The current research investigates whether higher economic inequality disproportionately intensifies the financial hardship of low-income individuals. We propose that higher economic inequality increases financial hardship for low-income individuals by reducing their ability to rely on their community as a buffer against financial difficulties. This may occur, in part, because a frayed community buffer reduces low-income individuals’ propensity to seek informal financial support from others. We provide empirical support across eight studies (sample size N = 1,029,900) from the United States, Australia and rural Uganda, through correlational and experimental data, as well as an instrumental variable analysis. On average across our studies, a 1 s.d. increase in economic inequality is associated with an increase of financial hardship among low-income individuals of 0.10 s.d. We discuss the implications of these results for policies aimed to help people living in poverty buffer against the adverse effects higher economic inequality imposes on them.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Data are available on the Open Science Framework at the following link: https://osf.io/a3qy8/. We note that the data providers did not allow us to share the data for study 3 and Supplementary Study 1. Access to data for study 3 is restricted by the National Centre for Longitudinal Data (NCLD), and can be obtained by submitting a request to the NCLD. Access to data for Supplementary Study 1 is restricted by Gallup, and can be obtained for purchase from Gallup.
The code to reproduce the analyses presented in the current research is available on the Open Science Framework at the following link: https://osf.io/a3qy8/.
Davies, J., Lluberas, R. & Shorrocks, A. Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook (Credit Suisse, 2016).
Cornia, G. A. Falling Inequality in Latin America: Policy Changes and Lessons (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).
Wolff, E. N. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2016: has middle class wealth recovered? NBER Working Paper 24085 https://doi.org/10.3386/w24085 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017).
Oishi, S. & Kesebir, S. Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1630–1638 (2015).
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S. & Diener, E. Income inequality and happiness. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1095–1100 (2011).
Delhey, J., Dragolov, G. & Pickett, K. Why inequality makes europeans less happy: the role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 30, 151–165 (2014).
Kelley, J. & Evans, M. D. R. Societal inequality and individual subjective well-being: results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Soc. Sci. Res. 62, 1–23 (2017).
Cheung, F. Can income inequality be associated with positive outcomes? Hope mediates the positive inequality-happiness link in rural China. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7, 320–330 (2015).
Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H. & Graham, C. Income inequality and well-being in the U.S.: evidence of geographic-scale- and measure-dependence. J. Econ. Inequal. 17, 415–434 (2019).
Ngamaba, K. H., Panagioti, M. & Armitage, C. J. Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual. Life Res. 27, 577–596 (2018).
Wilkinson, R. G. Income distribution and life expectancy. Brit. Med. J. 304, 165–168 (1992).
Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R. G. Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc. Sci. Med. 128, 316–326 (2015).
Sommet, N., Morselli, D. & Spini, D. Income inequality affects the psychological health only of the people facing scarcity. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1911–1921 (2018).
Truesdale, B. C. & Jencks, C. The health effects of income inequality: averages and disparities. Annu. Rev. Public Health 37, 413–430 (2016).
Rantakeisu, U., Starrin, B. & Hagquist, C. Financial hardship and shame: a tentative model to understand the social and health effects of unemployment. Br. J. Soc. Work 29, 877–901 (1999).
Bradshaw, M. & Ellison, C. G. Financial hardship and psychological distress: exploring the buffering effects of religion. Soc. Sci. Med. 71, 196–204 (2010).
Algan, Y. & Cahuc, P. in Handbook of Economic Growth Vol. 1 (eds Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S.) 49–120 (Elsevier, 2014).
Rothstein, B. & Uslaner, E. M. All for all: equality, corruption, and social trust. World Polit. 58, 41–72 (2005).
Buttrick, N. R. & Oishi, S. The psychological consequences of income inequality. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11, e12304 (2017).
Putnam, R. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, 2000).
Hsee, C. & Weber, E. Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 12, 165–179 (1999).
Weber, E. U. & Hsee, C. K. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards risk. Manag. Sci. 44, 1205–1212 (1998).
Jachimowicz, J. M., Chafik, S., Munrat, S., Prabhu, J. C. & Weber, E. U. Community trust reduces myopic decisions of low-income individuals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5401–5406 (2017).
Hauser, O. & Norton, M. I. (Mis)perceptions of inequality. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 18, 21–25 (2017).
Norton, M. I. & Ariely, D. Building a better America – one wealth quintile at a time. Perspect Psychol. Sci. 6, 9–12 (2011).
Phillips, P. C. B. & Hansen, B. E. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 57, 99–125 (1990).
Davidson, R. & Mackinnon, J. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1993).
Oishi, S., Kushlev, K. & Schimmack, U. Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. Am. Psychol. 73, 157–168 (2018).
Brown, R. & Craig, M. Intergroup inequality heightens reports of discrimination along alternative identity dimensions. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219880186 (2019).
Hackel, L. M. & Zaki, J. Propagation of economic inequality through reciprocity and reputation. Psychol. Sci. 29, 604–613 (2018).
Côté, S., House, J. & Willer, R. High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15838–15843 (2015).
Shah, A. K., Zhao, J., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Money in the mental lives of the poor. Soc. Cogn. 36, 4–19 (2018).
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Some consequences of having too little. Science 338, 682–685 (2012).
Steinhart, Y. & Jiang, Y. Securing the future: threat to self-image spurs financial saving intentions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 741–757 (2019).
Thomas, K. A. & Clifford, S. Validity and mechanical turk: an assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 184–197 (2017).
Chandler, J., Mueller, P. & Paolacci, G. Nonnaïveté among amazon mechanical turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behav. Res. Methods 46, 112–130 (2014).
Shah, A. K., Shafir, E. & Mullainathan, S. Scarcity frames value. Psychol. Sci. 26, 402–412 (2015).
Haushofer, J. & Fehr, E. On the psychology of poverty. Science 344, 862–867 (2014).
Frankenhuis, W. E. & Nettle, D. The strengths of people in poverty. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29, 16–21 (2019).
Greenberg, A. E. & Hershfield, H. E. Financial decision making. Consum. Psychol. Rev. 2, 17–29 (2018).
Stanley, D. T. & Girth, M. Bankruptcy: Problem, Process, Reform (The Brookings Institute, 1971).
Thorne, D. & Anderson, L. Managing the stigma of personal bankruptcy. Sociol. Focus 39, 77–97 (2006).
Tadelis, S. The Power of Shame and the Rationality of Trust (Haas School of Business, 2011).
Deri, S., Stein, D. H. & Bohns, V. K. With a little help from my friends (and strangers): closeness as a moderator of the underestimation-of-compliance effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 82, 6–15 (2019).
Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., Jetten, J. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1114–1127 (2018).
Major, B. & O’Brien, L. T. The social psychology of stigma. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56, 393–421 (2005).
Lusardi, A., Schneider, D. & Tufano, P. Financially fragile households: evidence and implications. NBER Working Paper No. 17072 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011).
Slepian, M. L., Chun, J. S. & Mason, M. F. The experience of secrecy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 113, 1–33 (2017).
Warren, E., Westbrook, J. L. & Sullivan, T. A. Less stigma or more financial distress: an empirical analysis of the extraordinary increase in bankruptcy filings. Stanf. Law Rev. 59, 213–256 (2006).
Sands, M. L. & de Kadt, D. Local exposure to inequality among the poor increases support for taxing the rich. Preprint at OSF https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9ktg2 (2019).
Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D. G. & Christakis, N. A. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 526, 426–429 (2015).
Hauser, O. P., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A. & Norton, M. I. Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich. Behav. Public Policy https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.4 (2019).
Landis, B. & Gladstone, J. J. Personality, income, and compensatory consumption: low-income extraverts spend more on status. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1518–1520 (2017).
Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. & Socolow, R. H. Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15827–15832 (2015).
Bebbington, A. J., Dani, A. A., de Haan, A. & Walton, M. Institutional Pathways to Equity: Addressing Inequality Traps (The World Bank, 2008).
Meuris, J. & Leana, C. The price of financial precarity: organizational costs of employees’ financial concerns. Organ. Sci. 29, 357–546 (2018).
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S. & Hunter, B. A. Sexism and racism: old-fashioned and modern prejudices. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 199–214 (1995).
Son Hing, L. S. et al. The merit of meritocracy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 433–450 (2011).
We thank C. Prottas for his help in data collection for study 6, and O. Hauser and G. Neszveda for useful discussions. We are also grateful to the Hungarian Fulbright Committee for their support. The authors received no specific funding for this work.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: Aisha Bradshaw
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jachimowicz, J.M., Szaszi, B., Lukas, M. et al. Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer. Nat Hum Behav 4, 702–712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0849-2