The experiences gained from the past 15 years of nanomaterial risk analysis may be useful for the risk analysis efforts of other emerging technologies.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $14.08 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of a Workshop Organized in Brussels on 1–2 March 2004 by the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European Commission (European Commission, 2004).
Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Risk Assessment Methodology in Accordance with the Technical Guidance Documents for New and Existing Substances for Assessing the Risks of Nanomaterials (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks, 2007).
Oomen, A. G. et al. NanoImpact 9, 1–13 (2018).
Investigating the Different Types of Risk Assessments of Manufactured Nanomaterials: Identifying Tools Available for Risk Management Measures and Uncertainties Driving Nano-Specific Data Needs (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018).
National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan (National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology, 2016).
White Paper: Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials (Prosafe, 2017).
Jantunen, P., Mech, A. & Rasmussen, K. Workshop on Regulatory Preparedness for Innovation in Nanotechnology (Joint Research Centre, 2018)
Linkov, I., Anklam, E., Collier, Z. A., Dimase, D. & Renn, O. Environ. Syst. Decis. 34, 134–137 (2014).
Wickson, F. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 870 (2014).
Miller, G. & Wickson, F. Rev. Policy Res. 32, 485–512 (2015).
Hjorth, R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1109–1110 (2017).
Marchant G. E. The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight, Vol. 7 (eds. Marchant, G., Allenby, B. & Herkert, J.) 199–205 (Springer, 2011).
National Nanotechnology Initiative Supplement to the President's 2019 Budget (Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering & Committee on Technology of the National Science and Technology Council, 2018).
National Nanotechnology Initiative. Environmental, health, and safety issues. Nano.gov https://www.nano.gov/you/environmental-health-safety (2019).
Syberg, K. & Hansen, S. F. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 784–794 (2016).
Dennis, S. D., Buchanan, R. L. & Miller, A. J. Microbial risk assessment: achievements and future challenges. Food Safety Magazine https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/december-2001january-2002/microbial-risk-assessment-achievements-and-future-challenges/ (2001)
Aven, T. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253, 1–13 (2016).
Choi, J. Y., Ramachandran, G. & Kandlikar, M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3030–3034 (2009).
Guidance on Uncertainty in EFSA Scientific Assessment - DRAFT (European Food Safety Authority, 2015).
Aven, T. et al. Risk Analysis: Fundamental Principles (Society for Risk Analysis, 2018).
Grieger, K. D., Hansen, S. F. & Baun, A. Nanotoxicology 3, 1–U17 (2009).
Hock, J. Proceedings of the Workshop on Research Projects on the Safety of Nanomaterials: Reviewing the Knowledge Gaps (European Commission, 2008).
US Environmental Protection Agency Nanotechnology White Paper (Nanotechnology Working Group, Science Policy Council, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
Jantunen, A. P. K., Gottardo, S., Rasmussen, K. & Crutzen, H. P. NanoImpact 12, 18–28 (2018).
Subramanian, V. et al. J. Nanopart. Res. 18, 1–13 (2016).
Grieger, K. D., Baun, A. & Owen, R. J. J. Nanopart. Res. 12, 383–392 (2010).
Hardy, A. et al. EFSA J. 16, 5123 (2017).
Ramachandran, G. et al. J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 1345–1371 (2011).
Kuzma, J. Regul. Gov. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12245 (2019).
Karcher, S. et al. NanoImpact 9, 85–101 (2018).
Kuzma, J. & Kuzhabekova, A. J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 1499–1512 (2011).
Lai, R. W. S. et al. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 3060–3077 (2018).
Bowman, D. M. & Hodge, G. A. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 27, 118–132 (2007).
Kuzma, J. & Roberts, J. P. J. Nanopart. Res. 18, 1–18 (2016).
Linkov, I. et al. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 170–176 (2018).
Trump, B. D., Hristozov, D., Malloy, T. & Linkov, I. Nano Today 21, 9–12 (2018).
Maynard, A. D. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 730 (2015).
The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this work through diverse funding mechanisms. In particular, K.G. and J.L.J. acknowledges the Game-Changing Research Incentive Program funded through the NC State Office of Research, Innovation, and Economic Development, RTI International and the Kenan Institute for Engineering, Science and Technology. K.G. and J.K. gratefully acknowledge the partial support of the Genetic Engineering and Society Center at NC State (https://go.ncsu.edu/ges). J.L.J also acknowledges National Science Foundation (NSF) award ECCS-1542015 and the Research Triangle Nanotechnology Network, a site in the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure. A.B. and K.A.J. acknowledge the Horizon 2020 project, caLIBRAte, for support (Grant agreement no. 686239). S.F.H. wishes to acknowledge the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) project Environmental Nanosafety Phase II. Finally, C.O.H. acknowledges support from the NSF and the Environmental Protection Agency under NSF Cooperative Agreement DBI‐1266252 and EF‐0830093, the Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology.
About this article
Cite this article
Grieger, K., Jones, J.L., Hansen, S.F. et al. Best practices from nano-risk analysis relevant for other emerging technologies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 998–1001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0572-1
Annals of Work Exposures and Health (2020)
In vitro and in vivo impact assessment of eco-designed CuO nanoparticles on non-target aquatic photoautotrophic organisms
Journal of Hazardous Materials (2020)