Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable

  • Nature Human Behaviourvolume 2pages133138 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0248-5
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Individual variation in preferences to maintain versus change the societal status quo can manifest in the political realm by choosing leaders and policies that reinforce or undermine existing inequalities1. We sought to understand which individuals are likely to defend or challenge inequality in society by exploring the neuroanatomical substrates of system justification tendencies. In two independent neuroimaging studies, we observed that larger bilateral amygdala volume was positively correlated with the tendency to believe that the existing social order was legitimate and desirable. These results held for members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups (men and women, respectively). Furthermore, individuals with larger amygdala volume were less likely to participate in subsequent protest movements. We ruled out alternative explanations in terms of attitudinal extremity and political orientation per se. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that system justification effects may extend to structures that are adjacent to the amygdala, including parts of the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that the amygdala may provide a neural substrate for maintaining the societal status quo, and opens avenues for further investigation into the association between system justification and other neuroanatomical regions.

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. & Nosek, B. A. A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Polit. Psychol. 25, 881–919 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999).

  3. 3.

    Moore, B. Jr Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (Routledge, London, 1978).

  4. 4.

    Bauman, M. D., Toscano, J. E., Mason, W. A., Lavenex, P. & Amaral, D. G. The expression of social dominance following neonatal lesions of the amygdala or hippocampus in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behav. Neurosci. 120, 749–760 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F. & Pribram, K. H. Influence of amygdalectomy on social behavior in monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47, 173–178 (1954).

  6. 6.

    Amaral, D. G. The amygdala, social behavior, and danger detection. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1000, 337–347 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Adolphs, R., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 393, 470–474 (1998).

  8. 8.

    Harrison, L. A., Hurlemann, R. & Adolphs, R. An enhanced default approach bias following amygdala lesions in humans. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1543–1555 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Scheele, D. et al. Amygdala lesion profoundly alters altruistic punishment. Biol. Psychiatry 72, e5–e7 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Feinstein, J. S., Adolphs, R., Damasio, A. & Tranel, D. The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Curr. Biol. 21, 34–38 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Kanai, R. & Rees, G. The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 231–242 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Noonan, M. P. et al. A neural circuit covarying with social hierarchy in macaques. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001940 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Sallet, J. et al. Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science 334, 697–700 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Bickart, K. C., Wright, C. I., Dautoff, R. J., Dickerson, B. C. & Barrett, L. F. Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 163–164 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Kanai, R., Bahrami, B., Roylance, R. & Rees, G. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1327–1334 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R. Fear and the human amygdala. J. Neurosci. 15, 5879–5891 (1995).

  17. 17.

    LeDoux, J. The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 23, 727–738 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Phelps, E. A. et al. Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 437–441 (2001).

  19. 19.

    Herry, C. et al. Processing of temporal unpredictability in human and animal amygdala. J. Neurosci. 27, 5958–5966 (2007).

  20. 20.

    Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D. & Camerer, C. F. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310, 1680–1683 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Kumaran, D., Melo, H. L. & Duzel, E. The emergence and representation of knowledge about social and nonsocial hierarchies. Neuron 76, 653–666 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J. & Cunningham, W. A. The neural substrates of in-group bias: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1131–1139 (2008).

  23. 23.

    Wheeler, M. E. & Fiske, S. T. Controlling racial prejudice: social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychol. Sci. 16, 56–63 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Zink, C. F. et al. Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron 58, 273–283.

  25. 25.

    Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C. & Rees, G. Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Curr. Biol. 21, 677–680 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G. & Kay, A. C. in Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (eds Greenberg J. et al.) Ch. 17 (Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2004).

  27. 27.

    Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 12, 339–375 (2003).

  28. 28.

    Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G. & Mosso, C. System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: cross-national evidence. Soc. Just. Res. 18, 305–333 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J. & Hunyady, G. Fair market ideology: its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Res. Organ. Behav. 25, 53–91 (2003).

  30. 30.

    Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 126–136 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R. & Chen, E. S. Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychol. Sci. 18, 267–274 (2007).

  32. 32.

    Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C. & Jost, J. T. Not all ideologies are created equal: epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Soc. Cogn. 30, 669–688 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Kay, A. C. & Jost, J. T. Complementary justice: effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 823–837 (2003).

  34. 34.

    Jost, J. T. The end of the end of ideology. Am. Psychol. 61, 651–670 (2006).

  35. 35.

    Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. NeuroImage 11, 805–821 (2000).

  36. 36.

    Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36, 209–232 (2000).

  37. 37.

    Bachevalier, J. & Loveland, K. A. The orbitofrontal–amygdala circuit and self-regulation of social-emotional behavior in autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 97–117 (2006).

  38. 38.

    Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003).

  39. 39.

    Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A. & Dolan, R. J. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 189–195 (2004).

  40. 40.

    Ploner, M., Lee, M. C., Wiech, K., Bingel, U. & Tracey, I. Prestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 355–360 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Singer, T., Critchley, H. D. & Preuschoff, K. A common role of insula in feelings, empathy, and uncertainty. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 334–340 (2009).

  42. 42.

    Hogue, M. & Yoder, J. D. The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women’s and men’s pay allocations. Psychol. Women Q. 27, 330–337 (2003).

  43. 43.

    Jost, J. T. An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychol. Women Q. 21, 387–393 (1997).

  44. 44.

    Major, B., McFarlin, D. B. & Gagnon, D. Overworked and underpaid: on the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47, 1399–1412 (1984).

  45. 45.

    Calogero, R. M. & Jost, J. T. Self-subjugation among women: exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 211–228 (2011).

  46. 46.

    Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. in Psychology of Intergroup Relations (eds Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G.) Ch. 1 (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL, 1986).

  47. 47.

    Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O. & Sullivan, B. N. Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33, 13–36 (2003).

  48. 48.

    Henry, P. J. & Saul, A. L. The development of system justification in the developing world. Soc. Just. Res. 19, 365–378 (2006).

  49. 49.

    Watanabe, N. & Yamamoto, M. Neural mechanisms of social dominance. Front. Neurosci. 9, 154 (2015).

  50. 50.

    Jost, J. T., Nam, H. H., Amodio, D. M. & Van Bavel, J. J. Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 35, 3–42 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J. & Rees, G. Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329, 1541–1543 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K. et al. Structure of orbitofrontal cortex predicts social influence. Curr. Biol. 22, 123–124 (2012).

Download references


This work was supported by the Center for Brain Imaging at NYU, and a National Science Foundation Grant 1555131 (to J.J.V.B.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analyses, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank S. Wharton and A. Skwara for assistance with data collection, and E. Jackson for assistance with manuscript preparation. We also thank E. Knowles, P. Shrout, and C. Dawes, as well as members of the Social Perception and Evaluation Lab and the Social Justice Lab at NYU for helpful comments on this programme of research.

Author information


  1. Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    • H. Hannah Nam
  2. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA

    • John T. Jost
    • , Lisa Kaggen
    •  & Jay J. Van Bavel
  3. Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    • Lisa Kaggen
  4. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

    • Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn
  5. Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA

    • Jay J. Van Bavel


  1. Search for H. Hannah Nam in:

  2. Search for John T. Jost in:

  3. Search for Lisa Kaggen in:

  4. Search for Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn in:

  5. Search for Jay J. Van Bavel in:


H.H.N., J.T.J., and J.J.V.B. designed the research. H.H.N. and L.K. collected the data. H.H.N., L.K., and D.C.-M. analysed the data with input from J.T.J. and J.J.V.B. H.H.N. wrote the manuscript with input from all other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hannah Nam.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables 1–5, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary References

  2. Life Sciences Reporting Summary and MRI Studies Reporting Summary