Comment | Published:

Human germline genome editing and broad societal consensus

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, Article number: 0103 (2017) | Download Citation

Should human genome editing be limited to somatic cells, or should germline genome editing also be permitted? Should (apparently) permissible human genome editing be limited to therapeutic purposes, or should enhancement purposes also be permitted? Who decides, and on what basis?

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    False inevitabilities and irrational exuberance. Biopolitical Times (2016).

  2. 2.

    N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 5–8 (2015).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Nature 519, 410–411 (2015).

  4. 4.

    et al. Protein Cell 6, 363–372 (2015).

  5. 5.

    International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion (The National Academis of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015);

  6. 6.

    National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance (The National Academies Press, 2017);

  7. 7.

    Engineering consensus in the development of genome editing policy. Hastings Bioethics Forum (2017).

  8. 8.

    Global Risks 2015 10th edn (World Economic Forum, 2017);

  9. 9.

    ‘Broad societal consensus’ on human germline editing. Harvard Health Policy Review Vol. 15, 19–23 (2016).

  10. 10.

    in Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences (eds Gissis, S. B., Lamm, E. & Shavit, A.) (in the press).

  11. 11.

    Resource Handbook (Women’s Encampment for a Future of Peace and Justice, 1983).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Françoise Baylis is Professor and Canada Research Chair in Bioethics and Philosophy, Novel Tech Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, 1379 Seymour Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.

    • Françoise Baylis

Authors

  1. Search for Françoise Baylis in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Françoise Baylis.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0103

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing