodkov, T., Khrapach, I., Craciun, M. F. & Russo, S. Direct observation of a gate tunable band gap in electrical transport in ABC-trilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 15, 4429–4433 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hao, Y. et al. Oxygen-activated growth and bandgap tunability of large single-crystal bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 426–431 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zou, K., Zhang, F., Clapp, C., MacDonald, A. H. & Zhu, J. Transport studies of dual-gated ABC and ABA trilayer graphene: band gap opening and band structure tuning in very large perpendicular electric fields. Nano Lett. 13, 369–373 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lee, D. S. et al. Quantum Hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 216602 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jhang, S. H. et al. Stacking-order dependent transport properties of trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 161408 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumar, A. et al. Integer quantum Hall effect in trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 126806 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nguyen, V. L. et al. Wafer-scale single-crystalline AB-stacked bilayer graphene. Adv. Mater. 28, 8177–8183 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Liu, W. et al. Controllable and rapid synthesis of high-quality and large-area Bernal stacked bilayer graphene using chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 26, 907–915 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Takesaki, Y. et al. Highly uniform bilayer graphene on epitaxial Cu–Ni(111) alloy. Chem. Mater. 28, 4583–4592 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen, S. et al. Synthesis and characterization of large-area graphene and graphite films on commercial Cu-Ni alloy foils. Nano Lett. 11, 3519–3525 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wu, Y. et al. Growth mechanism and controlled synthesis of AB-stacked bilayer graphene on Cu–Ni alloy foils. ACS Nano 6, 7731–7738 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lin, T. et al. Self-regulating homogenous growth of high-quality graphene on Co–Cu composite substrate for layer control. Nanoscale 5, 5847–5853 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim, K. et al. Van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment. Nano Lett. 16, 1989–1995 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kim, C.-J. et al. Chiral atomically thin films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 520–524 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sutter, P. W., Flege, J.-I. & Sutter, E. A. Epitaxial graphene on ruthenium. Nat. Mater. 7, 406–411 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Que, Y. et al. Stacking-dependent electronic property of trilayer graphene epitaxially grown on Ru(0001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 263101 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sutter, P. & Sutter, E. Microscopy of graphene growth, processing, and properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 2617–2634 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Guo, H. et al. Centimeter-scale, single-crystalline, AB-stacked bilayer graphene on insulating substrates. 2D Mater. 6, 045044 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nyakiti, L. O. et al. Bilayer graphene grown on 4H-SiC (0001) step-free mesas. Nano Lett. 12, 1749–1756 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, Q. et al. Large-scale uniform bilayer graphene prepared by vacuum graphitization of 6H-SiC(0001) substrates. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 095002 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fang, W., Hsu, A. L., Song, Y. & Kong, J. A review of large-area bilayer graphene synthesis by chemical vapor deposition. Nanoscale 7, 20335–20351 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Xue, R., Abidi, I. H. & Luo, Z. Domain size, layer number and morphology control for graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Funct. Mater. Lett. 10, 1730003 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yan, K., Peng, H., Zhou, Y., Li, H. & Liu, Z. Formation of bilayer Bernal graphene: layer-by-layer epitaxy via chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett. 11, 1106–1110 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Liu, L. et al. High-yield chemical vapor deposition growth of high-quality large-area AB-stacked bilayer graphene. ACS Nano 6, 8241–8249 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zou, Z., Fu, L., Song, X., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Z. Carbide-forming groups IVB-VIB metals: a new territory in the periodic table for CVD growth of graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 3832–3839 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hackley, J., Ali, D., DiPasquale, J., Demaree, J. D. & Richardson, C. J. K. Graphitic carbon growth on Si(111) using solid source molecular beam epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 133114 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yazdi, G., Iakimov, T. & Yakimova, R. Epitaxial graphene on SiC: a review of growth and characterization. Crystals 6, 53 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang, P. Y. et al. Direct imaging of a two-dimensional silica glass on graphene. Nano Lett. 12, 1081–1086 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ruiz, I., Wang, W., George, A., Ozkan, C. S. & Ozkan, M. Silicon oxide contamination of graphene sheets synthesized on copper substrates via chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Sci. Eng. Med. 6, 1070–1075 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ta, H. Q. et al. Stranski-Krastanov and Volmer-Weber CVD growth regimes to control the stacking order in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 16, 6403–6410 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bittencourt, C. Reaction of Si(100) with silane–methane low-power plasma: SiC buffer-layer formation. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4643–4648 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liu, X. et al. Segregation growth of graphene on Cu–Ni alloy for precise layer control. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 11976–11982 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lui, C. H. et al. Imaging stacking order in few-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 11, 164–169 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ni, Z. H. et al. Graphene thickness determination using reflection and contrast spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 7, 2758–2763 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nguyen, V. L. et al. Seamless stitching of graphene domains on polished copper (111) foil. Adv. Mater. 27, 1376–1382 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Liu, X.-Y. et al. Perfect strain relaxation in metamorphic epitaxial aluminum on silicon through primary and secondary interface misfit dislocation arrays. ACS Nano 12, 6843–6850 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Orlando, F. et al. Epitaxial growth of a single-domain hexagonal boron nitride monolayer. ACS Nano 8, 12063–12070 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kim, S.-K., Jeong, S.-Y. & Cho, C.-R. Structural reconstruction of hexagonal to cubic ZnO films on Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si substrate by annealing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 562–564 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kato, T. et al. Simultaneous growth of two differently oriented GaN epilayers on (1 1 · 0) sapphire II. A growth model of (0 0 · 1) and (10 · 0) GaN. J. Cryst. Growth 183, 131–139 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Geng, D. et al. Uniform hexagonal graphene flakes and films grown on liquid copper surface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7992–7996 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pan, Y. et al. Highly ordered, millimeter-scale, continuous, single-crystalline graphene monolayer formed on Ru(0001). Adv. Mater. 21, 2777–2780 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Peng, H. et al. Substrate doping effect and unusually large angle van Hove singularity evolution in twisted bi- and multilayer graphene. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606741 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Giovannetti, G. et al. Doping graphene with metal contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026803 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bao, C. et al. Stacking-dependent electronic structure of trilayer graphene resolved by nanospot angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 17, 1564–1568 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yankowitz, M., Wang, F., Lau, C. N. & LeRoy, B. J. Local spectroscopy of the electrically tunable band gap in trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 87, 165102 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bao, W. et al. Stacking-dependent band gap and quantum transport in trilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 7, 948–952 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Huang, M. et al. Large-area single-crystal AB-bilayer and ABA-trilayer graphene grown on a Cu/Ni(111) foil. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 289–295 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ma, W. et al. Interlayer epitaxy of wafer-scale high-quality uniform AB-stacked bilayer graphene films on liquid Pt3Si/solid Pt. Nat. Commun. 10, 2809 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R011-D1), Republic of Korea. S.-Y.J. thanks the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (no. NRF-2017R1A2B3011822). The Antares’s group at the Synchrotron SOLEIL is supported by Université Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientique (CNRS) and Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), France. Y.-M.K. was supported in part by an NRF grant (NRF-2015M3D1A1070672) in Korea.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.L.N. performed most of the experiments, measurements and data analysis, and prepared the manuscript. D.L.D. performed the DFT calculations for graphene band structure, data analysis and manuscript preparation. S.H.L. conducted the graphene growth experiments. J.A. and M.C.A. designed, conducted and analysed the nano-ARPES measurements. S.-Y.J. prepared monocrystalline Cu films on sapphire. G.H. and Y.-M.K. conducted STEM analysis. Y.H.L. contributed to experimental planning, data analysis and manuscript preparation. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maria C. Asensio, Se-Young Jeong or Young Hee Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Nanotechnology thanks Jeremy Robinson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 SIMS profiles of O and Si obtained after annealing the Cu film in an H2-rich environment at atmospheric pressure.

The O depth profile indicates that the oxygen exists only within 1–2 nm from the surface. In contrast, the Si depth profile indicates that the silicon exists up to 8 nm from the surface. Thus, it is evident that the thickness of Si is greater than that of O, implying that only the Si atoms were extracted from the quartz tube and deposited on the Cu surface to form a Cu-Si alloy. The presence of O atoms within 2 nm is unavoidable owing to the native oxide formation in the samples when exposed to ambient conditions. In Supplementary Fig. 1, the O content is in the range of 38.8–40.1 at.%, and the Si content increases from 15.1 to 38.6 at.% when the Cu film is annealed at atmospheric pressure (H2-rich environment, 1 atm) for 60 min. A similar O content (~40.5%) was revealed even when no Si was deposited. However, when the Cu substrate is annealed at a low pressure, a much higher O content (64.3 at.%) is observed owing to the deposition of SiO2 (Supplementary Fig. 3). These results also indicate that only the Si atoms are deposited on the Cu surface when annealed in an H2-rich environment at 1 atm, and the presence of O atoms is attributed to the native oxide formation occurring when the samples are exposed to ambient conditions. The O content will be much higher if SiO2 is deposited.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Schematic of graphene growth processes and the corresponding flow rates in each step for uniform multilayer growth.

Three mass flow controllers were employed to control the flow rates of H2, CH4, and Ar, respectively. The H2 and Ar gas bottles had a 6N purity. CH4 was introduced only to form SiC in step II. The temperature was increased to 1075 °C, and 200 sccm of Ar was injected into the chamber for the Si sublimation in step III. Pre-diluted CH4 (with Ar) gas of different concentrations was purchased. For growth in Fig. 2, the concentration of CH4 was 0.1%. The growth times of the island and full film were 5 and 10 min, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Optimisation of temperature at step II for a uniform multilayer growth.

a, When step II was performed at 700 °C, no graphene was observed. At this temperature, CH4 could not be decomposed, and thus, SiC was not formed in this step. Therefore, graphene was not formed although the conditions were suitable for growth in step III. b, In contrast, when steps II and III were performed at 900 and 1075 °C, respectively, multilayer islands with considerable uniform thickness were obtained. c, However, when the temperature was set at 1075 °C in step II, the Si sublimation could occur partially at such a high temperature, resulting in a non-uniform Cu-Si alloy and consequently a non-uniform multilayer graphene in step III. Therefore, 900 °C is considered to be an optimal temperature for step II.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Optimisation of temperature at step III.

As shown in panels a and b, the growth rate of multilayer graphene domains is directly proportional to the temperature. However, when the temperature is increased to more than 1075 °C, the Cu-Si alloy melts. Therefore, 1075 °C is considered to be an optimal temperature for step III.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Optical contrast of multilayer graphene.

a–d, Optical images of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and tetralayer graphene islands on SiO2/Si. The inset in each image depicts the optical contrast profile across the dashed line. e, Contrast difference of different graphene layers. The optical contrast difference increases linearly from panels (a)(d), with the number of graphene layers.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Uniformity of multilayer graphene.

a–d, Optical images of full films of monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and tetralayered graphene on SiO2/Si, and the inset images depict the corresponding confocal Raman mapping images of two-dimensional FWHM. The uniform colour contrast of these mapping images suggests a uniform stacking order across the entire graphene film.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Uniformly oriented graphene domains.

SEM image of the tetralayer graphene islands on a TEM grid and the corresponding SEAD patterns of the highlighted points. The parallel yellow dotted-lines indicate the orientation of tetralayer islands aligned in one preferred orientation.

Extended Data Fig. 8 LEED measurements of tetra-layer graphene on a mono-crystalline Cu(111) film.

a, Image of tetralayer graphene on a Cu substrate; the enlarged optical image depicts the wrinkles in the graphene film. b–d, Three representative LEED patterns of the highlighted points in panel (a). All the LEED patterns exhibit an identical lattice orientation of the graphene film across the entire wafer. The misalignment between graphene and copper is below 0.4°, and the mismatch of the lattice constant between graphene and Cu(111) surface is approximately 4.6%.

Extended Data Fig. 9 EADM analysis of graphene on the Cu(111) surface.

The alignment of the graphene supercell on the surface of Cu(111) is illustrated in both small and large scales. EADM is obtained from the following expression: (Id – I′d′)/I′d′, where d and d′ are the two respective atomic distances of the epilayer and substrate. I and I′ are determined by the relationship between two structures, and I/I′ is determined to be the smallest integral ratio required to match the extended lattice. Considering 5 × dCu-Cu interatomic spacing (12.7810 nm) of Cu and 9 × dC-C interatomic spacing (12.7827 nm) of graphene, the EADM of the graphene/Cu interface is determined to be only 0.013%.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Confocal Raman mapping of the graphene domains grown on a pure Cu substrate with 0.1% CH4.

a, Optical image of the graphene domains. The interlayer rotation angle between 1L and 2L (red and black dashed-lines) is 30°, whereas the angle between 2L, 3L, and 4L (red dashed-lines) is 0°. b, Corresponding confocal Raman mapping of 2D FWHM. (c) Raman spectra corresponding to the points marked in panel (b). d–f, Identical measurements on another domain. The interlayer crystal orientation of the three layers is 0°, forming the Bernal-stacking order. These observations indicate that the stacking order in this growth mode was random.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–15, experimental methods, Tables 1–3 and refs. 1–11.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Graph for Fig. 1c–e.

Source Data Fig. 3

Graph for Fig. 3f.

Source Data Fig. 4

Graph for Fig. 4e–k.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Graph for Extended Data Fig. 1.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Graph for Extended Data Fig. 5a–d.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Graph for Extended Data Fig. 10c,f.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, V.L., Duong, D.L., Lee, S.H. et al. Layer-controlled single-crystalline graphene film with stacking order via Cu–Si alloy formation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 861–867 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0743-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research