Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Decoupling the roles of Ni and Co in anionic redox activity of Li-rich NMC cathodes

Subjects

Abstract

Li[LixNiyMnzCo1−xyz]O2 (lithium-rich NMCs) are benchmark cathode materials receiving considerable attention due to the abnormally high capacities resulting from their anionic redox chemistry. Although their anionic redox mechanisms have been much investigated, the roles of cationic redox processes remain underexplored, hindering further performance improvement. Here we decoupled the effects of nickel and cobalt in lithium-rich NMCs via a comprehensive study of two typical compounds, Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 and Li1.2Co0.4Mn0.4O2. We discovered that both Ni3+/4+ and Co4+, generated during cationic redox processes, are actually intermediate species for triggering oxygen redox through a ligand-to-metal charge-transfer process. However, cobalt is better than nickel in mediating the kinetics of ligand-to-metal charge transfer by favouring more transition metal migration, leading to less cationic redox but more oxygen redox, more O2 release, poorer cycling performance and more severe voltage decay. Our work highlights a compositional optimization pathway for lithium-rich NMCs by deviating from using cobalt to using nickel, providing valuable guidelines for future high-capacity cathode design.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Decomposing Li1.2Ni0.13Mn0.54Co0.13O2 as a linear combination of LNMO and LCMO.
Fig. 2: Redox mechanism of LNMO.
Fig. 3: Redox mechanism of LCMO.
Fig. 4: Operando X-ray diffraction of LNMO and LCMO.
Fig. 5: Electrochemical analysis of the LMCT process.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. All data supporting the findings of this Article and its Supplementary Information will be made available upon reasonable request to the authors. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Li, W., Erickson, E. M. & Manthiram, A. High-nickel layered oxide cathodes for lithium-based automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 26–34 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozier, P. & Tarascon, J. M. Review—Li-rich layered oxide cathodes for next-generation Li-ion batteries: chances and challenges. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A2490–A2499 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, H. & Zhou, H. High-energy cathode materials (Li2MnO3–LiMO2) for lithium-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1268–1280 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Assat, G. & Tarascon, J.-M. Fundamental understanding and practical challenges of anionic redox activity in Li-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 373–386 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, B. & Xia, D. Anionic redox in rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701054 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gent, W. E., Abate, I. I., Yang, W., Nazar, L. F. & Chueh, W. C. Design rules for high-valent redox in intercalation electrodes. Joule 4, 1369–1397 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eum, D. et al. Voltage decay and redox asymmetry mitigation by reversible cation migration in lithium-rich layered oxide electrodes. Nat. Mater. 19, 419–427 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu, Z. & Dahn, J. R. Understanding the anomalous capacity of Li/Li[NixLi(1/3−2x/3)Mn(2/3−x/3)]O2 cells using in situ X-ray diffraction and electrochemical studies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A815 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Armstrong, A. R. et al. Demonstrating oxygen loss and associated structural reorganization in the lithium battery cathode Li[Ni0.2Li0.2Mn0.6]O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8694–8698 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, A. D. & Bruce, P. G. The origin of electrochemical activity in Li2MnO3. Chem. Commun. 2790–2791 (2002).

  11. Lu, Z., Beaulieu, L. Y., Donaberger, R. A., Thomas, C. L. & Dahn, J. R. Synthesis, structure, and electrochemical behavior of Li[NixLi1/3−2x/3Mn2/3−x/3]O2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A778 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yabuuchi, N., Yoshii, K., Myung, S. T., Nakai, I. & Komaba, S. Detailed studies of a high-capacity electrode material for rechargeable batteries, Li2MnO3–LiCo(1/3)Ni(1/3)Mn(1/3)O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4404–4419 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hy, S., Felix, F., Rick, J., Su, W.-N. & Hwang, B. J. Direct in situ observation of Li2O evolution on Li-rich high-capacity cathode material, Li[NixLi(1–2x)/3Mn(2–x)/3]O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 999–1007 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Assat, G. et al. Fundamental interplay between anionic/cationic redox governing the kinetics and thermodynamics of lithium-rich cathodes. Nat. Commun. 8, 2219 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, X. et al. Direct visualization of the reversible O(2−)/O(−) redox process in Li-rich cathode materials. Adv. Mater. 30, e1705197 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, M. et al. Pushing the limit of 3d transition metal-based layered oxides that use both cation and anion redox for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 522–540 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, M. et al. Cationic and anionic redox in lithium-ion based batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 1688–1705 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yabuuchi, N. et al. High-capacity electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries: Li3NbO4-based system with cation-disordered rocksalt structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7650–7655 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seo, D. H. et al. The structural and chemical origin of the oxygen redox activity in layered and cation-disordered Li-excess cathode materials. Nat. Chem. 8, 692–697 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rong, X. et al. Structure-induced reversible anionic redox activity in Na layered oxide cathode. Joule 2, 125–140 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong, J. et al. Metal–oxygen decoordination stabilizes anion redox in Li-rich oxides. Nat. Mater. 18, 256–265 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, K. et al. Charge-compensation in 3d-transition-metal-oxide intercalation cathodes through the generation of localized electron holes on oxygen. Nat. Chem. 8, 684–691 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuchimoto, A. et al. Nonpolarizing oxygen-redox capacity without O–O dimerization in Na2Mn3O7. Nat. Commun. 12, 631 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McCalla, E. et al. Visualization of O–O peroxo-like dimers in high-capacity layered oxides for Li-ion batteries. Science 350, 1516–1521 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ning, F. et al. Inhibition of oxygen dimerization by local symmetry tuning in Li-rich layered oxides for improved stability. Nat. Commun. 11, 4973 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. House, R. A. et al. Superstructure control of first-cycle voltage hysteresis in oxygen-redox cathodes. Nature 577, 502–508 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, C. S. et al. The significance of the Li2MnO3 component in ‘composite’ xLi2MnO3·(1−x)LiMn0.5Ni0.5O2 electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 6, 1085–1091 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Francis Amalraj, S. et al. Study of the electrochemical behavior of the ‘inactive’ Li2MnO3. Electrochim. Acta 78, 32–39 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, B. et al. Correlating ligand-to-metal charge transfer with voltage hysteresis in a Li-rich rock-salt compound exhibiting anionic redox. Nat. Chem. 13, 1070–1080 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, B. et al. Capturing dynamic ligand-to-metal charge transfer with a long-lived cationic intermediate for anionic redox. Nat. Mater. 21, 1165–1174 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bréger, J. et al. High-resolution X-ray diffraction, DIFFaX, NMR and first principles study of disorder in the Li2MnO3–Li[Ni1/2Mn1/2]O2 solid solution. J. Solid State Chem. 178, 2575–2585 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, F. et al. Preparation and electrochemical performance of Li-rich layered cathode material, Li[Ni0.2Li0.2Mn0.6]O2, for lithium-ion batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 40, 783–789 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun, Y.-K., Lee, D.-J., Lee, Y. J., Chen, Z. & Myung, S.-T. Cobalt-free nickel rich layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 11434–11440 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu, J. et al. Elucidating anionic oxygen activity in lithium-rich layered oxides. Nat. Commun. 9, 947 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai, K. et al. High reversibility of lattice oxygen redox quantified by direct bulk probes of both anionic and cationic redox reactions. Joule 3, 518–541 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhuo, Z. et al. Cycling mechanism of Li2MnO3:Li–CO2 batteries and commonality on oxygen redox in cathode materials. Joule 5, 975–997 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ben Yahia, M., Vergnet, J., Saubanere, M. & Doublet, M. L. Unified picture of anionic redox in Li/Na-ion batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 496–502 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sathiya, M. et al. Reversible anionic redox chemistry in high-capacity layered-oxide electrodes. Nat. Mater. 12, 827–835 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Saubanère, M., McCalla, E., Tarascon, J. M. & Doublet, M. L. The intriguing question of anionic redox in high-energy density cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 984–991 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu, E. et al. Oxygen-redox reactions in LiCoO2 cathode without O–O bonding during charge–discharge. Joule 5, 720–736 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boulineau, A., Simonin, L., Colin, J. F., Bourbon, C. & Patoux, S. First evidence of manganese–nickel segregation and densification upon cycling in Li-rich layered oxides for lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 13, 3857–3863 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yin, W. et al. Structural evolution at the oxidative and reductive limits in the first electrochemical cycle of Li1.2Ni0.13Mn0.54Co0.13O2. Nat. Commun. 11, 1252 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kitchaev, D. A., Vinckeviciute, J. & Van der Ven, A. Delocalized metal–oxygen π-redox is the origin of anomalous nonhysteretic capacity in Li-ion and Na-ion Cathode materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1908–1916 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Voronina, N., Sun, Y.-K. & Myung, S.-T. Co-free layered cathode materials for high energy density lithium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1814–1824 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, B. et al. Constructing ‘Li-rich Ni-rich’ oxide cathodes for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 1210–1222 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B 192, 55–69 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Briois, V. et al. ROCK: the new Quick-EXAFS beamline at SOLEIL. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 712, 012149 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, L., Tsolakidou, C., Mariyappan, S., Tarascon, J.-M. & Trabesinger, S. Unraveling gas evolution in sodium batteries by online electrochemical mass spectrometry. Energy Storage Mater. 42, 12–21 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility, operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357, and resources of the Advanced Light Source, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Hard XAS experiments were performed on the ROCK beamline at the SOLEIL Synchrotron. We appreciate help from S. Mariyappan with performing the TGA and DSC experiments. A.V.M. and A.M.A. are grateful to the Russian Science Foundation for financial support (grant 23-73- 30003). J.-M.T and B.L. acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) (FP/2014)/ERC Grant-Project 670116-ARPEMA. We dedicate this article to J.B. Goodenough, as it deals with the layered oxides and fundamentals of electronic structure and redox chemistry in solid state that were so dear to the heart of John, the inspirer of so many of us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.L. and J.-M.T. planned the project and designed the experiments. B.L. carried out the synthesis, structural characterization and electrochemical analysis. X.G. prepared some of the samples for RIXS and performed the operando XRD experiment of LNMCO compound. Z.Z., J.G. and W.Y. collected and analysed the RIXS and soft XAS data. A.I. collected and processed the hard XAS data. A.V.M. and A.M.A. performed TEM experiments and did the analysis. L.Z. performed the OEMS experiments and data analysis. B.L., J.-M.T. and A.M.A. discussed the results and wrote the paper with the contributions from all other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marie Tarascon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks Valerie Pralong and Naoaki Yabuuchi for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 OEMS results of LNMO and LCMO.

OEMS results for (ac) LNMO and (df) LCMO. The cells were cycled at a current density of 15 mA g-1. The amount of O2 and CO2 release were indicated. The loss of O was calculated as percentage of O in the formula and shown as the loss of stoichiometry. ‘P1’ and ‘P2’ label the CO2 release peaks corresponding to different originations but with different intensities in LNMO and LCMO. The first peak P1 starts at ~4 V and normally can be attributed to the chemical/electrochemical decomposition of surface Li2CO3 residue, and their evolution rates depend on the amount of surface carbonate residuals after synthesis. The second peak P2 at the end of charge generally originates from electrolyte decomposition, and can be partially related to the singlet O species generated during oxygen release that can react with electrolyte to form CO2. The smaller amount of CO2 release in LNMO can hence be explained by its smaller oxygen release or less oxidized oxygen (shorter 4.5 V plateau) compared with that of LCMO.

Extended Data Fig. 2 TEM results of LNMO and LCMO after 40 cycles.

TEM images of LNMO and LCMO before and after 40 cycles. (a) [010] and (b) [\(\bar{1}10\)] HAADF-STEM images and corresponding SAED patterns of discharged LNMO after 40 cycles. Main reflections in the SAED patterns can be indexed in the parent O3-trigonal structure (space group: R\(\bar{3}\)m), whereas additional h ± 1/2 0l and h ± 1/2 k ± 1/2l reflections appear in both [010] and [\(\bar{1}10\)] SAED patterns of cycled LNMO. These extra spots indicate a formation of a tetragonally distorted I41/amd spinel structure aroused from TM migration from their initial positions (3a) towards both empty Li sites (3b) and tetrahedrally coordinated interstices in FCC oxygen lattice. An interlayer migration of the TM cations to Li layers is also directly evidenced in HAADF-STEM images, since extra HAADF intensity is observed between the (Li,TM)O2 layers. Besides interlayer, pronounced irreversible intra-layer TM cation migration is clearly seen in (b) [\(\bar{1}10\)] HAADF-STEM, that is a typical sign of structure densification. However, in LNMO material the densified layer is confined to near surface area and does not exceed few nm in thickness, while the diffuse intensity lines (marked with white arrowheads) are recognizable in [\(\bar{1}10\)] SAED pattern as well as double-dot contrast typical for Li/TM ‘honeycomb’ ordering is preserved in a bulk part of LNMO. (c) [010] and (d) [\(\bar{1}10\)] HAADF-STEM images and corresponding SAED patterns of the discharged LСMO after 40 cycles. A large fraction of the TM cations moves to Li layers and tetrahedral voids forming spinel-like nano domains clearly visible in [010] HAADF-STEM image. The ‘honeycomb’ Li/M ordering is completely suppressed in cycled LCMO: no diffuse intensity is observed in [\(\bar{1}10\)] SAED patterns and the dots in Li/TM layers are uniformly spaced and have similar brightness in [\(\bar{1}10\)] HAADF-STEM image. Altogether, such significant structural degradation indicates much higher degree of ‘densification’ of LCMO, where it propagates through all observed area compared to LNMO where it is confined to the near-surface layer. The scale bar is 2 nm.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–29, Note I and Tables 1–7.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data of electrochemical profiles and XRD refinements.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data of electrochemistry and XAS.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data of electrochemistry and XAS.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data of electrochemistry and in situ XRD.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data of electrochemistry.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Zhuo, Z., Zhang, L. et al. Decoupling the roles of Ni and Co in anionic redox activity of Li-rich NMC cathodes. Nat. Mater. 22, 1370–1379 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01679-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01679-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing