Self-insight into emotional and cognitive abilities is not related to higher adjustment

Abstract

Despite the popularity of the Ancient Greek maxim ‘know thyself’, the importance of self-insight for adjustment, or effective psychological functioning, remains unclear. Here we examined four perspectives about how cognitive and emotional abilities and self-views about these abilities relate to adjustment. We administered tests of cognitive and emotional abilities and assessed self-views about these abilities. Participants then completed daily diaries for a week to report multiple self-reported indicators of adjustment. We analysed data using polynomial regression and response surface analysis. We found no support for benefits of self-insight. The conditions to infer support for linear or curvilinear associations between abilities or self-views about these abilities and adjustment were also not met. The findings suggest that giving employees and students feedback about their cognitive and emotional abilities in organizations and in schools may not enhance their adjustment. We discuss the limitations of our study and offer suggestions for future research.

Protocol registration

The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 21 June 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4283567.v1.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Response surface graphs for main hypotheses.
Fig. 2: Response surface graphs for emotional abilities and self-views.
Fig. 3: Response surface graphs for cognitive ability and self-views.

Data availability

The materials and data for the main study and the pilot studies have been deposited at Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BSUNGB

To download the csv versions of the data that are required by the code, researchers need to select the ‘Original File Format (Comma Separated Values)’ option under ‘Download’. The code for analysis will not work if researchers download the tab versions of the data files instead.

Code availability

The R code for analysis for the main study and the pilot studies have been deposited at Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BSUNGB

References

  1. 1.

    Colvin, C. R., Block, J. & Funder, D. C. Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: negative implications for mental health. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 1152–1162 (1995).

  2. 2.

    Maslow, A. H. Self-actualizing people: a study of psychological health. Personality 1, 11–34 (1950).

  3. 3.

    Wilson, T. D. Know thyself. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 384–389 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Allport, G. W. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation 422 (Holt, 1937).

  5. 5.

    Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol. Bull. 103, 193–210 (1988).

  6. 6.

    Greenwald, A. G. The totalitarian ego: fabrication and revision of personal history. Am. Psychol. 35, 603–618 (1980).

  7. 7.

    Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. Psychol. Bull. 116, 21–27 (1994).

  8. 8.

    Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychol. Bull. 124, 262–274 (1998).

  9. 9.

    Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol. Bull. 119, 254–284 (1996).

  10. 10.

    Galef, J. When is overconfidence useful (if ever)? Julia Galef https://juliagalef.com/2017/02/18/when-is-overconfidence-useful-if-ever/ (2017).

  11. 11.

    Meikle, N. L., Tenney, E. R. & Moore, D. A. Overconfidence at work: does overconfidence survive the checks and balances of organizational life? Res. Organ. Behav. 36, 121–134 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Colvin, C. R. & Block, J. Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychol. Bull. 116, 3–20 (1994).

  13. 13.

    Humberg, S. et al. Is accurate, positive, or inflated self-perception most advantageous for psychological adjustment? A competitive test of key hypotheses. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 116, 835–859 (2019).

  14. 14.

    Lewinsohn, P. M., Mischel, W., Chaplin, W. & Barton, R. Social competence and depression: the role of illusory self-perceptions. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 89, 203–212 (1980).

  15. 15.

    Paulhus, D. L. Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: a mixed blessing? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1197–1208 (1998).

  16. 16.

    Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84, 231–259 (1977).

  17. 17.

    Petrides, K. V., Furnham, A. & Martin, G. N. Estimates of emotional and psychometric intelligence: evidence for gender-based stereotypes. J. Soc. Psychol. 144, 149–162 (2004).

  18. 18.

    Kwan, V. S., John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Kuang, L. L. Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 1062–1077 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Leising, D., Locke, K. D., Kurzius, E. & Zimmermann, J. Quantifying the association of self-enhancement bias with self-ratings of personality and life satisfaction. Assessment 23, 588–602 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Church, A. H. Managerial self-awareness in high-performing individuals in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 281–292 (1997).

  21. 21.

    Edwards, J. R. Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. J. Manage. 20, 683–689 (1994).

  22. 22.

    Edwards, J. R. in Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (eds Drasgow, F. & Schmitt N. W.) 350–400 (Jossey-Bass, 2002).

  23. 23.

    Edwards, J. R. & Parry, M. E. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad. Manage. J. 36, 1577–1613 (1993).

  24. 24.

    Barranti, M., Carlson, E. N. & Côté, S. How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8, 465–475 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Joseph, D. L. & Newman, D. A. Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. J. Appl. Psychol. 95, 54–78 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Mabe, P. A. & West, S. G. Validity of self-evaluation of ability: a review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 67, 280–296 (1982).

  27. 27.

    Zell, E. & Krizan, Z. Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 111–125 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Ruehlman, L. S., West, S. G. & Pasahow, R. J. Depression and evaluative schemata. J. Pers. 53, 46–92 (1985).

  29. 29.

    John, O. P. & Robins, R. W. Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66, 206–219 (1994).

  30. 30.

    Carlson, M. Performance: A Critical Introduction (Routledge, 2013).

  31. 31.

    Robins, R. W. & John, O. P. in Handbook of Personality Psychology (eds Hogan, R. et al.) 649–679 (Academic Press, 1997).

  32. 32.

    Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215 (1977).

  33. 33.

    Gohm, C. L., Corser, G. C. & Dalsky, D. J. Emotional intelligence under stress: useful, unnecessary, or irrelevant? Pers. Individ. Dif. 39, 1017–1028 (2005).

  34. 34.

    Wood, R., Allen, J., Pillinger, T. & Kohn, N. in Human Resource Strategies: An Applied Approach (eds Travaghone, A. & Marshall, V.) 210–230 (McGraw-Hill, 2000).

  35. 35.

    Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A. & Smith, K. G. The paradox of success: an archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Manage. J. 43, 837–853 (2000).

  36. 36.

    Försterling, F. & Morgenstern, M. Accuracy of self-assessment and task performance: does it pay to know the truth? J. Educ. Psychol. 94, 576–585 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Anderson, C., Ames, D. R. & Gosling, S. D. Punishing hubris: the perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 90–101 (2008).

  38. 38.

    Jahoda, M. Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health (Basic Books, 1958).

  39. 39.

    Helgeson, V. S. & Taylor, S. E. Social comparisons and adjustment among cardiac patients. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23, 1171–1195 (1993).

  40. 40.

    Horton, R. S. Similarity and attractiveness in social perception: differentiating between biases for the self and the beautiful. Self Identity 2, 137–152 (2003).

  41. 41.

    Epley, N. & Whitchurch, E. Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 1159–1170 (2008).

  42. 42.

    Kuiper, N. A. & Derry, P. A. Depressed and nondepressed content self‐reference in mild depressives. J. Pers. 50, 67–80 (1982).

  43. 43.

    Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., MacDonald, M. R. & Shaw, B. F. Self-schema processing of depressed and nondepressed content: the effects of vulnerability to depression. Soc. Cogn. 3, 77–93 (1985).

  44. 44.

    Bandura, A. & Jourden, F. J. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60, 941–951 (1991).

  45. 45.

    Cervone, D. & Peake, P. K. Anchoring, efficacy, and action: the influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 492–501 (1986).

  46. 46.

    Wood, R. & Bandura, A. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56, 407–415 (1989).

  47. 47.

    Anderson, C., Brion, S., Moore, D. A. & Kennedy, J. A. A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 718–735 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C. & Moore, D. A. When overconfidence is revealed to others: testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 122, 266–279 (2013).

  49. 49.

    Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A. & DeGrassi, S. W. What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 1392–1411 (2009).

  50. 50.

    Tracy, J. L., Shariff, A. F., Zhao, W. & Henrich, J. Cross-cultural evidence that the nonverbal expression of pride is an automatic status signal. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 163–180 (2013).

  51. 51.

    Grant, A. M. & Schwartz, B. Too much of a good thing: the challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 61–76 (2011).

  52. 52.

    Pierce, J. R. & Aguinis, H. The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. J. Manage. 39, 313–338 (2013).

  53. 53.

    Milam, J. E., Richardson, J. L., Marks, G., Kemper, C. A. & McCutchan, A. J. The roles of dispositional optimism and pessimism in HIV disease progression. Psychol. Health 19, 167–181 (2004).

  54. 54.

    De Ridder, D., Schreurs, K. & Bensing, J. The relative benefits of being optimistic: optimism as a coping resource in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. Br. J. Health Psychol. 5, 141–155 (2000).

  55. 55.

    Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I. & Vohs, K. D. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 4, 1–44 (2003).

  56. 56.

    Baumeister, R. F. The optimal margin of illusion. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 8, 176–189 (1989).

  57. 57.

    McAllister, H. A., Baker, J. D., Mannes, C., Stewart, H. & Sutherland, A. The optimal margin of illusion hypothesis: evidence from the self-serving bias and personality disorders. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 21, 414–426 (2002).

  58. 58.

    Bertua, C., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: a UK meta‐analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 78, 387–409 (2005).

  59. 59.

    Hunter, J. E. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 29, 340–362 (1986).

  60. 60.

    Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1, 89–92 (1992).

  61. 61.

    Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. Measurement error in psychological research: lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychol. Methods 1, 199–223 (1996).

  62. 62.

    Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Egan, V. Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Dif. 38, 547–558 (2005).

  63. 63.

    Rossen, E. & Kranzler, J. H. Incremental validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) after controlling for personality and intelligence. J. Res. Pers. 43, 60–65 (2009).

  64. 64.

    Ali, A. et al. The relationship between happiness and intelligent quotient: the contribution of socio-economic and clinical factors. Psychol. Med. 43, 1303–1312 (2012).

  65. 65.

    Brackett, M. A. & Mayer, J. D. Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 1147–1158 (2003).

  66. 66.

    Ree, M. J. & Earles, J. A. Predicting training success: not much more than g. Pers. Psychol. 44, 321–332 (1991).

  67. 67.

    Sackett, P. R., Gruys, M. L. & Ellingson, J. E. Ability–personality interactions when predicting job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 83, 545–556 (1998).

  68. 68.

    Terborg, J. R. Women in management: a research review. J. Appl. Psychol. 62, 647–664 (1977).

  69. 69.

    Bechtoldt, M. N. & Schneider, V. K. Predicting stress from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings: emotional intelligence and testosterone jointly predict cortisol reactivity. Emotion 16, 815–825 (2016).

  70. 70.

    Simpson, J. A. et al. Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 242–254 (2011).

  71. 71.

    Antonakis, J., House, R. J. & Simonton, D. K. Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 1003–1021 (2017).

  72. 72.

    Simonton, D. K. Intelligence and personal influence in groups: four nonlinear models. Psychol. Rev. 92, 532–547 (1985).

  73. 73.

    Beal, D. J. ESM 2.0: state of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2, 383–407 (2015).

  74. 74.

    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903 (2003).

  75. 75.

    Schönbrodt, F. D. Testing fit patterns with polynomial regression models. OSF https://osf.io/ndggf/ (2017).

  76. 76.

    Cronbach, L. Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychol. Bull. 52, 177–193 (1955).

  77. 77.

    Humberg, S. et al. Enhanced versus simply positive: a new condition-based regression analysis to disentangle effects of self-enhancement from effects of positivity of self-view. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 114, 303–322 (2018).

  78. 78.

    Amdurer, E., Boyatzis, R. E., Saatcioglu, A., Smith, M. L. & Taylor, S. N. Long term impact of emotional, social and cognitive intelligence competencies and GMAT on career and life satisfaction and career success. Front. Psychol. 5, 1447 (2014).

  79. 79.

    Lounsbury, J. W., Gibson, L. W., Steel, R. P., Sundstrom, E. D. & Loveland, J. L. An investigation of intelligence and personality in relation to career satisfaction. Pers. Individ. Dif. 37, 181–189 (2004).

  80. 80.

    Wigtil, C. J. & Henriques, G. R. The relationship between intelligence and psychological well-being in incoming college students. Psychol. Well Being 5, 1–19 (2015).

  81. 81.

    Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W. & Blackstone, T. When the head protects the heart: empathic accuracy in dating relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 629–641 (1995).

  82. 82.

    Elfenbein, H. A., Foo, M.-D. D., White, J. B., Tan, H. H. & Aik, V.-C. Reading your counterpart: the benefit of emotion recognition accuracy for effectiveness in negotiation. J. Nonverbal Behav. 31, 205–223 (2007).

  83. 83.

    Paolacci, G. & Chandler, J. Inside the Turk: understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 184–188 (2014).

  84. 84.

    Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A. & Lenz, G. S. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit. Anal. 20, 351–368 (2012).

  85. 85.

    Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J. & Mueller, P. A. Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 1, 213–220 (2013).

  86. 86.

    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49, 71–75 (1985).

  87. 87.

    Diener, E., Inglehart, R. & Tay, L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc. Indic. Res. 112, 497–527 (2013).

  88. 88.

    Lucas, R. E., Diener, E. & Suh, E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 616–628 (1996).

  89. 89.

    Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L. & Liden, R. C. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Manage. 44, 219–237 (2001).

  90. 90.

    Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W. & Bretz, R. D. Jr An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Pers. Psychol. 48, 485–519 (1995).

  91. 91.

    Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L. & Feldman, D. C. Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta‐analysis. Pers. Psychol. 58, 367–408 (2005).

  92. 92.

    Impett, E. A., Javam, L., Le, B. M., Asyabi-Eshghi, B. & Kogan, A. The joys of genuine giving: approach and avoidance sacrifice motivation and authenticity. Pers. Relatsh. 20, 740–754 (2013).

  93. 93.

    Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159 (1992).

  94. 94.

    US Census Bureau. Hispanic or Latino Origin by Race, 2011–2015 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_15_5YR_B03002&prodType=table (2015).

  95. 95.

    US Census Bureau. Sex by Age, 2011–2015 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_15_5YR_B01001A&prodType=table (2015).

  96. 96.

    Conway, N. & Briner, R. B. A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. J. Organ. Behav. 23, 287–302 (2002).

  97. 97.

    Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L. & Ferguson, M. J. Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. J. Soc. Issues 57, 31–53 (2001).

  98. 98.

    Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics (Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, 2007).

  99. 99.

    Beaupré, M. G. & Hess, U. Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 36, 355–370 (2005).

  100. 100.

    Nowicki, S. & Duke, M. P. in Interpersonal Sensitivity: Theory and Measurement (eds Hall, J. A. & Bernieri, F. J.) 183–198 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001).

  101. 101.

    Sheldon, O. J., Dunning, D. & Ames, D. R. Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. J. Appl. Psychol. 99, 125–137 (2014).

  102. 102.

    Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C. & Heggestad, E. D. Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. J. Bus. Psychol. 25, 543–554 (2010).

  103. 103.

    Raven, J. C., Raven, J. & Court, J. H. Advanced Progressive Matrices Set II (Oxford Psychologists Press, 1962).

  104. 104.

    Denissen, J. J. A., Schönbrodt, F. D., van Zalk, M., Meeus, W. H. & van Aken, M. A. Antecedents and consequences of peer-rated intelligence. Eur. J. Pers. 25, 108–119 (2011).

  105. 105.

    Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N. & Stone, A. A. Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science 312, 1908–1910 (2006).

  106. 106.

    Zou, C., Schimmack, U. & Gere, J. The validity of well-being measures: a multiple-indicator-multiple-rater model. Psychol. Assess. 25, 1247–1254 (2013).

  107. 107.

    Schimmack, U. in The Science of Subjective Well-being (eds Eid, M. & Larsen, R. J.) 97–123 (Guilford Press, 2008).

  108. 108.

    Pavot, W. & Diener, E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol. Assess. 5, 164–172 (1993).

  109. 109.

    Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S. & Wormley, W. M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Manage. J. 33, 64–86 (1990).

  110. 110.

    Côté, S. et al. Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 217–232 (2011).

  111. 111.

    Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S. & Reichard, R. J. The strong, sensitive type: effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 106, 39–60 (2008).

  112. 112.

    Bollen, K. A. & Jackman, R. W. Regression diagnostics: an expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Sociol. Methods Res. 13, 510–542 (1985).

  113. 113.

    Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E. & Welsch, R. E. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley, 2005).

  114. 114.

    Hair, J. F. Jr, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis 3rd edn (Macmillan, 1995).

  115. 115.

    Kennedy, P. A Guide to Econometrics (Blackwell, 1992).

  116. 116.

    Neter, J., Wasserman, W. & Kutner, M. H. Applied Linear Regression Models (Irwin, 1989).

  117. 117.

    Schönbrodt, F. D. RSA: an R package for response surface analysis. Version 0.9.11 https://cran.r-project.org/package=RSA (2017).

  118. 118.

    Humberg, S., Nestler, S. & Back, M. D. Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 10, 409–419 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by grant no. 500342 from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank M. Barranti, E. Carlson and J. Hirsh for guidance on data analysis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C.H. jointly conceived the study with S.C., designed and conducted the pilot studies and main study, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. S.C. supervised the design and analysis of the pilot studies and main study, and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce C. He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Primary Handling Editor: Marike Schiffer

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1–5, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J.C., Côté, S. Self-insight into emotional and cognitive abilities is not related to higher adjustment. Nat Hum Behav 3, 867–884 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0644-0

Download citation

Further reading