Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Negativity bias fails to predict right-wing ideology and personality in five studies

This study tested the hypothesis that negativity bias — giving disproportionately more attention and decision weight to negative than to positive stimuli — is associated with right-wing political ideology. Across five distinct studies and multiple measures of ideology, the results provide no consistent evidence that people with right-wing ideology have a stronger negativity bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Negativity bias, right-wing ideology and personality.

References

  1. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339–375 (2003). This analysis suggests that right-wing political preferences are driven by needs to reduce threat and uncertainty.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O. & Sterling, J. The politics of fear: is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Soc. Cognition 35, 324–353 (2017). A review and meta-analysis of the relationship between objective and subjective threat and political conservatism.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B. & Alford, J. R. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 297–350 (2014). This review argues that many observed psychological differences between liberals and conservatives indicate their responses to negative features of their environment.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D. J., Lausten, L., Smith, K. B. & Petersen, M. B. The psychophysiology of political ideology: replications, reanalyses, and recommendations. J. Politics 84, 50–66 (2022). This work critically analyses and ultimately fails to replicate prior findings of ideological differences in physiological reactions to threatening stimuli.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shook, N. J. & Fazio, R. H. Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 995–998 (2009). This study found ideological differences in memory accuracy for negative versus positive stimuli in a game of learning and decision-making under high levels of uncertainty.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Johnston, C. D. & Madson, G. J. Negative bias, personality, and political ideology. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01327-5 (2022)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negativity bias fails to predict right-wing ideology and personality in five studies. Nat Hum Behav 6, 622–623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01324-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01324-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing