Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Anisotropic polarization-induced conductance at a ferroelectric–insulator interface

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 05 October 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Coupling between different degrees of freedom, that is, charge, spin, orbital and lattice, is responsible for emergent phenomena in complex oxide heterostrutures1,2. One example is the formation of a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at the polar/non-polar LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (LAO/STO)3,4,5,6,7 interface. This is caused by the polar discontinuity and counteracts the electrostatic potential build-up across the LAO film3. The ferroelectric polarization at a ferroelectric/insulator interface can also give rise to a polar discontinuity8,9,10. Depending on the polarization orientation, either electrons or holes are transferred to the interface, to form either a 2DEG or two-dimensional hole gas (2DHG)11,12,13. While recent first-principles modelling predicts the formation of 2DEGs at the ferroelectric/insulator interfaces9,10,12,13,14, experimental evidence of a ferroelectrically induced interfacial 2DEG remains elusive. Here, we report the emergence of strongly anisotropic polarization-induced conductivity at a ferroelectric/insulator interface, which shows a strong dependence on the polarization orientation. By probing the local conductance and ferroelectric polarization over a cross-section of a BiFeO3–TbScO3 (BFO/TSO) (001) heterostructure, we demonstrate that this interface is conducting along the 109° domain stripes in BFO, whereas it is insulating in the direction perpendicular to these domain stripes. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy and theoretical modelling suggest that the anisotropy of the interfacial conduction is caused by an alternating polarization associated with the ferroelectric domains, producing either electron or hole doping of the BFO/TSO interface.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Domain structure in BFO films with 109° domain arrays.
Fig. 2: Anisotropic interfacial conduction at the BFO/TSO interface with 109° domain arrays.
Fig. 3: Mechanism for the anisotropic interfacial conduction.
Fig. 4: STEM and EELS measurements at the BFO/TSO interface.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 05 October 2018

    In the version of this Letter originally published, the right-hand arrow in Fig. 3b was incorrectly labelled; see correction note for details. Also, ref. 29 was incorrectly included in the reference list; it has now been removed.

References

  1. 1.

    Hwang, H. Y. et al. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 103–113 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sulpizio, J. A., Ilani, S., Irvin, P. & Levy, J. Nanoscale phenomena in oxide heterostructures. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 117–149 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Reyren, N. et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brinkman, A. et al. Magnetic effects at the interface between non-magnetic oxides. Nat. Mater. 6, 493–496 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bert, J. A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Salluzzo, M. et al. Origin of interface magnetism in BiMnO3/SrTiO3 and LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 087204 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen, Y. Z. et al. Creation of high mobility two-dimensional electron gases via strain induced polarization at an otherwise nonpolar complex oxide interface. Nano Lett. 15, 1849–1854 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Niranjan, M. K., Wang, Y., Jaswal, S. S. & Tsymbal, E. Y. Prediction of a switchable two-dimensional electron gas at ferroelectric oxide interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 016804 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yin, B., Puente, P. A., Qu, S. & Artacho, E. Two-dimensional electron gas at the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 interface: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B 92, 115406 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Marshall, S. J. et al. Conduction at a ferroelectric interface. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 051001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fredrickson, K. D. & Demkov, A. A. Switchable conductivity at the ferroelectric interface: nonpolar oxides. Phys. Rev. B 91, 115126 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Puente, P. A. et al. Model of two-dimensional electron gas formation at ferroelectric interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 92, 035438 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang, Z., Wu, P., Chen, L. & Wang, J. L. First-principles prediction of a two dimensional electron gas at the BiFeO3/SrTiO3 interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 062902 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tan, H. Y., Verbeeck, J., Abakumov, A. & Tendeloo, G. V. Oxidation state and chemical shift investigation in transition metal oxides by EELS. Ultramicroscopy 116, 24–33 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rojac, T. et al. Domain-wall conduction in ferroelectric BiFeO3 controlled by accumulation of charged defects. Nat. Mater. 16, 322–327 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yong, W. et al. Ferroelectric instability under screened Coulomb interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 247601 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nelson, C. T. et al. Domain dynamics during ferroelectric switching. Science 334, 968–971 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ihlefeld, J. F. et al. Effect of domain structure on dielectric nonlinearity in epitaxial films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 262904 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lim, S. H. et al. Enhanced dielectric properties in single crystal-like thin films grown by flux-mediated epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 012918 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cen, C. et al. Nanoscale control of an interfacial metal–insulator transition at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 7, 298–302 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Paudel, T. R., Jaswal, S. S. & Tsymbal, E. Y. Intrinsic defects in multiferroic BiFeO3 and their effect on magnetism. Phys. Rev. B 85, 104409 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chen, L. Q. Phase-field model of phase transitions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: a review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1835–1844 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li, Y. L., Hu, S. Y., Liu, Z. K. & Chen, L. Q. Effect of substrate constraint on the stability and evolution of ferroelectric domain structures in thin films. Acta Mater. 50, 395–411 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Li, Y. L., Hu, S. Y., Liu, Z. K. & Chen, L. Q. Effect of electrical boundary conditions on ferroelectric domain structures in thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 427–429 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under award DE-SC0014430 and partially by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grants DMR-1506535 and DMR-1629270. L.X. was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (grant no. 2015CB654901) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51302132). The research at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln was supported by the NSF through the Nebraska Materials Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) under grant DMR-1420645. J.K., H.W. and R.Q.W. acknowledge support of DOE-BES (grant no. DE-272 FG02-05ER46237) and computing allocation by NERSC. The work at Penn State is supported by the US Department of Energy under award DE-FG02-07ER46417. The work at Cornell University was supported by the NSF (Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Translational Applications of Nanoscale Multiferroic Systems) under grant EEC-1160504 (C.H. and D.G.S.). Substrate preparation was performed in part at the Cornell Nanoscale Facility, a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), which is supported by the NSF (grant ECCS-1542081). The authors would also like to acknowledge the University of California, Irvine’s Materials Research Institute (IMRI) for the use of TEM facilities. Y.Z. would like to thank J. R. Jokisaari for his initial work and help on the PFM measurements carried out at the University of Michigan. The authors also thank T. Aoki (University of California, Irvine) for his help on EELS measurements.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.Q.P. and Y.Z. conceived this project and designed experiments. Y.Z. and H.D.L. carried out the scanning probe microscopy experiments and data analysis supervised by A.G. and X.Q.P. X.X.Y., Y.Z. and L.X. carried out the TEM and EELS studies supervised by X.Q.P. T.R.P., J.W.K. and H.W. performed the first-principles modelling supervised by E.Y.T. and R.Q.W. X.X.C carried out the phase-field simulations supervised by L.-Q.C. Thin films were grown by C.H. supervised by D.G.S. L.Z.L. and M.J.X. participated in the analysis of experimental data. Y.Z., H.D.L., X.Q.P., A.G. and E.Y.T wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alexei Gruverman or Xiaoqing Pan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–11, Supplementary Notes 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Xie, L. et al. Anisotropic polarization-induced conductance at a ferroelectric–insulator interface. Nature Nanotech 13, 1132–1136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0259-z

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research