Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ozone pollution mitigation strategy informed by long-term trends of atmospheric oxidation capacity

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 18 December 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone pollution is a critical air-quality concern in China. However, the most effective mitigation approach remains unclear, with prioritizing the reduction of volatile organic compounds or nitrogen oxides (NOX) currently still under debate. Here we analyse observational measurements of ozone in August, as well as its precursors, from urban Beijing between 2006 and 2020. We show that, despite a continuous increase in the primary atmospheric oxidant (hydroxyl radical, OH), ozone increased until 2014 and then decreased. This ozone trend can be explained by changes in OH turnover rate, primarily determined by the reactivity ratio between volatile organic compounds and NOX. Overall, reactive abatement of volatile organic compounds should be a near-future priority for ozone-pollution control in China, followed by further NOX controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Variations in O3 and the OH reactivity of precursors, derived from observations in Beijing, August, between 2006 and 2020.
Fig. 2: Variations in model-simulated OH concentration and its driving forces in Beijing.
Fig. 3: Impact of the VOCR/NOXR ratio on O3 production.
Fig. 4: Isopleth plots for O3 and total OH turnover rate.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and code to generate the results in the manuscript are freely available at Open Research Data Repository of the Max Planck Society (https://doi.org/10.17617/3.LEFS4A). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The box model is available from https://sites.google.com/site/wolfegm/models.

Change history

References

  1. Huang, R. J. et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 514, 218–222 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu, X. et al. Severe surface ozone pollution in China: a global perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5, 487–494 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide: Executive Summary (WHO, 2021); https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345334/9789240034433-eng.pdf

  4. Zhang, Q. et al. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24463–24469 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, S. et al. Natural gas shortages during the ‘coal-to-gas’ transition in China have caused a large redistribution of air pollution in winter 2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31018–31025 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, X. et al. Rapid increases in warm-season surface ozone and resulting health impact in China since 2013. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 7, 240–247 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A. & Yin, J. H. Long‐term trends in ground level ozone over the contiguous United States, 1980–1995. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 103, 1471–1480 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, O. R. et al. Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: an observation-based review. Elem. Sci. Anth. 2, 29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simon, H., Reff, A., Wells, B., Xing, J. & Frank, N. Ozone trends across the United States over a period of decreasing NOx and VOC emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 186–195 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleming, Z. L. et al. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health. Elem. Sci. Anth. 6, 12 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, W. et al. Exploring the drivers of the increased ozone production in Beijing in summertime during 2005–2016. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 15617–15633 (2020).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Q. et al. Variations of ground-level O3 and its precursors in Beijing in summertime between 2005 and 2011. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6089–6101 (2014).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, Y. & Wang, T. Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 2: the effects of emission changes and implications for multi-pollutant control. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 6323–6337 (2020).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, N. et al. Ground ozone variations at an urban and a rural station in Beijing from 2006 to 2017: trend, meteorological influences and formation regimes. J. Clean. Prod. 235, 11–20 (2019).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, Z. Q. et al. Significant increase of surface ozone at a rural site, north of eastern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3969–3977 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monks, P. S. et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 8889–8973 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. UN Environment Programme. A Review of 20 YearsAir Pollution Control in Beijing. Publication (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019); https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27645/airPolCh_EN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  18. Yang, Y., Liao, H. & Lou, S. Increase in winter haze over eastern China in recent decades: roles of variations in meteorological parameters and anthropogenic emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 13050–13065 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, K. et al. Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 422–427 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chinese State Council. Three-Year Action Plan on Defending the Blue Sky 2018 (Chinese State Council, 2018); http://english.mee.gov.cn/News_service/news_release/201807/t20180713_446624.shtml

  21. Kirchner, F. et al. Total VOC reactivity in the planetary boundary layer: 2. A new indicator for determining the sensitivity of the ozone production to VOC and NOx. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 3095–3110 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sillman, S., Logan, J. A. & Wofsy, S. C. The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 95, 1837–1851 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards, P. M. et al. High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin. Nature 514, 351–354 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheehy, P. M., Volkamer, R., Molina, L. T. & Molina, M. J. Oxidative capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 2: a ROx radical cycling perspective. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 6993–7008 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenkin, M., Saunders, S., Wagner, V. & Pilling, M. Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part B): tropospheric degradation of aromatic volatile organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 181–193 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Womack, C. C. et al. An odd oxygen framework for wintertime ammonium nitrate aerosol pollution in urban areas: NOx and VOC control as mitigation strategies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 4971–4979 (2019).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, Y. J. et al. Isoprene photo-oxidation products quantify the effect of pollution on hydroxyl radicals over Amazonia. Sci. Adv. 4, 8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barket, D. J. et al. A study of the NOx dependence of isoprene oxidation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109, 12 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, W. et al. The impact of aerosols on photolysis frequencies and ozone production in Beijing during the 4-year period 2012–2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 9413–9429 (2019).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacob, D. J. Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone. Atmos. Environ. 34, 2131–2159 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleinman, L. I. et al. Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2299–2302 (1997).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tonnesen, G. S. & Dennis, R. L. Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and NOx: 1. Local indicators of instantaneous odd oxygen production sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 9213–9225 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Volkamer, R., Sheehy, P., Molina, L. T. & Molina, M. J. Oxidative capacity of the Mexico City atmosphere – Part 1: A radical source perspective. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 6969–6991 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao, J. et al. Atmospheric oxidation capacity in the summer of Houston 2006: comparison with summer measurements in other metropolitan studies. Atmos. Environ. 44, 4107–4115 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, W., van der A, R., Ding, J., van Weele, M. & Cheng, T. Spatial and temporal changes of the ozone sensitivity in China based on satellite and ground-based observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 7253–7269 (2021).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, H. & Ying, Q. On the relevancy of observed ozone increase during COVID-19 lockdown to summertime ozone and PM2.5 control policies in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 8, 289–294 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Otero, N. et al. A multi-model comparison of meteorological drivers of surface ozone over Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 12269–12288 (2018).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tai, A. P. K., Mickley, L. J. & Jacob, D. J. Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3976–3984 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wolfe, G. M., Marvin, M. R., Roberts, S. J., Travis, K. R. & Liao, J. The framework for 0-D atmospheric modeling (F0AM) v3. 1. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 3309–3319 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, L., Brook, J. R. & Vet, R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 2067–2082 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, S. et al. The formation and mitigation of nitrate pollution: comparison between urban and suburban environments. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 4539–4556 (2022).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu, X. et al. Long-term changes of regional ozone in China: implications for human health and ecosystem impacts. Elem. Sci. Anth. 8, 13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tan, Z. et al. No evidence for a significant impact of heterogeneous chemistry on radical concentrations in the North China Plain in Summer 2014. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 5973–5979 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, H. et al. Model simulation of NO3, N2O5 and ClNO2 at a rural site in Beijing during CAREBeijing-2006. Atmos. Res. 196, 97–107 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hendrick, F. et al. Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and NO2 in the Beijing area. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 765–781 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kleinman, L. I. The dependence of tropospheric ozone production rate on ozone precursors. Atmos. Environ. 39, 575–586 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.L. received financial support from the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ21030) and from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91644108, 91844301). F.R. and A.W. received financial support from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (01LP1929A, Practice). Hang Su was supported by the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project “Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility” (EarthLab).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.S., Y.L., Y.Z. and Y.C. conceived and designed this study, and revised the Article critically. W.W. and X.L. acquired, analysed and interpreted data, drafted the Article, and revised it critically. R.N. and Y.C. performed the chemical transport model simulations. D.D.P., F.R., A.W., R.N., Z.T. and U.P. revised the Article critically. Q.Z. provided the emission inventory data. Y.L., S.L., Y.W., S.C., K.L., M.H., L.Z., M.S., C.H., X.T., K.M.L., L.C. and M.F. collected data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Li, Hang Su or Yuanhang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Xujia Jiang, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Seasonal variation of O3 in Beijing.

The dot represents the mean of MDA8 O3 concentrations for each month during 2014-2020 and the error bar represents the standard deviation, with sample size of 1940 daily values in total (averages of 12 NMN sites in Beijing, for which the measurement data are available since 2014).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Variations in column concentrations of NO2 and formaldehyde (HCHO) in Beijing, August between 2006 and 2020.

Results are from satellite measurements.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3

Variations in observed VOCR, NOXR, VOCR/NOXR, O3 and normalized O3 in August in Shanghai (A), Yangtze River Delta and Hong Kong (B), Pearl River Delta under clear-sky conditions.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Model-simulated relationship between OH, O3 and precursors - VOC and NOX.

The levels of NOXR and VOCR in 2006, 2014 and 2020 are marked in dashed lines.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Correlation between kHO2+NO[HO2][NO] and [OH]×VOCR simulated by the box model.

VOCR and NOXR ranges from 0 to 16 s-1 and from 0 to 10 s-1 with respective 40 equal-distance steps. Each dot represents a combination of VOCR and NOXR levels. The dots are colored by different ChL levels. The black line corresponds to 1:1 ratio.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Isopleth plots for O3 as a function of NOXR and VOCR in summer, Shanghai.

Red solid circles represent the average levels of MDA8 O3 for each year during 2011-2019, and the solid lines indicate fits to the trend. The yellow dotted lines indicate the VOCR level from biogenic emissions. The blue and magenta arrows indicate future routes for VOCs and NOX abatement that mitigate ozone effectively in the short term (2019-2025) and long term (after 2025), respectively.

Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Instruments deployed in the measurements undertaken in Beijing, August between 2006 and 2020

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text 1–7, Figs. 1–15 and Tables 1 and 2.

Supplementary Data 1

Source data of Supplementary Figures

Source data

Source Data for Figs. 1–4 and Extended Data Fig. 1-6

Fig. 1. Trends of VOCR, NOxR, VOCR/NOXR, O3 and normalized O3. Figure 2. Model-simulated OH concentrations and OH×VOCR. Figure 3. Trends of P(ROX) and ChL, diurnal profiles of modeled rates of primary ROX production, dependence of OVOCR on VOCR/NOXR ratio. Figure 4. Isopleth plots for O3 and total OH turnover rate as a function of NOXR and VOCR. ED Fig. 1. Seasonal variation of O3 in Beijing. ED Fig. 2. Column concentrations of NO2 and formaldehyde (HCHO) in Beijing. ED Fig. 3. Observed VOCR, NOXR, VOCR/NOXR, O3 and normalized O3 in August in Shanghai and Hong Kong. ED Fig. 4. Model-simulated relationship between OH, O3 and precursors - VOC and NOX. ED Fig. 5. Correlation between kHO2+NO[HO2][NO] and [OH]×VOCR simulated by the box model. ED Fig. 6. Isopleth plots for O3 as a function of NOXR and VOCR in summer, Shanghai.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Li, X., Cheng, Y. et al. Ozone pollution mitigation strategy informed by long-term trends of atmospheric oxidation capacity. Nat. Geosci. 17, 20–25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene