Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Recent human-induced atmospheric drying across Europe unprecedented in the last 400 years

Abstract

The vapor pressure deficit reflects the difference between how much moisture the atmosphere could and actually does hold, a factor that fundamentally affects evapotranspiration, ecosystem functioning, and vegetation carbon uptake. Its spatial variability and long-term trends under natural versus human-influenced climate are poorly known despite being essential for predicting future effects on natural ecosystems and human societies such as crop yield, wildfires, and health. Here we combine regionally distinct reconstructions of pre-industrial summer vapor pressure deficit variability from Europe’s largest oxygen-isotope network of tree-ring cellulose with observational records and Earth system model simulations with and without human forcing included. We demonstrate that an intensification of atmospheric drying during the recent decades across different European target regions is unprecedented in a pre-industrial context and that it is attributed to human influence with more than 98% probability. The magnitude of this trend is largest in Western and Central Europe, the Alps and Pyrenees region, and the smallest in southern Fennoscandia. In view of the extreme drought and compound events of the recent years, further atmospheric drying poses an enhanced risk to vegetation, specifically in the densely populated areas of the European temperate lowlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distribution of 45 tree-ring cellulose δ18O chronologies across Europe, spatial clustering and changes in observed European summer VPD.
Fig. 2: Spatial extend of the summer VPD signal in five European target regions.
Fig. 3: Reconstructed and observed summer (June-August) VPD for four European target regions.
Fig. 4: Unprecedented summer VPD increase in the context of pre-industrial natural variability and its attribution to human influence.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All raw tree-ring δ18O chronologies used in this study together with the final summer VPD reconstructions can be downloaded at the NOAA National Centre for Environmental Information (NCEI): https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/paleo-search/study/38660.

The CMIP6 data used in this study are available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/. Detailed inputs for the search query are as follows: source IDs are ACCESS-ESM1-5, CESM2, CMCC-ESM2, CNRM-ESM2-1, CanESM5, EC-Earth3-Veg, GFDL-ESM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC-ES2L, MPI-ESM1-2-LR, MRI-ESM2-0, and UKESM1-0-LL; experiment IDs are piControl, historical and ssp245, also hist-nat and hist-noLu; variant label is r1i1p1f1 or the next lowest number if unavailable for some models; frequency is mon; and variables are tas and hurs.

Code availability

R-codes used for fuzzy cluster and principal component analysis are available at https://github.com/Treydte/code_NGeo23, and python-codes for site-based monthly and seasonal correlations with climate variables are available at https://github.com/andreaskessler/VPDSeasonalCorr.

References

  1. Bohren, C. F., Albrecht, B. A. & Schroeder, D. V. Atmospheric thermodynamics. Am. J. Phys. 68, 1159–1160 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Douville, H et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1055–1210 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  3. Seneviratne, S. I. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1513–1766 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  4. Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grossiord, C. et al. Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. N. Phytol. 226, 1550–1566 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsiao, J. et al. Maize yield under a changing climate: the hidden role of vapor pressure deficit. Agric. Meteorol. 279, 107692 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranasinghe, R. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1767–1926 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  8. Yuan, W. et al. Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1396 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I. & Teuling, A. J. Land–atmospheric feedbacks during droughts and heatwaves: state of the science and current challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1436, 19–35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ficklin, D. L. & Novick, K. A. Historic and projected changes in vapor pressure deficit suggest a continental-scale drying of the United States atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 122, 2061–2079 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Humphrey, V. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability. Nature 592, 65–69 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, Z. et al. Atmospheric dryness reduces photosynthesis along a large range of soil water deficits. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28652-7 (2022).

  13. Breshears, D. D. et al. The critical amplifying role of increasing atmospheric moisture demand on tree mortality and regional die-off. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 266 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke, H. et al. Forest fire threatens global carbon sinks and population centres under rising atmospheric water demand. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34966-3 (2022).

  15. Büntgen, U. et al. Recent European drought extremes beyond Common Era background variability. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00698-0 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Treydte, K. et al. Signal strength and climate calibration in a European tree-ring isotope network. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L24302 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Treydte, K. et al. Impact of climate and CO2 on a millennium-long tree-ring carbon isotope record. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 4635–4647 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCarroll, D. et al. Correction of tree ring stable carbon isotope chronologies for changes in the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 1539–1547 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klesse, S. et al. Oxygen isotopes in tree rings are less sensitive to tree size and stand dynamics than carbon isotopes. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 2899–2914 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Young, G. H. F. et al. Age trends in tree ring growth and isotopic archives: a case study of Pinus sylvestris L. from northwestern Norway. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003913 (2011).

  21. Duffy, J. E. et al. Absence of age-related trends in stable oxygen isotope ratios from oak tree rings. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 841–848 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Büntgen, U. et al. No evidence of age trends in oak stable isotopes. Paleooceanogr. Paleoclimatol. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003831 (2020).

  23. Gessler, A. et al. Stable isotopes in tree rings—toward a mechanistic understanding of isotope fractionation and mixing processes from the leaves to the wood. Tree Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu040 (2014).

  24. Treydte, K. et al. Seasonal transfer of oxygen isotopes from precipitation and soil to the tree ring: Source water versus leaf water enrichment. N. Phytol. 202, 772–783 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sternberg, L., Pinzon, M. C., Anderson, W. T. & Jahren, A. H. Variation in oxygen isotope fractionation during cellulose synthesis: intramolecular and biosynthetic effects. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1881–1889 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martíınez-Sancho, E. et al. Unenriched xylem water contribution to cellulose synthesis influenced by atmospheric demand governs the intra-annual tree-ring d18O signature. New Phyt. 240, 1743–1757 (2023).

  27. Levesque, M. et al. Tree-ring isotopes capture interannual vegetation productivity dynamics at the biome scale. Nat. Commun. 10, 742 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daux, V. et al. Comparisons of the performance of δ13C and δ18O of Fagus sylvatica, Pinus sylvestris, and Quercus petraea in the record of past climate variations. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 1145–1160 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vitali, V. et al. High-frequency stable isotope signals in uneven-aged forests as proxy for physiological responses to climate in Western Europe. Tree Physiol. 41, 2046–2062 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Naulier, M. et al. A millennial summer temperature reconstruction for northeastern Canada using oxygen isotopes in subfossil trees. Clim. Past 11, 1153–1164 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Field, R. D. et al. Tree-ring cellulose δ18O records similar large-scale climate influences as precipitation δ18O in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Clim. Dyn. 58, 759–776 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Padrón, R. S. et al. Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 13, 477–481 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dorado-Liñán, I. et al. Jet stream position explains regional anomalies in European beech forest productivity and tree growth. Nat. Commun. 13, 2015 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trouet, V., Babst, F. & Meko, M. Recent enhanced high-summer North Atlantic Jet variability emerges from three-century context. Nat. Commun. 9, 180 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luterbacher, J., Dietrich, D., Xoplaki, E., Grosjean, M. & Wanner, H. European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends, and extremes since 1500. Science 303, 1499–1503 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Derham, W. The history of the great frost in the last winter 1703 and 1708/9. Phil. Trans. 26, 454–478 (1709).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. Recent changes of relative humidity: regional connections with land and ocean processes. Earth Syst. Dyn. 9, 915–937 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sherwood, S. & Fu, Q. A drier future? Science 343, 737–739 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McDowell, N. G. et al. Mechanisms of woody-plant mortality under rising drought, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00272-1 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Still, C. J. et al. No evidence of canopy-scale leaf thermoregulation to cool leaves below air temperature across a range of forest ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205682119 (2022).

  42. Lansu, E. M., van Heerwaarden, C. C., Stegehuis, A. I. & Teuling, A. J. Atmospheric aridity and apparent soil moisture drought in European forests during heat waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087091 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao, M., Geruo, A., Liu, Y. & Kronings, A. G. Evapotranspiration frequently increases during droughts. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1024–1030 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., McVicar, T. R., Miralles, D. G., Yang, Y. & Tomas-Burguera, M. Unraveling the influence of atmospheric evaporative demand on drought and its response to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.632 (2020).

  45. Li, S. et al. Attribution of global evapotranspiration trends based on the Budyko framework. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 26, 3691–3707 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Novick, K. A. et al. The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1023 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Babst, F. et al. Twentieth century redistribution in climatic drivers of global tree growth. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4313 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Trotsiuk, V. et al. Tree growth in Switzerland is increasingly constrained by rising evaporative demand. J. Ecol. 1.09, 2981–2990 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Q. et al. Response of ecosystem intrinsic water use efficiency and gross primary productivity to rising vapor pressure deficit. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 074023 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D. & McDowell, N. G. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6, 1–55 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. de Dios, V. R. et al. Climate change induced declines in fuel moisture may turn currently fire-free Pyrenean mountain forests into fire-prone ecosystems. STOTEN 797, 149104 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Labuhn, I. et al. French summer droughts since 1326 CE: a reconstruction based on tree ring cellulose. Clim. Past 12, 1101–1117 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Konter, O. et al. Climate sensitivity and parameter coherency in annually resolved δ13C and δ18O from Pinus uncinata tree-ring data in the Spanish Pyrenees. Chem. Geol. 377, 12–19 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Boettger, T. et al. Wood cellulose preparation methods and mass spectrometric analyses of δ13C, δ18O, and nonexchangeable δ2H values in cellulose, sugar, and starch: an interlaboratory comparison. Anal. Chem. 79, 4603–4612 (2007).

  55. Cook, E. R., Krusic, P. J., Peters, K. & Holmes, R. L. Program ARSTAN (version 49v1_Mac), autoregressive tree-ring standardization program (Tree–Ring Laboratory of Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, 2017).

  56. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M. & Hornik, K. cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 2.1.3 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cluster (2022).

  57. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. Finding Groups in DataAn Introduction to Cluster Analysis (Wiley, 1990); https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801

  58. Frank, D. C. & Esper, J. Temperature reconstructions and comparisons with instrumental data from a tree-ring network for the European Alps. Int. J. Clim. 25, 1437–1454 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Harris, I. et al. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7, 109 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Murray, F. W. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 203–204 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Grant, L. et al. Attribution of global lake systems change to anthropogenic forcing. Nat. Geosci. 14, 849–854 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing their model output and making it available. For the CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of the software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

This study was funded by the EC projects ISONET EVK2-CT-2002-00147 and Millennium FP6-2004-GLOBAL-017008-2 and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) projects iTREE CRSII3_136295 and TROXY 200021_175888. Other funding included ERC 724750 (AK), NASA’s Terrestrial Ecology programme (BP), Slovenian Research Agency P4-0107 (TL, PH), MIUR-PRIN 2002 2002075152 & MIUR-PRIN 2005 2005072877 (AS, LT), PALEOMEX-ISOMEX programme CNRS-INSU (VD), Fundació La Caixa through the Junior Leader Program LCF/BQ/LR18/11640004 (IDL), ERC 755865 & Academy of Finland 295319 and 343059 (KR-G), Czech Science Foundation CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797 (UB, JE), Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology REN2002-11476-E/CLI (EG), and ERC AdG 882727 (JE), UKRI EP/X025098/1 (NJL). L.L., R.P., and S.I.S. acknowledge support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme (grant agreement 821003 (4 C)). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the funding agencies and supporting institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.T., L.L., R.P., F.B., D.C.F., A. Kahmen, S.I.S. and N.J.L. designed the research; K.T., L.L., R.P., F.B., D.C.F., E.M.-S., B.P. and R.W. performed the research with input from A.G., A. Kahmen, A. Kessler, A.I.S. and S.I.S. K.T. wrote the paper. All listed authors from L.A.-H. to G.Y. were involved in data production and provided feedback on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Treydte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks William Lukens, Christopher Still and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: James Super, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Dependency of mean δ18O site values of the common period 1900-1994 on geographic location.

p-values below 0.05 indicate significant relationships.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Climate sensitivity of the site tree-ring δ18O chronologies in two independent time periods.

Periods cover 1920-1960 and 1961-2000; shorter for those records that end in 1994, 1996 and 1998, (see Extended Data Table 1). Colours indicate Pearson’s correlation coefficients calculated between each of the 45 site δ18O chronologies of the network and the closest gridpoints of VPD, maximum temperature (Tmax), precipitation sums and SPEI for each individual month from March of the year before to October of the actual year of tree-ring formation. For VPD and Tmax red colours indicate positive correlations, for PPT and SPEI red colours indicate negative correlations. Order of sites from North to South corresponds to the order in Extended Data Table 1.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Relationship between climate- δ18O correlations and geographic location for VPD, Tmax, precipitation (PPT) and SPEI in summer (June to August).

Each point indicates a correlation coefficient calculated between a site δ18O chronology and the closest gridpoint dataset, plotted as a function of latitude, longitude and elevation. Points above the dashed horizontal line are significant at P < 0.05. p-values in the legend indicate the significance of the slope of the linear regression line. Most p-values are above 0.05 which suggests independency of the correlation strength from geographical location. Note the inverse y-axis for PPT and SPEI.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Relationship between climate- d18O correlations and long-term means (period 1920-1994) of precipitation sums (PPT), SPEI, water balance (WAB), mean temperature (Tmean), maximum temperature (Tmax) and VPD.

Each point indicates a correlation coefficient calculated between a site δ18O chronology and the closest gridpoint climate dataset, plotted as a function of the nine selected climate long-term means (‘climatic regions’). R- and p-values in the legend indicate the significance of the relationship. Most p-values are above 0.05 which suggests independency of the correlation strength from the climatic region.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Contribution of the individual site chronologies to the common variance in the regional clusters of Northern Fennoscandia (NF), Southern Fennoscandia (SF), Western Europe (WE), Eastern Central Europe (ECE) and Alps & Pyrenees (AP).

Membership (%) the contribution to the common variance in a cluster in percentage. Mean rall is the mean inter-series correlation coefficient (that is, the common signal strength) of all chronologies contributing to the corresponding cluster, mean r>75 is the mean inter-series correlation of the chronologies with a membership >75% in a cluster (* P < 0.01, ** P < 0.001). Calculations are based on the period 1920-2000. Sites above a membership threshold of 75% (straight line) were used for the development of regional chronologies through nested principal component analysis. Site codes see Supplementary Table 1.

Extended Data Table 1 European Network of tree-ring cellulose δ18O chronologies listed from North to South
Extended Data Table 2 Normalized mean VPD values of the period 1991 to 2020 and 2011-2020 respectively, as derived from observations and multi-model means together with the values simulated by individual models

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Results and Discussion, References, Tables 1–6 and Figs. 1–5.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treydte, K., Liu, L., Padrón, R.S. et al. Recent human-induced atmospheric drying across Europe unprecedented in the last 400 years. Nat. Geosci. 17, 58–65 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01335-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01335-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing