Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive

Matters Arising to this article was published on 16 September 2019

The Original Article was published on 17 September 2018

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Data are available from (Johnson-300 and Johnson-120) and (BBC-44).

Code accessibility

The code necessary to conduct the reported analysis is available on the Open Science Framework (


  1. Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W. & Amaral, L. A. N. A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nat. Hum. Behav. (2018).

  2. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. & Soto, C. J. in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (eds Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P.) 114–158 (The Guilford Press, 2008).

  3. Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F. & Van Aken, M. A. Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur. J. Pers. 15, 169–198 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: three replicable personality types. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 157–171 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. E. How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput. J. 41, 578–588 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, D. & Seo, B. Assessment of the number of components in Gaussian mixture models in the presence of multiple local maximizers. J. Multivar. Anal. 125, 100–120 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haslam, N., Holland, E. & Kuppens, P. Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychol. Med. 42, 903–920 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Asendorpf, J. B. Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. Eur. J. Pers. 17, 327–346 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopwood, C. J. & Donnellan, M. B. How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14, 332–346 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



J.-P.F. and C.S. analysed the data. J.-P.F., C.S., P.M. and M.Z. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Philipp Freudenstein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freudenstein, JP., Strauch, C., Mussel, P. et al. Four personality types may be neither robust nor exhaustive. Nat Hum Behav 3, 1045–1046 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing