Science, by its nature, is open to uncertainty and interpretation, but politicization — fuelled by motivated reasoning and advances in the technological environment — is leading to a new level of science scepticism among citizens and scientists themselves. What can be done to address these crises?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The spectrum of knowledge: integrating knowledge dimensions in the context of forests and climate change
Sustainability Science Open Access 29 March 2023
-
To wear or not to wear? Unpacking the #NoMask discourses and conversations on Twitter
SN Social Sciences Open Access 21 November 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Nature 467, 133 (2010).
Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).
Dietz, T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14081–14087 (2013).
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N. & Cook, F. L. Public Opin. Q. 76, 1–26 (2014).
van der Linden, S. Pers. Individ. Dif. 87, 171–173 (2015).
Open Science Collaboration. Science 349, aac4716 (2015).
Bollen, K., Cacioppo, J. T., Kaplan, R. M., Krosnick, J. A. & Olds, J. L. Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science (Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, 2015).
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. & Maibach, E. Global Challenges 1, 1600008 (2017).
Nosek, B. A. et al. Science 348, 1422–1425 (2015).
Ioannidis, J. P. A. in The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (eds Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D. & Scheufele, D. A.) 103–110 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Druckman, J.N. The crisis of politicization within and beyond science. Nat Hum Behav 1, 615–617 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0183-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0183-5
This article is cited by
-
Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility
Nature (2023)
-
The spectrum of knowledge: integrating knowledge dimensions in the context of forests and climate change
Sustainability Science (2023)
-
To wear or not to wear? Unpacking the #NoMask discourses and conversations on Twitter
SN Social Sciences (2022)
-
Pre-service Teachers’ False Beliefs in Superstitions and Pseudosciences in Relation to Science and Technology
Science & Education (2020)
-
Countering science denial
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)